HB 1116 — Addressing motorcycle safety.
Last action — Effective date 1/1/2020.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2019. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The legislative amendments made to Bill HB 1116 primarily focus on enhancing motorcycle safety measures and education in Washington State. Key changes include creating separate novice and advanced motorcycle training courses to improve rider skills, and allowing private programs to certify their courses with oversight from the Department of Licensing. Additionally, the bill establishes a motorcycle operator subsidy program to help reduce training costs and increase access to motorcycle education. These changes are important as they aim to decrease motorcycle-related fatalities and injuries by ensuring riders receive better training and support.
H-1704.2SUBSTITUTEZ-0079.2HOUSE HOUSE BILL 1116State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByHouseSessionByRepresentatives Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Lovick and Ryu;
by request of Department of Licensing and Washington Traffic Safety Commission)READCommissionPrefiled FIRST01/11/19.Read TIMEfirst 02/19/19.ANtime 01/14/19.Referred to Committee on Transportation.AN ACT Relating to motorcycle safety;
amending RCW 46.81A.020, 46.20.510, 46.20.500,46.20.520, 3.62.090, 2.68.040, and 46.63.110;46.20.500;
creating a new section;
and providing an effective date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEWWASHINGTON:Sec. SECTION. Sec.
The legislature finds that target zero is Washington's strategic highway safety plan of zero traffic fatalities by 2030 and the number of motorcycle involved fatalities has doubled since the 1990s and remains at a high level.
Motorcycles are involved in nearly twenty percent of fatal and serious injury crashes while they make up only three percent of the total registered vehicles.
Motorcyclists are also at fault in seventy-five percent of motorcycle fatalities.
In order to move Washington closer to target zero, the department of licensing is updating its motorcycle safety program with feedback from the national highway traffic safety administration, the Washington traffic safety commission, and other stakeholders.
These changes will improve public safety by creating a more meaningful and comprehensive motorcycle endorsement test, providing training programs greater flexibility, increasing penalties to discourage unendorsed riders, and focusing motorcycle subsidies on expanding access to motorcycle ridership.Sec.
2.
An agreement entered into under this subsection must provide that the department may conduct periodic audits to ensure that educational standards continue to meet those required for courses conducted under the motorcycle skills education program, and that the costs of the review, certification, and audit process will be borne by the party seeking certification.(5) ((SubjectSubject to the requirements provided in this subsection, the department must allow private motorcycle skills education programs to offer motorcycle safety education where students pay the full cost for the training.
An agreement entered into under this subsection must provide that (a) the department may conduct periodic audits to ensure that educational standards continue to meet those of other programs approved by the department, and (b) the costs of the review,review((,))and certification,certification((, and auditaudit)) process will be borne by the program seeking certification))Thecertification.(6) department shall adopt rules to establish a motorcycle operator subsidy program, which may address testing costs, offer financial need-based subsidies for motorcycle training, and employ other strategies to improve access to motorcycle ridership.(6) The department shall obtain and compile information from applicants for a motorcycle endorsement regarding whether they have completed a state approved or certified motorcycle skills education course.Sec.
3.2.
The director shall collect a fee of fifteen dollars for the motorcycle instruction permit or renewal, and deposit the fee in the motorcycle safety education account of the highway safety fund.(a) The examination for a two-wheeled motorcycle instruction permit and the examination for a three-wheeled motorcycle instruction permit must be separate and distinct examinations.(b) The department may authorize an entity that has entered into a contract authorized under RCW 46.20.520 to administer the motorcycle instruction permit examinations.(c)examinations.(2) If a motorcyclist fails the motorcycle endorsement skills test, but demonstrates a level of riding skill consistent with a motorcycle instruction permit, the department may waive any further skills testing required to obtain a motorcycle instruction permit.(2) Effect of motorcycle instruction permit.
3.
RCW 46.20.520 and 1998 c 245 s 89 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The director of licensing shall use moneys designated for the motorcycle safety education account of the highway safety fund to implement by July 1, 1983, a voluntary motorcycle operator training and education program.
The director may contract with public and private entities to implement this program.(2) There is created a motorcycle safety education advisory board to assist the director of licensing in the development of a motorcycle operator training education program.
The board shall monitor this program following implementation and report to the director of licensing as necessary with recommendations including, but not limited to, administration, application, and substance of the motorcycle operator training and education program.The board shall consist of ((five))seven members appointed by the director of licensing.
((Three members of the board, one of whom shall be appointed chairperson, shall be active motorcycle riders or members of nonprofit motorcycle organizations which actively support and promote motorcycle safety education.
One member shall be a currently employed Washington state patrol motorcycle officer with at least five years experience and at least one year cumulative experience as a motorcycle officer.
One member shall be))Two members of the board must be active motorcycle riders or members of nonprofit motorcycle organizations that actively support and promote motorcycle safety education.
The remainder of the board must consist of one representative from each of the following:
Washington traffic safety commission, Washington state patrol, Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, a statewide motorcycle dealer's association, and a member of the public.
The board shall appoint a chair.
The term of appointment shall be two years.
The board shall meet at the call of the director, but not less than two times annually ((and not less than five times during its term of appointment)), and shall receive no compensation for services but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses while engaged in business of the board in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060 as now existing or hereafter amended.(3) The priorities of the program shall be in the following order of priority:(a) Public awareness of motorcycle safety.(b) Motorcycle safety education programs conducted by public and private entities.(c) Classroom and on-cycle training.(d) Improved motorcycle operator testing.Sec.
AThe personmonetary whobase violatespenalty for violating this sectionsubsection commitsis three hundred dollars.(2) However, a trafficperson infractionsixteen andyears of age or older, holding a valid driver's license of any class issued by the state of the person's residence, may operate a moped without taking any special examination for the operation of a moped.(3) No driver's license is subjectrequired to:for operation of an electric-assisted bicycle.
(a) The base penalty provided under RCW 46.63.110;
and (b) an additional monetary penalty of two hundred fifty dollars, which must be deposited in the motorcycle safety education account under RCW 46.68.065.(2) However, a person sixteen years of age or older, holding a valid driver's license of any class issued by the state of the person's residence, may operate a moped without taking any special examination for the operation of a moped.(3) No driver's license is required for operation of an electric-assisted bicycle.
Motorized foot scooters may not be operated at any time from a half hour after sunset to a half hour before sunrise without reflectors of a type approved by the state patrol.(6) A person holding a valid driver's license may operate a motorcycle as defined under RCW 46.04.330(2) without a motorcycle endorsement.(7) A person operating a motorcycle with a stabilizing conversion kit must have a valid driver's license specially endorsed by the director for a three-wheeled motorcycle to enable the holder to operate such a motorcycle.Sec.motorcycle.NEW SECTION. Sec.
RCW 3.62.090 and 2004 c 15 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:(1) There shall be assessed and collected in addition to any fines, forfeitures, or penalties assessed, other than for parking infractions, by all courts organized under Title 3 or 35 RCW a public safety and education assessment equal to seventy percent of such fines, forfeitures, or penalties, which shall be remitted as provided in chapters 3.46, 3.50, 3.62, and 35.20 RCW.
The assessment required by this section shall not be suspended or waived by the court.(2) There shall be assessed and collected in addition to any fines, forfeitures, or penalties assessed, other than for parking infractions and for fines levied under RCW 46.61.5055, and in addition to the public safety and education assessment required under subsection (1) of this section, by all courts organized under Title 3 or 35 RCW, an additional public safety and education assessment equal to fifty percent of the public safety and education assessment required under subsection (1) of this section, which shall be remitted to the state treasurer and deposited as provided in RCW 43.08.250.
The additional assessment required by this subsection shall not be suspended or waived by the court.(3) This section does not apply to the fee imposed under RCW 46.63.110(7), the penalty imposed under RCW 46.63.110(8), the additional penalty imposed under RCW 46.20.500, or the penalty assessment imposed under RCW 10.99.080.Sec.
6.
RCW 2.68.040 and 1994 c 8 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:(1) To support the judicial information system account provided for in RCW 2.68.020, the supreme court may provide by rule for an increase in fines, penalties, and assessments, and the increased amount shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the account:(a) Pursuant to the authority of RCW 46.63.110(((2)))(3), the sum of ten dollars to any penalty collected by a court pursuant to supreme court infraction rules for courts of limited jurisdiction;(b) Pursuant to RCW 3.62.060, a mandatory appearance cost in the initial sum of ten dollars to be assessed on all defendants;
and(c) Pursuant to RCW 46.63.110(((5)))(6), a ten-dollar assessment for each account for which a person requests a time payment schedule.(2) Notwithstanding a provision of law or rule to the contrary, the assessments provided for in this section may not be waived or suspended and shall be immediately due and payable upon forfeiture, conviction, deferral of prosecution, or request for time payment, as each shall occur.(3) The supreme court is requested to adjust these assessments for inflation.(4) This section does not apply to the additional monetary penalty under RCW 46.20.500.Sec.
7.
RCW 46.63.110 and 2012 c 82 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A person found to have committed a traffic infraction shall be assessed a monetary penalty.
No penalty may exceed two hundred and fifty dollars for each offense unless authorized by this chapter or title.(2) The monetary penalty for a violation of (a) RCW 46.55.105(2) is two hundred fifty dollars for each offense;
Show all 70 changed lines (30 more)
(b) RCW 46.61.210(1) is five hundred dollars for each offense.
No penalty assessed under this subsection (2) may be reduced.(3) The supreme court shall prescribe by rule a schedule of monetary penalties for designated traffic infractions.
This rule shall also specify the conditions under which local courts may exercise discretion in assessing fines and penalties for traffic infractions.
The legislature respectfully requests the supreme court to adjust this schedule every two years for inflation.(4) There shall be a penalty of twenty-five dollars for failure to respond to a notice of traffic infraction except where the infraction relates to parking as defined by local law, ordinance, regulation, or resolution or failure to pay a monetary penalty imposed pursuant to this chapter.
A local legislative body may set a monetary penalty not to exceed twenty-five dollars for failure to respond to a notice of traffic infraction relating to parking as defined by local law, ordinance, regulation, or resolution.
The local court, whether a municipal, police, or district court, shall impose the monetary penalty set by the local legislative body.(5) Monetary penalties provided for in chapter 46.70 RCW which are civil in nature and penalties which may be assessed for violations of chapter 46.44 RCW relating to size, weight, and load of motor vehicles are not subject to the limitation on the amount of monetary penalties which may be imposed pursuant to this chapter.(6) Whenever a monetary penalty, fee, cost, assessment, or other monetary obligation is imposed by a court under this chapter, it is immediately payable and is enforceable as a civil judgment under Title 6 RCW.
If the court determines, in its discretion, that a person is not able to pay a monetary obligation in full, and not more than one year has passed since the later of July 1, 2005, or the date the monetary obligation initially became due and payable, the court shall enter into a payment plan with the person, unless the person has previously been granted a payment plan with respect to the same monetary obligation, or unless the person is in noncompliance of any existing or prior payment plan, in which case the court may, at its discretion, implement a payment plan.
If the court has notified the department that the person has failed to pay or comply and the person has subsequently entered into a payment plan and made an initial payment, the court shall notify the department that the infraction has been adjudicated, and the department shall rescind any suspension of the person's driver's license or driver's privilege based on failure to respond to that infraction.
"Payment plan," as used in this section, means a plan that requires reasonable payments based on the financial ability of the person to pay.
The person may voluntarily pay an amount at any time in addition to the payments required under the payment plan.(a) If a payment required to be made under the payment plan is delinquent or the person fails to complete a community restitution program on or before the time established under the payment plan, unless the court determines good cause therefor and adjusts the payment plan or the community restitution plan accordingly, the court may refer the unpaid monetary penalty, fee, cost, assessment, or other monetary obligation for civil enforcement until all monetary obligations, including those imposed under subsections (3) and (4) of this section, have been paid, and court authorized community restitution has been completed, or until the court has entered into a new time payment or community restitution agreement with the person.
For those infractions subject to suspension under RCW 46.20.289, the court shall notify the department of the person's failure to meet the conditions of the plan, and the department shall suspend the person's driver's license or driving privileges.(b) If a person has not entered into a payment plan with the court and has not paid the monetary obligation in full on or before the time established for payment, the court may refer the unpaid monetary penalty, fee, cost, assessment, or other monetary obligation to a collections agency until all monetary obligations have been paid, including those imposed under subsections (3) and (4) of this section, or until the person has entered into a payment plan under this section.
For those infractions subject to suspension under RCW 46.20.289, the court shall notify the department of the person's delinquency, and the department shall suspend the person's driver's license or driving privileges.(c) If the payment plan is to be administered by the court, the court may assess the person a reasonable administrative fee to be wholly retained by the city or county with jurisdiction.
The administrative fee shall not exceed ten dollars per infraction or twenty-five dollars per payment plan, whichever is less.(d) Nothing in this section precludes a court from contracting with outside entities to administer its payment plan system.
When outside entities are used for the administration of a payment plan, the court may assess the person a reasonable fee for such administrative services, which fee may be calculated on a periodic, percentage, or other basis.(e) If a court authorized community restitution program for offenders is available in the jurisdiction, the court may allow conversion of all or part of the monetary obligations due under this section to court authorized community restitution in lieu of time payments if the person is unable to make reasonable time payments.(7) In addition to any other penalties imposed under this section and not subject to the limitation of subsection (1) of this section, a person found to have committed a traffic infraction shall be assessed:(a) A fee of five dollars per infraction.
Under no circumstances shall this fee be reduced or waived.
Revenue from this fee shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the emergency medical services and trauma care system trust account under RCW 70.168.040;(b) A fee of ten dollars per infraction.
Under no circumstances shall this fee be reduced or waived.
Revenue from this fee shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the Washington auto theft prevention authority account;
and(c) A fee of two dollars per infraction.
Revenue from this fee shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the traumatic brain injury account established in RCW 74.31.060.(8)(a) In addition to any other penalties imposed under this section and not subject to the limitation of subsection (1) of this section, a person found to have committed a traffic infraction other than of RCW 46.61.527 or 46.61.212 shall be assessed an additional penalty of twenty dollars.
The court may not reduce, waive, or suspend the additional penalty unless the court finds the offender to be indigent.
If a court authorized community restitution program for offenders is available in the jurisdiction, the court shall allow offenders to offset all or a part of the penalty due under this subsection (8) by participation in the court authorized community restitution program.(b) Eight dollars and fifty cents of the additional penalty under (a) of this subsection shall be remitted to the state treasurer.
The remaining revenue from the additional penalty must be remitted under chapters 2.08, 3.46, 3.50, 3.62, 10.82, and 35.20 RCW.
Money remitted under this subsection to the state treasurer must be deposited in the state general fund.
The balance of the revenue received by the county or city treasurer under this subsection must be deposited into the county or city current expense fund.
Moneys retained by the city or county under this subsection shall constitute reimbursement for any liabilities under RCW 43.135.060.(9) If a legal proceeding, such as garnishment, has commenced to collect any delinquent amount owed by the person for any penalty imposed by the court under this section, the court may, at its discretion, enter into a payment plan.(10) The monetary penalty for violating RCW 46.37.395 is:
(a) Two hundred fifty dollars for the first violation;
(b) five hundred dollars for the second violation;
and (c) seven hundred fifty dollars for each violation thereafter.(11) The additional monetary penalty for a violation of RCW 46.20.500 is not subject to assessments or fees provided under this section.NEW SECTION. Sec.
8.
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 1/1/2020.
-
Chapter 65, 2019 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 38; nays, 5; absent, 0; excused, 6.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 03:30 PM
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 03:30 PM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
TRAN - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Transportation.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 72; nays, 25; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 03:30 PM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 03:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Transportation.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- John Lovick · Primary
- Cindy Ryu · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 16 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- John Lovick Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- Cindy Ryu Democrat
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 38 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 10% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Not Voting |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Not Voting |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Not Voting |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Mullet | — | Not Voting |
| Sheldon | — | Not Voting |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 25 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 26% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Not Voting |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Nay |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Van Werven | — | Nay |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1116?
- HB 1116 is sponsored by John Lovick (Democrat) and Cindy Ryu (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1116?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1116?
- Track HB 1116 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1116
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1116
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →