HB 1415 — Historic structures; civil penalty for demolition.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0835)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 17, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Civil penalty for demolition of historic structures. Authorizes any locality to adopt an ordinance establishing a civil penalty for the razing, demolition, or moving of a building or structure that is located in a historic district or that has been designated by a governing body as a historic structure or landmark in violation of an ordinance that no such building or structure shall be razed, demolished, or moved without the approval of a review board. The bill provides that such civil penalty shall not exceed the market value of the property as determined by the assessed value of the property at the time of razing, demolition, or moving of the building or structure.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
132 added · 128 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to HB 1415 updates the provisions regarding the preservation of historic structures in Virginia. Specifically, it clarifies the requirements for localities to adopt ordinances that protect historic landmarks and allows for the establishment of review boards to oversee developments in these areas. These changes are important because they strengthen the mechanisms that ensure historical and architectural sites are maintained, helping to preserve Virginia’s cultural heritage.
RECONVENED SESSION REENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY --–– 2024 RECONVENED SESSION CHAPTER 835R An Act to amend and reenact § 15.2-2306 of the Code of Virginia, relating to civil penalty for E demolition of historic structures.
E N [H 1415] Approved AprilR 17,O 20241. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
L A.
Any locality may adopt an ordinance setting forth the historic landmarks within the locality as established by the Virginia Board of Historic Resources, and any other buildings or structures withinEithin the locality having an important historic, architectural, archaeological or cultural interest, any historic areas within the locality as defined by § 15.2-2201, and areas of unique architectural value located withinDithin ordinancedesignated andconservation, delineatingrehabilitation one or moreredevelopment historic districts, adjacentamending tothe suchexisting landmarks,zoning buildings and structures, or encompassing such areas, or encompassing parcels of land contiguous to arterial streets or highways (as designated pursuant to Title 33.2, including § 33.2-319 ) found by the governing body to be significant routes of tourist access to the locality or to designated historic landmarks, buildings, structures or districts therein or in a contiguous locality.
A governing body may provide in the ordinance that the applicant must submit documentation that any development in an area of the locality of known historical or archaeological significance will preserve or accommodate the historical or archaeologicalarchaeHlogical resources.
An amendment of the zoning ordinance and the establishment of a district or districtsdistrict1 shall be infor accordancea withreview board to administer the provisionsordinance ofand Articlemay 7provide (§compensation 15.2-2280to etthe seq.).board.
TheThepr1vide governingordinance body may provideinclude for a provision that no building or structure, including signs, shall be erected, reconstructed, altered or restored within any such district unless approved by the review board toor, administeron appeal, by the ordinancegoverning andbody mayof providethe compensationlocality toas being architecturally compatible with the board.historic landmarks, buildings or structures therein.
The ordinance may include a provision that no building or structure, including signs, shall be erected, reconstructed, altered or restored within any such district unless approved by the review board or, on appeal, by the governing body of the locality as being architecturally compatible with the historic landmarks, buildings or structures therein.
Subject to the provisions of subdivision 3, the governing body may provide in the ordinance that no historic landmark, building or structure within any district shall be razed, demolished or moved until thegoverning razing,body demolitionafter orconsultation movingwith thereofthe isreview approvedboard.the by the review board, or, on appeal, by the governing3. body after consultation with the review board.
3.
The filing of the petition shall stay the decision of the governing body pending the outcome of the appeal to the court, except that the filing of the petition shall not stay the decision of the governing body if the decision denies the right to raze or demolish a historic landmark, building ororon of the structure.
(i) he has applied to the governing body for such right, (ii) the owner has for the period of time set forth in the same schedule hereinafter contained and at a price reasonably related to its fair market value, made a bona fide offer to sell the landmark, building or structure, and the land pertaining thereto, to the locality or to any person, firm, corporation, government or agency thereof, or political subdivision or agency thereof, which gives reasonable assurance that it is willing to preserve and restore the landmark, building or structure and the land pertaining thereto, and (iii) no bona fide contract, binding upon all parties thereto, shall have been executed for the sale of any such landmark, building or structure, and the land pertaining thereto, prior to the expiration of the applicable time period set forth in the time schedule hereinafterbody, contained.whether instituted by the owner or by any other proper party, notwithstanding the provisionsng heretofore stated relating to a stay of the decision appealed from shall not affect the right of the owner of 3 to make the bona fide offer to sell referred to above.
AnyNo appealoffer whichto maysell shall be takenmade tomore thethan courtone fromyear theafter a final decision ofby the governing body, whetherbut institutedthereafter by the owner ormay byrenew anyhis otherrequest properto party, notwithstanding the provisionsgoverning heretoforebody stated relating to aapprove stay of the decisionrazing appealedor fromdemolition shall not affect the right of the ownerhistoric tolandmark, makebuilding theor bonastructure. fide offer to sell referred to above.
No offer to sell shall be made more than one year after a final decision by the governing body, but thereafter the owner may renew his request to the of 3 governing body to approve the razing or demolition of the historic landmark, building or structure.
Any locality may adopt an ordinance that establishes a civil penalty for the razing, demolition, or of 3 moving of a building or structure that is located in a historic district or that has been designated by a governing body as a historic structure or landmark in violation of an ordinance adopted pursuantpursuanR to subsection A.
Such civil penalty shall not exceed twice the market value of the razed, demolished,demolishEd, or moved building or structure on the property as determined by the assessed value of the property at the time of the razing, demolition, or moving of the building or structure.
Such ordinance may be enforced of 3 by the attorney for the governing body of the locality by bringing an action in the name of the locality be established by a preponderance of the evidence.or parties alleged to have violated such ordiNance shall Nothing in this subsection shall preclude action by the circuitzoning court.administrator for the governing body seeking a civil penalty as authorized by this subsection.r a separate action or as part of the Oction L L E D H 5 R 2
A finding against the party or parties alleged to have violated such ordinance shall be established by a preponderance of the evidence.
Nothing in this subsection shall preclude action by the zoning administrator for the governing body pursuant to the general laws of the Commonwealth in either a separate action or as part of the action seeking a civil penalty as authorized by this subsection.
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0835)
-
Enacted, Chapter 835 (effective 7/1/24)
-
Signed by President as reenrolled
-
Signed by Speaker as reenrolled
-
Reenrolled bill text (HB1415ER2)
-
Reenrolled
-
Governor's recommendation adopted
-
Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (40-Y 0-N)
-
VOTE: Adoption (62-Y 38-N)
-
House concurred in Governor's recommendation (62-Y 38-N)
-
Governor's recommendation received by House
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB1415ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Passed Senate (24-Y 15-N)
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Local Government (10-Y 3-N 2-A)
-
Referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Passage (54-Y 44-N)
-
Read third time and passed House (54-Y 44-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns (13-Y 9-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (5-Y 3-N)
-
Assigned CC & T sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Presented and ordered printed 24105076D
Sponsors
- Delores L. McQuinn · Primary
- Nadarius E. Clark · Cosponsor
- Jr. Rozia A. Henson · Cosponsor
- Marty Martinez · Cosponsor
- Sam Rasoul · Cosponsor
- Shelly A. Simonds · Cosponsor
- Kelly K. Convirs-Fowler · Cosponsor
- W. Chad Green · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 140 not signed on · 60 voted No
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 61 | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 38% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Not Voting |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 20% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Not Voting |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Not Voting |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 44 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 53 | 44 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 44% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 41% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Q. Askew | — | Yea |
| Anne Ferrell Tata | — | Nay |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Debra D. Gardner | — | Yea |
| Delores Oates | — | Nay |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Yea |
| Ellen H. McLaughlin | — | Nay |
| Higgins, Geary | — | Nay |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Nay |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Nay |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Nay |
| Laura Jane Cohen | — | Yea |
| Lovejoy, Ian T. | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Nay |
| Marty Martinez | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Ferrell Tata | — | Nay |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Nay |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Laura Jane Cohen | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Nay |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Not Voting |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1415 do?
- Civil penalty for demolition of historic structures. Authorizes any locality to adopt an ordinance establishing a civil penalty for the razing, demolition, or moving of a building or structure that is located in a historic district or that has been designated by a governing body as a historic structure or landmark in violation of an ordinance that no such building or structure shall be razed, demolished, or moved without the approval of a review board. The bill provides that such civil penalty shall not exceed the market value of the property as determined by the assessed value of the property at the time of razing, demolition, or moving of the building or structure.
- Who sponsors HB 1415?
- HB 1415 is sponsored by Delores L. McQuinn, Nadarius E. Clark, Rozia A. Henson, Jr., Marty Martinez, Sam Rasoul, Shelly A. Simonds, Kelly K. Convirs-Fowler, and Green, W. Chad.
- What is the current status of HB 1415?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1415?
- Track HB 1415 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1415
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1415
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →