Changing the home care agency vendor rate and repealing electronic timekeeping.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6249 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6249.
You're tracking SB 6249
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6249 — Changing the home care agency vendor rate and repealing electronic timekeeping.
Last action — First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Bill View text Current html
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies how home care agency vendor rates are calculated and repeals the requirement for electronic timekeeping for in-home personal care services.
-
RCW 74.39A.310
create a formula that converts into a per-hour amount, excluding those benefits defined in subsection (3) of this section, the cost of the increase in:(a) Wages→ convert and distribute any change in the total amount of wages and benefits negotiated and funded in the contract for individual providers of home care services pursuant to RCW 74.39A.270 and 74.39A.300 into a per-quarter-hour amount.Changes the method of calculating adjustments to home care agency vendor rates from per-hour to per-quarter-hour.
-
RCW 74.39A.310
the formula shall account for:(a) All types of→ for paying any resulting change in required employer contributions or premiums.Clarifies that the formula includes adjustments to employer contributions or premiums.
-
RCW 74.39A.310
increase in the average costs experienced by medicaid contracted home care agencies and application of the increases identified in (a) of this subsection to all hours required to be paid, including travel time, of direct service workers under the wage and hour laws and associated employer taxes.→ of employer contributions or premiums required by law including, but not limited to:(i) Federal insurance contributions act;(ii) Federal unemployment tax act;(iii) State unemployment tax authority;(iv) State paid family medical leave act; and(v) State workers' compensation system;Updates the language to specify contributions and premiums required by law.
-
RCW 74.39A.310
The contribution rate for health care benefits, including but not limited to medical, dental, and vision benefits, for eligible agency home care workers shall be paid by the department to home care agencies at the same rate as negotiated and funded in the collective bargaining agreement for individual providers of home care servicesRemoves the specific provision for contribution rates for health care benefits.
-
RCW 74.39A.325
In-home personal care or respite services—Electronic timekeepingRepeals the requirement for electronic timekeeping for in-home personal care services.
Action History
-
First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.
Sponsors
- Annette Cleveland · Primary
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Das · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Annette Cleveland Democrat
Co-sponsors (4)
- Keiser
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Das
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6249?
- SB 6249 is sponsored by Annette Cleveland (Democrat), Keiser, Steve Conway (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), and Das.
- What is the current status of SB 6249?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6249?
- Track SB 6249 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6249
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6249
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →