AB 569 — Relating to: law enforcement investigative services and making an appropriation. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
57 added · 122 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Assembly Bill 569 clarify that counties and municipalities can seek reimbursement for law enforcement expenses related to prisoners and juveniles both while they are in facilities and during transport to and from those facilities. Additionally, the bill removes previous provisions regarding appropriations and some details on claims processing, streamlining the process for local governments. These changes matter because they ensure that local entities are fairly compensated for the costs incurred in managing individuals in the justice system, which can help alleviate financial burdens on communities.
-Date 2022of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-4486/1 MLJ:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 569 September 22, 2021 - Introduced by Representatives P ETERSEN , CALLAHAN , STEFFEN , T HIESFELD, M OSES, JAMES, EDMING , M URSAU , O LDENBURG , PENTERMAN , SPIROS, INICKIand K NODL , cosponsored by Senators ALLWEG , FELZKOWSKI , OWLES , EYEN and W ANGGAARD.
ReferredAssembly toBill Committee569 onDate Localof Government.publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 16.51 (7),(7) 20.410 (1) (c), 20.410 (3) (c) and 62.03 (1);
law enforcement investigative servicesservices. and making an appropriation.
AnalysisThe bypeople theof Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, the Departmentstate of CorrectionsWisconsin, mustrepresented reimbursein countiesniles forin certainsecure expensescustody relatedwhile tothose anactions action or proceedingproceed- involvingsenate aand prisonerassembly, indo aenact stateas prisonfollows: or a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility in the county.
Thisings billare addspending. that DOC must also reimburse any county, city, village, or town that provides law enforcement investigative services for an incident involving a prisoner in a state prison or a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility.
UnderThe currentdepartment DOCshall practicereimburse ina accordancecounty, withcity, memorandavillage, ofor understanding,town DOCunder reimbursesthis thesubsection village of Allouez and Dodge County specific amounts at specific intervals during the year for lawSECTION enforcement1. investigative services.
This16.51 bill(7) providesof that, notwithstanding the statutorystatutes changesis containedamended into theexpenses bill,relating the village of Allouez and Dodge County may continue to belaw reimbursedenforcement ininvestigative accordanceser- withread: their MOUs.
Thisvices billthat alsoit decreasesprovided DOC'sfor generalan operationsincident appropriationinvolving ina theprisoner amounts16.51(7) currentlyA spentUDIT annuallyCLAIMSFOR underEXPENSES theseIN MOUsCONNECTION toin bea reallocatedstate prison or in transit to lawor enforcementfrom investigativea servicesstate reimbursement.prison or WITH PRISONERS AND JUVENILES IN JUVENILE CORREC - a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility or in transit TIONAL FACILITIES.
-Receive, 2022examine, Legislaturedetermine, -and 2to -or LRB-4486/1from MLJ:cdca ASSEMBLYjuvenile BILLcorrectional 569facility Forwithin furtherits informationjuris- seeaudit theclaims, stateduly certified and localapproved fiscalby estimate,the whichdepart- willdiction. be printed as an appendix to this bill.
TheExpenses peopleshall only include the amounts that ment of corrections, from the statecounty clerk of Wisconsin,any representedcounty inwere senatenecessarily incurred and assembly,actually dopaid enactand asshall follows:be in, city, village, or town, on behalf of the county, city, vil- no more than the legitimate cost would be to any other lage, or town, which are presented for payment to reim- county jurisdiction had the offense or crime occurred burse the county reimbursement for certain expenses therein.
incurred or paid by it in reference to allatters growing SECTION 1.4.
16.51 (7) of the statutes is amended to read:
16.51 (7) A UDIT CLAIMS FOR EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH PRISONERS AND JUVENILES IN JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES.Receive, examine, determine, and audit claims, duly certified and approved by the department of corrections, from the county clerk of any county in, city, village, or town, on behalf of the county, city, village, or town, which are presented for payment to reimburse the county reimbursement for certain expenses incurred or paid by it in reference to all matters growing out of actions and proceedings involving prisoners in state prisons, as defined in s.
302.01, or juveniles in juvenile correctional facilities, as defined in s.
938.02 (10p), including prisoners or juveniles transferred to a mental health institute for observation or treatment, when the.
The department shall reimburse a county under this subsection for expenses relating to actions or proceedings that are commenced in counties in which the prisons or juvenile correctional facilities are located by a district attorney or by the prisoner or juvenile as a postconviction remedy or a matter involving the prisoner's status as a prisoner or the juvenile's status as a resident of a juvenile correctional facility and for certain expenses incurred or paid by itthe county in reference to holding those juveniles in secure custody while those actions or proceedings are pending.
The department shall reimburse a county, city, village, or town under this subsection for expenses relating to law enforcement investigative services that it provided for an incident involving a prisoner in a state prison or a juvenile in a juvenile correctional facility within its jurisdiction.
LRB-4486/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - MLJ:cdc SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 569 Expenses shall only include the amounts that were necessarily incurred and actually paid and shall be no more than the legitimate cost would be to any other county jurisdiction had the offense or crime occurred therein.
SECTION 2.
20.410 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.410 (1) (c) Reimbursement claims of counties or municipalitiesining state prisons.
A sum sufficient to pay all valid claims made by county clerks of counties, cities, villages, and towns containing state prisons as provided in s.
16.51 (7).
SECTION 3.
20.410 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.410 (3) (c) Reimbursement claims of counties or municipalitiesining juvenile correctional facilities.
A sum sufficient to pay all valid claims made by county clerks of counties, cities, villages, or towns containing state juvenile correctional facilities as provided in s.
16.51 (7).
SECTION 4.
60.33out (10p)of CLAIMSactions INand TOWNSproceedings CONTAININGinvolving STATEprisoners INSTITUTIOMake a certified claim against the state, without direction from the board, in allstate casesprisons, inas whichdefined the reimbursement is directed in s.
16.51302.01, (7),or uponjuveniles formsin prescribedjuve- by60.33 the(10p) departmentC ofLAIMS administration.IN TOWNS CONTAINING STATE nile correctional facilities, as defined in s.
The938.02 forms(10p), shallINSTITUTIONS. contain information required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the department of corrections on or before June 1.
SECTIONMake 5.a certified claim against the state, including prisoners or juveniles transferred to a mental without direction from the board, in all cases in which the health institute for observation or treatment, when the.
61.25reimbursement (11) of the statutes is createddirected toin read:s.
61.2516.51 (11)(7), Toupon makeforms apre- certifiedThe claimdepartment againstshall thereimburse state,a withoutcounty directionunder fromthis thesub- board,scribed inby all cases in which the reimbursementdepartment isof directedadministration. in s.
16.51The (7),forms uponsection formsfor prescribedexpenses relating to actions or proceedings shall contain information required by the clerk and shall thatare commenced in counties in which the prisons or be filed annually with the department of administration.corrections on or juvenile correctional facilities are located by a district before June 1.
Theattorney formsor shall contain information required by the clerkprisoner andor shalljuvenile beas fileda annuallypostconviction withSECTION the5. department of corrections on or before June 1.
-61.25 2022(11) Legislatureof -the 4statutes -is LRB-4486/1created MLJ:cdcto ASSEMBLYremedy BILLor 569a SECTIONmatter 6involving Sthe ECTIONprisoner’s 6.status as a read:
62.03prisoner (1)or the juvenile’s status as a resident of a juvenile 61.25(11) To make a certified claim against the statutesstate, iscorrectional amendedfacility and for certain expenses incurred or without direction from the board, in all cases in which the paid by itthe county in reference to read:holding those juve- reimbursement is directed in s.
Show all 71 changed lines (31 more)
62.0316.51 (1)(7), Thisupon subchapter,forms exceptpre- ss.* Section 991.11,ISCONSINSTATUTE:
62.071,Effective 62.08date (1),of 62.09acts. (1) (e) and (11) (j) and, (k), and (m), 62.175, 62.23 (7) (em) and (he) and 62.237, does not apply to 1st class cities under special charter.
S“Every ECTIONact 7.and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Assembly Bill 569 scribed by the department of administration.
62.09The (11)forms (m)administration. of the statutes is created to read:
62.09The (11)forms (m)shall Thecontain information shall contain information required by the clerk and shall required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the be filed annually with the department of anycorrections cityon thator isdepartment entitledof tocorrections reimbursementon underor s.before June 1.
16.51before (7)June shall1. make a certified claim against the state, without direction from the council, in all cases in which the reimbursement is directed in s.
16.51 (7), upon forms prescribed by the department of administration.
The forms shall contain information required by the clerk and shall be filed annually with the department of corrections on or before June 1.
S ECTION 8.Fiscal changes.
(1) LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICESIn the schedule under s.
20.005 (3) for the appropriation to the department of corrections under s.
20.410 (1) (a), the dollar amount for fiscal year 2021-22 is decreased by $142,000 to reallocate those funds to reimburse law enforcement investigative services as provided under s.
16.51 (7).
In the schedule under s.
20.005 (3) for the appropriation to the department of corrections under s.
20.410 (1) (a), the dollar amount for fiscal year 2022-23 is decreased by $142,000 to reallocate those funds to reimburse law enforcement investigative services as provided under s.
16.51 (7).
(1)SECTION VILLAGE6. OFA LLOUEZ REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.Notwithstanding ss.
16.5162.03 (7)(1) and 61.25 (11), the Village of Allouez may be reimbursed for law enforcement investigative services in accordance with the LRB-4486/1statutes -is 2022amended Legislatureto -(1) 5V -ILLAGE MLJ:cdcOF SECTIONA 9LLOUEZ ASSEMBLYREIMBURSEMENTS BILLFOR 569LAW memorandumread: of understanding that is in effect on the effective date of this subsection.
(2)62.03 DODGE(1) COUNTYThis REIMBURSEMENTSsubchapter, FORexcept LAWss. ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
Notwithstanding62.071, s.62.08 ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
16.51Notwithstanding (7),ss. Dodge County may be reimbursed for law enforcement investigative services in accordance with the memorandum of understanding that is in effect on the effective date of this subsection.
(END)16.51 (7) and 61.25 (11), the Village of Allouez may (1), 62.09 (1) (e) and (11) (j) and, (k), and (m), 62.175, be reimbursed for law enforcement investigative services 62.23 (7) (em) and (he) and 62.237, does not apply to 1st in accordance with the memorandum of understanding class cities under special charter.
SECTION 7.
62.09 (11) (m) of the statutes is created that is in effect on the effective date of this subsection.
to read:
(2) D ODGE C OUNTY REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
Notwithstanding 62.09 (11) (m) The clerk of any city that is entitled to reimbursement under s.
16.51 (7) shall make a certified s.
16.51 (7), Dodge County may be reimbursed for law claim against the state, without direction from the coun- enforcement investigative services in accordance with cil, in all cases in which the reimbursement is directed in the memorandum of understanding that is in effect on the s.
16.51 (7), upon forms prescribed by the department of effective date of this subsection.
Show all 71 changed rows (31 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2022
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 12
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 20, Noes 12
-
Read a second time
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter
-
Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Representative Milroy added as a coauthor
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 34, Paired 2
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up
-
Referred to joint committee on Finance
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 8:23 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
-
Representative Sinicki withdrawn as a coauthor
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petersen
-
Public hearing held
-
Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Introduced by Representatives Petersen, Callahan, Steffen, Thiesfeldt, Moses, James, Edming, Mursau, Oldenburg, Penterman, Spiros, Sinicki and Knodl; cosponsored by Senators Ballweg, Felzkowski, Cowles, Feyen and Wanggaard
Sponsors
- Daniel Knodl · Primary
- Christine Sinicki · Primary
- John Spiros · Primary
- William Penterman · Primary
- Oldenburg · Primary
- Jeffrey Mursau · Primary
- Edming · Primary
- Jesse James · Primary
- Clint Moses · Primary
- Thiesfeldt · Primary
- David Steffen · Primary
- Calvin Callahan · Primary
- Kevin Petersen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →13 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (13)
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
- Sinicki, Christine Democrat Voted No
- Spiros, John Republican
- Penterman, William Republican
- Oldenburg
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Edming
- James, Jesse Republican
- Moses, Clint Republican
- Thiesfeldt
- Steffen, David Republican
- Callahan, Calvin Republican
- Petersen, Kevin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 36% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| BALLWEG | — | Not Voting |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 62 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (96)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALDEH | — | Nay |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| BROSTOFF | — | Nay |
| CABRAL-GUEVA | — | Yea |
| CABRERA | — | Nay |
| CONLEY | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| HEBL | — | Nay |
| HINTZ | — | Nay |
| HORLACHER | — | Yea |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| KERKMAN | — | Yea |
| KUGLITSCH | — | Yea |
| LOUDENBECK | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MEYERS | — | Nay |
| MILROY | — | Yea |
| MOORE OMOKUN | — | Nay |
| MYERS | — | Nay |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| POPE | — | Nay |
| RAMTHUN | — | Yea |
| RIEMER | — | Nay |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SANFELIPPO | — | Yea |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SHELTON | — | Nay |
| SKOWRONSKI | — | Yea |
| STEINEKE | — | Yea |
| TAUCHEN | — | Yea |
| THIESFELDT | — | Yea |
| VORPAGEL | — | Yea |
| VRUWINK | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Yea |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 569?
- AB 569 is sponsored by Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Sinicki, Christine (Democrat), Spiros, John (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Oldenburg, Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Edming, James, Jesse (Republican), Moses, Clint (Republican), Thiesfeldt, Steffen, David (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), and Petersen, Kevin (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 569?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 569?
- Track AB 569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 569
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 569
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →