Virginia 2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee

HB 768 — Child victims and witnesses; using two-way closed-circuit television, expands age range.

Last action — Left in Appropriations

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House of Delegates
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television; standard. Expands the age range during which a childmay testify using two-way closed-circuit television in a criminalcase to include any child younger than 18 years of age at the timeof the trial. Under current law, an alleged victim must be 14 yearsof age or younger at the time of the alleged offense and 16 yearsof age or younger at the time of the trial to testify by two-wayclosed-circuit television, and a child witness must be 14 years ofage or younger at the time of the trial to so testify. The bill alsoprovides that the court may order that the testimony of a child betaken by two-way closed-circuit television if it finds that the childis unavailable to testify in open court in the presence of the defendant,the jury, the judge, and the public if the court finds, by a preponderanceof the evidence, based upon expert opinion testimony, that the childwill suffer emotional trauma that is more than de minimis as a resultof testifying in the defendant's presence and not the courtroom generally.Under current law, the court may order such testimony be taken bytwo-way closed-circuit television if there is a substantial likelihood,based upon expert opinion testimony, that the child will suffer severeemotional trauma from so testifying.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

39 added · 38 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Bill HB 768 updates the rules concerning how child victims and witnesses can give testimony in court. Originally, the bill applied to children 16 years and younger at the time of the trial, but it now specifies that the provisions cover children who are 14 and younger. Additionally, it allows the court to consider a child’s ability to testify based on their communication skills or refusal to do so. This change is important because it aims to make the process less intimidating for younger victims and witnesses, ensuring they can still participate in the legal process in a safer environment.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION INTRODUCED 24104919D I HOUSE BILL NO.
SESSION HOUSE SUBSTITUTE 24106208D HOUSE BILL NO.
768 N Offered January 10, 2024 A BILL to amend and reenact § 18.2-67.9 of the Code of Virginia, relating to testimony by child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television;
768 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee for Courts of Justice on February 7, 2024) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Delegate Delaney) A Band witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television;
standard.
standard.lating to testimony by child victims Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
R –––––––––– Patron––Delaney O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice –––––––––– U 1.
1.
C § 18.2-67.9.
§ 18.2-67.9.
Testimony by child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit televisioE.
Testimony by child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television.
The provisions of this section shall apply to an alleged victim who was 14 years of age or younger at the time of the alleged offense and is 16 years of age or younger a child at the time of the trial and to a witness who is 14 years of age or younger a child at the time of the trial.
The provisions of this section shall apply to an alleged victim who was 14 years of age or to a witness who is 14 years of age or younger at the time of the trial.nger at the time of the trial and In any criminal proceeding, including preliminary hearings, involving an alleged offense against a child, relating to a violation of the laws pertaining to kidnapping pursuant to Article 3 (§ 18.2-47 et seq.) of Chapter 4, criminal sexual assault pursuant to Article 7 (§ 18.2-61 et seq.) of Chapter 4, commercial sex trafficking or prostitution offenses pursuant to Article 3 (§ 18.2-346 et seq.) Uf Chapter murder of a person of any age, the attorney for the Commonwealth or the defendant may apply for aneged order from the court that the testimony of the alleged victim or a child witness be taken in a Soom outside the courtroom and be televised by two-way closed-circuit television.
In any criminal proceeding, including preliminary hearings, involving an alleged offense against a child, relating to a violation of the laws pertaining to kidnapping pursuant to Article 3 (§ 18.2-47 et commercial sex trafficking or prostitution offenses pursuant to Article 3 (§ 18.2-346 et seq.) of Chapter 8, or family offenses pursuant to Article 4 (§ 18.2-362 et seq.) of Chapter 8, or involving an alleged murder of a person of any age, the attorney for the Commonwealth or the defendant may apply for an order from the court that the testimony of the alleged victim or a child witness be taken in a Hoom outside the courtroom and be televised by two-way closed-circuit television.
The party seeking such order shall apply for the order at least seven 30 days before the trial date or at least seven Eays before such other preliminary proceeding to which the order is to apply.
The party seeking 7uch order shall apply for the order at least seven days before the trial date or at least seven day8 before such other preliminary proceeding to which the order is to apply.
1.
S 1.
2.
or 2.
or 3.
or U 3.
The substantial likelihood The court's finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, based upon expert opinion testimony, that the child will suffer severe emotional trauma from so that is more than de minimis as a result of testifying in the defendant's presence and not the courtroom generally.
The substantial likelihood The court's finding, by clear and convincing evidence, based uBon a result of testifying in the defendant's presence and not in the courtroom generally, such thaS it so as prevents the child from reasonably communicating to the jury or renders the child unavailable to testify, or will cause the child to suffer long-lasting adverse effects.
findings on the record or with written findings in a court not of record.e supported by the court with 36 C.
T Any ruling on the child's unavailability under this subsection shall be supported by the couIt with 35 findings on the record or with written findings in a court not of record.
In any proceeding in which closed-circuit television is used to receive testimony, the attorney for 37 the Commonwealth and the defendant's attorney shall be present in the room with the child, and the / 38 child shall be subject to direct and cross-examination.
37 the Commonwealth and the defendant's attorney shall be present in the room with the child, and theney for / 38 child shall be subject to direct and cross-examination.
The only other persons allowed to be present in 39 the room with the child during his testimony shall be those persons necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment and any other person whose presence is determined by the court to be necessary to the welfare and well-being of the child.
The only other persons allowed to be present in / 39 the room with the child during his testimony shall be those persons necessary to operate the T 40 closed-circuit equipment and any other person whose presence is determined by the court to be necessary to the welfare and well-being of the child.
defendant, jury, judge, and public to view.
E defendant, jury, judge, and public to view.
B H 1
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Left in Appropriations

  2. Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (6-Y 1-N)

  3. Impact statement from DPB (HB768H1)

  4. Assigned App. sub: General Government and Capital Outlay

  5. Referred to Committee on Appropriations

  6. Committee substitute printed 24106208D-H1

  7. Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (22-Y 0-N)

  8. Subcommittee recommends referring to Committee on Appropriations

  9. Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)

  10. House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered

  11. Assigned Courts sub: Criminal

  12. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  13. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104919D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6102
Total 6102
% of votes cast 67%11%0%22%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Briana D. Sewell — Yea
C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. — Yea
David A. Reid — Yea
Delores L. McQuinn — Not Voting
James W. Morefield — Yea
Knight, Barry D. — Yea
Luke E. Torian — Not Voting
Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. — Nay
Sam Rasoul — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22000
Total 22000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (22)

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 768 do?
Child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television; standard. Expands the age range during which a childmay testify using two-way closed-circuit television in a criminalcase to include any child younger than 18 years of age at the timeof the trial. Under current law, an alleged victim must be 14 yearsof age or younger at the time of the alleged offense and 16 yearsof age or younger at the time of the trial to testify by two-wayclosed-circuit television, and a child witness must be 14 years ofage or younger at the time of the trial to so testify. The bill alsoprovides that the court may order that the testimony of a child betaken by two-way closed-circuit television if it finds that the childis unavailable to testify in open court in the presence of the defendant,the jury, the judge, and the public if the court finds, by a preponderanceof the evidence, based upon expert opinion testimony, that the childwill suffer emotional trauma that is more than de minimis as a resultof testifying in the defendant's presence and not the courtroom generally.Under current law, the court may order such testimony be taken bytwo-way closed-circuit television if there is a substantial likelihood,based upon expert opinion testimony, that the child will suffer severeemotional trauma from so testifying.
Who sponsors HB 768?
HB 768 is sponsored by Karrie K. Delaney.
What is the current status of HB 768?
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 768?
Track HB 768 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 768

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 768

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →