S 122 — Qualified Immunity Act of 2025
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 16, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Qualified Immunity Act of 2025This bill provides statutory authority for qualified immunity for law enforcement officers in civil cases involving constitutional violations.Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors (e.g., law enforcement officers) for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The Supreme Court has also found an implied cause of action against federal law enforcement officers in certain situations (e.g., Fourth Amendment violations), also known as Bivens lawsuits. However, under the judicial doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary duties are generally shielded from civil liability, unless their actions violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known.The bill provides statutory authority for these principles with respect to law enforcement officers. Specifically, under the bill, law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) at the time of the alleged violation, the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established or the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable officer would have known that the conduct was unconstitutional; or (2) a court has held that the specific conduct at issue is constitutional.The bill applies to federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. It also specifies that law enforcement agencies and local governments may not be held liable if their officers are entitled to qualified immunity.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html January 16, 2025
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill codifies a defense of qualified immunity specifically for law enforcement officers in actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
Every→ (a) In General-- EveryThis addition indicates that the section will contain subsections, beginning with general provisions.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
(b) Applicability to Law Enforcement Officers.--
This new subsection establishes specific provisions for law enforcement officers under this law.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
A law enforcement officer subject to an action under this section in their individual capacity shall not be found liable if such law enforcement officer establishes that--
This sets a standard for qualified immunity protection for law enforcement officers.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
(i) the right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution or Federal law was not clearly established at the time of their deprivation by the law enforcement officer, or that at this time, the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable law enforcement officer would have understood that the conduct alleged constituted a violation of the Constitution or Federal law; or
This clause establishes criteria under which law enforcement officers can claim qualified immunity based on the clarity of established law.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
(ii) a court of competent jurisdiction had issued a final decision on the merits holding, without reversal, vacatur, or preemption, that the specific conduct alleged to be unlawful was consistent with the Constitution and Federal laws.
This provides an additional basis for law enforcement officers to avoid liability if prior court rulings support their actions.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
A law enforcement agency or unit of local government who employed a law enforcement officer subject to an action under subsection (a), shall not be liable for such action if the law enforcement officer--
This specifies that agencies are also protected from liability if their officers are not found liable.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
(i) is found not liable under paragraph (1); and
This provision adds a condition for agency liability based on the officer's liability status.
-
42 U.S.C. 1983
(ii) was acting within the scope of their employment.
This condition further clarifies the circumstances under which agencies will not be held liable.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Jim Banks · Primary
- Ted Budd · Cosponsor
- Rick Scott · Cosponsor
- Marsha Blackburn · Cosponsor
- Tim Sheehy · Cosponsor
- Mike Crapo · Cosponsor
- Cindy Hyde-Smith · Cosponsor
- Markwayne Mullin · Cosponsor
- James E. Risch · Cosponsor
- Bill Cassidy · Cosponsor
- Bernie Moreno · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 536 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Banks, Jim Republican
Co-sponsors (10)
- Budd, Ted Republican
- Scott, Rick Republican
- Blackburn, Marsha Republican
- Sheehy, Tim Republican
- Crapo, Mike Republican
- Hyde-Smith, Cindy Republican
- Mullin, Markwayne Republican
- Risch, James E. Republican
- Cassidy, Bill Republican
- Moreno, Bernie Republican
Not signed on (536)
536 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 536 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 122 do?
- Qualified Immunity Act of 2025This bill provides statutory authority for qualified immunity for law enforcement officers in civil cases involving constitutional violations.Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors (e.g., law enforcement officers) for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The Supreme Court has also found an implied cause of action against federal law enforcement officers in certain situations (e.g., Fourth Amendment violations), also known as Bivens lawsuits. However, under the judicial doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary duties are generally shielded from civil liability, unless their actions violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known.The bill provides statutory authority for these principles with respect to law enforcement officers. Specifically, under the bill, law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) at the time of the alleged violation, the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established or the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable officer would have known that the conduct was unconstitutional; or (2) a court has held that the specific conduct at issue is constitutional.The bill applies to federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. It also specifies that law enforcement agencies and local governments may not be held liable if their officers are entitled to qualified immunity.
- Who sponsors S 122?
- S 122 is sponsored by Banks, Jim (Republican), Budd, Ted (Republican), Scott, Rick (Republican), Blackburn, Marsha (Republican), Sheehy, Tim (Republican), Crapo, Mike (Republican), Hyde-Smith, Cindy (Republican), Mullin, Markwayne (Republican), Risch, James E. (Republican), Cassidy, Bill (Republican), and Moreno, Bernie (Republican).
- What is the current status of S 122?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 16, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 122?
- Track S 122 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 122
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 122
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →