HB 1923 — Increasing urban residential building capacity.
Last action — Effective date 7/28/2019*.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2019. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of House Bill 1923, the focus has shifted towards increasing urban residential building capacity while ensuring a balance with the need for affordability and community protection. Changes include specific actions that cities must undertake to enhance housing development, such as allowing for more residential units near transit stations and enabling accessory dwelling units in single-family zones. Notably, there's an emphasis on actions to address housing affordability, requiring inclusionary zoning programs that designate a portion of new housing as affordable, in an effort to prevent displacement in vulnerable communities. These changes are crucial as they aim to create a more inclusive housing strategy while addressing the housing crisis in urban areas.
H-2217.1SECONDH-1266.4HOUSE SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1923State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByHouseSessionByRepresentatives Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Fitzgibbon, Macri, Appleton, Doglio, Dolan, Santos, and Frame)READFrameRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 03/01/19.AN02/06/19.Referred to Committee on Environment & Energy.AN ACT Relating to increasing urban residential building capacity;
amending RCW 36.70A.280, 36.70A.280, 36.70A.290, 36.70A.030, 43.21C.450, 70.146.070, 43.155.070, 47.26.086, 43.21C.420, 36.70A.490, and 82.02.060;
reenacting and amending RCW 36.70A.070;
and adding a new section to chapter 35.21 RCW;RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec.
adding a new section to chapter 35A.21 RCW;
creating a new section;
providing an effective date;
and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:(1) A city planning pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 with a population greater than ten thousand shall take two or more of the following actions by December 31, 2022, in order to increase its residential building capacity,capacity:(a) while seeking to avoid displacement of vulnerable communities:(a) Authorize development of an average of at least fifty residential units per acre in onelocations or more areas of not fewer than five hundred acres that includeare onelocated orwithin moreone-half transitmile stations, as defined in RCW 9.91.025, served by commuter rail or light rail;(b) Authorize development of ana averagefixed ofguideway at least twenty-five residential units per acre in one or more areas of not fewer than five hundred acres that include one or more transit stations,station;(b) as defined in RCW 9.91.025, served by scheduled bus service of at least four times per hour for twelve or more hours per day;(c) Authorize at least one duplex, triplex, or courtyard apartment on each parcel in one or more zoning districts that permit single-family residencesresidential zones unless a city documents a specific infrastructure of physical constraint that would make this requirement unfeasible for a particular parcel;(d)parcel;(c) Authorize cluster zoning or lot size averaging in all zoning districts that permit single-family residences;(e) Require no more than one on-site parking space per two dwelling units in multifamily zones that are located within one-half mile of a fixed guideway transit station;(f)station;(d) Authorize accessory dwelling units on all lots located in zoningsingle-family districtsresidential thatzoning permitdistricts;(e) single-family residences;(g) Adopt a planned action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.420;(h)43.21C.420, except that an environmental impact statement pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030 is not required for such an action;(f) Adopt a planned action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440(1)(b)(ii),43.21C.440, except that an environmental impact statement pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030 is not required for such an action;(i)action;(g) AdoptAdapt increasesthe inmaximum feasible number of categorical exemptions pursuant to RCW 43.21C.229 for residentialsingle-family orand mixed-usemultifamily development;(j)development.(2) AdoptA city planning pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 with a policypopulation greater than ten thousand shall take two or more of the following actions by December 31, 2022, in order to certifyincrease projecthousing permitaffordability:(a) applicationsAdopt asan counterinclusionary completezoning withinprogram, fourteenin dayswhich twenty-five percent of submittal.the new housing capacity directed by this act consists of affordable housing;
"Counteror(b) complete"Take meanssome aother cityaction officialto hasaddress determinedaffordability for very low-income households.(3) A city that allis elementssubject necessaryto subsections (1) and (2) of this section that fails to begincomply processingwith subsections (1) and (2) of this section by December 31, 2021, shall update the housing element of its comprehensive plan as required by RCW 36.70A.070.(4) The actions taken by a projectcity permitto applicationcomply arewith present,subsections but(1) doesand (2) of this section are not meansubject to appeal under chapter 43.21C RCW.(5)(a) A city that is subject to the cityrequirements hasof certifiedsubsections that(1) alland necessary(2) informationof isthis presentsection forshall fullcertify processing,to northe doesdepartment once it meanhas thatcomplied with the applicationrequirements isof asubsections complete(1) applicationand for(2) of this section.(b) When the purposesdepartment ofreceives RCWa 36.70B.070;(k)certification Adoptfrom a form-basedcity codepursuant into one(a) orof morethis zoningsubsection districts(5), thatthe permitdepartment residentialshall uses.take such investigative steps as are necessary to confirm the accuracy of the certification.
"Form-basedOnce code"the meansdepartment has confirmed the accuracy of the certification, the department shall issue a landletter developmentverifying regulationthe city's compliance.(c) A city who has received a letter of verification from the department is eligible to receive a one-time grant from the department of one hundred thousand dollars in order to support planning and outreach efforts.(6) A city that usesis physicalsubject form,to ratherthe thanrequirements separationof subsections (1) and (2) of use,this assection that fails to comply with subsections (1) and (2) of this section by December 31, 2021, may not receive grants, loans, or any other form of funding from the organizingfollowing principleaccounts foruntil the code;city certifies to the department that the city has complied with subsections (1) and (2) of this section:
and(l) Authorize a duplex on each corner lot within all zoning districts that permit single-family residences.(2) A city planning pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 with a population greater than ten thousand shall take one or more of the following actions by December 31, 2022, in order to increase housing affordability, while seeking to avoid displacement of vulnerable communities:(a) Adopt an inclusionary zoning program, in which ten percent of the new housing capacity directed by this act consists of affordable housing;(b) Provide surplus property to be used for affordable housing pursuant to RCW 39.33.015;
or(c) Enact an affordable housing levy pursuant to RCW 84.52.105.(3) A city may rely on actions that take effect on or after January 1, 2013, for purposes of compliance with subsections (1) and (2) of this section.(4) A city that is subject to subsections (1) and (2) of this section may choose instead to update the housing element of its comprehensive plan as required by section 2 of this act.
A city that is subject to subsections (1) and (2) of this section that fails to comply with subsections (1) and (2) of this section by December 31, 2022, shall update the housing element of its comprehensive plan as required by section 2 of this act.(5) Amendments to development regulations and other nonproject actions taken by a city to comply with subsections (1) and (2) of this section are categorically exempt from the requirements of chapter 43.21C RCW.(6) A city that is subject to the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section shall certify to the department once it has complied with the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section.(7) A city that is subject to the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section that fails to comply with subsections (1) and (2) of this section by December 31, 2022, may not receive grants, loans, or any other form of funding from the following accounts until the city certifies to the funding authority, as part of its request for funding, that the city has complied with subsections (1) and (2) of this section:
andor the transportation improvement account created in RCW 47.26.084.47.26.084.(7) In meeting the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section, cities are encouraged to utilize strategies that increase residential building capacity in areas with frequent transit service and with the transportation and utility infrastructure that supports the additional residential building capacity.Sec.
A city that is subject to the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section but that chooses instead to update the housing element of its comprehensive plan as required by section 2 of this act is not barred by this section from receiving grants, loans, or other forms of funding from these accounts.(8) In meeting the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section, cities are encouraged to utilize strategies that increase residential building capacity in areas with frequent transit service and with the transportation and utility infrastructure that supports the additional residential building capacity.NEW SECTION. Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to36.70A.070 read as follows:(1) In addition to the requirements set forth in RCW 36.70A.070(2) for the housing element of a comprehensive plan, the cities described in subsection (2) of this section shall update the housing element of their comprehensive plan as described in subsection (3) of this section.(2) This section applies to cities that are subject to section 1 (1) and (2)2017 of3rd thissp.s. act but that fail to comply with the requirements of those subsections by December 31, 2022 or that choose to update the housing element of their comprehensive plan as described in this section in place of taking the actions described in section 1 (1) and (2) of this act.(3) The housing element must:(a) Quantify existing and projected housing needs for all income levels, including extremely low-income households, with documentation of housing and household characteristics, including housing stock condition, overcrowding, and comparison of level of payment with ability to pay;(b) Include policies, regulations, and programs to conserve and preserve existing private market and subsidized affordable housing and existing manufactured home parks;(c) In cities with populations of more than eighty thousand, include policies, regulations, and programs to minimize displacement;(d) If the inventory in (a) of this subsection demonstrates a lack of sufficient sites to accommodate housing needs for extremely low-income, very low-income, and low-income households, include a program to make sufficient sites available at multifamily densities available for development;(e) Analyze population and employment trends, with documentation of projections;(f) Include an eight-year schedule of programs and actions to implement the policies of the housing element and to accommodate the planned housing units, including incentives and funding for affordable housing;
and(g)c Review18 ands evaluate4 the previous housing element, including an evaluation of success in attaining planned housing units, achievement of goals and policies,2017 and3rd implementationsp.s. of the schedule of programs and actions.(4) The housing element update described in subsection (3) of this section must be incorporated into the housing element of a city's comprehensive plan by the next regularly scheduled comprehensive plan update as provided in RCW 36.70A.130.(5) The department shall review and, if compliant with the requirements of this section and any other applicable requirements within this chapter, approve the housing element of a city's comprehensive plan after each periodic review required under RCW 36.70A.130.Sec.
c 16 s 4 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:The comprehensive plan of a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall consist of a map or maps, and descriptive text covering objectives, principles, and standards used to develop the comprehensive plan.
The plan shall be an internally consistent document and all elements shall be consistent with the future land use map.
A comprehensive plan shall be adopted and amended with public participation as provided in RCW 36.70A.140.
Each comprehensive plan shall include a plan, scheme, or design for each of the following:(1) A land use element designating the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land, where appropriate, for agriculture, timber production, housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, general aviation airports, public utilities, public facilities, and other land uses.
The land use element shall include population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth.
The land use element shall provide for protection of the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies.
Wherever possible, the land use element should consider utilizing urban planning approaches that promote physical activity.
Where applicable, the land use element shall review drainage, flooding, and storm water run-off in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute waters of the state, including Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound.(2)(a) A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that:
(((a)))(i) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing units necessary to manage projected growth and quantifies existing and projected housing needs for all income levels, including extremely low-income households, with documentation of housing and household characteristics, including housing stock condition, overcrowding, and comparison of level of payment with ability to pay;
(((b)))(ii) includes a statement of goals, policies, objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including single-family residences;
(((c)))(iii) includes policies, regulations, and programs to conserve and preserve existing private market and subsidized affordable housing and existing manufactured home parks.
In cities with populations of more than eighty thousand, the housing element must include policies, regulations, and programs to minimize displacement;
(iv) identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government-assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, and group homes and foster care facilities.
If the inventory in (a) of this subsection demonstrates a lack of sufficient sites to accommodate housing needs for extremely low-income, very low-income, and low-income households, the housing element must include a program to make sufficient sites available at multifamily densities available for development;
((and (d)))(v) makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community;
(vi) analyzes population and employment trends, with documentation of projections;
(vii) provides a zone where emergency shelters are permitted without a discretionary review process;
(viii) includes an eight-year schedule of programs and actions to implement the policies of the housing element and to accommodate the planned housing units, including incentives and funding for affordable housing;
and (ix) reviews and evaluates the previous housing element, including an evaluation of success in attaining planned housing units, achievement of goals and policies, and implementation of the schedule of programs and actions.
In counties and cities subject to the review and evaluation requirements of RCW 36.70A.215, any revision to the housing element shall include consideration of prior review and evaluation reports and any reasonable measures identified.(b) The department must review and, if compliant with the requirements of this subsection, approve the housing element of each planning jurisdiction after each periodic review required under RCW 36.70A.130.(3) A capital facilities plan element consisting of:
(a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities;
(b) a forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities;
Show all 134 changed lines (94 more)
(c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities;
(d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes;
and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent.
Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.(4) A utilities element consisting of the general location, proposed location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical lines, telecommunication lines, and natural gas lines.(5) Rural element.
Counties shall include a rural element including lands that are not designated for urban growth, agriculture, forest, or mineral resources.
The following provisions shall apply to the rural element:(a) Growth management act goals and local circumstances.
Because circumstances vary from county to county, in establishing patterns of rural densities and uses, a county may consider local circumstances, but shall develop a written record explaining how the rural element harmonizes the planning goals in RCW 36.70A.020 and meets the requirements of this chapter.(b) Rural development.
The rural element shall permit rural development, forestry, and agriculture in rural areas.
The rural element shall provide for a variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, and rural governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses.
To achieve a variety of rural densities and uses, counties may provide for clustering, density transfer, design guidelines, conservation easements, and other innovative techniques that will accommodate appropriate rural economic advancement, densities, and uses that are not characterized by urban growth and that are consistent with rural character.(c) Measures governing rural development.
The rural element shall include measures that apply to rural development and protect the rural character of the area, as established by the county, by:(i) Containing or otherwise controlling rural development;(ii) Assuring visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding rural area;(iii) Reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development in the rural area;(iv) Protecting critical areas, as provided in RCW 36.70A.060, and surface water and groundwater resources;
and(v) Protecting against conflicts with the use of agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36.70A.170.(d) Limited areas of more intensive rural development.
Subject to the requirements of this subsection and except as otherwise specifically provided in this subsection (5)(d), the rural element may allow for limited areas of more intensive rural development, including necessary public facilities and public services to serve the limited area as follows:(i) Rural development consisting of the infill, development, or redevelopment of existing commercial, industrial, residential, or mixed-use areas, whether characterized as shoreline development, villages, hamlets, rural activity centers, or crossroads developments.(A) A commercial, industrial, residential, shoreline, or mixed-use area are subject to the requirements of (d)(iv) of this subsection, but are not subject to the requirements of (c)(ii) and (iii) of this subsection.(B) Any development or redevelopment other than an industrial area or an industrial use within a mixed-use area or an industrial area under this subsection (5)(d)(i) must be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population.(C) Any development or redevelopment in terms of building size, scale, use, or intensity shall be consistent with the character of the existing areas.
Development and redevelopment may include changes in use from vacant land or a previously existing use so long as the new use conforms to the requirements of this subsection (5);(ii) The intensification of development on lots containing, or new development of, small-scale recreational or tourist uses, including commercial facilities to serve those recreational or tourist uses, that rely on a rural location and setting, but that do not include new residential development.
A small-scale recreation or tourist use is not required to be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population.
Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the recreation or tourist use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl;(iii) The intensification of development on lots containing isolated nonresidential uses or new development of isolated cottage industries and isolated small-scale businesses that are not principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population and nonresidential uses, but do provide job opportunities for rural residents.
Rural counties may allow the expansion of small-scale businesses as long as those small-scale businesses conform with the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to RCW 36.70A.030(16).
Rural counties may also allow new small-scale businesses to utilize a site previously occupied by an existing business as long as the new small-scale business conforms to the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to RCW 36.70A.030(16).
Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the isolated nonresidential use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl;(iv) A county shall adopt measures to minimize and contain the existing areas or uses of more intensive rural development, as appropriate, authorized under this subsection.
Lands included in such existing areas or uses shall not extend beyond the logical outer boundary of the existing area or use, thereby allowing a new pattern of low-density sprawl.
Existing areas are those that are clearly identifiable and contained and where there is a logical boundary delineated predominately by the built environment, but that may also include undeveloped lands if limited as provided in this subsection.
The county shall establish the logical outer boundary of an area of more intensive rural development.
In establishing the logical outer boundary, the county shall address (A) the need to preserve the character of existing natural neighborhoods and communities, (B) physical boundaries, such as bodies of water, streets and highways, and land forms and contours, (C) the prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries, and (D) the ability to provide public facilities and public services in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl;(v) For purposes of (d) of this subsection, an existing area or existing use is one that was in existence:(A) On July 1, 1990, in a county that was initially required to plan under all of the provisions of this chapter;(B) On the date the county adopted a resolution under RCW 36.70A.040(2), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter under RCW 36.70A.040(2);
or(C) On the date the office of financial management certifies the county's population as provided in RCW 36.70A.040(5), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040(5).(e) Exception.
This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit in the rural area a major industrial development or a master planned resort unless otherwise specifically permitted under RCW 36.70A.360 and 36.70A.365.(6) A transportation element that implements, and is consistent with, the land use element.(a) The transportation element shall include the following subelements:(i) Land use assumptions used in estimating travel;(ii) Estimated traffic impacts to state-owned transportation facilities resulting from land use assumptions to assist the department of transportation in monitoring the performance of state facilities, to plan improvements for the facilities, and to assess the impact of land-use decisions on state-owned transportation facilities;(iii) Facilities and services needs, including:(A) An inventory of air, water, and ground transportation facilities and services, including transit alignments and general aviation airport facilities, to define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning.
This inventory must include state-owned transportation facilities within the city or county's jurisdictional boundaries;(B) Level of service standards for all locally owned arterials and transit routes to serve as a gauge to judge performance of the system.
These standards should be regionally coordinated;(C) For state-owned transportation facilities, level of service standards for highways, as prescribed in chapters 47.06 and 47.80 RCW, to gauge the performance of the system.
The purposes of reflecting level of service standards for state highways in the local comprehensive plan are to monitor the performance of the system, to evaluate improvement strategies, and to facilitate coordination between the county's or city's six-year street, road, or transit program and the office of financial management's ten-year investment program.
The concurrency requirements of (b) of this subsection do not apply to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance except for counties consisting of islands whose only connection to the mainland are state highways or ferry routes.
In these island counties, state highways and ferry route capacity must be a factor in meeting the concurrency requirements in (b) of this subsection;(D) Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level of service standard;(E) Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information on the location, timing, and capacity needs of future growth;(F) Identification of state and local system needs to meet current and future demands.
Identified needs on state-owned transportation facilities must be consistent with the statewide multimodal transportation plan required under chapter 47.06 RCW;(iv) Finance, including:(A) An analysis of funding capability to judge needs against probable funding resources;(B) A multiyear financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan, the appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street, road, or transit program required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, and RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems.
The multiyear financing plan should be coordinated with the ten-year investment program developed by the office of financial management as required by RCW 47.05.030;(C) If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs, a discussion of how additional funding will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that level of service standards will be met;(v) Intergovernmental coordination efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions;(vi) Demand-management strategies;(vii) Pedestrian and bicycle component to include collaborative efforts to identify and designate planned improvements for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and corridors that address and encourage enhanced community access and promote healthy lifestyles.(b) After adoption of the comprehensive plan by jurisdictions required to plan or who choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development.
These strategies may include increased public transportation service, ride-sharing programs, demand management, and other transportation systems management strategies.
For the purposes of this subsection (6), "concurrent with the development" means that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years.
If the collection of impact fees is delayed under RCW 82.02.050(3), the six-year period required by this subsection (6)(b) must begin after full payment of all impact fees is due to the county or city.(c) The transportation element described in this subsection (6), the six-year plans required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, and RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems, and the ten-year investment program required by RCW 47.05.030 for the state, must be consistent.(7) An economic development element establishing local goals, policies, objectives, and provisions for economic growth and vitality and a high quality of life.
A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of this subsection.(8) A park and recreation element that implements, and is consistent with, the capital facilities plan element as it relates to park and recreation facilities.
The element shall include:
(a) Estimates of park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period;
(b) an evaluation of facilities and service needs;
and (c) an evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide regional approaches for meeting park and recreational demand.(9) It is the intent that new or amended elements required after January 1, 2002, be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A.130.
Requirements to incorporate any such new or amended elements shall be null and void until funds sufficient to cover applicable local government costs are appropriated and distributed by the state at least two years before local government must update comprehensive plans as required in RCW 36.70A.130.Sec.
RCW 36.70A.280 and 2014 c 147 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The growth management hearings board shall hear and determine only those petitions alleging either:(a) That, except as provided otherwise by this subsection, a state agency, county, or city planning under this chapter is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption of shoreline master programs or amendments thereto, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to plans, development regulations, or amendments, adopted under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW.
Nothing in this subsection authorizes the board to hear petitions alleging noncompliance with RCW 36.70A.5801;(b) That the twenty-year growth management planning population projections adopted by the office of financial management pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 should be adjusted;(c) That the approval of a work plan adopted under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(a) is not in compliance with the requirements of the program established under RCW 36.70A.710;(d) That regulations adopted under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(b) are not regionally applicable and cannot be adopted, wholly or partially, by another jurisdiction;
(e) That a department certification under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(c) is erroneous;
((or))(f) That a department certification of the housing element under section 2 of this act is erroneous;
or(g) That a department determination under RCW 36.70A.060(1)(d) is erroneous.(2) A petition may be filed only by:
(a) The state, or a county or city that plans under this chapter;
(b) a person who has participated orally or in writing before the county or city regarding the matter on which a review is being requested;
(c) a person who is certified by the governor within sixty days of filing the request with the board;
or (d) a person qualified pursuant to RCW 34.05.530.(3) For purposes of this section "person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, state agency, governmental subdivision or unit thereof, or public or private organization or entity of any character.(4) To establish participation standing under subsection (2)(b) of this section, a person must show that his or her participation before the county or city was reasonably related to the person's issue as presented to the board.(5) When considering a possible adjustment to a growth management planning population projection prepared by the office of financial management, the board shall consider the implications of any such adjustment to the population forecast for the entire state.The rationale for any adjustment that is adopted by the board must be documented and filed with the office of financial management within ten working days after adoption.If adjusted by the board, a county growth management planning population projection shall only be used for the planning purposes set forth in this chapter and shall be known as the "board adjusted population projection." None of these changes shall affect the official state and county population forecasts prepared by the office of financial management, which shall continue to be used for state budget and planning purposes.Sec.
4.
RCW 36.70A.280 and 2011 c 360 s 17 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The growth management hearings board shall hear and determine only those petitions alleging either:(a) That, except as provided otherwise by this subsection, a state agency, county, or city planning under this chapter is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption of shoreline master programs or amendments thereto, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to plans, development regulations, or amendments, adopted under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW.
Nothing in this subsection authorizes the board to hear petitions alleging noncompliance with RCW 36.70A.5801;(b) That the twenty-year growth management planning population projections adopted by the office of financial management pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 should be adjusted;(c) That the approval of a work plan adopted under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(a) is not in compliance with the requirements of the program established under RCW 36.70A.710;(d) That regulations adopted under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(b) are not regionally applicable and cannot be adopted, wholly or partially, by another jurisdiction;
((or))(e) That a department certification under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(c) is erroneous;
or(f) That a department certification of the housing element under section 2 of this act is erroneous.(2) A petition may be filed only by:
(a) The state, or a county or city that plans under this chapter;
(b) a person who has participated orally or in writing before the county or city regarding the matter on which a review is being requested;
(c) a person who is certified by the governor within sixty days of filing the request with the board;
or (d) a person qualified pursuant to RCW 34.05.530.(3) For purposes of this section "person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, state agency, governmental subdivision or unit thereof, or public or private organization or entity of any character.(4) To establish participation standing under subsection (2)(b) of this section, a person must show that his or her participation before the county or city was reasonably related to the person's issue as presented to the board.(5) When considering a possible adjustment to a growth management planning population projection prepared by the office of financial management, the board shall consider the implications of any such adjustment to the population forecast for the entire state.The rationale for any adjustment that is adopted by the board must be documented and filed with the office of financial management within ten working days after adoption.If adjusted by the board, a county growth management planning population projection shall only be used for the planning purposes set forth in this chapter and shall be known as the "board adjusted population projection." None of these changes shall affect the official state and county population forecasts prepared by the office of financial management, which shall continue to be used for state budget and planning purposes.Sec.
5.
RCW 36.70A.290 and 2011 c 277 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:(1) All requests for review to the growth management hearings board shall be initiated by filing a petition that includes a detailed statement of issues presented for resolution by the board.
The board shall render written decisions articulating the basis for its holdings.
The board shall not issue advisory opinions on issues not presented to the board in the statement of issues, as modified by any prehearing order.(2) All petitions relating to whether or not an adopted comprehensive plan, development regulation, or permanent amendment thereto, is in compliance with the goals and requirements of this chapter or chapter 90.58 or 43.21C RCW must be filed within sixty days after publication as provided in (a) through (c) of this subsection.(a) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, the date of publication for a city shall be the date the city publishes the ordinance, or summary of the ordinance, adopting the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto, as is required to be published.(b) Promptly after adoption, a county shall publish a notice that it has adopted the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto.Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, for purposes of this section the date of publication for a county shall be the date the county publishes the notice that it has adopted the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto.(c) For local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040, promptly after approval or disapproval of a local government's shoreline master program or amendment thereto by the department of ecology as provided in RCW 90.58.090, the department of ecology shall publish a notice that the shoreline master program or amendment thereto has been approved or disapproved.
For purposes of this section, the date of publication for the adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program is the date the department of ecology publishes notice that the shoreline master program or amendment thereto has been approved or disapproved.(d) For local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040, promptly after approval or disapproval of a local government's housing element by the department as provided in section 2 of this act, the department shall publish a notice that the housing element has been approved or disapproved.
For purposes of this section, the date of publication for the adoption or amendment of a housing element is the date that the department publishes notice that the housing element has been approved or disapproved.(3) Unless the board dismisses the petition as frivolous or finds that the person filing the petition lacks standing, or the parties have filed an agreement to have the case heard in superior court as provided in RCW 36.70A.295, the board shall, within ten days of receipt of the petition, set a time for hearing the matter.(4) The board shall base its decision on the record developed by the city, county, or the state and supplemented with additional evidence if the board determines that such additional evidence would be necessary or of substantial assistance to the board in reaching its decision.(5) The board, shall consolidate, when appropriate, all petitions involving the review of the same comprehensive plan or the same development regulation or regulations.Sec.
6.
Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands.(24) "Affordable housing" means, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, residential housing whose monthly costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed thirty percent of the monthly income of a household whose income is sixty percent of the median householdfamily income adjusted for householdfamily size, for the county where the household is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development.(25) "Extremely low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below thirty percent of the median householdfamily income adjusted for householdfamily size, for the county where the household is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development.(26) "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below eighty percent of the median householdfamily income adjusted for householdfamily size, for the county where the household is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development.(27) "Very low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below fifty percent of the median householdfamily income adjusted for householdfamily size, for the county where the household is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development.Sec.
7.4.
8.5.
9.6.
A county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040 that has not adopted a comprehensive plan and development regulations within the time periods specified in RCW 36.70A.040 is not prohibited from receiving a grant or loan under this chapter if the comprehensive plan and development regulations are adopted as required by RCW 36.70A.040 before the department executes a contractual agreement for the grant or loan.(3) Whenever the department is considering awarding grants or loans for public facilities to special districts requesting funding for a proposed facility located in a county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040, it shall consider whether the county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040 in whose planning jurisdiction the proposed facility is located has adopted a comprehensive plan and development regulations as required by RCW 36.70A.040.(4) The department may not award a grant or loan for a public facility located in a city subject to the requirements of section 11(1) (1) and (2) of this act unless the city has certified to the department of commerce that it is in compliance with section 11(1) (1) and (2) of this act.(5)act, as appropriate.(5) After January 1, 2010, any project designed to address the effects of water pollution on Puget Sound may be funded under this chapter only if the project is not in conflict with the action agenda developed by the Puget Sound partnership under RCW 90.71.310.Sec.
10.7.
A county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040 that has not adopted a comprehensive plan and development regulations within the time periods specified in RCW 36.70A.040 may apply for and receive financial assistance under this chapter if the comprehensive plan and development regulations are adopted as required by RCW 36.70A.040 before executing a contractual agreement for financial assistance with the board.(3) In considering awarding financial assistance for public facilities to special districts requesting funding for a proposed facility located in a county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040, the board must consider whether the county, city, or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040 in whose planning jurisdiction the proposed facility is located has adopted a comprehensive plan and development regulations as required by RCW 36.70A.040.(4) The board may not award financial assistance for a proposed facility located in a city subject to the requirements of section 11(1) (1) and (2) of this act unless the city has certified to the boarddepartment of commerce that it is in compliance with section 11(1) (1) and (2) of this act, as appropriate, of this act.(5)(a) The board must develop a process to prioritize applications and funding of loans and grants for public works projects submitted by local governments.
11.8.
For a project located in a city that is subject to the requirements of section 11(1) (1) and (2) of this act, the city must certify to the boarddepartment of commerce that it is in compliance with section 11(1) (1) and (2) of this actact, as appropriate, in order for the project to be eligible to receive these funds.
12.9.
A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW to read as follows:(1) A project action implementing section 1 of this act and evaluated under this chapter by a city, town, or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 is exempt from appeals under this chapter on the basis of the evaluation of or impacts to transportation elements of the environment, so long as the project does not present significant adverse impacts to thestate state-ownedhighways transportation system as determined by the department of transportation and the project is:(a)(i) Consistent with a locally adopted transportation plan;
13.10.
The process for community involvement must have the goal of fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the development and implementation of the subarea planning process.(d)))process.)) The notice of the community meeting must include general illustrations and descriptions of buildings generally representative of the maximum building envelope that will be allowed under the proposed plan and indicate that future appeals of proposed developments that are consistent with the plan will be limited.
The city shall also discuss the results of the analysis at the community meeting.(g)))(e)meeting.))(e) As an incentive for development authorized under this section, a city shall consider establishing a transfer of development rights program in consultation with the county where the city is located, that conserves county-designated agricultural and forestland of long-term commercial significance.
14.11.
15.12.
A new section is added to chapter 35.21 RCW to read as follows:Permanent supportive housing shall be a permitted use in all areas where multifamily housing is permitted.NEWpermitted.Sec. SECTION. Sec.
16.13.
A new section is added to chapter 35A.21 RCW to read as follows:Permanent supportive housing shall be a permitted use in all areas where multifamily housing is permitted.Sec.
17.
((and(8)))(9)and(((8)))(9) May provide for the imposition of an impact fee for system improvement costs previously incurred by a county, city, or town to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvements provided such fee shall not be imposed to make up for any system improvement deficiencies;deficiencies.For purposes of this section, "low-income housing" means housing with a monthly housing expense, that is no greater than thirty percent of eighty percent of the median family income adjusted for family size, for the county where the project is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development.--- END ---
and(10) May not impose impact fees that cumulatively amount to more than fifty thousand dollars for any single-family residential project.For purposes of this section, "low-income housing" means housing with a monthly housing expense, that is no greater than thirty percent of eighty percent of the median ((family))household income adjusted for ((family))household size, for the county where the project is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development.NEW SECTION. Sec.
18.
Section 4 of this act takes effect December 31, 2020.NEW SECTION. Sec.
19.
Section 3 of this act expires December 31, 2020.NEW SECTION. Sec.
20.
If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 2019, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.--- END ---
Show all 134 changed rows (94 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Engrossed Second Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 7/28/2019*.
-
Chapter 348, 2019 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Passed final passage; yeas, 75; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 4.
-
House concurred in Senate amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 33; nays, 16; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Returned to second reading for amendment.
-
Senate receded from amendments.
-
House refuses to concur in Senate amendments. Asks Senate to recede from amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 33; nays, 12; absent, 0; excused, 4.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Committee amendment not adopted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing Stability & Affordability at 01:30 PM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
HSA - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing Stability & Affordability at 01:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Housing Stability & Affordability.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 66; nays, 30; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 10:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
APP - Executive action taken by committee.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
APP - Executive action taken by committee.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 01:30 PM
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 08:00 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
ENVI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
ENVI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 01:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Environment & Energy.
Sponsors
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Primary
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Appleton · Cosponsor
- Beth Doglio · Cosponsor
- Dolan · Cosponsor
- Sharon Tomiko Santos · Cosponsor
- Noel Frame · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
Co-sponsors (6)
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Appleton
- Beth Doglio Democrat
- Dolan
- Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat
- Noel Frame Democrat
Not signed on (144)
144 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 144 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 13 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 42 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 19 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 19% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Not Voting |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Nay |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Not Voting |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Not Voting |
| Van Werven | — | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Nay |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Not Voting |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Nay |
| Becker | — | Nay |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Nay |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Nay |
| Rolfes | — | Nay |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Nay |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 24% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Not Voting |
| Becker | — | Nay |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Nay |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Not Voting |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Not Voting |
| Mullet | — | Not Voting |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Nay |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Nay |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 8 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 41 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 66 | 30 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 31% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Nay |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Nay |
| Jenkin | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Not Voting |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Not Voting |
| Van Werven | — | Nay |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Nay |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Nay |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1923?
- HB 1923 is sponsored by Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Appleton, Beth Doglio (Democrat), Dolan, Sharon Tomiko Santos (Democrat), and Noel Frame (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1923?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1923?
- Track HB 1923 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1923
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1923
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →