West Virginia 2025 Regular Session Status: In Committee 4 R cosponsors

SB 264 — Allowing death penalty for intentionally killing law-enforcement officer or first responder in line of duty

Last action — To Finance

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

255 added · 213 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to SB 264 make significant changes to how the death penalty is applied in West Virginia, particularly regarding first-degree murder cases involving law enforcement officers or first responders. Notably, the revised bill includes clear guidelines for sentencing procedures, calls for mandatory automatic review of death penalty sentences by the state Supreme Court, and adds provisions for forensic DNA testing in such cases. This matters because it aims to provide a more structured and fair approach to capital punishment, ensuring that proper legal and procedural safeguards are in place.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Introduced FISCAL Senate Bill 264 NOTE By Senator Stuart [Introduced February 12, 2025;
CS for SB 264 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 264 By Senators Stuart, Thorne, Helton, Phillips, and Woodrum [Reported March 7, 2025, from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 264 A BILL to amend and reenact §61-2-2 and §62-3-15 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary;
to amend the code by adding eleven new sections, designated §61-2-2a, §61-2- 2b, §61-2-2c, §61-2-2d, §61-2-2e, §61-2-2f, §61-2-2g, §62-7-4, §62-7-5, §62-7-6, and §62-7-6a;
and then to the Committee on Finance] Intr SB 264 2025R1159 A BILL to amend and reenact §61-2-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
and to repeal §61-11-2, relating to permitting the imposition of a death penalty for first degree murder when the victim is a law-enforcement officer or first responder murdered in the performance of his or her official duties;
to amend the code by adding eleven new sections, designated §61-2-2a, §61-2-2b, §61-2-2c, §61-2- 2d, §61-2-2e, §61-2-2f, §61-2-2g §62-7-4, §62-7-5, §62-7-6, and §62-7-6a;
providing for sentencing procedures relating to imposition of death penalty, setting forth aggravating and mitigating circumstances for the imposition of capital punishment;
and to repeal §61-11-2 and §62-3-15 of said code, relating to permitting the death penalty for first degree murder for the crime of intentional killing of a law-enforcement officer or first responder in the line of duty;
describing contents of sentencing verdict and requiring it be recorded;
providing for procedures, standards, and findings applicable to imposition thereof in certain instances, including aggravating and mitigating circumstances;
providing automatic review of death penalty sentence by the Supreme Court of Appeals;
sentencing;
providing for forensic DNA testing in death penalty cases;
providing automatic review of the death penalty by the Supreme Court of Appeals;
directing the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation to carry out death sentence;
providing for forensic DNA testing of biological material in death penalty cases;
authorizing West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation to promulgate rules and emergency rules;
providing for execution of the death sentence by any legally acceptable means, including lethal injection or firing squad;
providing exception for death penalty sentence in murder cases;
providing for delivery of sentence of death to officer retaining custody of person so sentenced;
providing for the execution of death sentence;
providing for transmission of indictment, order of conviction, sentence, and judgment entered thereon to the warden of the state correctional facility;
providing for delivery of sentence of death;
providing for transmission of certain court records to warden of the state correctional facility;
execution;
providing for presence of certain persons at execution;
providing presence of certain persons be requested for the execution;
providing for record of execution;
providing for certification that sentence of death has been executed;
and providing for disposition of deceased defendant’s body.
and providing for disposition of the body.
Any person convicted of murder of in the first degree shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for life sentenced to death if any one or more of the aggravating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2b have been charged and found to be true without a finding of any one or more of the mitigating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2c.
Murder of the first degree shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for life:
Any person otherwise convicted of Intr SB 2025R1159 murder in the first degree is sentenced to confinement in a state correctional facility for life without probation or parole.
Provided, That a person convicted of murder in the first degree may be sentenced to death if any of the aggravating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2b of this code have been charged and 1 CS for SB 264 proven beyond a reasonable doubt without a finding of the presence of any one or more of the mitigating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2c of this code.
Sentencing procedures for murder in the first degree.
Sentencing procedures when seeking imposition of death penalty.
-- After a verdict of murder in the first degree is recorded and before the jury is discharged, the court shall conduct a separate sentencing hearing in which the jury shall determine whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.
-- Upon a unanimous jury finding that the state has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of an aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b of this code, the court shall conduct a separate sentencing hearing in which the jury shall make a determination as to whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment with or without mercy.
In the sentencing hearing, evidence may be presented as to any matter that the court determines relevant and admissible on the question of the sentence to be imposed, including evidence relating to any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances specified in §61-2-2b and §61-2-2c.
In the sentencing hearing, evidence shall be presented by either party as to any matter that the court determines relevant and admissible on the question of the sentence to be imposed.
Evidence of aggravating circumstances shall be limited to those circumstances specified in §61-2-2b.
Such evidence shall include evidence relating to mitigating circumstances specified in §61-2-2c of this code.
After the presentation of evidence, the court shall permit counsel to present argument for and against the sentence of death.
Following the presentation of evidence, the court shall permit counsel for the state and defendant to present an argument for and against the sentence of death.
The court shall then instruct the jury in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.
The court shall then instruct the jury in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.
Failure of the jury to unanimously agree upon a sentence does not impeach or in any way affect the guilty verdict previously recorded.
(b) Instructions to jury.
(b) Procedure in nonjury trials and guilty pleas.
-- Before retiring to determine the imposition of sentence, the court shall specifically instruct the jury as to the following:
-- If the defendant waives a jury trial or pleads guilty, the sentencing proceeding shall be conducted before a jury impaneled for that purpose unless waived by the defendant with the consent of the state, in which latter case the trial judge shall hear the evidence and determine the penalty in the same manner as would a jury.
(1) That the jury shall fully consider any mitigating circumstances, including those specified in §61-2-2c of this code, for which any evidence has been presented;
(c) Instructions to jury.
(2) That only upon the unanimous finding of the jury, shall the sentence of death be imposed;
-- Before retiring to determine the imposition of sentence, the jury shall be instructed by the court as to the following:
and (3) That the jury shall consider any other matter that the judge determines to be just and proper under the circumstances.
(1) The aggravating circumstances specified in §61-2-2b for which any evidence has been presented;
(2) Mitigating circumstances, including those specified in §61-2-2c, for which any evidence Intr SB 2025R1159 has been presented;
(3) Aggravating circumstances must be proved by the state beyond a reasonable doubt.
Mitigating circumstances must be proved by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence;
(4) The sentence shall be a sentence of death if the jury unanimously finds the aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b and no mitigating circumstance or if the jury unanimously finds one or more aggravating circumstances which outweigh all mitigating circumstances.
The sentence shall be life imprisonment without probation or parole in all other cases;
(5) The court may discharge the jury if it is of the opinion that further deliberation will not result in a unanimous agreement as to the sentence, in which case the court shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment;
and (6) The court shall instruct the jury on any other matter that may be just and proper under the circumstances.
(a) When a defendant is convicted of murder in the first degree, aggravating circumstances shall be when the victim was a law-enforcement officer or first responder intentionally killed while in the performance of his or her duty;
(a) When a defendant is convicted of murder in the first degree, it is an aggravating circumstance when the defendant intentionally killed a victim who was a law-enforcement officer 2 CS for SB 264 or emergency responder in the performance of his or her official duties and that the defendant knew or had reason to know that the victim was a law-enforcement officer or emergency responder performing his or her official duties.
(b) A finding of aggravated circumstances may not be based on circumstantial evidence but requires some physical evidence, such as forensic DNA evidence, or an uncoerced confession.
(b) A finding of aggravated circumstances may not be based on circumstantial evidence, but requires evidence including, but not limited to, forensic DNA evidence, witness testimony, or an uncoerced confession.
Show all 114 changed rows (74 more)
Previous
Latest
(c) For purposes of this section, “law-enforcement officer” has the same meaning as ascribed in §30-29-1 of this code and shall include law-enforcement officials and pre-certified law- enforcement officers as those terms are defined in §30-29-1 of this code.
(d) For purposes of this section, “emergency responder” means a paid or volunteer firefighter, emergency services personnel, or any other similar individuals authorized to respond to call for public safety services or emergency medical assistance.
When a defendant is convicted of murder in the first degree, mitigating circumstances include the following:
(a) When a defendant is convicted of murder in the first degree with a further finding that the state has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of an aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b of this code, mitigating circumstances shall be considered in the matter of sentencing.
(1) The defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance at the time of the commission of the murder at issue;
(b) The mitigating circumstances to be considered in the matter of sentencing include the following:
(2) The capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his or her conduct or to conform his or her conduct to the requirements of the law was substantially impaired at the time of Intr SB 2025R1159 the commission of the action that led to the death of the member of law enforcement or first responder;
(1) The defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance at the time of the commission of the murder;
(3) The defendant, at the time of the murder at issue, was 17 years old or younger;
(2) The capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his or her conduct or to conform his or her conduct to the requirements of the law was substantially impaired at the time of the commission of the murder;
(4) The defendant's participation in the murder at issue was relatively minor;
(3) The defendant, at the time of the murder at issue, was under the age of 18 years;
and (5) Any other evidence of mitigation concerning the character and record of the defendant and the circumstances of the murder.
(4) The defendant acted under duress, or acted under the substantial influence of another person at the time of the commission of the offense;
and 3 CS for SB 264 (5) Any other evidence of mitigation concerning the character and record of the defendant, and the circumstances of the murder that would mitigate the appropriateness or necessity of imposing a sentence of death.
(c) The defendant shall bear the burden of proving the existence of a mitigating circumstance by clear and convincing evidence.
In rendering the verdict, the jury shall set forth in writing the findings upon which the sentence is based.
The jury shall set forth, in writing, whether the sentence imposed is death, life imprisonment without mercy, or life imprisonment with mercy.
Based upon these findings, the jury shall set forth in writing whether the sentence is death or life imprisonment without probation or parole.
Whenever the jury agrees upon a sentencing verdict, it shall be received and recorded by the court.
(a) Whenever the jury unanimously agrees to the sentencing verdict, it shall be received and recorded by the court.
In any case in which the death penalty is imposed, execution shall be by lethal injection.
If the sentencing verdict is death, the court shall direct the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation to carry out the sentence according the rules and procedures of the Commissioner.
§61-2-2f.
(b) The West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code, and may promulgate emergency rules pursuant to §29A-3-15 of this code when necessary, to adopt the procedures and methods that the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation will use to carry out a sentence of death.
The rules authorized by this section shall at a minimum provide for the carrying out of a death sentence within the walls of a West Virginia correctional facility under the direction of West Virginia corrections officials.
The method of execution shall comply with both the United states and West Virginia Constitution and shall be carried out according to current evidence-based scientific research, including but not limited to, lethal injection or firing squad.
4 CS for SB 264 §61-2-2f.
(a) Whenever the death penalty is imposed and upon the judgment becoming final in the circuit court, the sentence shall automatically be reviewed on the record by the Supreme Court of Appeals.
(a) Whenever the death penalty is imposed and upon the judgment becoming final in the circuit court, the sentence shall be reviewed automatically on the record by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
The clerk of the circuit court, within 10 days after receiving the transcript, shall transmit the entire record and transcript to the Supreme Court of Appeals together with a notice prepared by the clerk and a report prepared by the circuit judge.
The clerk of the circuit court, within 10 days after receiving the transcript of all recorded proceedings, shall transmit the entire record and transcript to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia together with a notice prepared by the clerk and a report prepared by the circuit judge.
The notice shall set forth the title and docket number of the case, the name of the defendant and the name and address of his or her attorney, a narrative statement of the judgment, the offense and the punishment prescribed.
The notice shall set forth the title and docket number of the case, the name of the defendant and the name and address of his or her attorney, and a narrative statement of the judgment, the offense and the punishment prescribed.
The report shall be in a standard form prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Appeals.
The report shall be in a standard form prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
(b) The Supreme Court of Appeals shall consider the punishment as well as any errors Intr SB 2025R1159 enumerated by way of appeal.
(b) The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal filed by the defendant, and the sentencing review set forth in subsection (a) of this section may be consolidated with the appeal.
(c) With regard to the sentence, the Supreme Court of Appeals shall determine:
(c) With regard to the sentence, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall specifically determine:
(2) Whether the evidence supports the jury's or judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance;
(2) Whether the evidence supports the jury's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance;
and (3) Whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant.
and (3) Whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the circumstances of the murder and the defendant.
(d) Both the defendant and the state shall have the right to submit briefs within the time limitations set forth in the rules by the Supreme Court of Appeals, and to present oral argument to the Supreme Court of Appeals.
(d) Both the defendant and the state shall have the right to submit briefs within the time limitations set forth in the rules by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, and to present oral argument to that court.
(e) The Supreme Court of Appeals shall render a written decision which shall include a reference to those similar cases which it took into consideration.
(e) The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall render a written decision which shall include a reference to those similar cases, including similar cases from jurisdictions outside of West Virginia, which it took into consideration.
The Supreme Court of Appeals, with regard to review of death sentences, shall:
The Supreme Court of Appeals, with regard to CS for SB 264 review of death sentences, shall:
The records of those similar cases referred to by the Supreme Court of Appeals in its written decision shall be provided to the resentencing judge for his or her consideration.
The records of those similar cases referred to by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia in its written decision shall be provided to the resentencing judge for his or her consideration.
(f) The Supreme Court of Appeals may employ an appropriate staff and establish methods to compile any cases or information considered by the chief justice to be appropriate and relevant to the statutory questions concerning the validity of the sentence.
(f) The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia may employ appropriate staff and establish methods to compile any cases or information considered by the court to be appropriate and relevant to the statutory questions concerning the validity of the sentence.
(g) The sentence review shall be in addition to direct appeal, if taken, and the review and appeal shall be consolidated for consideration.
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is requested to promulgate rules prior to January 1, 2026, to the extent necessary to comply with the provisions of this section.
The Supreme Court of Appeals shall render its decision on legal errors enumerated, the factual substantiation of the verdict and the validity of the sentence.
(g) The sentence review is in addition to a direct appeal, if taken, and the review and appeal may be consolidated for consideration.
INTRODUCED 2017R1640 §61-2-2g.
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall render its decision on legal errors enumerated, the factual substantiation of the verdict and the validity of the sentence.
(h) Appeals involving a sentence of death shall be given expedited consideration by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
§61-2-2g.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a court of this state in which the death penalty has been imposed may, at any time after conviction, apply to the court that entered the judgment for forensic deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") testing of any biological material that:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a court of this state in which the death penalty has been imposed may, at any time after conviction, apply to the court that entered the judgment for the testing of any forensic deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") biological material that:
and (3) Was not previously subjected to DNA testing or can be subjected to retesting with new DNA techniques that provide a reasonable likelihood of more accurate and probative results.
and (3) Was not previously subjected to DNA testing or can be subjected to retesting with DNA techniques that were previously not available that provide a reasonable likelihood of more 6 CS for SB 264 accurate and probative results.
(b) The court shall notify the state of an application made under subsection (a) of this section and shall afford the state an opportunity to respond.
(b) The court shall notify the prosecutor of the county in which the sentence of death was entered and the Attorney General of an application made under subsection (a) of this section and shall afford the state an opportunity to respond.
(c) Upon receiving notice of an application made under subsection (a) of this section, the state shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that any remaining biological material that was secured in connection with the case is preserved pending the completion of proceedings under this section.
(c) Upon receiving notice of an application made under subsection (a) of this section, the prosecutor of the county in which the sentence of death was entered or the Attorney General shall take necessary steps to ensure that any remaining biological material that was secured in connection with the case is preserved pending the completion of proceedings under this section.
and (2) In the case of an applicant who is not indigent, may assess the applicant for the cost of Intr SB 2025R1159 such testing.
and (2) In the case of an applicant who is not indigent, may assess the applicant for the cost of such testing.
(1) Order a hearing, notwithstanding any provision of law that would bar such a hearing;
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary that would bar a hearing, order a hearing, and (2) Enter any order that serves the interests of justice, including an order:
and (2) Enter any order that serves the interests of justice, including an order:
7 CS for SB 264 (A) Vacating and setting aside the judgment;
(A) Vacating and setting aside the judgment;
(B) Discharging the applicant, if the applicant is in custody;
(B) Discharging the applicant if the applicant is in custody;
[Repealed.] ARTICLE 7.
If a person indicted for murder is found by the jury guilty thereof, they shall in their verdict find whether he or she is guilty of murder of the first degree or second degree.
If the person indicted for murder is found by the jury guilty thereof, and if the jury find in their verdict that he or she is guilty of murder of the first degree, or if a person indicted for murder pleads guilty of murder of the first degree, he or she shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for life, and he or she, notwithstanding the provisions of article twelve, chapter sixty-two of this code, shall not be eligible for parole:
Provided, That the jury may, in their discretion, recommend mercy, and if such recommendation is added to their verdict, such person shall be eligible for parole in accordance with the provisions of said article twelve, except that, notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, such person shall not be eligible for parole until he or she has served fifteen 8 CS for SB 264 years:
Provided, however, That if the accused pleads guilty of murder of the first degree, the court may, in its discretion, provide that such person shall be eligible for parole in accordance with the provisions of said article twelve, and, if the court so provides, such person shall be eligible for parole in accordance with the provisions of said article twelve in the same manner and with like effect as if such person had been found guilty by the verdict of a jury and the jury had recommended mercy, except that, notwithstanding any provision of said article twelve or any other provision of this code to the contrary, such person shall not be eligible for parole until he or she has served fifteen years:
Provided further, That nothing in this section shall preclude a sentence of death where the individual is guilty of the offense of murder in the first degree and there is a further finding that the state has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of an aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b of this code.
ARTICLE 7.
Sentence of death, except for insurrection or rebellion, may not be executed sooner than Intr SB 2025R1159 three months after the sentence is pronounced.
The sentence of death shall shall be executed at a state correctional facility in accordance with §61-2-2e of this code.
The sentence of death shall, in every case, be executed by any legally acceptable means, including lethal injection or firing squad.
The execution shall be performed under the direction of the warden of the state correctional facility and the authorities in control of the facility.
The sentence shall be executed within the walls of a state correctional facility within an enclosure prepared for that purpose and constructed so as to exclude public view.
The warden of the state correctional facility or, in the case of his or her death, absence or inability to act, the Commissioner of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall be the executioner.
The execution shall be performed under the direction of the warden of the state correctional facility and the authorities in control thereof.
In carrying out the execution of the sentence, the warden or the Commissioner of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation may secure the services and advice of any person or persons either considers appropriate.
The warden of the state correctional facility or, in the case of his or her death, absence or inability to act, the Commissioner of Corrections shall be the executioner.
In carrying out the execution of sentence, the warden or the Commissioner of Corrections may secure the services and advice of any person or persons either considers appropriate.
transfer of convict to a state correctional facility;
transfer of convict to a state correctional facility;persons present at execution.
persons present at execution.
The clerk of the court which pronounces the sentence of death shall, as soon as possible after sentence, deliver a certified copy of the sentence to the sheriff, who shall retain the custody of the convict sentenced to death until he or she is delivered to a properly authorized guard sent by 9 CS for SB 264 the warden for the removal of the convict to the state correctional facility.
The clerk of the court which pronounces the sentence of death shall, as soon as possible after sentence, deliver a certified copy of the sentence to the sheriff, who shall retain the custody of the convict sentenced to death until he or she is delivered to a properly authorized guard sent by the warden for the removal of the convict to the state correctional facility.
The clerk of the court shall also immediately transmit to the warden of the state correctional facility a copy of the indictment, order of conviction and the sentence and judgment entered thereon.
The clerk of the court shall also forthwith transmit to the warden of the state correctional facility a copy of the indictment, order of conviction and the sentence and judgment entered thereon.
As soon as possible after receipt of the copies, the warden shall send a guard or guards to remove the convict to the state correctional facility.
As soon as possible after receipt of the copies the warden shall send a guard or guards to remove the convict to the state correctional facility.
At the execution there may be present those officers, guards and assistants as the warden or Commissioner of Corrections considers appropriate.
At the execution there may be present those officers, guards, and assistants as the warden or Commissioner of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation considers appropriate.
The warden or the commissioner, as the case may be, shall request the presence of the prosecuting attorney of the county wherein the conviction occurred, the clerk of the circuit court thereof, 12 respectable citizens, including a physician and representatives of the press as may be considered appropriate.
The warden or the commissioner, as the case may be, shall request the presence of the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the conviction occurred, the clerk of the circuit court of the county, 12 respectable citizens, including a physician and representatives of the press as may be considered appropriate.
INTRODUCED 2017R1640 The warden or Commissioner of Corrections who executes the sentence of death shall certify to the clerk of the circuit court, by which the sentence was imposed, that the sentence has been executed.
The warden or Commissioner of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation who executes the sentence of death shall certify to the clerk of the circuit court, by which the sentence was imposed, that the sentence has been executed.
If the friends or relatives of the convict make a request in writing to the warden at any time within two days after the sentence of death has been executed, the body of the convict shall be returned to the friends or relatives, in any county in the state, for burial.
If the friends or relatives of the convict make a request in writing to the warden at any time within two days after the sentence of death has been executed, the body of the convict shall be returned to the friends or relatives, in any county of the state, for burial.
The warden may draw his or her order on the Auditor of the state for whatever sum is necessary to pay for transportation of the body, to be paid out of funds appropriated to the Division of Corrections.
The warden may draw his or her order on the Auditor of the state for whatever sum is necessary to pay for transportation of the body, to be paid out of funds appropriated to the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
If no request is made by friends or relatives, the body shall be disposed of as provided for other convicts who die within a state correctional facility.
If no request is made by friends or relatives, the body shall be disposed of as 10 CS for SB 264 provided for other convicts who die within a state correctional facility.
NOTE:
11
The purpose of this bill is to provide for the death penalty in limited circumstances;
the bill provides for procedures and standards applicable thereto, and automatic review of the penalty, for commission of murder in the first degree.
Procedures for carrying out the death sentence are established.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. To Finance

  2. Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance

  3. To Judiciary

  4. Introduced in Senate

  5. To Judiciary then Finance

  6. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Stuart

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 264?
SB 264 is sponsored by Stuart, Darren Thorne (Republican), Brian Helton (Republican), Phillips, Jack Woodrum (Republican), and Vince Deeds (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 264?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 264?
Track SB 264 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 264

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 264

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →