SB 591 — Relating to: informed consent regarding a certain abortion-inducing drug regimen and reporting requirements for induced abortions.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
55 added · 142 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to SB 591 introduce additional reporting requirements for induced abortions, specifically focusing on informed consent for abortion-inducing drug regimens. Notably, it now requires tracking various reasons for undergoing an abortion, such as previous abortions, emotional or physical health concerns, and financial circumstances. This change matters because it aims to enhance understanding of why women seek abortions, potentially impacting public health policies and support services for women facing these decisions.
-Date 2022of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-4539/1 TJD:emw SENATE BILL 591 October 4, 2021 - Introduced by Senators KAPENGA, BALLWEG , ERNIER , RADLEY, F ELZKOWSKI, AGLER, LEM AHIEU, MARKLEIN, NASS, OTH, STROEBEL, ESTIN and W ANGGAARD , cosponsored by RepresentativesOS, DUCHOW , LLEN, CALLAHAN, D ITTRIC, E DMING, G UNDRUM , K ATSMA, K NODL, LOUDENBECK , M AGNAFIC, M URPHY, P ENTERMAN , PLUMER , J.R ODRIGUEZ, R OZAR, SCHRAA , SORTWELL, SPIROS, SUMMERFIELD , THIESFELDT, TITT, TUSLER and W ITTKE.
ReferredSenate toBill Committee591 onDate Health.of publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 69.186 (1) (hm) and 69.186 (2) (intro.) and (a);
informed consent regarding a certain abortion-inducingabortion−inducing drug regimen and reporting requirements for induced abortions.
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Thisrepresented billin requires2. certain information regarding an abortion-inducing drug regimen to be provided to a woman that is planning to have an abortion induced by the abortion-inducing drug regimen.
The bill also adds to the information required to be reported for induced abortions.
Informed consent Under current law, a woman upon whom an abortion is to be performed or induced must give voluntary and informed written consent to an abortion.
Except in a medical emergency, a woman's consent to an abortion is considered informed only if, at least 24 hours before the abortion is performed or induced, the physician or an assistant has, in person, orally provided the woman with certain information and given to the woman certain written materials.
If the pregnancy is the result of sexual assault or incest, the 24-hour period, but not the provision of information, may be waived or reduced under certain circumstances.
The bill requires a physician, as part of the information that must be provided, to inform the woman, - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4539/1 TJD:emw SENATE BILL 591 if she is considering or planning to have an abortion induced by an abortion-inducing drug regimen that includes mifepristone, that the ingestion of the first drug in the abortion-inducing drug regimen may not result in an immediate abortion and that, if the woman changes her mind after ingesting the first drug, the woman may be able to continue the pregnancy but time is of the essence and she should contact a physician to discuss options or consult the information provided in the materials that she is required to be given to locate a health care professional that can assist in counteracting the effects of the drug.
The bill requires the Department of Health Services to include with the written materials that a woman considering an abortion must be given materials that are designed to inform a woman about the possibilities of continuing a pregnancy after ingesting an abortion-inducing drug, including contact information for resources and health care professionals that assist women in counteracting the effects of the drug and continuing their pregnancies.
Induced abortion reporting The bill requires a hospital, clinic, or other facility in which an induced abortion is performed to report additional information in its required annual report to DHS.
Under current law, the report must include, among other pieces of information, for each patient, the state, and county if Wisconsin, of residence;
certain demographic information;
the month and year in which the abortion was performed;
the number of weeks since the patient's last menstrual period;
whether the abortion was chemically or surgically induced or surgically induced following a failed chemical abortion;
any resulting complications;
and certain information for abortions of an unborn child capable of experiencing pain.
The bill adds to the information required in the report the number of previous induced abortions, if any;
whether the induced abortion was paid for by private health coverage, public assistance coverage, or self-pay;
and the reason for the induced abortion as selected from a list of reasons specified in the bill.
The bill also requires reporting of the specific method of a chemical or surgical abortion and includes intrauterine instillation as a selection for the method of abortion.
Under current law, DHS is required to collect the reported information in a manner that ensures anonymity of the patient who obtained the abortion, the health care provider who performed the abortion, and the hospital, clinic, or other facility in which the abortion was performed.
DHS is also required to publish annual demographic summaries of the reported information except that which reveals the identity of a patient, provider, or hospital, clinic, or other facility.
The bill eliminates the anonymity of the hospital, clinic, or other facility in which the abortion was performed and requires that the annual summary by DHS include information summarized by hospital, clinic, or other facility in which the abortion was performed.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
69.186 (1) (gg) and (gm) of the statutes are created to read:
LRB-4539/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - TJD:emw SECTION 1 SENATE BILL 591 69.186 (1) (gg) The number of previous induced abortions, if any.
(gm) Whether the induced abortion was paid for by private health coverage, public assistance coverage, or self-pay.
SECTION 2.
69.186 (1) (hm) of the statutes is amended to read:
69.186 (1) (hm) Whether the abortion was a chemically induced abortion, and, if so, whether mifepristone, misoprostol, a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, methotrexate, or another medication was used;
a surgical abortion and, if so, whether dilation and curettage, dilation and evacuation, hysterectomy or hysterotomy, or another surgical method was used;
or an intrauterine instillation and whether the abortion was a surgical abortion following a failed or incomplete chemical abortion.
SECTION 3.
69.186 (1) (m) of the statutes is created to read:
69.186 (1) (m) The reason for the induced abortion as selected from any of the following reasons:
1.
Show all 88 changed lines (48 more)
The pregnancy was the result of rape.
2.
senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
69.186 (1) (gg) and (gm) of the statutes are created to read:
The woman'swoman’s emotional health is at stake.
69.186 (1) (gg) The number of previous induced 6.
The woman'swoman’s physical health is at stake.
abortions, if any.
The woman will suffer substantial and irreversible (gm) Whether the induced abortion was paid for by impairment of a major bodily function if the pregnancy private health coverage, public assistance coverage, or continues.
self−pay.
9.SECTION 2.
The69.186 reason(1) is(hm) unknownof or the womanstatutes refusedis to9. provide a reason.
SECTIONThe 4.reason is unknown or the woman refused to amended to read:
69.186provide (2)a (intro.)reason. and (a) of the statutes are amended to read:
-69.186 2022(1) Legislature(hm) -Whether 4the -abortion LRB-4539/1was TJD:emwa SENATEchemi- BILL 591 SECTION 44. 69.186 (2) (intro.) The department shall collect the information under sub.
(1)69.186 in(2) a(intro.) manner which the department shall specify and which(a) ensuresof the anonymitystatutes ofcally a patient who receives an induced abortion, andand, aif healthso, carewhether providermifepristone, whoare providesamended anto inducedread: abortion and a hospital, clinic or other facility in which an induced abortion is performed.
Themisoprostol, departmenta shallcombination publish annual demographic summaries of themifepristone informationand obtainedmisop- under69.186 this(2) section(intro.) includingThe information summarized by hospital, clinic, or other facility in which an induced abortion is performed, except that the department mayshall notcollect disclose any information obtained under this section that reveals the identityrostol, ofmethotrexate, any patient, or healthanother caremedication providerwas orused; hospital, clinic or other facility and shall ensure anonymity in all of the following ways:
(a)a The department may use information concerning the patient number under sub.
(1) (b)in ora concerningmanner which the identitydepart- surgical abortion and, if so, whether dilation and curet- ment shall specify and which ensures the anonymity of a specifictage, reportingdilation hospital,and clinicevacuation, hysterectomy or otherhystero- facilitypatient forwho purposesreceives ofan informationinduced collectionabortion, only and maya nothealth reproducetomy, or extrapolateanother thissurgical informationmethod forwas anyused; purpose.
or an care provider who provides an induced abortion and a intrauterine instillation and whether the abortion was a hospital, clinic or other facility in which an induced abor- surgical abortion following a failed or incomplete chemi- tion is performed.
The department shall publish annual cal abortion.
demographic summaries of the information obtained SECTION 3.
69.186 (1) (m) of the statutes is created under this section including information summarized by to read:
hospital, clinic, or other facility in which an induced 69.186 (1) (m) The reason for the induced abortion abortion is performed, except that the department may as selected from any of the following reasons:
not disclose any information obtained under this section 1.
The pregnancy was the result of rape.
that reveals the identity of any patient, or health care * Section 991.11ISCONSINSTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2021 Senate Bill 591 provider or hospital, clinic or other facility and shall the first drug, the woman may be able to continue the ensure anonymity in all of the following ways:
pregnancy but time is of the essence and she should con- (a) The department may use information concerning tact a physician to discuss options or consult the informa- the patient number under sub.
(1) (b) or concerning the tion provided in the materials under par.
(d) to locate a identity of a specific reporting hospital, clinic or other health care professional that can assist in counteracting facility for purposes of information collection only and the effects of the drug.
may not reproduce or extrapolate this information for any SECTION 6.
253.10 (3) (d) 2m.
of the statutes is cre- purpose.
ated to read:
of the statutes is createdcre- ated to read:
253.10 (3) (c) 1.
hr.
If the woman is considering or planning to have an abortion induced by an abortion-inducing drug regimen that includes mifepristone, that the ingestion of the first drug in the abortion-inducing drug regimen may not result in an immediate abortion and that, if the woman changes her mind after ingesting the first drug, the woman may be able to continue the pregnancy but time is of the essence and she should contact a physician to discuss options or consult the information provided in the materials under par.
(d) to locate a health care professional that can assist in counteracting the effects of the drug.
SECTION 6.
ofMaterials thethat statutesare isdesigned created to read:253.10 (3) (c) 1.
LRB-4539/1hr. - 2022 Legislature - 5 - TJD:emw SECTION 6 SENATE BILL 591 253.10 (3) (d) 2m.
MaterialsIf thatthe arewoman designedis toconsidering or inform a woman about the possibilities of continuing a planning to have an abortion induced by an abortion− pregnancy after ingesting an abortion-inducingabortion−inducing drug.
inducing drug regimen that includes mifepristone, that The materials shall include contact information for resources and health care professionals that assist women the ingestion of the first drug in the abortion−inducing drug regimen may not result in an immediate abortion in counteracting the effects of the drug and continuing and that, if the woman changes her mind after ingesting their pregnancies.
(END)
Show all 88 changed rows (48 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 12-3-2021
-
Presented to the Governor on 12-2-2021
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 55, Noes 39, Paired 2
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor
-
Placed on calendar 10-27-2021 by Committee on Rules
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 11
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 10-20-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Representative Kurtz added as a cosponsor
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Representative James added as a cosponsor
-
Representatives Born and Krug added as cosponsors
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health
-
Introduced by Senators Kapenga, Ballweg, Bernier, Bradley, Felzkowski, Jagler, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Roth, Stroebel, Testin and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Vos, Duchow, Allen, Callahan, Dittrich, Edming, Gundrum, Katsma, Knodl, Loudenbeck, Magnafici, Murphy, Penterman, Plumer, J. Rodriguez, Rozar, Schraa, Sortwell, Spiros, Summerfield, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tusler and Wittke
Sponsors
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Patrick Testin · Primary
- Stroebel · Primary
- Roth · Primary
- Steve Nass · Primary
- Howard Marklein · Primary
- Devin LeMahieu · Primary
- John Jagler · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Julian Bradley · Primary
- Bernier · Primary
- Ballweg · Primary
- Chris Kapenga · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →13 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 27 voted No
Sponsors (13)
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- Testin, Patrick Republican
- Stroebel
- Roth
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- LeMahieu, Devin Republican
- Jagler, John Republican
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- Bradley, Julian Republican
- Bernier
- Ballweg
- Kapenga, Chris Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 37 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 39 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 41% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (94)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| CABRERA | — | Nay |
| CONLEY | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| HEBL | — | Nay |
| HINTZ | — | Nay |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| KERKMAN | — | Yea |
| KUGLITSCH | — | Yea |
| LOUDENBECK | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MEYERS | — | Nay |
| MILROY | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUN | — | Nay |
| MYERS | — | Nay |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| POPE | — | Nay |
| RAMTHUN | — | Nay |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SHANKLAND | — | Nay |
| SHELTON | — | Nay |
| SKOWRONSKI | — | Yea |
| STEINEKE | — | Yea |
| THIESFELDT | — | Yea |
| VORPAGEL | — | Yea |
| VRUWINK | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| BALDEH | — | Nay |
| BOWEN | — | Nay |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| BROSTOFF | — | Nay |
| CABRAL-GUEVA | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Nay |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 33% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| BEWLEY | — | Nay |
| RINGHAND | — | Nay |
| ERPENBACH | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Johnson, LaTonya | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 591?
- SB 591 is sponsored by Wanggaard, Van (Republican), Testin, Patrick (Republican), Stroebel, Roth, Nass, Steve (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), LeMahieu, Devin (Republican), Jagler, John (Republican), Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Bradley, Julian (Republican), Bernier, Ballweg, and Kapenga, Chris (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 591?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 591?
- Track SB 591 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 591
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 591
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →