Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed House 1 R cosponsors

HB 2936 — Adjusting predesign requirements and thresholds.

Last action — By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes to Bill HB 2936 primarily involve raising the threshold for when predesigns are required for major capital projects from five million dollars to ten million dollars. Additionally, the updated bill allows agencies to waive some or all predesign requirements if certain conditions are met, such as the project having a clear scope or past similar projects being completed. These amendments aim to reduce unnecessary costs and delays in project timelines, ultimately streamlining government processes and making it easier for agencies to move forward with important projects.

→
Previous
Latest
H-5041.1SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2936State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionByHouse Capital Budget (originally sponsored by Representative Steele)READ FIRST TIME 02/26/20.AN ACT Relating to predesign requirements and thresholds;
H-4712.1HOUSE BILL 2936State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionByRepresentative SteeleRead first time 02/11/20.Referred to Committee on Capital Budget.AN ACT Relating to predesign requirements and thresholds;
amending RCW 43.88.110, 43.82.035, and 43.88.0301;
amending RCW 43.88.110;
The legislature finds that predesigns are often done due to statutory requirements regardless of whether it is necessary to the capital project.
The legislature finds that predesigns are often done due to statutory requirement regardless of whether it is necessary to the capital project.
The legislature also finds that the cost of unnecessary predesigns includes not only limited resources in the capital budget, but an extended project timeline.
The legislature also finds that the cost of these unnecessary predesigns includes not only limited resources in the capital budget, but an extended project timeline.
Therefore, the legislature intends to reduce the number of predesigns by raising the cost threshold and adding exceptions to the predesign requirements.Sec.
Therefore, the legislature intends to reduce the number of predesigns being conducted by applying a set of standards to assist agencies in deciding whether a predesign is necessary.Sec.
and(c) A requirement to incorporate value-engineering analysis and constructability review into the project schedule.(6) The office of financial management may make an exception to some or all of the predesign requirements in subsection (5) of this section.
and(c) A requirement to incorporate value-engineering analysis and constructability review into the project schedule.(6) For a construction project exceeding the ten million dollar threshold established in subsection (5) of this section, an agency may, at its discretion, waive some or all of the predesign requirements specified in subsection (5) of this section if the project meets two or more of the following conditions:(a) There is no determination to be made regarding the site of the project;(b) There is no determination to be made regarding whether the project will involve renovation, new construction, or both;(c) Within six years of submitting the request for funding, the agency has completed, or initiated the construction of, a substantially similar project, as determined by the requesting agency;(d) There is no anticipated change to the project's program or the services to be delivered at the facility;
The office of financial management shall report any exception to the fiscal committees of the legislature and include:
or(e) The agency and the office of financial management jointly determine that a project does not require a predesign due to a lack of complexity.(7) No expenditure may be incurred or obligation entered into for such major capital construction projects including, without exception, land acquisition, site development, predesign, design, construction, and equipment acquisition and installation, until the allotment of the funds to be expended has been approved by the office of financial management.
(a) A description of the major capital project for which the predesign waiver is made;
This limitation does not prohibit the continuation of expenditures and obligations into the succeeding biennium for projects for which allotments have been approved in the immediate prior biennium.(((7)))(8) If at any time during the fiscal period the governor projects a cash deficit in a particular fund or account as defined by RCW 43.88.050, the governor shall make across-the-board reductions in allotments for that particular fund or account so as to prevent a cash deficit, unless the legislature has directed the liquidation of the cash deficit over one or more fiscal periods.
(b) an explanation of the reason for the waiver;
and (c) a rough order of magnitude cost estimate for the project's design and construction.(7) In deliberations related to submitting an exception under subsection (6) of this section, the office of financial management shall consider the following factors:(a) Whether there is any determination to be made regarding the site of the project;(b) Whether there is any determination to be made regarding whether the project will involve renovation, new construction, or both;(c) Whether, within six years of submitting the request for funding, the agency has completed, or initiated the construction of, a substantially similar project;(d) Whether there is any anticipated change to the project's program or the services to be delivered at the facility;(e) Whether the requesting agency indicates that the project may not require some or all of the requirements in subsection (5) of this section due to a lack of complexity;
and(f) Whether any other factors related to project complexity or risk, as determined by the office of financial management, could reduce the need for, or scope of, a predesign.(8) If under subsection (6) of this section, some or all of the predesign requirements under subsection (5) of this section are waived, the office of financial management may instead propose a professional project cost estimate instead of a request for predesign funding.(9) No expenditure may be incurred or obligation entered into for such major capital construction projects including, without exception, land acquisition, site development, predesign, design, construction, and equipment acquisition and installation, until the allotment of the funds to be expended has been approved by the office of financial management.
This limitation does not prohibit the continuation of expenditures and obligations into the succeeding biennium for projects for which allotments have been approved in the immediate prior biennium.(((7)))(10) If at any time during the fiscal period the governor projects a cash deficit in a particular fund or account as defined by RCW 43.88.050, the governor shall make across-the-board reductions in allotments for that particular fund or account so as to prevent a cash deficit, unless the legislature has directed the liquidation of the cash deficit over one or more fiscal periods.
If an agency or the director of financial management is unable to meet these requirements, the director of financial management shall provide a timely explanation in writing to the legislative fiscal committees.(((8)))(11) It is expressly provided that all agencies shall be required to maintain accounting records and to report thereon in the manner prescribed in this chapter and under the regulations issued pursuant to this chapter.
If an agency or the director of financial management is unable to meet these requirements, the director of financial management shall provide a timely explanation in writing to the legislative fiscal committees.(((8)))(9) It is expressly provided that all agencies shall be required to maintain accounting records and to report thereon in the manner prescribed in this chapter and under the regulations issued pursuant to this chapter.
Prior to submitting fiscal data, written or oral, to committees of the legislature, it is the responsibility of the agency submitting the data to reconcile it with the budget and accounting data reported by the agency to the director of financial management.(((9)))(12) The director of financial management may exempt certain public funds from the allotment controls established under this chapter if it is not practical or necessary to allot the funds.
Prior to submitting fiscal data, written or oral, to committees of the legislature, it is the responsibility of the agency submitting the data to reconcile it with the budget and accounting data reported by the agency to the director of financial management.(((9)))(10) The director of financial management may exempt certain public funds from the allotment controls established under this chapter if it is not practical or necessary to allot the funds.
The director of financial management shall report any exemptions granted under this subsection to the legislative fiscal committees.Sec.
The director of financial management shall report any exemptions granted under this subsection to the legislative fiscal committees.--- END ---
3.
RCW 43.82.035 and 2015 c 225 s 75 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The office of financial management shall design and implement a modified predesign process for any space request to lease, purchase, or build facilities that involve (a) the housing of new state programs, (b) a major expansion of existing state programs, or (c) the relocation of state agency programs.
This includes the consolidation of multiple state agency tenants into one facility.
The office of financial management shall define facilities that meet the criteria described in (a) and (b) of this subsection.(2) State agencies shall submit modified predesigns to the office of financial management and the legislature.
Modified predesigns must include a problem statement, an analysis of alternatives to address programmatic and space requirements, proposed locations, and a financial assessment.
For proposed projects of twenty thousand gross square feet or less, the agency may provide a cost-benefit analysis, rather than a life-cycle cost analysis, as determined by the office of financial management.(3) Projects that meet the capital requirements for predesign on major facility projects with an estimated project cost of ((five))ten million dollars or more pursuant to chapter 43.88 RCW shall not be required to prepare a modified predesign.(4) The office of financial management shall require state agencies to identify plans for major leased facilities as part of the ten-year capital budget plan.
State agencies shall not enter into new or renewed leases of more than one million dollars per year unless such leases have been approved by the office of financial management except when the need for the lease is due to an unanticipated emergency.
The regular termination date on an existing lease does not constitute an emergency.
The department of enterprise services shall notify the office of financial management and the appropriate legislative fiscal committees if an emergency situation arises.(5) For project proposals in which there are estimates of operational savings, the office of financial management shall require the agency or agencies involved to provide details including but not limited to fund sources and timelines.Sec.
4.
RCW 43.88.0301 and 2017 3rd sp.s.
c 25 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The office of financial management must include in its capital budget instructions, beginning with its instructions for the 2003-05 capital budget, a request for "yes" or "no" answers for the following additional informational questions from capital budget applicants for all proposed major capital construction projects valued over ((five))ten million dollars and required to complete a predesign:(a) For proposed capital projects identified in this subsection that are located in or serving city or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040:(i) Whether the proposed capital project is identified in the host city or county comprehensive plan, including the capital facility plan, and implementing rules adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW;(ii) Whether the proposed capital project is located within an adopted urban growth area:(A) If at all located within an adopted urban growth area boundary, whether a project facilitates, accommodates, or attracts planned population and employment growth;(B) If at all located outside an urban growth area boundary, whether the proposed capital project may create pressures for additional development;(b) For proposed capital projects identified in this subsection that are requesting state funding:(i) Whether there was regional coordination during project development;(ii) Whether local and additional funds were leveraged;(iii) Whether environmental outcomes and the reduction of adverse environmental impacts were examined.(2) For projects subject to subsection (1) of this section, the office of financial management shall request the required information be provided during the predesign process of major capital construction projects to reduce long-term costs and increase process efficiency.(3) The office of financial management, in fulfilling its duties under RCW 43.88.030(5) to create a capital budget document, must take into account information gathered under subsections (1) and (2) of this section in an effort to promote state capital facility expenditures that minimize unplanned or uncoordinated infrastructure and development costs, support economic and quality of life benefits for existing communities, and support local government planning efforts.(4) The office of community development must provide staff support to the office of financial management and affected capital budget applicants to help collect data required by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. First reading, referred to Ways & Means.

  3. Third reading, passed; yeas, 96; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  4. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  5. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  6. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  7. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  8. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  9. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  10. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  11. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Capital Budget at 08:00 AM

  12. CB - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  13. CB - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  14. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Capital Budget at 01:30 PM

  15. First reading, referred to Capital Budget (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (150)

150 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 150 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 96 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 43000
Unaffiliated 33000
Republican 20002
Total 96002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Dolan — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mead — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Smith — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Not Voting
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Not Voting
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2936?
HB 2936 is sponsored by Mike Steele (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2936?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2936?
Track HB 2936 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2936

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2936

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →