Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: To Executive 7 R cosponsors

AB 49 — Relating to: the wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program. (FE)

Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

273 added · 11 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest amendment to Assembly Bill 49 updates the effective dates for certain provisions related to wildlife damage claims, changing them from 2021 to 2022 and from 2022 to 2023. Additionally, it clarifies that specific aspects of the wildlife damage claim payment rules will take effect retroactively to January 1, 2022. These changes aim to ensure that the rules are applied correctly going forward and that claims are processed fairly for damages incurred in the past. This matters because it provides clarity for landowners facing wildlife damage and helps ensure timely compensation.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRBa1074/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 49 January 18, 2022 - Offered by RepresentatiDMING .
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-0509/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 February 10, 2021 - Introduced by Representatives E DMING, ARMSTRONG , CALLAHAN, KRUG , MILRO, M OSES, MURSAU, PLUMER , OZAR, SKOWRONSKI , SPIRO, TAUCHEN and VANDERM EER, cosponsored by Senators PETROWSKI, BEWLEY, OWLES and M ARKLEIN.
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Agriculture.
A N A CT to repeal 29.889 (2) (c), 29.889 (2) (d), 29.889 (3), 29.889 (4) (a), 29.889 (6) (a), 29.889 (7) (b) 4., 29.889 (7) (bm) and 29.89 (3) (a);
to renumber 29.889 (7m) (ar) 1.
and 2.;
to consolidate, renumber and amend 29.889 (5) (b) and (c);
to amend 20.370 (5) (fq), 29.889 (2) (a), 29.889 (4) (b), 29.889 (4) (c), 29.889 (5) (a), 29.889 (5) (bm), 29.889 (5) (bs), 29.889 (6) (d), 29.889 (6) (em), 29.889 (6) (f), 29.889 (7) (a), 29.889 (7) (b) (intro.), 29.889 (7) (b) 2., 29.889 (7) (b) 3., 29.889 (7) (d) 2., 29.889 (7m) (a), 29.889 (7m) (ar) (intro.), 29.889 (8g), 29.889 (8r) and 29.89 (5) (b) 2.
c.;
and to create 29.889 (5) (d) and 29.889 (7m) (ar) 2m.
of the statutes;relating to:
the wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill makes changes to the wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program.
Current law authorizes a person who owns, leases, or controls land on which certain wild animals cause damage to crops or livestock (wildlife damage) to apply to the county for wildlife damage claim payments and for wildlife damage abatement - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-0509/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 assistance (wildlife damage payments).
Wildlife damage for which a person is eligible to receive wildlife damage payments includes damage caused by deer, bears, geese, and cougars, as well as elk and sandhill cranes if hunting those animals is authorized.
Current law requires that, to be eligible for wildlife damage payments, the location must be in a county that participates in the administration of these programs.
A county must apply to the Department of Natural Resources to administer these programs, including in its application a plan of administration that meets certain requirements.
Once approved, DNR provides funding to the county for the costs incurred in administering these programs.
Under current law and DNR rule, a county pays 75 percent of the actual costs of providing wildlife damage abatement assistance, for which it is reimbursed by DNR, and the person receiving the assistance pays 25 percent of the costs.
DNR pays wildlife damage claims directly.
Effective January 1, 2022, this bill removes counties from the administration of these programs and requires DNR to administer the programs instead.
The bill specifies that, if DNR provides wildlife damage abatement assistance to a person, it must determine the actual cost of providing that assistance and pay 75 percent of that cost, leaving the remaining 25 percent as the responsibility of the recipient.
The bill eliminates a $10,000 limit under current law on the total amount that may be paid to a claimant for each damage claim.
The bill maintains the current law requirement that DNR pay claimants on a prorated basis if there is not a sufficient amount appropriated to pay all claims.
The bill also eliminates the requirement under current law that a county participate in the administration of these programs in order to be eligible for reimbursement by DNR for the costs that the county incurs in processing and donating venison from certain deer carcasses and in processing and donating meat from certain wild turkey carcasses.
Under current law, the type of wildlife damage that is eligible for wildlife damage claim payments is limited to damage to commercial seedings or crops growing on agricultural land, damage to crops that have been harvested for sale or further use but that have not been removed from the agricultural land, damage to orchard trees or nursery stock, and damage to apiaries or livestock.
This bill adds that damage to commercial seedings or crops growing on agricultural land caused by operating a vehicle in a field in order to place a bear trap under the wildlife damage abatement program is eligible for a wildlife damage claim payment.
Under current law, if the amount of a wildlife damage claim exceeds $500 but does not exceed $5,250, the claimant is paid 100 percent of the amount, and if the amount of the claim exceeds $5,250, the claimant is paid that amount plus 80 percent of the amount that exceeds $5,250.
This bill increases the wildlife damage claim amount threshold from $5,250 to $5,500.
Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person may receive wildlife damage payments only if the person opens the land for hunting the type of animal that caused the wildlife damage.
Under this bill, this hunting requirement does not apply to a person who receives wildlife damage abatement assistance to acquire a LRB-0509/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 bear trap for land the person leases if the person waives any eligibility to receive a wildlife damage claim payment for damage caused by bears.
Under the bill, effective June 30, 2021, DNR must require all bear traps acquired with wildlife damage abatement assistance to be equipped with remote monitors, including traps placed under the program prior to the effective date of the bill.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
20.370 (5) (fq) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.370 (5) (fq) Wildlife damage claims and abatement.
All moneys received under ss.
29.181, 29.559 (1r), and 29.563 (13) and not appropriated under par.
(fr) and subs.
(1) (hs), (hx), and (Ls) and (5) (fs) to provide state aidife damage abatement program under s.
Show all 220 changed rows (180 more)
Previous
Latest
29.889 (5) (c) (b) and the wildlife damage claim program under s.
29.889 (7) (d), for county administration costs under s.
29.889 (2) (d), and for payments under s.
29.89.
S ECTION 2.
29.889 (2) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889(2) (a) Assistancedministration.
The department shall assist counties in developing develop and administering administer the wildlife damage abatement and wildlife damage claim programs.
The department shall provide this assistance through technical aid, program guidance, research, demonstration, funding, plan review, audit and evaluation services.
S ECTION 3.
29.889 (2) (c) of the statutes is repealed.
S ECTION 4.
29.889 (2) (d) of the statutes is repealed.
S ECTION 5.
29.889 (3) of the statutes is repealed.
S ECTION 6.
29.889 (4) (a) of the statutes is repealed.
S ECTION 7.
29.889 (4) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
- 2022 Legislature - 4 - LRB-0509/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 SECTION 7 29.889 (4) (b) Filing of application.
In order to be eligible for wildlife damage abatement assistance, a person is required to file an application with the participating county department in a form acceptable to the county department.
An owner or lessee of land, a person who controls land, or an owner of an apiary or livestock may file an application.
SECTION 8.
29.889 (4) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (4) (c) Other eligibility requirements.
In order to be eligible for wildlife damage abatement assistance, a person is required to comply with eligibility requirements adopted by the department under sub.
(2) (b) and with eligibility requirements specified in the plan administration under sub.
(3) (c).
SECTION 9.
29.889 (5) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (5) (a) Review.
A participating countye department shall review each application for wildlife damage abatement assistance to determine if wildlife damage is occurring or likely to occur.
SECTION 10.
29.889 (5) (b) and (c) of the statutes are consolidated, renumbered 29.889 (5) (b) and amended to read:
29.889(5) (b) Assistance.
A participating county The department may provide wildlife damage assistance where wildlife damage is occurring or is likely to occur for the reimbursement of costs associated with wildlife damage abatement measures if the measures are authorized in the plan of administration under sub.
(3) (c) 2.
(c) State aid.
The rules adopted by the department under sub.
(2) (b) and are carried out in full compliance with the direction of the department.
If the department provides wildlife damage abatement assistance to a person, the department shall determine the actual cost of providing that wildlife damage abatement assistance.
The department shall pay participating counties 75 percent of the actual cost of LRB-0509/1 - 2022 Legislature - 5 - EHS:amn S ECTION 10 ASSEMBLY BILL 49 providing wildlife damage abatement assistance if wildlife damage abatement measures are carried out in full compliance with the direction of the county and with funding requirements adopted under sub.
(2) (b) and shall require the recipient to be responsible for the remaining 25 percent of that cost.
SECTION 11.
29.889 (5) (bm) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (5) (bm) Cost-effectiveness of abatement.
A participating county department may recommend only those wildlife damage abatement measures that are cost-effective in relation to the wildlife damage claim payments that would be paid if the wildlife damage abatement measures are not implemented.
SECTION 12.
29.889 (5) (bs) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (5) (bs) Abatement authorized.
Notwithstanding par.
(bm), for damage caused by elk to crops or grasses grown for use by a bird hunting preserve licensed under ch.
169, a participating county the department may recommend fencing the affected property as a damage abatement measure.
SECTION 13.
29.889 (5) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
29.889 (5) (d) Bear traps.
The department shall require that any bear trap acquired with wildlife damage abatement assistance be equipped with a remote monitor.
SECTION 14.
29.889 (6) (a) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 15.
29.889 (6) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (6) (d) Compliance with wildlife damage abatement measures.
In order to be eligible for wildlife damage claim payments for an occurrence of wildlife damage, a person seeking wildlife damage claim payments shall have complied with any wildlife damage abatement measures to abate that wildlife damage that were recommended by the countydepartment.
- 2022 Legislature - 6 - LRB-0509/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 SECTION 16 SECTION 16.
29.889 (6) (em) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (6) (em) Type of wildlife damage.
The type of wildlife damage that is eligible for wildlife damage claim payments shall be limited to damage to commercial seedings or crops growing on agricultural land, damage to crops that have been harvested for sale or further use but that have not been removed from the agricultural land, damage to orchard trees or nursery stock, or damage to apiaries or livestock.
Damage to commercial seedings or crops growing on agricultural land caused by operating a vehicle in a field in order to place a bear trap pursuant to the wildlife damage abatement program is eligible for wildlife damage claim payment.
SECTION 17.
29.889 (6) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (6) (f) Other eligibility requirements.
In order to be eligible for wildlife damage claim payments, a person is required to comply with eligibility requirements adopted by the department under sub.
(2) (b) and with eligibility requirements specified in the plan of administration under sub.
(3) (c).
SECTION 18.
29.889 (7) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (7) (a) InvestigationA participating countyThe department shall investigate each statement of claim and determine the total amount of the wildlife damage that occurred, regardless of the amount that may be eligible for payment under par.
(b).
SECTION 19.
29.889 (7) (b) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (7) (b) Calculating amount of payment.
(intro.) In calculating the amount of the wildlife damage claim payment to be paid for a claim under par.
(a), the participating countypartment shall determine the amount as follows:
SECTION 20.
29.889 (7) (b) 2.
of the statutes is amended to read:
LRB-0509/1 - 2022 Legislature - 7 - EHS:amn S ECTION 20 ASSEMBLY BILL 49 29.889 (7) (b) 2.
If the amount of claim is more than $500 but not more than $5,250 $5,500, the claimant will be paid 100 percent of the amount of the claim that exceeds $500.
SECTION 21.
29.889 (7) (b) 3.
of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (7) (b) 3.
If the amount of the claim is more than $5,2500, the claimant will be paid the amount calculated under subd.
2., plus 80 percent of the amount of the claim that exceeds $5,250, subject to subd.
4.
$5,500.
SECTION 22.
29.889 (7) (b) 4.
of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 23.
29.889 (7) (bm) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 24.
29.889 (7) (d) 2.
of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (7) (d) 2.
The department shall pay claimants under subd.
Page 9, line 22:
from the appropriation under s.
delete “2022" and substitute “2023".
20.370 (5) (fq) after first deducting from s.
2.
20.370 (5) (fq) payments made for county administrative costs under sub.
Page 9, line 25:
(2) (d) and payments made for wildlife damage abatement assistance under sub.
delete “2021" and substitute “2022".
(5) (c)f the amount remaining after these deductions from the appropriation under s.
3.
20.370 (5) (fq) are not sufficient to pay the full amount required under subd.
Page 10, line 3:
1., the department shall pay claimants on a prorated basis.
after that line insert:
SECTION 25.
“(3) IMIT ON WILDLIFE DAMAGE CLAIM PAYMENTThe treatment of s.
29.889 (7m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (7) (b) 2., 3., and 4.
29.889 (7m) (a) Requirements.
takes effect retroactively to January 1, 2022.”.
A person who receives wildlife damage abatement assistance or wildlife damage claim payments and any other person who owns, leases, or controls the land where the wildlife damage occurred shall permit hunting of the type of wild animals causing the wildlife damage on that land and on contiguous land under the same ownership, lease or control, subject to par.
(ae).
In order to satisfy the requirement to permit hunting under this subsection, the land shall be open to hunting during the appropriate open season.
The county, with the - 2022 Legislature - 8 - LRB-0509/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 SECTION 25 assistance of theepartment, shall determine the acreage of land suitable for hunting.
SECTION 26.
29.889 (7m) (ar) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (7m) (ar) Exemption;
land not required to be open to hunting.
(intro.) The requirement under par.
(a) does not apply to a any of the following:
1m.
A person to whom the department grants a shooting permit for deer causing damage that is issued as an abatement measure recommended under this section if all of the following apply:
SECTION 27.
29.889 (7m) (ar) 1.
and 2.
of the statutes are renumbered 29.889 (7m) (ar) 1m.
a.
and b.
SECTION 28.
29.889 (7m) (ar) 2m.
of the statutes is created to read:
29.889 (7m) (ar) 2m.
A person who acquires a bear trap with wildlife damage abatement assistance under this section if all of the following apply:
a.
The person leases the land on which the trap is placed.
b.
The person waives any eligibility to receive a wildlife damage claim payment under sub.
(7) for wildlife damage caused by bears.
SECTION 29.
29.889 (8g) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (8g) REVIEW.A participating county'se department's determination of the amount of wildlife damage, the amount of a wildlife damage claim, or the amount of wildlife damage abatement assistance shall be treated as a final decisions decision for purposes of review.
SECTION 30.
29.889 (8r) of the statutes is amended to read:
29.889 (8r) RECORDS;
ENTRY TO LAND(a) Records.
A person receiving wildlife damage abatement assistance or wildlife damage claim payments shall retain all records as required by the participating county or the department and make them LRB-0509/1 - 2022 Legislature - 9 - EHS:amn SECTION 30 ASSEMBLY BILL 49 available to the participating county or thetment for inspection at reasonable times.
(b) Entry to land.
The department or a participating counmay enter and inspect, at reasonable times, any land for which a wildlife damage claim has been filed or for which wildlife damage abatement measures have been implemented.
(c) Responsibilities.
No person may refuse entry or access to or withhold records from the department or the participating county under this subsection.
No person may obstruct or interfere with an inspection by the department or a participating county under this subsection.
The department or participating county, if requested, shall furnish to the person a report setting forth all of the factual findings by the department or participating countyt relate to the inspection.
SECTION 31.
29.89 (3) (a) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 32.
29.89 (5) (b) 2.
c.
of the statutes is amended to read:
29.89 (5) (b) 2.
c.
Moneys are available under s.
20.370 (5) (fq) after first deducting from s.
20.370 (5) (fq) payments made for county administrative costs, payments made for wildlife damage abatement assistance, and wildlife damage claim payments under s.
29.889.
SECTION 33.Initial applicability.
(1) REMOTE MONITORING OF BEAR TRAPS.The treatment of s.
29.889 (5) (d) first applies to a bear trap acquired with wildlife damage abatement assistance on July 2, 1983.
SECTION 34.Effective dates.
This act takes effect on January 1, 2022, except as follows:
(1) REMOTE MONITORING OF BEAR TRAPS.The treatment of s.
29.889 (5) (d) and SECTION 33 (1) of this act take effect on June 30, 2021.
- 2022 Legislature - 10 - LRB-0509/1 EHS:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 49 SECTION 34 (2) TYPES OF ELIGIBLE DAMAGE AND HUNTING LAND EXEMPTIOThe treatment of s.
20.889 (6) (em) and (7m) (ar) (intro.), 1., 2., and 2m.
takes effect on the day after publication.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Read first time and referred to committee on Sporting Heritage, Small Business and Rural Issues

  3. Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  4. Received from Assembly

  5. Ordered immediately messaged

  6. Read a third time and passed

  7. Rules suspended

  8. Ordered to a third reading

  9. Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  10. Read a second time

  11. Made a special order of business at 8:02 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  12. Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  14. Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  15. Executive action taken

  16. Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Edming

  17. LRB correction

  18. Public hearing held

  19. Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  20. LRB correction

  21. Fiscal estimate received

  22. Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  23. Introduced by Representatives Edming, Armstrong, Callahan, Krug, Milroy, Moses, Mursau, Plumer, Rozar, Skowronski, Spiros, Tauchen and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Bewley, Cowles and Marklein

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

13 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (13)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

environment agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 49?
AB 49 is sponsored by VanderMeer, Nancy (Republican), Tauchen, Spiros, John (Republican), Skowronski, Rozar, Plumer, Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Moses, Clint (Republican), Milroy, Krug, Scott (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), Armstrong, David (Republican), and Edming.
What is the current status of AB 49?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 49?
Track AB 49 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 49

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 49

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →