SB 252 — Relating to: extending the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the city of Wisconsin Dells and extending the time during which expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.
Last action — Published 3-5-2022
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
38 added · 100 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes made to SB 252 involve extending the time frames for financial activities related to Tax Incremental Districts (TIDs) in the city of Wisconsin Dells. Specifically, the allocation of tax increments for Tax Incremental District Number 2 has been extended until 2036, while project costs can now be incurred until 2031. Additionally, Tax Incremental District Number 3 can now allocate tax increments through 2040. This is important as it gives the city more time to invest in and develop these districts, potentially boosting economic growth and revitalization in the area.
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRBs0305/1LRB-1812/1 JK:cjs/cdc/amnJK:cdc SENATE SUBSTITUTEBILL AMENDMENT252 1,March TO31, SENATE2021 BILL- 252Introduced Januaryby 12,Senators 2022BALLWEG -and OfferedM ARKLEIN , cosponsored by SenatorRepresentatives BALLWEGD ALLMAN , KURTZ, SKOWRONSKI , STEFFEN, TITTLand T USLER .
AReferred Nto ACommittee CTon toGovernment amendOperations, 66.1105Legal (5)Review (g) and 66.1105Consumer (6)Protection. (a) (intro.);
andA N A CT to create 66.1105 (6) (a) 20.,19., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2.
o.,n. 66.1105 (6m) (c) 8.
and 66.1105 (6m)(6) (c)(am) 9.2.
o.
extending the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 32 in the city of Wisconsin Dells and reportingextending the valuetime ofduring netwhich newexpenditures constructionfor project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in taxthe incrementalcity districts.of Wisconsin Dells.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under this bill, tax increments may be allocated for Tax Incremental District Number 32 in the city ofWisconsin Dells through 2036 and expenditures may be made for project costs for that TID through 2031.
The bill also allows expenditures for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells through 2040.
LRBs0305/1 - 2022 Legislature - 2 - JK:cjs/cdc/amn The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the city, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
site preparation - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1812/1 JK:cdc SENATE BILL 252 costs;
Under current law, each city or village that creates tax incremental districts must prepare and make available to the public updated annual reports describing the status of each existing tax incremental district, including expenditures and revenues.
The reports must contain certain information, including the name assigned to each district, the name of any developer who receives financial assistance from tax increments allocated for the district, and the amount of tax increments to be deposited into a special fund for that district.
Under the bill, the annual reports must also include the value of new construction in each tax incremental district, less the value of improvements removed from each district.
In addition, the bill requires the annual reports to include an analysis of the impact on property taxes and levy limits resulting from the value of new construction less improvements removed in each tax incremental district.
SECTIONS ECTION 1.
66.1105 (5)(6) (g)(a) of19. the statutes is amended to read:
66.1105 (5) (g) The department of revenue shall annually give notice to the designated finance officer of all governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within each district as to the equalized value of the property, the equalized value due to new construction less the value of improvements destroyed or removed, and the equalized value of the tax increment base.
The notice shall also explain that the tax increment allocated to a city shall be paid to the city as provided under sub.
(6) (b) from the taxes collected.
SECTION 2.
66.1105 (6) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
66.1105 (6) (a) (intro.) If the joint review board approves the creation of the tax incremental district under sub.
(4m), and subject to pars.
(ae) and (ag), positive tax LRBs0305/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - JK:cjs/cdc/amn SECTION 2 increments with respect to a tax incremental district are allocated to the city which created the district or, in the case of a city or village that annexes or attaches a district created under sub.
(16), to the annexing or attaching city or village, for each year commencing after the date when a project plan is adopted under sub.
(4) (g).
The department of revenue may not authorize allocation of tax increments until it determines from timely evidence submitted by the city that each of the procedures and documents required under sub.
(4) (d) to (f) has been completed and all related notices given in a timely manner.
The department of revenue may authorize allocation of tax increments for any tax incremental district only if the city clerk and assessor annually submit to the department all required information, including the value of new construction less the value of improvements destroyed or removed, in a form and manner prescribed by the department, on or before the 2nd Monday in June.
The facts supporting any document adopted or action taken to comply with sub.
(4) (d) to (f) are not subject to review by the department of revenue under this paragraph.
After the allocation of tax increments is authorized, the department of revenue shall annually authorize allocation of the tax increment to the city that created the district until the soonest of the following events:
SECTION 3.
66.1105 (6) (a) 20.
66.1105(6) (a) 20.19.
December 31, 2036, if the district is Tax Incremental District Number 32 in the city of Wisconsin DellsDells. and notwithstanding sub.
(4e)S (e)ECTION 1.,2. 3., and 6.
and (g).
SECTION 4.
Show all 79 changed lines (39 more)
o.n.
o.n.
Expenditures for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 32 in the city of Wisconsin Dells,Dells. notwithstanding sub.
(4e) (e) 1., 3., and 6.
and (g).
LRBs0305/1S -ECTION 20223. Legislature - 4 - JK:cjs/cdc/amn SECTION 5 SECTION 5.
66.1105 (6m)(6) (c)(am) 8.2.
o.
66.1105 (6m)(6) (c)(am) 8.2.
Theo. value of new construction in the tax incremental district, less the value of improvements removed from the tax incremental district.
SECTIONExpenditures 6.for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.
66.1105Such (6m)expenditures (c)may 9.be made through 2040.
of the statutes is created to read:
66.1105 (6m) (c) 9.
An analysis of the impact on property taxes and levy limits resulting from the value of new construction less improvements removed in each tax incremental district.
The analysis shall include all of the following:
a.
The values reported under subd.
8.
b.
The amount of the valuation factor under s.
66.0602 (1) (d) for the municipality that is attributable to the value reported under subd.
8.
for each tax incremental district for the current year and for each of the previous years from January 1, 2023, to the current year.
c.
The amount of the valuation factor under s.
66.0602 (1) (d) for the municipality that is attributable to the total of the values reported under subd.
8.
for all tax incremental districts in the municipality, expressed as a dollar amount and as a percentage.
d.
The amount of any increase in the municipality's property tax levy attributable to the total of the values reported under subd.
8., expressed as a dollar amount per each $100,000 of increase in the levy.
SECTION 7.0Effective dates.
This act takes effect on the day after publication, except as follows:
(1) REPORTING.
The treatment of ss.
66.1105 (5) (g), (6) (a) (intro.), and (6m) (c) 8.
and 9.
takes effect on January 1, 2023.
Show all 79 changed rows (39 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Substitute Senate Substitute Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 3-5-2022
-
Report approved by the Governor on 3-4-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 142
-
Presented to the Governor on 3-3-2022
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Placed on calendar 2-17-2022 by Committee on Rules
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Ballweg
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Ballweg
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection
-
Introduced by Senators Ballweg and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Dallman, Kurtz, Skowronski, Steffen, Tittl and Tusler
Sponsors
- Howard Marklein · Primary
- Ballweg · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 130 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Ballweg
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (130)
130 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 130 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (94)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| KERKMAN | — | Yea |
| KUGLITSCH | — | Yea |
| LOUDENBECK | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MEYERS | — | Yea |
| MYERS | — | Yea |
| OHNSTAD | — | Yea |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| POPE | — | Yea |
| RAMTHUN | — | Yea |
| RIEMER | — | Yea |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SANFELIPPO | — | Yea |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SHELTON | — | Yea |
| SKOWRONSKI | — | Yea |
| STEINEKE | — | Yea |
| TAUCHEN | — | Yea |
| THIESFELDT | — | Yea |
| BALDEH | — | Yea |
| BOWEN | — | Yea |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| BROSTOFF | — | Yea |
| CABRAL-GUEVA | — | Yea |
| CABRERA | — | Yea |
| CONLEY | — | Yea |
| CONSIDINE | — | Yea |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Yea |
| HEBL | — | Yea |
| HINTZ | — | Yea |
| HORLACHER | — | Yea |
| VORPAGEL | — | Yea |
| VRUWINK | — | Yea |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Yea |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Yea |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Yea |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Yea |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Yea |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Yea |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Yea |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Yea |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Yea |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Yea |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Yea |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Yea |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Yea |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Yea |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Yea |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Yea |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Yea |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 252?
- SB 252 is sponsored by Marklein, Howard (Republican) and Ballweg.
- What is the current status of SB 252?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 252?
- Track SB 252 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 252
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 252
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →