Relating to: high-performing charter schools authorized by school boards. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 967 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 967.
You're tracking AB 967
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 967 — Relating to: high-performing charter schools authorized by school boards. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
31 added · 64 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to AB 967 allow school boards to approve contracts for charter schools that include a provision enabling the charter school's governing board to open additional charter schools, provided that their existing schools rank in the top two performance categories in state accountability reports. This update makes it easier for high-performing charter schools to grow and expand, fostering more educational opportunities in Wisconsin. Essentially, if a charter school is doing well, it can open more schools without waiting for new contracts, promoting effective educational models.
-Date 2022of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-5984/1 KRP:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 967 February 8, 2022 - Introduced by Representatives W ITTKE, HIESFELDT , ITTRICH, BRANDTJEN , KNODL , MACCO , MAGNAFICI , MURPHY and R OZAR , cosponsored by Senators D ARLING, ROTH , TROEBEL and W ANGGAARD .
ReferredAssembly toBill Committee967 onDate Education.of publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 118.40 (2m) (a) and 118.40 (3) (a) of the statutes;
high-performinghigh−performing charter schools authorized by school boards.
AnalysisThe bypeople the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a school board, the Office of Educational Opportunity in the UWstate System (OEO), the City of Milwaukee,Wisconsin, therepresented chancellor of an institution in the118.40 UW(3) System,(a) aIf technical college district board, the countyschool executiveboard ofgrants Waukesha County, the collegepetition ofsenate Menominee Nation, and theassembly, Lacdo Courteenact Oreillesas Ojibwafollows: community college may contract with a person to operate a charter school.
Thoseunder entitiessub. are commonly referred to as charter school authorizers.
This bill provides that a contract to operate a charter school between a school board and a charter school governing board must allow the governing board to open additional charter schools if all of the charter schools operated by the governing board are in one of the top two performance categories on the Department of Public Instruction's most recent school and school district accountability report.
Current law requires that a contract between a charter school governing body and an authorizer other than a school board or the OEO must include such a provision.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
- 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5984/1 KRP:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 967 SECTION 1 SECTION 1.
118.40 (2m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
118.40 (2m) (a) A school board may on its own initiative contract with a person to operate a school as a charter school.
The contract shall include all of the provisions specified under sub.
(1m) (b) and may include other provisions agreed to by the parties.
The contract also shall include a provision allowing the governing board of the charter school to open one or more additional charter schools if all of the charter schools operated by the governing board were assigned to one of the top 2 performance categories in the most recent school and school district accountability report published under s.
115.385.
If the charter school governing board opens one or more additional charter schools, the existing contract applies to the new school or schools unless the parties agree to amend the existing contract or enter into a new contract.
SECTION 2.
118.40 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
118.40 (3) (a) If the school board grants the petition under sub.
to operateSECTION the1. school as a charter school under this section.
The118.40 contract(2m) shall(a) include all of the provisionsstatutes specifiedis inamended operate the petitionschool andas maya includecharter otherschool provisionsunder agreedthis tosection. by the parties.
The contract also shall include a provision allowing the governing board of the charter school to openread: one or more additional charter schools if all of the charter schools operated by the governing board were assigned to one of the top 2 performance categories in the most recent school and school district accountability report published under s.
118.40(2m) (a) Aschoolboardmayonitsowninitia- The contract shall include all of the provisions specified tive contract with a person to operate a school as a charter in the petition and may include other provisions agreed school.
The contract shall include all of the provisions to by the parties.
The contract also shall include a provi- sion allowing the governing board of the charter school specified under sub.
(1m) (b) and may include other pro- to open one or more additional charter schools if all of the visions agreed to by the parties.
The contract also shall charter schools operated by the governing board were include a provision allowing the governing board of the charter school to open one or more additional charter assigned to one of the top 2 performance categories in the schools if all of the charter schools operated by the gov- most recent school and school district accountability erning board were assigned to one of the top 2 perfor- report published under s.
If the charter school governingmance boardcategories opensin one or more additional charter schools, the existingmost contractrecent appliesschool toand the new school orgoverning schoolsboard unlessopens theone partiesor agreemore toadditional amendcharter thedistrict existingaccountability contractreport orpublished enterunder intos. a new contract.
LRB-5984/1115.385. - 2022 Legislature - 3 - KRP:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 967 SECTION 3 SECTION 3.Initial applicability.
(1)schools, Thisthe actexisting firstcontract applies to athe contractnew thatschool isor enteredschools into,unless renewed,the parties agree to amend the existing If the charter school governing board opens one or modifiedmore onadditional charter schools, the effectiveexisting datecontract ofapplies thisto subsection.contract or enter into a new contract.
(END)the new school or schools unless the parties agree to SECTION 3.0Initial applicability.
amend the existing contract or enter into a new contract.
(1) This act first applies to a contract that is entered SECTION 2.
118.40 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended into, renewed, or modified on the effective date of this to read:
subsection.
* Section 991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill allows charter school governing boards to open additional charter schools if they meet performance criteria in accountability reports.
-
118.40 (2m) (a)
The contract also shall include a provision allowing the governing board of the charter school to open one or more additional charter schools if all of the charter schools operated by the governing board were assigned to one of the top 2 performance categories in the most recent school and school district accountability report published under s. 115.385.
This change allows charter school governing boards to expand their operations based on performance.
-
118.40 (3) (a)
The contract also shall include a provision allowing the governing board of the charter school to open one or more additional charter schools if all of the charter schools operated by the governing board were assigned to one of the top 2 performance categories in the most recent school and school district accountability report published under s. 115.385.
This change requires similar performance-based provisions in contracts for schools that are formed from granted petitions.
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-10-2022
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 11
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Representative Steffen added as a coauthor
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 5
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
-
Introduced by Representatives Wittke, Thiesfeldt, Dittrich, Brandtjen, Knodl, Macco, Magnafici, Murphy and Rozar; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Roth, Stroebel and Wanggaard
Sponsors
- Rozar · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
- Magnafici · Primary
- Macco · Primary
- Daniel Knodl · Primary
- Brandtjen · Primary
- Barbara Dittrich · Primary
- Thiesfeldt · Primary
- Robert Wittke · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →9 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 123 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (9)
- Rozar
- Murphy, David Republican
- Magnafici
- Macco
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
- Brandtjen
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Thiesfeldt
- Wittke, Robert Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (123)
123 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 123 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 33% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| BALLWEG | — | Not Voting |
| ERPENBACH | — | Not Voting |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 967?
- AB 967 is sponsored by Rozar, Murphy, David (Republican), Magnafici, Macco, Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Brandtjen, Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Thiesfeldt, and Wittke, Robert (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 967?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 967?
- Track AB 967 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 967
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 967
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →