Relating to: distribution of the aid payment for personal property upon termination of a tax incremental di...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 56 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 56.
You're tracking AB 56
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 56 — Relating to: distribution of the aid payment for personal property upon termination of a tax incremental district. (FE)
Last action — Published 7-9-2021
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
11 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
42 added · 17 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Assembly Bill 56 clarifies how state aid payments for personal property taxes are distributed after a tax incremental district terminates. Previously, the bill did not specify how aid would be allocated for districts that had ended before the amendment's effective date. Now, it ensures that municipalities and other taxing jurisdictions will receive past aid payments that the terminated district would have received, which helps those areas maintain funding for local services. This change is significant because it provides financial support to communities affected by the early termination of tax incremental districts.
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRBa0250/1LRB-0707/1 JK:cdcJK:skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 56 MarchFebruary 16,10, 2021 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentativeRepresentatives TEFFEN.STEFFEN, BOWEN, DITTRICH, G UNDRUM , MURPHY , NOVAK , PETERSEN, ROZAR , SKOWRONSKI , SPIROS and ZIMMERMAN , cosponsored by Senators B ERNIER, RINGHAND and STROEBEL .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendWays theand billMeans. as follows:
1.A N A CT to amend 79.096 (3);
Pageand 2,to linecreate 12:79.095 (4) (d) of the statutes;
afterrelating “thereafter."to: insert “For a tax incremental district that terminated prior to the effective date of this subsection ....
[LRBdistribution insertsof date], if the taxaid incremental district received a payment underfor thispersonal subsectionproperty priorupon to its termination date, the department of administrationa shall, with the distribution in 2021, distribute to the municipality and applicable taxing jurisdictions the sum of all such payments that would have been paid to the tax incremental districtdistrict. from its termination date to 2021 had the district not terminated.
InAnalysis 2022,by andthe inLegislative eachReference yearBureau thereafter,Under thecurrent departmentlaw, ofeach administrationmunicipality, shallcounty, distributeschool todistrict, thespecial municipalitypurpose district, tax incremental district, and thetechnical applicablecollege taxingdistrict jurisdictions(taxing thejurisdiction) amountreceives ofa thestate lastaid payment to compensate for the personal property taxes that the taxing jurisdictions would have collected on tax incrementalexempt districtcomputers, receivedmachinery, undertools, thisand subsection.".patterns.
The bill clarifies that following the termination of a tax incremental district the amount that would have been paid to the tax incremental district is distributed to the other applicable taxing jurisdictions.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
79.095 (4) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
79.095 (4) (d) Each taxing jurisdiction shall attribute to each tax incremental district within the taxing jurisdiction the district's proportionate share of the amount - 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-0707/1 JK:skw ASSEMBLY BILL 56 SECTION 1 the taxing jurisdiction receives under par.
(b).
The amount that would have been paid to a tax incremental district under this subsection shall be distributed to the municipality and applicable taxing jurisdictions in the year following the termination of the tax incremental district and in each year thereafter.
SECTION 2.
79.096 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
79.096 (3) Each taxing jurisdiction shall attribute to each tax incremental district within the taxing jurisdiction the district's proportionate share of the amount the taxing jurisdiction receives under sub.
(1), except that this subsection does not apply after the district closes.
The amount that would have been paid to a tax incremental district under this subsection shall be distributed to the municipality and applicable taxing jurisdictions in the year following the termination of the tax incremental district and in each year thereafter.
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 7-9-2021
-
Report approved by the Governor on 7-8-2021. 2021 Wisconsin Act 61
-
Presented to the Governor on 7-2-2021
-
Report correctly enrolled on 6-24-2021
-
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 2)
-
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 6-23-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Steffen
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Representatives Behnke and Snyder added as coauthors
-
Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor
-
Placed on calendar 4-13-2021 by Committee on Rules
-
Representative Allen added as a coauthor
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 12, Noes 0
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 12, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steffen
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
-
Introduced by Representatives Steffen, Bowen, Dittrich, Gundrum, Murphy, Novak, Petersen, Rozar, Skowronski, Spiros and Zimmerman; cosponsored by Senators Bernier, Ringhand and Stroebel
Sponsors
- Shannon Zimmerman · Primary
- John Spiros · Primary
- Skowronski · Primary
- Rozar · Primary
- Kevin Petersen · Primary
- Todd Novak · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
- Rick Gundrum · Primary
- Barbara Dittrich · Primary
- Bowen · Primary
- David Steffen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (11)
- Zimmerman, Shannon Republican
- Spiros, John Republican
- Skowronski
- Rozar
- Petersen, Kevin Republican
- Novak, Todd Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Gundrum, Rick Republican
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Bowen
- Steffen, David Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 56?
- AB 56 is sponsored by Zimmerman, Shannon (Republican), Spiros, John (Republican), Skowronski, Rozar, Petersen, Kevin (Republican), Novak, Todd (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Bowen, and Steffen, David (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 56?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 56?
- Track AB 56 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 56
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 56
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →