SR 11 — Relating to: castigating the Wisconsin Elections Commission for ignoring statutory requirements, for sidestepping the administrative rulemaking process, and for not following both the letter and intent of state statute.
Last action — Adopted, Ayes 21, Noes 12
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
67 added · 85 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Resolution 11 adds specific findings from a Legislative Audit Bureau report that criticize the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) for failing to adhere to state statutes and proper administrative processes in their election oversight. This includes issues with verifying municipal clerk training and not properly training election officials as required. These changes clarify the reasons for the resolution's disapproval of the WEC's actions, highlighting the importance of accountability and compliance in election administration.
-Senate 2022Resolution LEGISLATURE11 LRB-5231/1ENGROSSED CMH:cjs SENATE RESOLUTION 11Relating Novemberto: 5, 2021 - Introduced by Senators R OTH, LEM AHIEU, W ANGGAARD , BRADLEY , DARLING, FELZKOWSKI, FEYEN , ACQUE , JAGLER, KAPENGA , NASS, PETROWSKI , STAFSHOLT, TROEBEL and T ESTIN.
Referred to Committee on Senate Organization.
Relating to:
and LRB-5231/1 - 2022 Legislature - 2 - CMH:cjs Whereas, the Joint Legislative Audit Committee directed the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau to conduct an audit of the 2020 election ensuring compliance with state and federal election laws;
S In regards to verifying municipal clerk training—“WEC'straining—“WEC’s staff did not comply with administrative rules because they did not contact governing bodies if clerks did not report having completed the required training for the two-yeartwo−year period that ended in December 2019”;
S In regards to the use of municipal absentee drop boxes—“If WEC believes that municipal clerks should be permitted to establish drop boxes, WEC'sWEC’s staff should work with WEC to promulgate administrative rules to permit clerks to establish them”;
S In regards to keeping accurate data on Wisconsin'sWisconsin’s voter rolls—“WEC did not regularly obtain all types of data from ERIC”;
LRB-5231/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - CMH:cjs S In regards to adjournment while counting ballots—“Written guidance that WEC'sWEC’s staff provided to municipal clerks in October 2020 did not comply with statutes;
and Senate Resolution 11 − 2− Whereas, WEC also served as a conduit for connecting Wisconsin clerks with the Center for Tech and Civic Life which poured more than $6 million into local election efforts, which bought access to the nonpartisan election administration process such as those uncovered in Green Bay that provided outside actors access to key information and administrative functions, drove out the sitting city clerk, implemented partisan/political campaign turnout strategies, and contributed to the undermined trust and faith in Wisconsin'sWisconsin’s elections;
and Whereas, WEC is entrusted to administer Wisconsin'sWisconsin’s elections laws and when necessary utilize the emergency rulemaking process to respond to unique and pressing circumstances, not ignore statutory requirements or emergency rulemaking in exchange for expediency or personal policy preference;
now, therefore, be it Resolved by the senate, That the Wisconsin Senate hereby castigates the Wisconsin Elections Commission for ignoring statutory requirements, for LRB-5231/1 - 2022 Legislature - 4 - CMH:cjs sidestepping the administrative rulemaking process, and for not following both the letter and intent of state statute, actions that represent a move not to administer but to unilaterally rewrite state law;
(END)S t a t e C a p i t o l Senator Chris Kapenga Madison, Wisconsin President of the Senate Date Michael J.
Queensland Senate Chief Clerk
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Engrossed Resolution pdf
- Resolution Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Adopted, Ayes 21, Noes 12
-
Point of order that Senate Substitute Amendment 1 was not germane well taken, Ayes 21, Noes 12
-
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Larson, Carpenter, Smith, Ringhand, Erpenbach, Wirch, Roys, L. Taylor and Johnson
-
Placed on calendar 11-8-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read and referred to Committee on Senate Organization
-
Introduced by Senators Roth, LeMahieu, Wanggaard, Bradley, Darling, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, Kapenga, Nass, Petrowski, Stafsholt, Stroebel and Testin
Sponsors
- Patrick Testin · Primary
- Stroebel · Primary
- Rob Stafsholt · Primary
- Petrowski · Primary
- Steve Nass · Primary
- Chris Kapenga · Primary
- John Jagler · Primary
- André Jacque · Primary
- Dan Feyen · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Darling · Primary
- Julian Bradley · Primary
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Devin LeMahieu · Primary
- Roth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →15 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (15)
- Testin, Patrick Republican
- Stroebel
- Stafsholt, Rob Republican
- Petrowski
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Kapenga, Chris Republican
- Jagler, John Republican
- Jacque, André Republican
- Feyen, Dan Republican
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- Darling
- Bradley, Julian Republican
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- LeMahieu, Devin Republican
- Roth
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SR 11?
- SR 11 is sponsored by Testin, Patrick (Republican), Stroebel, Stafsholt, Rob (Republican), Petrowski, Nass, Steve (Republican), Kapenga, Chris (Republican), Jagler, John (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Feyen, Dan (Republican), Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Darling, Bradley, Julian (Republican), Wanggaard, Van (Republican), LeMahieu, Devin (Republican), and Roth.
- What is the current status of SR 11?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SR 11?
- Track SR 11 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SR 11
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SR 11
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →