HB 1239 — Protecting the confidentiality of health care quality and peer review discussions to support effective patient safety.
Last action — Effective date 7/28/2019.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2019. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Bill HB 1239 focus on clarifying the processes for meetings related to the privileges of healthcare providers and quality improvement committees. The updated bill ensures that while discussions about granting or revoking clinical privileges are confidential, any final decisions must be made in public. This matters because it balances the need for privacy during sensitive discussions with the public's right to transparency and accountability in healthcare decisions. By reinforcing public access to final actions, it aims to enhance trust in the healthcare system and the decision-making processes of public hospitals.
H-1503.1SUBSTITUTEH-0133.1HOUSE HOUSE BILL 1239State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByHouseSessionByRepresentatives Health Care & Wellness (originally sponsored by Representatives Cody, Schmick, Macri, Harris, Appleton, Thai, Wylie, and Chambers)READChambersRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/08/19.AN01/17/19.Referred to Committee on Health Care & Wellness.AN ACT Relating to protecting the confidentiality of health care quality and peer review discussions to support effective patient safety;
amending RCW 42.30.110;
however, the final action of the governing body as to the denial, revocation, or restriction of clinical or staff privileges of a physician or other health care provider as defined in RCW 7.70.020 must be done in public session.(2) All meetings, proceedings, and deliberations of a quality improvement committee established under RCW 4.24.250, 43.70.510, or 70.41.200 and all meetings, proceedings, and deliberations of the governingboard body,of commissioners, its staff or agents, to review the report or the activities of a quality improvement committee established under RCW 4.24.250, 43.70.510, or 70.41.200 may, at the discretion of the quality improvement committee or the governing body, be confidential and may be conducted in executive session.
and(b) "Public hospital" means any hospital owned or operated by the state or any of its subdivisions, including the University of Washington.Sec.Washington.--- END ---
2.
RCW 42.30.110 and 2017 c 137 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Nothing contained in this chapter may be construed to prevent a governing body from holding an executive session during a regular or special meeting:(a)(i) To consider matters affecting national security;(ii) To consider, if in compliance with any required data security breach disclosure under RCW 19.255.010 and 42.56.590, and with legal counsel available, information regarding the infrastructure and security of computer and telecommunications networks, security and service recovery plans, security risk assessments and security test results to the extent that they identify specific system vulnerabilities, and other information that if made public may increase the risk to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of agency security or to information technology infrastructure or assets;(b) To consider the selection of a site or the acquisition of real estate by lease or purchase when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased price;(c) To consider the minimum price at which real estate will be offered for sale or lease when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of decreased price.
However, final action selling or leasing public property shall be taken in a meeting open to the public;(d) To review negotiations on the performance of publicly bid contracts when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased costs;(e) To consider, in the case of an export trading company, financial and commercial information supplied by private persons to the export trading company;(f) To receive and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer or employee.
However, upon the request of such officer or employee, a public hearing or a meeting open to the public shall be conducted upon such complaint or charge;(g) To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment or to review the performance of a public employee.
However, subject to RCW 42.30.140(4), discussion by a governing body of salaries, wages, and other conditions of employment to be generally applied within the agency shall occur in a meeting open to the public, and when a governing body elects to take final action hiring, setting the salary of an individual employee or class of employees, or discharging or disciplining an employee, that action shall be taken in a meeting open to the public;(h) To evaluate the qualifications of a candidate for appointment to elective office.
However, any interview of such candidate and final action appointing a candidate to elective office shall be in a meeting open to the public;(i) To discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to agency enforcement actions, or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency.This subsection (1)(i) does not permit a governing body to hold an executive session solely because an attorney representing the agency is present.
For purposes of this subsection (1)(i), "potential litigation" means matters protected by RPC 1.6 or RCW 5.60.060(2)(a) concerning:(i) Litigation that has been specifically threatened to which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party;(ii) Litigation that the agency reasonably believes may be commenced by or against the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity;
or(iii) Litigation or legal risks of a proposed action or current practice that the agency has identified when public discussion of the litigation or legal risks is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency;(j) To consider, in the case of the state library commission or its advisory bodies, western library network prices, products, equipment, and services, when such discussion would be likely to adversely affect the network's ability to conduct business in a competitive economic climate.
However, final action on these matters shall be taken in a meeting open to the public;(k) To consider, in the case of the state investment board, financial and commercial information when the information relates to the investment of public trust or retirement funds and when public knowledge regarding the discussion would result in loss to such funds or in private loss to the providers of this information;(l) To consider proprietary or confidential nonpublished information related to the development, acquisition, or implementation of state purchased health care services as provided in RCW 41.05.026;(m) To consider in the case of the life sciences discovery fund authority, the substance of grant applications and grant awards when public knowledge regarding the discussion would reasonably be expected to result in private loss to the providers of this information;(n) To consider in the case of a health sciences and services authority, the substance of grant applications and grant awards when public knowledge regarding the discussion would reasonably be expected to result in private loss to the providers of this information;(o) To consider information regarding staff privileges or quality improvement committees under section 1 of this act.(2) Before convening in executive session, the presiding officer of a governing body shall publicly announce the purpose for excluding the public from the meeting place, and the time when the executive session will be concluded.
The executive session may be extended to a stated later time by announcement of the presiding officer.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 7/28/2019.
-
Chapter 162, 2019 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 44; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 5.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Placed on second reading consent calendar.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Health & Long Term Care at 01:30 PM
-
HLTC - Majority; do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Health & Long Term Care at 01:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 98; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 01:30 PM
-
HCW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
HCW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness at 01:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness.
Sponsors
- Joe Schmick · Cosponsor
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Paul Harris · Cosponsor
- Appleton · Cosponsor
- My-Linh Thai · Cosponsor
- Sharon Wylie · Cosponsor
- Chambers · Cosponsor
- Cody · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cody
Co-sponsors (7)
- Joe Schmick Republican
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Paul Harris Republican
- Appleton
- My-Linh Thai Democrat
- Sharon Wylie Democrat
- Chambers
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 44 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Not Voting |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Not Voting |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Not Voting |
| Mullet | — | Not Voting |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Not Voting |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Van Werven | — | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1239?
- HB 1239 is sponsored by Joe Schmick (Republican), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Paul Harris (Republican), Appleton, My-Linh Thai (Democrat), Sharon Wylie (Democrat), Chambers, and Cody.
- What is the current status of HB 1239?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1239?
- Track HB 1239 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1239
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1239
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →