Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 252 — Relating to: extending the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the city of Wisconsin Dells and extending the time during which expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.

Last action — Published 3-5-2022

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

38 added · 100 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes made to SB 252 involve extending the time frames for financial activities related to Tax Incremental Districts (TIDs) in the city of Wisconsin Dells. Specifically, the allocation of tax increments for Tax Incremental District Number 2 has been extended until 2036, while project costs can now be incurred until 2031. Additionally, Tax Incremental District Number 3 can now allocate tax increments through 2040. This is important as it gives the city more time to invest in and develop these districts, potentially boosting economic growth and revitalization in the area.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRBs0305/1 JK:cjs/cdc/amn SENATE SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 252 January 12, 2022 - Offered by Senator BALLWEG .
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-1812/1 JK:cdc SENATE BILL 252 March 31, 2021 - Introduced by Senators BALLWEG and M ARKLEIN , cosponsored by Representatives D ALLMAN , KURTZ, SKOWRONSKI , STEFFEN, TITTLand T USLER .
A N A CT to amend 66.1105 (5) (g) and 66.1105 (6) (a) (intro.);
Referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection.
and to create 66.1105 (6) (a) 20., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2.
A N A CT to create 66.1105 (6) (a) 19., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2.
o., 66.1105 (6m) (c) 8.
n.
and 66.1105 (6m) (c) 9.
and 66.1105 (6) (am) 2.
o.
extending the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells and reporting the value of net new construction in tax incremental districts.
extending the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the city of Wisconsin Dells and extending the time during which expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under this bill, tax increments may be allocated for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city ofWisconsin Dells through 2036 and expenditures may be made for project costs for that TID through 2031.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under this bill, tax increments may be allocated for Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the city ofWisconsin Dells through 2036 and expenditures may be made for project costs for that TID through 2031.
The bill also allows expenditures for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells through 2040.
LRBs0305/1 - 2022 Legislature - 2 - JK:cjs/cdc/amn The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the city, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the city, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
site preparation costs;
site preparation - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1812/1 JK:cdc SENATE BILL 252 costs;
Under current law, each city or village that creates tax incremental districts must prepare and make available to the public updated annual reports describing the status of each existing tax incremental district, including expenditures and revenues.
The reports must contain certain information, including the name assigned to each district, the name of any developer who receives financial assistance from tax increments allocated for the district, and the amount of tax increments to be deposited into a special fund for that district.
Under the bill, the annual reports must also include the value of new construction in each tax incremental district, less the value of improvements removed from each district.
In addition, the bill requires the annual reports to include an analysis of the impact on property taxes and levy limits resulting from the value of new construction less improvements removed in each tax incremental district.
SECTION 1.
S ECTION 1.
66.1105 (5) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:
66.1105 (6) (a) 19.
66.1105 (5) (g) The department of revenue shall annually give notice to the designated finance officer of all governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within each district as to the equalized value of the property, the equalized value due to new construction less the value of improvements destroyed or removed, and the equalized value of the tax increment base.
The notice shall also explain that the tax increment allocated to a city shall be paid to the city as provided under sub.
(6) (b) from the taxes collected.
SECTION 2.
66.1105 (6) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
66.1105 (6) (a) (intro.) If the joint review board approves the creation of the tax incremental district under sub.
(4m), and subject to pars.
(ae) and (ag), positive tax LRBs0305/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - JK:cjs/cdc/amn SECTION 2 increments with respect to a tax incremental district are allocated to the city which created the district or, in the case of a city or village that annexes or attaches a district created under sub.
(16), to the annexing or attaching city or village, for each year commencing after the date when a project plan is adopted under sub.
(4) (g).
The department of revenue may not authorize allocation of tax increments until it determines from timely evidence submitted by the city that each of the procedures and documents required under sub.
(4) (d) to (f) has been completed and all related notices given in a timely manner.
The department of revenue may authorize allocation of tax increments for any tax incremental district only if the city clerk and assessor annually submit to the department all required information, including the value of new construction less the value of improvements destroyed or removed, in a form and manner prescribed by the department, on or before the 2nd Monday in June.
The facts supporting any document adopted or action taken to comply with sub.
(4) (d) to (f) are not subject to review by the department of revenue under this paragraph.
After the allocation of tax increments is authorized, the department of revenue shall annually authorize allocation of the tax increment to the city that created the district until the soonest of the following events:
SECTION 3.
66.1105 (6) (a) 20.
66.1105(6) (a) 20.
66.1105(6) (a) 19.
December 31, 2036, if the district is Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells and notwithstanding sub.
December 31, 2036, if the district is Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.
(4e) (e) 1., 3., and 6.
S ECTION 2.
and (g).
SECTION 4.
Show all 79 changed rows (39 more)
Previous
Latest
o.
n.
o.
n.
Expenditures for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells, notwithstanding sub.
Expenditures for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.
(4e) (e) 1., 3., and 6.
and (g).
LRBs0305/1 - 2022 Legislature - 4 - JK:cjs/cdc/amn SECTION 5 SECTION 5.
S ECTION 3.
66.1105 (6m) (c) 8.
66.1105 (6) (am) 2.
o.
66.1105 (6m) (c) 8.
66.1105 (6) (am) 2.
The value of new construction in the tax incremental district, less the value of improvements removed from the tax incremental district.
o.
SECTION 6.
Expenditures for project costs for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Wisconsin Dells.
66.1105 (6m) (c) 9.
Such expenditures may be made through 2040.
of the statutes is created to read:
66.1105 (6m) (c) 9.
An analysis of the impact on property taxes and levy limits resulting from the value of new construction less improvements removed in each tax incremental district.
The analysis shall include all of the following:
a.
The values reported under subd.
8.
b.
The amount of the valuation factor under s.
66.0602 (1) (d) for the municipality that is attributable to the value reported under subd.
8.
for each tax incremental district for the current year and for each of the previous years from January 1, 2023, to the current year.
c.
The amount of the valuation factor under s.
66.0602 (1) (d) for the municipality that is attributable to the total of the values reported under subd.
8.
for all tax incremental districts in the municipality, expressed as a dollar amount and as a percentage.
d.
The amount of any increase in the municipality's property tax levy attributable to the total of the values reported under subd.
8., expressed as a dollar amount per each $100,000 of increase in the levy.
SECTION 7.0Effective dates.
This act takes effect on the day after publication, except as follows:
(1) REPORTING.
The treatment of ss.
66.1105 (5) (g), (6) (a) (intro.), and (6m) (c) 8.
and 9.
takes effect on January 1, 2023.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Published 3-5-2022

  2. Report approved by the Governor on 3-4-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 142

  3. Presented to the Governor on 3-3-2022

  4. Report correctly enrolled

  5. LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

  6. Received from Assembly concurred in

  7. Ordered immediately messaged

  8. Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0

  9. Rules suspended

  10. Ordered to a third reading

  11. Read a second time

  12. Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  13. Placed on calendar 2-17-2022 by Committee on Rules

  14. Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  15. Received from Senate

  16. Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Read a third time and passed

  18. Rules suspended

  19. Ordered to a third reading

  20. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  21. Read a second time

  22. Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  24. Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  25. Available for scheduling

  26. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  27. Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  28. Executive action taken

  29. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Ballweg

  30. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Ballweg

  31. Public hearing held

  32. Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection

  33. Introduced by Senators Ballweg and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Dallman, Kurtz, Skowronski, Steffen, Tittl and Tusler

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 130 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (130)

130 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 130 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

CONCURRENCE

Passed 94 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 37000
Unaffiliated 39000
Democrat 18000
Total 94000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
KATSMA — Yea
KERKMAN — Yea
KUGLITSCH — Yea
LOUDENBECK — Yea
MACCO — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MEYERS — Yea
MYERS — Yea
OHNSTAD — Yea
OLDENBURG — Yea
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
POPE — Yea
RAMTHUN — Yea
RIEMER — Yea
ROZAR — Yea
SANFELIPPO — Yea
SCHRAA — Yea
SHELTON — Yea
SKOWRONSKI — Yea
STEINEKE — Yea
TAUCHEN — Yea
THIESFELDT — Yea
BALDEH — Yea
BOWEN — Yea
BRANDTJEN — Yea
BROSTOFF — Yea
CABRAL-GUEVA — Yea
CABRERA — Yea
CONLEY — Yea
CONSIDINE — Yea
EDMING — Yea
GOYKE — Yea
HEBL — Yea
HINTZ — Yea
HORLACHER — Yea
VORPAGEL — Yea
VRUWINK — Yea
SPEAKER — Yea
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Yea
Andraca, Deb Democrat Yea
Billings, Jill Democrat Yea
Doyle, Steve Democrat Yea
Drake, Dora Democrat Yea
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Yea
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Yea
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Yea
Hong, Francesca Democrat Yea
McGuire, Tip Democrat Yea
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Yea
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Yea
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Yea
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Yea
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Yea
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Yea
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Yea
Vining, Robyn Democrat Yea
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 252?
SB 252 is sponsored by Marklein, Howard (Republican) and Ballweg.
What is the current status of SB 252?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 252?
Track SB 252 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 252

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 252

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →