Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 4 D cosponsors

SB 6342 — Concerning chemical contaminants in drinking water.

Last action — Returned to Senate Rules 3.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Senate Bill 6342 clarifies definitions and sets requirements for testing and reporting related to harmful chemicals, specifically PFAS substances, in drinking water. It mandates that all group A water systems submit testing results to the Department of Health by the end of 2020, ensuring that any contamination is quickly addressed for the safety of the public. Additionally, the bill requires the establishment of maximum contaminant levels for PFAS and emphasizes ongoing monitoring and communication with consumers about water quality. These changes are significant as they aim to better protect public health by addressing the growing concerns over water contamination and setting clear standards for water systems.

→
Previous
Latest
S-5810.2SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6342State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenate Environment, Energy & Technology (originally sponsored by Senators Dhingra, Das, Lovelett, Mullet, Stanford, and Wilson, C.)READ FIRST TIME 01/31/20.AN ACT Relating to chemical contaminants in drinking water;
S-5260.1SENATE BILL 6342State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenators Dhingra, Das, Lovelett, Mullet, Stanford, and Wilson, C.Read first time 01/15/20.Referred to Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology.AN ACT Relating to chemical contaminants in drinking water;
adding new sections to chapter 70.142 RCW;
and adding new sections to chapter 70.142 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec.
and creating a new section.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec.
(1) The legislature finds that ensuring safe drinking water is a primary concern for protecting public health.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:The definitions in this section apply throughout sections 2 through 5 of this act unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(1) "Department" means the department of health.(2) "Group A water system" means a system with fifteen or more service connections, regardless of the number of people;
The federal safe drinking water act was established to protect the quality of drinking water through standards and regulations adopted by the United States environmental protection agency and implemented by the state.
or a system serving an average of twenty-five or more people per day for sixty or more days within a calendar year, regardless of the number of service connections.(3) "PFAS substances" means perfluorooctanoic acid, chemical abstract number 335-67-1 (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, chemical abstract number 1763-23-1 (PFOS), perfluorohexyl sulfonate, chemical abstract number 335-46-4 (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid, chemical abstract number 375-95-1 (PFNA), and perfluorobutane sulfonate, chemical abstract number 375-73-5 (PFBS).(4) "Public water system" means any system, excluding a system serving only one single-family residence and a system with four or fewer connections all of which serve residences on the same farm, providing piped water for human consumption, including any collection, treatment, storage, or distribution facilities under control of the purveyor and used primarily in connection with the system;
The United States has been known for safe and reliable drinking water.
However, public health needs to keep pace with evolving science in developing and reevaluating standards to protect drinking water from contaminants.(2) The legislature intends to protect public health, including vulnerable populations, by requiring the department of health to develop maximum contaminant levels or state action levels that take into account the best available science and treatment techniques to ensure safe drinking water.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
2.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:The definitions in this section apply throughout sections 3 and 4 of this act unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(1) "Department" means the department of health.(2) "Group A water system" means a system with fifteen or more service connections, regardless of the number of people;
or a system serving an average of twenty-five or more people per day for sixty or more days within a calendar year, regardless of the number of service connections.(3) "PFAS chemicals" means a class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom and referred to as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.(4) "Public water system" means any system, excluding a system serving only one single-family residence and a system with four or fewer connections all of which serve residences on the same farm, providing piped water for human consumption, including any collection, treatment, storage, or distribution facilities under control of the purveyor and used primarily in connection with the system;
2.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:(1) By December 31, 2020, all group A water systems must provide results from testing conducted after January 1, 2017, for PFAS substances to the department.
The samples must be collected, transported, and submitted for analysis consistent with the United States environmental protection agency methods or other department-approved methods.(2) The department must make recommendations regarding state action levels and treatment or other remedies to reduce PFAS substances in the drinking water systems.
(3) By January 1, 2021, the state board of health must adopt rules to implement recommendations for state action levels and treatment or other remedies to reduce PFAS substances, as developed under subsection (2) of this section.
The rules may include waivers for testing and frequency of testing.
Minimum requirements for water systems with PFAS substances at or above the state action level must include:(a) Ongoing monitoring of the water system;
and(b) Notification to water system consumers.(4) When a maximum contaminant level for PFAS substances has been established by the state board of health or the United States environmental protection agency, if determined by the department to be adequate to protect public health, the state board of health must repeal the rules implementing the PFAS substances state action levels.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:(1)(a) Beginning January 1, 2021, public water systems, as determined by the department through sampling results or identified as known or potential sources of contaminants and proximity to group A water systems that have levels of PFAS chemicals above the state action level, must test drinking water for PFAS chemicals.(b) The department may work with local health jurisdictions to determine public water systems at risk for contamination as well as testing and monitoring parameters.(c) The samples must be collected by public water systems and must be transported and submitted for analysis consistent with the United States environmental protection agency methods or other department-approved methods.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:(1)(a) By January 1, 2021, public water systems, as determined by the department through sampling results or identified as known or potential sources of contaminants, must test drinking water for PFAS substances.(b) The department may work with local health jurisdictions to determine public water systems at risk for contamination as well as testing and monitoring parameters.(c) The samples must be collected by public water systems and must be transported and submitted for analysis consistent with the United States environmental protection agency methods or other department-approved methods.
The test results must be provided to the department.(2) By June 1, 2022, the department must review the test results and provide a report, consistent with RCW 43.01.036, to the legislature regarding the extent to which any PFAS chemicals are found in public water systems, sources of contamination, clean-up requirements or mitigation, impacts to consumers and the water systems, including costs, and any necessary legislative actions.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
The test results must be provided to the department.(2) The department must review the test results and provide a report, consistent with RCW 43.01.036, to the legislature regarding the extent to which any PFAS substances are found in public water systems, sources of contamination, clean-up requirements or mitigation, impacts to consumers and the water systems, including costs, and any necessary legislative actions.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department must establish for group A water systems statewide maximum contaminant levels for PFAS chemicals.(2) When establishing maximum contaminant levels, the department must review maximum contaminant levels adopted by other states, the studies and scientific evidence reviewed by those states, material in the agency for toxic substances and disease registry, and the latest peer-reviewed science and independent or government agency studies.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department must establish for group A water systems statewide maximum contaminant levels for PFAS substances, chromium 6, and 1,4 dioxane.(2) When establishing maximum contaminant levels, the department must review maximum contaminant levels adopted by other states, the studies and scientific evidence reviewed by those states, material in the agency for toxic substances and disease registry, and the latest peer-reviewed science and independent or government agency studies.
The maximum contaminant levels must be protective of public health, including vulnerable populations, and must be at least as restrictive as the maximum contaminant levels or health advisories promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency.(3) The department may adopt maximum contaminant levels more stringent than federal maximum contaminant levels or health advisories if, accounting for an adequate margin of safety to protect human health at all life stages including, but not limited to, prenatal development, the department determines federal standards do not provide adequate protection of human health.(4) By January 1, 2025, the department must provide to the state board of health recommendations to implement requirements for maximum contaminant levels for PFAS chemicals in group A water systems.
The maximum contaminant levels must be protective of public health, including vulnerable subpopulations such as pregnant and nursing mothers, infants, and children, and at least as restrictive as the maximum contaminant levels or health advisory promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency.(3) The department may adopt maximum contaminant levels more stringent than federal maximum contaminant levels or health advisories if, accounting for an adequate margin of safety to protect human health at all life stages including, but not limited to, prenatal development, the department determines federal standards do not provide adequate protection of human health.(4) By January 1, 2025, the department must provide to the state board of health recommendations to implement requirements for maximum contaminant levels for PFAS substances in group A water systems.(5) By July 1, 2026, the state board of health must adopt rules to specify actions to be taken by group A water systems when PFAS substances are detected at or above the maximum contaminant level.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
However, where the department finds there is insufficient information to develop a maximum contaminant level for a specific PFAS chemical found in group A water systems, the department must establish a state action level and provide recommendations for the best available treatment technology necessary to protect public health and to assist group A water systems to achieve the state action level.(5) By July 1, 2026, the state board of health must adopt rules to specify actions to be taken by group A water systems when PFAS chemicals are detected at or above the maximum contaminant level or a state action level.(6) The state board of health must require a group A water system that exceeds a state action level, as adopted by rule, to recommend consumers use an alternate source of drinking water.Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 70.142 RCW to read as follows:(1) By December 31, 2025, every group A water system must provide results from testing conducted after January 1, 2020, for chromium 6 and 1,4 dioxane.(2) The state board of health must adopt rules to specify actions to be taken by water system purveyors when chromium 6 or 1,4 dioxane are detected at or above the maximum contaminant level established by the department, as required under section 4 of this act.
When developing the rules, the state board of health may determine water systems at risk for contamination to prioritize monitoring requirements and treatment or other remedies to reduce the levels of chromium 6 and 1,4 dioxane in the drinking water system to below the maximum contaminant level.
Minimum requirements for water systems contaminated with chromium 6 and 1,4 dioxane must include:(a) Ongoing monitoring of the water system;
and(b) Notification to water system consumers.Sec.
6.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Returned to Senate Rules 3.

  2. Referred to Appropriations.

  3. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 08:00 AM

  4. Minority; do not pass.

  5. ENVI - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  6. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 01:30 PM

  7. First reading, referred to Environment & Energy.

  8. Third reading, passed; yeas, 32; nays, 15; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  9. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  10. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  11. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  12. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  13. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  14. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  15. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  16. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  17. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  18. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  19. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM

  20. Minority; without recommendation.

  21. Minority; do not pass.

  22. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  23. Minority; without recommendation.

  24. Minority; do not pass.

  25. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  26. Minority; without recommendation.

  27. Minority; do not pass.

  28. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  29. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 03:30 PM

  30. Referred to Ways & Means.

  31. Referred to Ways & Means.

  32. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 10:00 AM

  33. Minority; without recommendation.

  34. Minority; do not pass.

  35. And refer to Ways & Means.

  36. ENET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  37. Minority; without recommendation.

  38. Minority; do not pass.

  39. And refer to Ways & Means.

  40. ENET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  41. First reading, referred to Environment, Energy & Technology.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 32 Yea · 15 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18601
Republican 0901
Democrat 14000
Total 321502
% of votes cast 65%31%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Becker — Nay
Billig — Yea
Brown — Nay
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Not Voting
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Nay
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Nay
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Ron Muzzall Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6342?
SB 6342 is sponsored by Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Das, Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Mullet, Derek Stanford (Democrat), and Claire Wilson (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 6342?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 6342?
Track SB 6342 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6342

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6342

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →