SB 321 — Limiting municipalities’ authority to restrict purchase and storage of weapons and ammunition
Last action — Rereferred to Rules on 2nd reading
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 11, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 24 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 321 allows municipalities to prohibit individuals without a valid concealed handgun license from carrying firearms on publicly owned properties. It also removes the ability of municipalities to regulate the operating hours of businesses selling firearms and related items, ensuring these businesses are treated similarly to other retail operations. These changes are significant because they could make it easier for people to carry firearms in public spaces while limiting local governments' authority to impose restrictions on gun-related businesses.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 321 BYSENATORTRUMPBY SENATORS TRUMP, DEEDS, UCKER , HAPMAN , PHILLIP, WOODRUM , ARR, MITH, HAMILTO, STUART, AND JEFFRIES [Originating in the Committee on GovernmentRules; Organization;
reported JanuaryFebruary 24,9, 2024] CS for CS for SB 321 A BILL to amend and reenact §8-12-5a of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to limitations upon municipalities’ power to restrict the sale and storage of weapons and ammunition;
GENERAL AND SPECIFIC POWERS, DUTIES,DUTIES AND ALLIED RELATIONS OF MUNICIPALITIES, GOVERNING BODIES,BODIES AND MUNICIPAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES;
(a) Neither a municipality nor the governing body of any municipality may, by ordinance or otherwise, limit the right of any person to purchase, possess, transfer, own, carry, transport, sell, or store any deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray, or any ammunition or ammunition components to be used therewith,therewith nor to so regulate the keeping of gunpowder so as to directly or indirectly prohibit the ownership of the ammunition in any manner inconsistent with or in conflict with state law.
Provided, That “municipally owned or operated building” does not include a building owned by a CS for CS for SB 321 municipality that is leased to a private entity where the municipality primarily serves as a property owner receiving rental payments.
(4) A municipality may not prohibit or regulate the carrying or possessing of a deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray on municipally owned or operated property other than municipally owned or operated buildings and municipally owned recreation facilities pursuant to subdivisions (1) and (2)(2), subsection (b), of this section:
CS for CS for SB 321 (d) It shall be an absolute defense to an action for an alleged violation of an ordinance authorized by this section prohibiting or regulating the possession of a deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray that the person:
(1) Upon being requested to do so, left the premises with the deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray,spray or temporarily relinquished the deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray in response to being informed that his or her possession of the deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray was contrary to municipal ordinance;
and (2) but for the municipal ordinance,ordinance the person was lawfully in possession of the deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray.
(e) Any municipality that enacts an ordinance regulating or prohibiting the carrying or possessing of a deadly weapon, firearm, or pepper spray pursuant to subsection (c) of this section shall prominently post a clear statement at each entrance to all applicable municipally owned or operated buildings,buildings or municipally owned recreation facilities setting forth the terms of the regulation or prohibition.
except that a municipality may not restrict or regulate a businessfirearms entity by closing or limitingammunitions therelated operatingbusiness hours of an entity engaged in thea lawfulmanner sellingmore orrestrictive servicing of any firearm, including any component or accessory, ammunition, ammunition reloading equipment, and supplies, or personal weapons other than firearms, unless CS for SB 321 the closingplanning or limitationzoning ofordinances hoursimposed appliesupon generallyany withinother theretail jurisdictionbusiness, of commerce, nor shall a municipality place restrictions oron quantity limitations regarding the lawful sale or servicing of any CS for CS for SB 321 firearm or ammunition, any firearm or ammunition component or accessory, ammunition reloading equipment and supplies, or personal weapons other than firearms, all including all indoor or outdoor shooting ranges.
View plain text versions (3)
- Committee Substitute Committee Substitute for the Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
Action History
-
Rereferred to Rules on 2nd reading
-
Laid over on 2nd reading 2/13/2024
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute for committee substitute reported
-
Referred to Rules on 1st reading
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Government Organization
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Government Organization
Sponsors
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Stuart · Cosponsor
- Eric Tarr · Cosponsor
- Jack Woodrum · Cosponsor
- Phillips · Cosponsor
- Laura Wakim Chapman · Cosponsor
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Vince Deeds · Cosponsor
- Trump · Primary
- Randy E. Smith · Cosponsor
- Bill Hamilton · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 141 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Trump
Co-sponsors (10)
- Jeffries
- Stuart
- Eric Tarr Republican
- Jack Woodrum Republican
- Phillips
- Laura Wakim Chapman Republican
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Vince Deeds Republican
- Randy E. Smith Republican
- Bill Hamilton Republican
Not signed on (141)
141 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 141 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 321?
- SB 321 is sponsored by Jeffries, Stuart, Eric Tarr (Republican), Jack Woodrum (Republican), Phillips, Laura Wakim Chapman (Republican), Patricia Rucker (Republican), Vince Deeds (Republican), Trump, Randy E. Smith (Republican), and Bill Hamilton (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 321?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 11, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 321?
- Track SB 321 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 321
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 321
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →