Allowing death penalty for intentionally killing law-enforcement officer or first responder in line of duty
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 264 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 264.
You're tracking SB 264
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 264 — Allowing death penalty for intentionally killing law-enforcement officer or first responder in line of duty
Last action — To Finance
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
255 added · 213 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 264 make significant changes to how the death penalty is applied in West Virginia, particularly regarding first-degree murder cases involving law enforcement officers or first responders. Notably, the revised bill includes clear guidelines for sentencing procedures, calls for mandatory automatic review of death penalty sentences by the state Supreme Court, and adds provisions for forensic DNA testing in such cases. This matters because it aims to provide a more structured and fair approach to capital punishment, ensuring that proper legal and procedural safeguards are in place.
CS for SB 264 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION IntroducedCommittee FISCALSubstitute for Senate Bill 264 NOTE By SenatorSenators StuartStuart, [IntroducedThorne, FebruaryHelton, 12,Phillips, 2025;and Woodrum [Reported March 7, 2025, from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 264 A BILL to amend and reenact §61-2-2 and §62-3-15 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
referred to amend the Committeecode onby theadding Judiciary;eleven new sections, designated §61-2-2a, §61-2- 2b, §61-2-2c, §61-2-2d, §61-2-2e, §61-2-2f, §61-2-2g, §62-7-4, §62-7-5, §62-7-6, and §62-7-6a;
and thento repeal §61-11-2, relating to permitting the Committeeimposition onof Finance]a Intrdeath SBpenalty 264for 2025R1159first Adegree BILLmurder towhen amendthe andvictim reenactis §61-2-2a oflaw-enforcement officer or first responder murdered in the Codeperformance of Westhis Virginia,or 1931,her asofficial amended;duties;
toproviding amendfor thesentencing codeprocedures byrelating addingto elevenimposition newof sections,death designatedpenalty, §61-2-2a,setting §61-2-2b,forth §61-2-2c,aggravating §61-2-and 2d,mitigating §61-2-2e,circumstances §61-2-2f,for §61-2-2gthe §62-7-4,imposition §62-7-5,of §62-7-6,capital andpunishment; §62-7-6a;
anddescribing tocontents repeal §61-11-2 and §62-3-15 of saidsentencing code,verdict relatingand torequiring permittingit thebe deathrecorded; penalty for first degree murder for the crime of intentional killing of a law-enforcement officer or first responder in the line of duty;
providing forautomatic procedures,review standards,of anddeath findingspenalty applicablesentence toby impositionthe thereofSupreme inCourt certainof instances,Appeals; including aggravating and mitigating circumstances;
sentencing;providing for forensic DNA testing in death penalty cases;
providingdirecting automaticthe reviewWest ofVirginia theDivision deathof penaltyCorrections byand theRehabilitation Supremeto Courtcarry ofout Appeals;death sentence;
providingauthorizing forWest forensicVirginia DNADivision testing of biologicalCorrections materialand inRehabilitation deathto penaltypromulgate cases;rules and emergency rules;
providing exception for execution of the death penalty sentence byin anymurder legallycases; acceptable means, including lethal injection or firing squad;
providing for deliverythe ofexecution sentence of death tosentence; officer retaining custody of person so sentenced;
providing for transmissiondelivery of indictment,sentence order of conviction,death; sentence, and judgment entered thereon to the warden of the state correctional facility;
providing for transmission of certain court records to warden of the state correctional facility;
providing for presence of certain persons at execution;
providing presence of certain persons be requested for therecord of execution;
and providing for certificationdisposition that sentence of deathdeceased hasdefendant’s beenbody. executed;
and providing for disposition of the body.
AnyMurder person convicted of murder of in the first degree shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for lifelife: sentenced to death if any one or more of the aggravating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2b have been charged and found to be true without a finding of any one or more of the mitigating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2c.
AnyProvided, personThat otherwisea person convicted of Intr SB 2025R1159 murder in the first degree ismay be sentenced to confinementdeath if any of the aggravating circumstances enumerated in a§61-2-2b stateof correctionalthis facilitycode have been charged and 1 CS for lifeSB 264 proven beyond a reasonable doubt without probationa finding of the presence of any one or parole.more of the mitigating circumstances enumerated in §61-2-2c of this code.
Sentencing procedures forwhen murderseeking inimposition theof firstdeath degree.penalty.
-- AfterUpon a verdictunanimous ofjury murderfinding inthat the firststate degreehas isproven recordedbeyond anda beforereasonable doubt the juryexistence isof discharged,an aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b of this code, the court shall conduct a separate sentencing hearing in which the jury shall determinemake a determination as to whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.imprisonment with or without mercy.
In the sentencing hearing, evidence mayshall be presented by either party as to any matter that the court determines relevant and admissible on the question of the sentence to be imposed,imposed. including evidence relating to any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances specified in §61-2-2b and §61-2-2c.
EvidenceSuch ofevidence aggravating circumstances shall beinclude limitedevidence relating to thosemitigating circumstances specified in §61-2-2b.§61-2-2c of this code.
AfterFollowing the presentation of evidence, the court shall permit counsel for the state and defendant to present an argument for and against the sentence of death.
The court shall then instruct the jury in accordance with subsection (c)(b) of this section.
Failure(b) ofInstructions the jury to unanimouslyjury. agree upon a sentence does not impeach or in any way affect the guilty verdict previously recorded.
(b)-- ProcedureBefore inretiring nonjuryto trialsdetermine andthe guiltyimposition pleas.of sentence, the court shall specifically instruct the jury as to the following:
--(1) IfThat the defendant waives a jury trial or pleads guilty, the sentencing proceeding shall befully conductedconsider beforeany amitigating jurycircumstances, impaneledincluding forthose thatspecified purposein unless§61-2-2c waived by the defendant with the consent of thethis state,code, infor which latterany case the trial judge shall hear the evidence andhas determinebeen thepresented; penalty in the same manner as would a jury.
(c)(2) InstructionsThat toonly jury.upon the unanimous finding of the jury, shall the sentence of death be imposed;
--and Before(3) retiringThat tothe determinejury theshall impositionconsider ofany sentence,other thematter jurythat shallthe bejudge instructeddetermines byto thebe courtjust asand toproper under the following:circumstances.
(1) The aggravating circumstances specified in §61-2-2b for which any evidence has been presented;
(2) Mitigating circumstances, including those specified in §61-2-2c, for which any evidence Intr SB 2025R1159 has been presented;
(3) Aggravating circumstances must be proved by the state beyond a reasonable doubt.
Mitigating circumstances must be proved by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence;
(4) The sentence shall be a sentence of death if the jury unanimously finds the aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b and no mitigating circumstance or if the jury unanimously finds one or more aggravating circumstances which outweigh all mitigating circumstances.
The sentence shall be life imprisonment without probation or parole in all other cases;
(5) The court may discharge the jury if it is of the opinion that further deliberation will not result in a unanimous agreement as to the sentence, in which case the court shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment;
and (6) The court shall instruct the jury on any other matter that may be just and proper under the circumstances.
(a) When a defendant is convicted of murder in the first degree, aggravatingit circumstancesis shallan beaggravating circumstance when the defendant intentionally killed a victim who was a law-enforcement officer or2 firstCS responderfor intentionallySB killed264 whileor emergency responder in the performance of his or her duty;official duties and that the defendant knew or had reason to know that the victim was a law-enforcement officer or emergency responder performing his or her official duties.
(b) A finding of aggravated circumstances may not be based on circumstantial evidenceevidence, but requires someevidence physicalincluding, evidence,but suchnot aslimited to, forensic DNA evidence, witness testimony, or an uncoerced confession.
Show all 114 changed lines (74 more)
(c) For purposes of this section, “law-enforcement officer” has the same meaning as ascribed in §30-29-1 of this code and shall include law-enforcement officials and pre-certified law- enforcement officers as those terms are defined in §30-29-1 of this code.
(d) For purposes of this section, “emergency responder” means a paid or volunteer firefighter, emergency services personnel, or any other similar individuals authorized to respond to call for public safety services or emergency medical assistance.
(a) When a defendant is convicted of murder in the first degree,degree with a further finding that the state has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of an aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b of this code, mitigating circumstances includeshall be considered in the following:matter of sentencing.
(1)(b) The defendantmitigating wascircumstances underto thebe influenceconsidered ofin extreme mental or emotional disturbance at the timematter of thesentencing commissioninclude of the murderfollowing: at issue;
(2)(1) The capacity of the defendant towas appreciateunder the criminalityinfluence of hisextreme ormental her conduct or toemotional conformdisturbance his or her conduct to the requirements of the law was substantially impaired at the time of Intr SB 2025R1159 the commission of the actionmurder; that led to the death of the member of law enforcement or first responder;
(3)(2) The defendant,capacity atof the timedefendant to appreciate the criminality of his or her conduct or to conform his or her conduct to the murderrequirements atof issue,the law was 17substantially yearsimpaired oldat orthe younger;time of the commission of the murder;
(4)(3) The defendant'sdefendant, participationat inthe time of the murder at issueissue, was relativelyunder minor;the age of 18 years;
and(4) (5)The Anydefendant otheracted evidenceunder ofduress, mitigationor concerningacted under the charactersubstantial andinfluence record of another person at the defendanttime andof the circumstancescommission of the murder.offense;
and 3 CS for SB 264 (5) Any other evidence of mitigation concerning the character and record of the defendant, and the circumstances of the murder that would mitigate the appropriateness or necessity of imposing a sentence of death.
(c) The defendant shall bear the burden of proving the existence of a mitigating circumstance by clear and convincing evidence.
InThe rendering the verdict, the jury shall set forthforth, in writingwriting, whether the findingssentence uponimposed whichis thedeath, sentencelife isimprisonment based.without mercy, or life imprisonment with mercy.
Based upon these findings, the jury shall set forth in writing whether the sentence is death or life imprisonment without probation or parole.
(a) Whenever the jury unanimously agrees uponto athe sentencing verdict, it shall be received and recorded by the court.
InIf anythe casesentencing inverdict whichis death, the deathcourt penaltyshall isdirect imposed,the executionWest shallVirginia beDivision byof lethalCorrections injection.and Rehabilitation to carry out the sentence according the rules and procedures of the Commissioner.
§61-2-2f.(b) The West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code, and may promulgate emergency rules pursuant to §29A-3-15 of this code when necessary, to adopt the procedures and methods that the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation will use to carry out a sentence of death.
The rules authorized by this section shall at a minimum provide for the carrying out of a death sentence within the walls of a West Virginia correctional facility under the direction of West Virginia corrections officials.
The method of execution shall comply with both the United states and West Virginia Constitution and shall be carried out according to current evidence-based scientific research, including but not limited to, lethal injection or firing squad.
4 CS for SB 264 §61-2-2f.
(a) Whenever the death penalty is imposed and upon the judgment becoming final in the circuit court, the sentence shall automatically be reviewed automatically on the record by the Supreme Court of Appeals.Appeals of West Virginia.
The clerk of the circuit court, within 10 days after receiving the transcript,transcript of all recorded proceedings, shall transmit the entire record and transcript to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia together with a notice prepared by the clerk and a report prepared by the circuit judge.
The notice shall set forth the title and docket number of the case, the name of the defendant and the name and address of his or her attorney, and a narrative statement of the judgment, the offense and the punishment prescribed.
The report shall be in a standard form prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Appeals.Appeals of West Virginia.
(b) The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall consider the punishment as well as any errors Intrenumerated SBby 2025R1159way enumeratedof appeal filed by waythe defendant, and the sentencing review set forth in subsection (a) of this section may be consolidated with the appeal.
(c) With regard to the sentence, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall specifically determine:
(2) Whether the evidence supports the jury's or judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance;
and (3) Whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crimecircumstances of the murder and the defendant.
(d) Both the defendant and the state shall have the right to submit briefs within the time limitations set forth in the rules by the Supreme Court of Appeals,Appeals of West Virginia, and to present oral argument to thethat Supremecourt. Court of Appeals.
(e) The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall render a written decision which shall include a reference to those similar cases, including similar cases from jurisdictions outside of West Virginia, which it took into consideration.
The Supreme Court of Appeals, with regard to CS for SB 264 review of death sentences, shall:
The records of those similar cases referred to by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia in its written decision shall be provided to the resentencing judge for his or her consideration.
(f) The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia may employ an appropriate staff and establish methods to compile any cases or information considered by the chiefcourt justice to be appropriate and relevant to the statutory questions concerning the validity of the sentence.
(g) The sentenceSupreme reviewCourt shallof beAppeals inof additionWest Virginia is requested to directpromulgate appeal,rules ifprior taken,to andJanuary 1, 2026, to the reviewextent andnecessary appealto shallcomply bewith consolidatedthe forprovisions consideration.of this section.
(g) The Supremesentence Courtreview ofis Appealsin shalladdition renderto itsa decisiondirect onappeal, legalif errorstaken, enumerated,and the factualreview substantiation of the verdict and theappeal validitymay ofbe theconsolidated sentence.for consideration.
INTRODUCEDThe 2017R1640Supreme §61-2-2g.Court of Appeals of West Virginia shall render its decision on legal errors enumerated, the factual substantiation of the verdict and the validity of the sentence.
(h) Appeals involving a sentence of death shall be given expedited consideration by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
§61-2-2g.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a court of this state in which the death penalty has been imposed may, at any time after conviction, apply to the court that entered the judgment for the testing of any forensic deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") testing of any biological material that:
and (3) Was not previously subjected to DNA testing or can be subjected to retesting with new DNA techniques that were previously not available that provide a reasonable likelihood of more 6 CS for SB 264 accurate and probative results.
(b) The court shall notify the stateprosecutor of the county in which the sentence of death was entered and the Attorney General of an application made under subsection (a) of this section and shall afford the state an opportunity to respond.
(c) Upon receiving notice of an application made under subsection (a) of this section, the stateprosecutor shallof takethe suchcounty stepsin aswhich arethe sentence of death was entered or the Attorney General shall take necessary steps to ensure that any remaining biological material that was secured in connection with the case is preserved pending the completion of proceedings under this section.
and (2) In the case of an applicant who is not indigent, may assess the applicant for the cost of Intr SB 2025R1159 such testing.
(1) OrderNotwithstanding a hearing, notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary that would bar sucha hearing, order a hearing;hearing, and (2) Enter any order that serves the interests of justice, including an order:
and7 (2)CS Enterfor anySB order264 that(A) servesVacating theand interestssetting ofaside justice,the includingjudgment; an order:
(A)(B) VacatingDischarging andthe settingapplicant, asideif the judgment;applicant is in custody;
(B) Discharging the applicant if the applicant is in custody;
[Repealed.]If ARTICLEa 7.person indicted for murder is found by the jury guilty thereof, they shall in their verdict find whether he or she is guilty of murder of the first degree or second degree.
If the person indicted for murder is found by the jury guilty thereof, and if the jury find in their verdict that he or she is guilty of murder of the first degree, or if a person indicted for murder pleads guilty of murder of the first degree, he or she shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for life, and he or she, notwithstanding the provisions of article twelve, chapter sixty-two of this code, shall not be eligible for parole:
Provided, That the jury may, in their discretion, recommend mercy, and if such recommendation is added to their verdict, such person shall be eligible for parole in accordance with the provisions of said article twelve, except that, notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, such person shall not be eligible for parole until he or she has served fifteen 8 CS for SB 264 years:
Provided, however, That if the accused pleads guilty of murder of the first degree, the court may, in its discretion, provide that such person shall be eligible for parole in accordance with the provisions of said article twelve, and, if the court so provides, such person shall be eligible for parole in accordance with the provisions of said article twelve in the same manner and with like effect as if such person had been found guilty by the verdict of a jury and the jury had recommended mercy, except that, notwithstanding any provision of said article twelve or any other provision of this code to the contrary, such person shall not be eligible for parole until he or she has served fifteen years:
Provided further, That nothing in this section shall preclude a sentence of death where the individual is guilty of the offense of murder in the first degree and there is a further finding that the state has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of an aggravating circumstance specified in §61-2-2b of this code.
ARTICLE 7.
SentenceThe sentence of death,death exceptshall forshall insurrection or rebellion, may not be executed soonerat thana Intrstate SBcorrectional 2025R1159facility threein monthsaccordance afterwith the§61-2-2e sentenceof isthis pronounced.code.
The sentenceexecution ofshall deathbe shall,performed inunder everythe case,direction beof executedthe bywarden anyof legallythe acceptablestate means,correctional includingfacility lethaland injectionthe orauthorities firingin squad.control of the facility.
The sentencewarden shallof bethe executedstate withincorrectional facility or, in the wallscase of ahis stateor correctionalher facilitydeath, withinabsence anor enclosureinability preparedto foract, thatthe purposeCommissioner andof constructedWest soVirginia asDivision toof excludeCorrections publicand view.Rehabilitation shall be the executioner.
TheIn executioncarrying shallout bethe performedexecution underof the directionsentence, of the warden ofor the stateCommissioner correctionalof facilityWest Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation may secure the authoritiesservices inand controladvice thereof.of any person or persons either considers appropriate.
The warden of the state correctional facility or, in the case of his or her death, absence or inability to act, the Commissioner of Corrections shall be the executioner.
In carrying out the execution of sentence, the warden or the Commissioner of Corrections may secure the services and advice of any person or persons either considers appropriate.
transfer of convict to a state correctional facility;facility;persons present at execution.
personsThe presentclerk atof execution.the court which pronounces the sentence of death shall, as soon as possible after sentence, deliver a certified copy of the sentence to the sheriff, who shall retain the custody of the convict sentenced to death until he or she is delivered to a properly authorized guard sent by 9 CS for SB 264 the warden for the removal of the convict to the state correctional facility.
The clerk of the court whichshall pronouncesalso theimmediately sentencetransmit of death shall, as soon as possible after sentence, deliver a certified copy of the sentence to the sheriff,warden who shall retain the custody of the convictstate sentencedcorrectional tofacility death until he or she is delivered to a properlycopy authorizedof guard sent by the wardenindictment, fororder theof removalconviction ofand the convictsentence toand thejudgment stateentered correctionalthereon. facility.
TheAs clerksoon ofas thepossible courtafter shallreceipt alsoof forthwiththe transmitcopies, to the warden ofshall thesend statea correctionalguard facilityor aguards copyto ofremove the indictment,convict orderto of conviction and the sentencestate andcorrectional judgmentfacility. entered thereon.
As soon as possible after receipt of the copies the warden shall send a guard or guards to remove the convict to the state correctional facility.
At the execution there may be present those officers, guardsguards, and assistants as the warden or Commissioner of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation considers appropriate.
The warden or the commissioner, as the case may be, shall request the presence of the prosecuting attorney of the county whereinin which the conviction occurred, the clerk of the circuit court thereof,of the county, 12 respectable citizens, including a physician and representatives of the press as may be considered appropriate.
INTRODUCED 2017R1640 The warden or Commissioner of West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation who executes the sentence of death shall certify to the clerk of the circuit court, by which the sentence was imposed, that the sentence has been executed.
If the friends or relatives of the convict make a request in writing to the warden at any time within two days after the sentence of death has been executed, the body of the convict shall be returned to the friends or relatives, in any county inof the state, for burial.
The warden may draw his or her order on the Auditor of the state for whatever sum is necessary to pay for transportation of the body, to be paid out of funds appropriated to the West Virginia Division of Corrections.Corrections and Rehabilitation.
If no request is made by friends or relatives, the body shall be disposed of as 10 CS for SB 264 provided for other convicts who die within a state correctional facility.
NOTE:11
The purpose of this bill is to provide for the death penalty in limited circumstances;
the bill provides for procedures and standards applicable thereto, and automatic review of the penalty, for commission of murder in the first degree.
Procedures for carrying out the death sentence are established.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
Show all 114 changed rows (74 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
Action History
-
To Finance
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary then Finance
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Stuart · Primary
- Darren Thorne · Cosponsor
- Brian Helton · Cosponsor
- Phillips · Cosponsor
- Jack Woodrum · Cosponsor
- Vince Deeds · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Stuart
Co-sponsors (5)
- Darren Thorne Republican
- Brian Helton Republican
- Phillips
- Jack Woodrum Republican
- Vince Deeds Republican
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 264?
- SB 264 is sponsored by Stuart, Darren Thorne (Republican), Brian Helton (Republican), Phillips, Jack Woodrum (Republican), and Vince Deeds (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 264?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 264?
- Track SB 264 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 264
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 264
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →