HB 1546 — Concerning the proposed department of natural resources' marbled murrelet long-term conservation strategy.
Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of HB 1546 adds important requirements for analyzing the economic impacts of the proposed long-term conservation strategy for the marbled murrelet. Specifically, it mandates that the joint legislative audit and review committee evaluate how the strategy will affect revenue and harvest volumes for all trust beneficiaries, including local governments, before any conservation strategy can be adopted. This change is significant because it ensures more thorough financial scrutiny, helping to protect the interests of local communities that rely on revenue from timber sales, and promoting transparency in the decision-making process regarding land management.
H-1708.3SUBSTITUTEH-0860.1HOUSE HOUSE BILL 1546State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByHouseSessionByRepresentatives RuralBlake, Development,Walsh, Agriculture,Chapman, &Kretz, NaturalOrcutt, ResourcesShewmake, (originallyand sponsoredTharingerRead byfirst Representativestime Blake,01/24/19.Referred Walsh,to Chapman,Committee Kretz,on Orcutt,Rural Shewmake,Development, andAgriculture, Tharinger)READ& FIRSTNatural TIMEResources.AN 02/22/19.AN ACT Relating to the proposed department of natural resources' marbled murrelet long-term conservation strategy;
(1) The departmentjoint oflegislative naturalaudit resourcesand review committee must analyze the harvest volume and revenue impacts of the department of natural resources' preferred alternative, alternative H, for the long-term conservation strategy to all department of natural resources' trust beneficiaries, including local governments and junior taxing districts.
and(d) Acres deferred by age class.(4) The departmentjoint oflegislative naturaland resourcesaudit review committee must consult with representatives of trust beneficiaries to seek input and guidance on the method of analysis, type of data, and sources of data needed for the analysis.NEWanalysis.(5) The joint legislative and audit review committee must compile the results of the analysis by December 31, 2019.NEW SECTION. Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 43.30 RCW to read as follows:(1) The board may not adopt a marbled murrelet long-term conservation strategy until the analysis required under section 2 of this act has been finalized and:(a)and Mademade available for public reviewreview.(2) andLands commentidentified for atpotential leastset-aside thirtyfrom days,timber includingmanagement aunder publicthe hearingmarbled murrelet long-term conservation strategy alternatives F and G that are not included within alternatives A, B, C, D, E, or H are not subject to receiveany inputlimitation on action pursuant to WAC 197-11-070 or a successor rule prior to adoption of a final marbled murrelet long-term conservation strategy by the analysis;board.--- END ---
and(b) Transmitted to the appropriate committees of the legislature along with a summary of the comments received under (a) of this subsection.(2) Lands identified for potential set-aside from timber management under the marbled murrelet long-term conservation strategy alternatives that are not included within the department's preferred alternative are not subject to any limitation on management activities relating to marbled murrelet conservation following the issuance of a final environmental impact statement by the department.(3) The legislature recognizes that forested stands that are set aside for marbled murrelet conservation can benefit from active management to enhance the development of murrelet habitat.
Accordingly, when evaluating whether lands should be set aside, the department should work with the federal government to preserve, to the maximum extent possible, the department's ability to conduct active forest management on such lands.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Rural Development, Agriculture, & Natural Resources at 08:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
RDAN - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
RDAN - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Rural Development, Agriculture, & Natural Resources at 10:00 AM
-
First reading, referred to Rural Development, Agriculture, & Natural Resources.
Sponsors
- Blake · Primary
- Mike Chapman · Cosponsor
- Kretz · Cosponsor
- Ed Orcutt · Cosponsor
- Sharon Shewmake · Cosponsor
- Steve Tharinger · Cosponsor
- Jim Walsh · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Blake
Co-sponsors (6)
- Mike Chapman Democrat
- Kretz
- Ed Orcutt Republican
- Sharon Shewmake Democrat
- Steve Tharinger Democrat
- Jim Walsh Republican
Not signed on (144)
144 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 144 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1546?
- HB 1546 is sponsored by Blake, Mike Chapman (Democrat), Kretz, Ed Orcutt (Republican), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Steve Tharinger (Democrat), and Jim Walsh (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1546?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1546?
- Track HB 1546 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1546
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1546
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →