HB 650 — Zoning; solar photovoltaic and energy storage projects.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0301)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 02, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Zoning; residential and electrical generation projects; period of validity. Provides that the conditions of a special exception or special use permit may include a period of validity; however, in the case of a special exception or special use permit for residential and electrical generation projects, the period of validity shall be no fewer than three years. The bill provides that for so long as a special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit remains valid, no change or amendment to any local ordinance, map, resolution, rule, regulation, policy, or plan adopted subsequent to the date of approval of the special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit shall adversely affect the right of the developer or his successor in interest to commence and complete an approved development in accordance with the lawful terms of the special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit unless the change or amendment is required to comply with state law or there has been a mistake, fraud, or a change in circumstances substantially affecting the public health, safety, or welfare.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
197 added · 189 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 650 extends the period that landowners or developers have to commence solar energy projects from a minimum of three years. It also clarifies that changes to local laws during this period cannot negatively affect their approved projects, except under specific circumstances like compliance with state law or significant changes in public health and safety. This matters because it provides more certainty and stability for developers invested in renewable energy projects, potentially encouraging more solar energy development in Virginia.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2024 SESSION CHAPTER E301 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 15.2-2209.1:2 and 15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia, relating toNto zoning;
period of validity for certain projeRts.projects.
O [H 650] Approved LApril L2, 2024 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That §§ 15.2-2209.1:2 and 15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted as E follows:
D§ A.15.2-2209.1:2.
Extension of land use approvals for solar photovoltaic projects.
A.
For so long as the special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit remains valid, no change or amendment to any local ordinance, map, resolution, rule, regulation, policy, or plan adoptedadoptedno subsequent to the date of approval of the special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit shall adversely affect the right of the developer or his successor in interest to commence and Hompletecomplete an approved development in accordance with the lawful terms of the special exception, special u6euse permit, or conditional use permit unless the change or amendment is required to comply with state law or there has been a mistake, fraud, or a change in circumstances substantially affecting the publicawpublic health, safety, or welfare.
R Application for minor modifications to special exceptions, special use permits, or conditional use permits made during the period of validity shall not constitute a waiver of the provisions hereof nor shall the approval of minor modifications extend the period of validity of such plats or plans.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, for any valid special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit, or any modifications thereto, for a solar photovoltaic or energy storage project outstanding as of July 1, 2023, any deadline in the exception permit, or in the local zoning ordinance that requires the landowner or developer to commence the project within a certain time, may be extended by a resolution of the governing body until July 1, 2026, or such longer period as may be agreed to by the locality.
jurisdiction2. of the governing body by annexation or otherwise, subsequent to the adoption of the zoning ordinance, and pending the orderly amendment of the ordinance.
For the temporary application of the ordinance to any property coming into the territorial jurisdiction of the governing body by annexation or otherwise, subsequent to the adoption of the zoning ordinance, and pending the orderly amendment of the ordinance.
When imposing conditions on residential projects specifying materials and methods of construction or specific design features, the approving body shall consider the impact of the exceptionconditions orupon specialthe useaffordability permit;of housing.
however,Conditions inmay include the caseperiod of validity for a special exception or special use permitpermit; forial residential projects, the period of validity shall be no less than three years.
however, in the case of a special exception or special use permit for residential projects, the period of validity shall be no less than three years.
The governing body of the City of Richmond may impose a condition upon any special use permit issued after July 1, 2000, relating to retail alcoholic beverage licensees which provides that such special use permit shall be subject to an automatic review by the governing body upon a change in possession,pecialpossession, a change in the owner of the business, or a transfer of majority control of the business entity.
Upon of 4 review by the governing body, it may either amend or revoke the special use permit after notice and a public hearing as required by § 15.2-2206.
of 4 4.
Failure to abate the violation within the specified time period shall be punishable by a fine of up to $5,000, and any such failure during any succeeding 10-day period shall constitute a separate misdemeanor offense of 4 for each 10-day period punishable by a fine of up to $7,500.
However, no such fine shall accrue against an owner or managing agent of a single-family residential dwelling unit during the pendency of Enyany legal action commenced by such owner or managing agent of such dwelling unit against a tenant to eliminate an overcrowding condition in accordance with the Virginia Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (§ 55.1-1200 et seq.).
A conviction resulting from a violation of provisions regulating theRnumberthe number of of 4 unrelated persons in single-family residential dwellings shall not be punishable by a jail term.
notices6. and other expenses incident to the administration of a zoning ordinance or to the filing oring of processing of any appeal or amendment thereto.
LFor 7.the collection of fees to cover the cost of making inspections, issuing permits, advertising of notices and other expenses incident to the administration of a zoning ordinance or to the filing or processing of any appeal or amendment thereto.
7.
Whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires, the governing body may by ordinance amend, supplement, or change the regulations, district boundariEs,boundaries, or classifications of property.
or (iii) by petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's written consent, or the owner's agent therefor, of the property which is the subject of the proposed zoning map amendment, addressed to the governing body or the local planning providecommission, forwho theshall considerationforward ofsuch proposedpetition amendmentsto only at specified intervals of time, and may further provide that substantially the samegoverning petitionbody; will not be reconsidered within a specific period, not exceeding one year.
however, the ordinance may provide for the consideration of proposed amendments only at specified intervals of time, and may further provide that substantially the same petition will not be reconsidered within a specific period, not exceeding one year.
H In any county having adopted such zoning ordinance, all motions, resolutions or petitions for amendment to the zoning ordinance, and/or map shall be acted upon and a decision made within su5hsuch reasonable time as may be necessary which shall not exceed 12 months unless the applicant requeEtsrequests or consents to action beyond such period or unless the applicant withdraws his motion, resolution or petition for amendment to the zoning ordinance or map, or both.
In the event of and upon such withdrawal, processing of the motion, resolution or petition shall cease without further action as oth8.otherwise would be required by this subdivision.
8.
The locality may establish reasonable guidelines for determining the amount of thisexcess section,real "downzoning"estate meanstax acollected zoningand actionthe bymethod aand localityduration thatfor resultsapplying inthe atax reductioncredit. in aurposes formerly permitted land use intensity or density.
For purposes of this section, "downzoning" means a zoning action by a locality that results in a reduction in a formerly permitted land use intensity or density.
Provisions for requiring and considering Phase I environmental site assessments based on the anticipated use of the property proposed for the subdivision or development that meet generally accepted national standards for such assessments, such as those developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials, and Phase II environmental site assessments, that also meet accepted national standards, such as, but not limited to, those developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials, if the locality deems such to be reasonably necessary, based on findings in the Phase I assessment, and in accordance with regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the American environmentalSociety assessments.for Testing and Materials.
A reasonable fee may be charged for the review of such environmental assessments.
permitted15. to occupy a single-family residential dwelling unit, provided such enforcement is inersons compliance with applicable local, state and federal fair housing laws.
For the enforcement of 4provisions 16.of the zoning ordinance that regulate the number of persons permitted to occupy a single-family residential dwelling unit, provided such enforcement is in compliance with applicable local, state and federal fair housing laws.
16.
After executing the warrant, the zoning administrator or his agents shall return the warrant to the clerk of the of 4 circuit court of the city or county wherein the inspection was made.
View plain text versions (4)
- CHAP0301 View text Current pdf April 02, 2024
- HB650ER View text pdf March 05, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24106089D-H1 pdf February 02, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104727D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0301)
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 301 (effective 7/1/24)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB650ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Passed Senate (37-Y 2-N)
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Local Government (14-Y 0-N 1-A)
-
Referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Passage (86-Y 10-N)
-
Read third time and passed House (86-Y 10-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB650H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24106089D-H1
-
Read second time
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns with substitute (21-Y 0-N)
-
Committee substitute printed 24106089D-H1
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned CC & T sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104727D
Sponsors
- Carrie E. Coyner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 37 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 5% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Not Voting |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Not Voting |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 85 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 85 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 10% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Q. Askew | — | Yea |
| Anne Ferrell Tata | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Debra D. Gardner | — | Yea |
| Delores Oates | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Not Voting |
| Ellen H. McLaughlin | — | Yea |
| Higgins, Geary | — | Yea |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Laura Jane Cohen | — | Yea |
| Lovejoy, Ian T. | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Marty Martinez | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Yea |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Ferrell Tata | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Laura Jane Cohen | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Not Voting |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 650 do?
- Zoning; residential and electrical generation projects; period of validity. Provides that the conditions of a special exception or special use permit may include a period of validity; however, in the case of a special exception or special use permit for residential and electrical generation projects, the period of validity shall be no fewer than three years. The bill provides that for so long as a special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit remains valid, no change or amendment to any local ordinance, map, resolution, rule, regulation, policy, or plan adopted subsequent to the date of approval of the special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit shall adversely affect the right of the developer or his successor in interest to commence and complete an approved development in accordance with the lawful terms of the special exception, special use permit, or conditional use permit unless the change or amendment is required to comply with state law or there has been a mistake, fraud, or a change in circumstances substantially affecting the public health, safety, or welfare.
- Who sponsors HB 650?
- HB 650 is sponsored by Coyner, Carrie E..
- What is the current status of HB 650?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 650?
- Track HB 650 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 650
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 650
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →