Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: To Executive Bipartisan · 9 R · 1 D cosponsors

AB 569 — Relating to: law enforcement investigative services and making an appropriation. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

57 added · 122 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Assembly Bill 569 clarify that counties and municipalities can seek reimbursement for law enforcement expenses related to prisoners and juveniles both while they are in facilities and during transport to and from those facilities. Additionally, the bill removes previous provisions regarding appropriations and some details on claims processing, streamlining the process for local governments. These changes matter because they ensure that local entities are fairly compensated for the costs incurred in managing individuals in the justice system, which can help alleviate financial burdens on communities.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-4486/1 MLJ:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 569 September 22, 2021 - Introduced by Representatives P ETERSEN , CALLAHAN , STEFFEN , T HIESFELD, M OSES, JAMES, EDMING , M URSAU , O LDENBURG , PENTERMAN , SPIROS, INICKIand K NODL , cosponsored by Senators ALLWEG , FELZKOWSKI , OWLES , EYEN and W ANGGAARD.
Date of enactment:
Referred to Committee on Local Government.
Assembly Bill 569 Date of publication*:
A N A CT to amend 16.51 (7), 20.410 (1) (c), 20.410 (3) (c) and 62.03 (1);
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 16.51 (7) and 62.03 (1);
law enforcement investigative services and making an appropriation.
law enforcement investigative services.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, the Department of Corrections must reimburse counties for certain expenses related to an action or proceeding involving a prisoner in a state prison or a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility in the county.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in niles in secure custody while those actions or proceed- senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
This bill adds that DOC must also reimburse any county, city, village, or town that provides law enforcement investigative services for an incident involving a prisoner in a state prison or a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility.
ings are pending.
Under current DOC practice in accordance with memoranda of understanding, DOC reimburses the village of Allouez and Dodge County specific amounts at specific intervals during the year for law enforcement investigative services.
The department shall reimburse a county, city, village, or town under this subsection for SECTION 1.
This bill provides that, notwithstanding the statutory changes contained in the bill, the village of Allouez and Dodge County may continue to be reimbursed in accordance with their MOUs.
16.51 (7) of the statutes is amended to expenses relating to law enforcement investigative ser- read:
This bill also decreases DOC's general operations appropriation in the amounts currently spent annually under these MOUs to be reallocated to law enforcement investigative services reimbursement.
vices that it provided for an incident involving a prisoner 16.51(7) A UDIT CLAIMSFOR EXPENSES IN CONNECTION in a state prison or in transit to or from a state prison or WITH PRISONERS AND JUVENILES IN JUVENILE CORREC - a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility or in transit TIONAL FACILITIES.
- 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4486/1 MLJ:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 569 For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
Receive, examine, determine, and to or from a juvenile correctional facility within its juris- audit claims, duly certified and approved by the depart- diction.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
Expenses shall only include the amounts that ment of corrections, from the county clerk of any county were necessarily incurred and actually paid and shall be in, city, village, or town, on behalf of the county, city, vil- no more than the legitimate cost would be to any other lage, or town, which are presented for payment to reim- county jurisdiction had the offense or crime occurred burse the county reimbursement for certain expenses therein.
SECTION 1.
incurred or paid by it in reference to allatters growing SECTION 4.
16.51 (7) of the statutes is amended to read:
16.51 (7) A UDIT CLAIMS FOR EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH PRISONERS AND JUVENILES IN JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES.Receive, examine, determine, and audit claims, duly certified and approved by the department of corrections, from the county clerk of any county in, city, village, or town, on behalf of the county, city, village, or town, which are presented for payment to reimburse the county reimbursement for certain expenses incurred or paid by it in reference to all matters growing out of actions and proceedings involving prisoners in state prisons, as defined in s.
302.01, or juveniles in juvenile correctional facilities, as defined in s.
938.02 (10p), including prisoners or juveniles transferred to a mental health institute for observation or treatment, when the.
The department shall reimburse a county under this subsection for expenses relating to actions or proceedings that are commenced in counties in which the prisons or juvenile correctional facilities are located by a district attorney or by the prisoner or juvenile as a postconviction remedy or a matter involving the prisoner's status as a prisoner or the juvenile's status as a resident of a juvenile correctional facility and for certain expenses incurred or paid by itthe county in reference to holding those juveniles in secure custody while those actions or proceedings are pending.
The department shall reimburse a county, city, village, or town under this subsection for expenses relating to law enforcement investigative services that it provided for an incident involving a prisoner in a state prison or a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility within its jurisdiction.
LRB-4486/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - MLJ:cdc SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 569 Expenses shall only include the amounts that were necessarily incurred and actually paid and shall be no more than the legitimate cost would be to any other county jurisdiction had the offense or crime occurred therein.
SECTION 2.
20.410 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.410 (1) (c) Reimbursement claims of counties or municipalitiesining state prisons.
A sum sufficient to pay all valid claims made by county clerks of counties, cities, villages, and towns containing state prisons as provided in s.
16.51 (7).
SECTION 3.
20.410 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.410 (3) (c) Reimbursement claims of counties or municipalitiesining juvenile correctional facilities.
A sum sufficient to pay all valid claims made by county clerks of counties, cities, villages, or towns containing state juvenile correctional facilities as provided in s.
16.51 (7).
SECTION 4.
60.33 (10p) CLAIMS IN TOWNS CONTAINING STATE INSTITUTIOMake a certified claim against the state, without direction from the board, in all cases in which the reimbursement is directed in s.
out of actions and proceedings involving prisoners in state prisons, as defined in s.
16.51 (7), upon forms prescribed by the department of administration.
302.01, or juveniles in juve- 60.33 (10p) C LAIMS IN TOWNS CONTAINING STATE nile correctional facilities, as defined in s.
The forms shall contain information required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the department of corrections on or before June 1.
938.02 (10p), INSTITUTIONS.
SECTION 5.
Make a certified claim against the state, including prisoners or juveniles transferred to a mental without direction from the board, in all cases in which the health institute for observation or treatment, when the.
61.25 (11) of the statutes is created to read:
reimbursement is directed in s.
61.25 (11) To make a certified claim against the state, without direction from the board, in all cases in which the reimbursement is directed in s.
16.51 (7), upon forms pre- The department shall reimburse a county under this sub- scribed by the department of administration.
16.51 (7), upon forms prescribed by the department of administration.
The forms section for expenses relating to actions or proceedings shall contain information required by the clerk and shall thatare commenced in counties in which the prisons or be filed annually with the department of corrections on or juvenile correctional facilities are located by a district before June 1.
The forms shall contain information required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the department of corrections on or before June 1.
attorney or by the prisoner or juvenile as a postconviction SECTION 5.
- 2022 Legislature - 4 - LRB-4486/1 MLJ:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 569 SECTION 6 S ECTION 6.
61.25 (11) of the statutes is created to remedy or a matter involving the prisoner’s status as a read:
62.03 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:
prisoner or the juvenile’s status as a resident of a juvenile 61.25(11) To make a certified claim against the state, correctional facility and for certain expenses incurred or without direction from the board, in all cases in which the paid by itthe county in reference to holding those juve- reimbursement is directed in s.
Show all 71 changed rows (31 more)
Previous
Latest
62.03 (1) This subchapter, except ss.
16.51 (7), upon forms pre- * Section 991.11,ISCONSINSTATUTE:
62.071, 62.08 (1), 62.09 (1) (e) and (11) (j) and, (k), and (m), 62.175, 62.23 (7) (em) and (he) and 62.237, does not apply to 1st class cities under special charter.
Effective date of acts.
S ECTION 7.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Assembly Bill 569 scribed by the department of administration.
62.09 (11) (m) of the statutes is created to read:
The forms administration.
62.09 (11) (m) The clerk of any city that is entitled to reimbursement under s.
The forms shall contain information shall contain information required by the clerk and shall required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the be filed annually with the department of corrections on or department of corrections on or before June 1.
16.51 (7) shall make a certified claim against the state, without direction from the council, in all cases in which the reimbursement is directed in s.
before June 1.
16.51 (7), upon forms prescribed by the department of administration.
The forms shall contain information required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the department of corrections on or before June 1.
S ECTION 8.Fiscal changes.
(1) LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICESIn the schedule under s.
20.005 (3) for the appropriation to the department of corrections under s.
20.410 (1) (a), the dollar amount for fiscal year 2021-22 is decreased by $142,000 to reallocate those funds to reimburse law enforcement investigative services as provided under s.
16.51 (7).
In the schedule under s.
20.005 (3) for the appropriation to the department of corrections under s.
20.410 (1) (a), the dollar amount for fiscal year 2022-23 is decreased by $142,000 to reallocate those funds to reimburse law enforcement investigative services as provided under s.
16.51 (7).
(1) VILLAGE OFA LLOUEZ REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.Notwithstanding ss.
SECTION 6.
16.51 (7) and 61.25 (11), the Village of Allouez may be reimbursed for law enforcement investigative services in accordance with the LRB-4486/1 - 2022 Legislature - 5 - MLJ:cdc SECTION 9 ASSEMBLY BILL 569 memorandum of understanding that is in effect on the effective date of this subsection.
62.03 (1) of the statutes is amended to (1) V ILLAGE OF A LLOUEZ REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LAW read:
(2) DODGE COUNTY REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
62.03 (1) This subchapter, except ss.
Notwithstanding s.
62.071, 62.08 ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
16.51 (7), Dodge County may be reimbursed for law enforcement investigative services in accordance with the memorandum of understanding that is in effect on the effective date of this subsection.
Notwithstanding ss.
(END)
16.51 (7) and 61.25 (11), the Village of Allouez may (1), 62.09 (1) (e) and (11) (j) and, (k), and (m), 62.175, be reimbursed for law enforcement investigative services 62.23 (7) (em) and (he) and 62.237, does not apply to 1st in accordance with the memorandum of understanding class cities under special charter.
SECTION 7.
62.09 (11) (m) of the statutes is created that is in effect on the effective date of this subsection.
to read:
(2) D ODGE C OUNTY REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
Notwithstanding 62.09 (11) (m) The clerk of any city that is entitled to reimbursement under s.
16.51 (7) shall make a certified s.
16.51 (7), Dodge County may be reimbursed for law claim against the state, without direction from the coun- enforcement investigative services in accordance with cil, in all cases in which the reimbursement is directed in the memorandum of understanding that is in effect on the s.
16.51 (7), upon forms prescribed by the department of effective date of this subsection.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  4. Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker

  5. Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2022

  6. Received from Senate concurred in

  7. Ordered immediately messaged

  8. Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  9. Rules suspended

  10. Ordered to a third reading

  11. Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  12. Read a second time

  13. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter

  14. Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  16. Representative Milroy added as a coauthor

  17. Available for scheduling

  18. Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  19. Received from Assembly

  20. Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 34, Paired 2

  22. Rules suspended

  23. Ordered to a third reading

  24. Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  25. Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up

  26. Referred to joint committee on Finance

  27. Read a second time

  28. Made a special order of business at 8:23 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  29. Representative Sinicki withdrawn as a coauthor

  30. Referred to committee on Rules

  31. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  32. Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  33. Executive action taken

  34. Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petersen

  35. Public hearing held

  36. Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor

  37. Fiscal estimate received

  38. Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government

  39. Introduced by Representatives Petersen, Callahan, Steffen, Thiesfeldt, Moses, James, Edming, Mursau, Oldenburg, Penterman, Spiros, Sinicki and Knodl; cosponsored by Senators Ballweg, Felzkowski, Cowles, Feyen and Wanggaard

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

13 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 25 voted No

Sponsors (13)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

CONCURRENCE

Passed 20 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7401
Republican 13000
Democrat 0800
Total 201201
% of votes cast 61%36%0%3%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
BERNIER — Yea
COWLES — Yea
KOOYENGA — Yea
STROEBEL — Yea
DARLING — Yea
PETROWSKI — Yea
AGARD — Nay
BEWLEY — Nay
ERPENBACH — Nay
RINGHAND — Nay
BALLWEG — Not Voting
ROTH — Yea
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Johnson, LaTonya Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Nay
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Yea
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

PASSAGE

Passed 62 Yea · 34 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 37100
Democrat 11700
Unaffiliated 241600
Total 623400
% of votes cast 65%35%0%0%
How each member voted (96)
Member Party Vote
BALDEH — Nay
BRANDTJEN — Yea
BROSTOFF — Nay
CABRAL-GUEVA — Yea
CABRERA — Nay
CONLEY — Nay
CONSIDINE — Nay
EDMING — Yea
GOYKE — Nay
HEBL — Nay
HINTZ — Nay
HORLACHER — Yea
KATSMA — Yea
KERKMAN — Yea
KUGLITSCH — Yea
LOUDENBECK — Yea
MACCO — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MEYERS — Nay
MILROY — Yea
MOORE OMOKUN — Nay
MYERS — Nay
OHNSTAD — Nay
OLDENBURG — Yea
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
POPE — Nay
RAMTHUN — Yea
RIEMER — Nay
ROZAR — Yea
SANFELIPPO — Yea
SCHRAA — Yea
SHELTON — Nay
SKOWRONSKI — Yea
STEINEKE — Yea
TAUCHEN — Yea
THIESFELDT — Yea
VORPAGEL — Yea
VRUWINK — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Nay
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Yea
Drake, Dora Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
Armstrong, David Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Nay
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 569?
AB 569 is sponsored by Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Sinicki, Christine (Democrat), Spiros, John (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Oldenburg, Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Edming, James, Jesse (Republican), Moses, Clint (Republican), Thiesfeldt, Steffen, David (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), and Petersen, Kevin (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 569?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 569?
Track AB 569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 569

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 569

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →