Child victims and witnesses; using two-way closed-circuit television, expands age range.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 768 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 768.
You're tracking HB 768
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 768 — Child victims and witnesses; using two-way closed-circuit television, expands age range.
Last action — Left in Appropriations
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television; standard. Expands the age range during which a childmay testify using two-way closed-circuit television in a criminalcase to include any child younger than 18 years of age at the timeof the trial. Under current law, an alleged victim must be 14 yearsof age or younger at the time of the alleged offense and 16 yearsof age or younger at the time of the trial to testify by two-wayclosed-circuit television, and a child witness must be 14 years ofage or younger at the time of the trial to so testify. The bill alsoprovides that the court may order that the testimony of a child betaken by two-way closed-circuit television if it finds that the childis unavailable to testify in open court in the presence of the defendant,the jury, the judge, and the public if the court finds, by a preponderanceof the evidence, based upon expert opinion testimony, that the childwill suffer emotional trauma that is more than de minimis as a resultof testifying in the defendant's presence and not the courtroom generally.Under current law, the court may order such testimony be taken bytwo-way closed-circuit television if there is a substantial likelihood,based upon expert opinion testimony, that the child will suffer severeemotional trauma from so testifying.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
39 added · 38 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill HB 768 updates the rules concerning how child victims and witnesses can give testimony in court. Originally, the bill applied to children 16 years and younger at the time of the trial, but it now specifies that the provisions cover children who are 14 and younger. Additionally, it allows the court to consider a child’s ability to testify based on their communication skills or refusal to do so. This change is important because it aims to make the process less intimidating for younger victims and witnesses, ensuring they can still participate in the legal process in a safer environment.
SESSION INTRODUCEDHOUSE 24104919DSUBSTITUTE I24106208D HOUSE BILL NO.
768 NAMENDMENT OfferedIN JanuaryTHE 10,NATURE 2024OF A BILLSUBSTITUTE to(Proposed amendby andthe reenactHouse §Committee 18.2-67.9for Courts of theJustice Codeon ofFebruary Virginia,7, relating2024) to(Patron testimonyPrior byto childSubstitute––Delegate victimsDelaney) andA Band witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television;
standard.standard.lating to testimony by child victims Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
R –––––––––– Patron––Delaney O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice –––––––––– U 1.
C § 18.2-67.9.
Testimony by child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit televisioE.television.
The provisions of this section shall apply to an alleged victim who was 14 years of age or to a witness who is 14 years of age or younger at the time of the allegedtrial.nger offenseat the time of the trial and isIn 16any yearscriminal ofproceeding, ageincluding orpreliminary youngerhearings, involving an alleged offense against a childchild, atrelating theto timea violation of the triallaws andpertaining to akidnapping witnesspursuant whoto isArticle 143 years(§ 18.2-47 et seq.) of ageChapter 4, criminal sexual assault pursuant to Article 7 (§ 18.2-61 et seq.) of Chapter 4, commercial sex trafficking or youngerprostitution offenses pursuant to Article 3 (§ 18.2-346 et seq.) Uf Chapter murder of a childperson atof any age, the timeattorney for the Commonwealth or the defendant may apply for aneged order from the court that the testimony of the trial.alleged victim or a child witness be taken in a Soom outside the courtroom and be televised by two-way closed-circuit television.
InThe anyparty criminalseeking proceeding,such includingorder preliminaryshall hearings,apply involvingfor anthe allegedorder offenseat againstleast aseven child,30 relatingdays tobefore a violation of the lawstrial pertainingdate to kidnapping pursuant to Article 3 (§ 18.2-47 et commercial sex trafficking or prostitutionat offensesleast pursuantseven toEays Articlebefore 3such (§other 18.2-346preliminary etproceeding seq.) of Chapter 8, or family offenses pursuant to Articlewhich 4 (§ 18.2-362 et seq.) of Chapter 8, or involving an alleged murder of a person of any age, the attorney for the Commonwealth or the defendant may apply for an order fromis theto courtapply. that the testimony of the alleged victim or a child witness be taken in a Hoom outside the courtroom and be televised by two-way closed-circuit television.
The party seeking 7uch order shall apply for the order at least seven days before the trial date or at least seven day8 before such other preliminary proceeding to which the order is to apply.
S 1.
or 2.
or U 3.
The substantial likelihood The court's finding, by aclear preponderanceand ofconvincing the evidence, based uponuBon experta opinionresult testimony,of thattestifying in the childdefendant's willpresence sufferand severenot emotionalin traumathe fromcourtroom generally, such thaS it so thatas isprevents morethe thanchild defrom minimisreasonably ascommunicating ato resultthe ofjury testifyingor inrenders the defendant'schild presenceunavailable andto nottestify, or will cause the courtroomchild generally.to suffer long-lasting adverse effects.
T Any ruling on the child's unavailability under this subsection shall be supported by the couIt with 35 findings on the record or with written findings in a court not of record.erecord. supported by the court with 36 C.
In any proceeding in which closed-circuit television is used to receive testimony, the attorney for 37 the Commonwealth and the defendant's attorney shall be present in the room with the child, and thetheney for / 38 child shall be subject to direct and cross-examination.
The only other persons allowed to be present in / 39 the room with the child during his testimony shall be those persons necessary to operate the T 40 closed-circuit equipment and any other person whose presence is determined by the court to be necessary to the welfare and well-being of the child.
E defendant, jury, judge, and public to view.
B H 1
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24106208D-H1 Current pdf February 07, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104919D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Left in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (6-Y 1-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB768H1)
-
Assigned App. sub: General Government and Capital Outlay
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 24106208D-H1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (22-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends referring to Committee on Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104919D
Sponsors
- Karrie K. Delaney · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Not Voting |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Not Voting |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Earley, Mark L., Jr. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Yea |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Obenshain, Chris | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Not Voting |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 768 do?
- Child victims and witnesses using two-way closed-circuit television; standard. Expands the age range during which a childmay testify using two-way closed-circuit television in a criminalcase to include any child younger than 18 years of age at the timeof the trial. Under current law, an alleged victim must be 14 yearsof age or younger at the time of the alleged offense and 16 yearsof age or younger at the time of the trial to testify by two-wayclosed-circuit television, and a child witness must be 14 years ofage or younger at the time of the trial to so testify. The bill alsoprovides that the court may order that the testimony of a child betaken by two-way closed-circuit television if it finds that the childis unavailable to testify in open court in the presence of the defendant,the jury, the judge, and the public if the court finds, by a preponderanceof the evidence, based upon expert opinion testimony, that the childwill suffer emotional trauma that is more than de minimis as a resultof testifying in the defendant's presence and not the courtroom generally.Under current law, the court may order such testimony be taken bytwo-way closed-circuit television if there is a substantial likelihood,based upon expert opinion testimony, that the child will suffer severeemotional trauma from so testifying.
- Who sponsors HB 768?
- HB 768 is sponsored by Karrie K. Delaney.
- What is the current status of HB 768?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 768?
- Track HB 768 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 768
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 768
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →