Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Died 2 D cosponsors

SB 5295 — Concerning labor neutrality and contractor compliance for certain contracted service providers.

Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. Died in session

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 5295 includes a new focus on ensuring that private contractors for adult care and related services maintain labor neutrality and comply with labor laws. Specifically, contracts now require contractors to have agreements with labor organizations that prevent them from interfering with employees' rights to organize. This change is significant because it aims to reduce potential service disruptions caused by labor disputes, thereby protecting vulnerable community members and ensuring efficient delivery of state services. Additionally, contractors must disclose any past labor law violations, which is intended to promote responsible contracting and better use of taxpayer resources.

→
Previous
Latest
S-1123.4SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5295State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenate Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators Keiser, Hasegawa, and Saldaña)READ FIRST TIME 02/20/19.AN ACT Relating to ensuring labor neutrality and contractor compliance for certain contracted service providers;
S-0605.6SENATE BILL 5295State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenators Keiser, Hasegawa, and SaldañaRead first time 01/17/19.Referred to Committee on Labor & Commerce.AN ACT Relating to ensuring labor neutrality and contractor compliance for certain contracted service providers;
adding new sections to chapter 43.20A RCW;
adding a new section to chapter 43.20A RCW;
The legislature intends to prevent or mitigate service disruptions caused by labor unrest within private sector providers contracted to provide certain essential state services that, if disrupted, could harm vulnerable members of the community, compromise the efficient delivery of essential state services, and burden taxpayers with additional costs.The legislature further intends to spend scarce taxpayer resources for the efficient delivery of certain essential state services by law-abiding private sector providers.
The legislature intends to prevent or mitigate service disruptions caused by labor unrest within private sector providers of certain state services that could harm vulnerable members of the community or compromise the efficient delivery of state services.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
Contracting with providers with multiple legal violations represents wasteful government spending on remedying legal wrongs.
Private sector providers of certain state services must certify their legal compliance with state, federal, and local laws before earning a contract involving government funds.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 43.20A RCW to read as follows:Any contract entered into by the department with a private contractor for adult care, behavioral health, disability support, or youth services must contain a provision that requires the private contractor to certify its compliance with federal, state, and local laws.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 43.20A RCW to read as follows:(1) Any contract entered into by the department with a private contractor for adult care, behavioral health, disability support, or youth services must contain a provision that requires the private contractor to have a labor neutrality agreement between it and any labor organization representing or seeking to represent the employees of the private contractor who perform or will perform work under the contract.(2) The labor neutrality agreements required in subsection (1) of this section must, at a minimum, contain provisions that:(a) Require the contractor remain neutral in its policies, practices, and activities with regard to its employees seeking to exercise rights guaranteed by the national labor relations act, 29 U.S.C.
3.
A new section is added to chapter 43.20A RCW to read as follows:(1) Any contract entered into by the department with a private contractor for adult care, behavioral health, disability support, or youth services must contain an assurance of the contractor's commitment to ensuring harmonious labor relations among its employees and their current or potential representative.
Such assurance may be provided through the execution of a labor neutrality agreement between the contractor and any labor organization representing the employees of the private contractor who perform or will perform work under the contract, or with any representative in the event such employees express an interest in being represented by a labor organization.(2) The labor peace assurance required under subsection (1) of this section is a condition of contracting with the state for the provision of such services.
As a condition of receiving a contract from the state, the contracting employer may make one or more of the following commitments:(a) A commitment that, upon receiving an award of the contract, the contractor will remain neutral in its policies, practices, and activities with regard to its employees performing the services required under the contract in the event such employees seek to exercise rights guaranteed by the national labor relations act, 29 U.S.C.
151 et seq.(b) A commitment that, in lieu of insisting on the certification of representation procedures established under the national labor relations act, the contractor shall afford recognition upon a representative labor organization based on a majority card check process verified by a neutral third-party arbitrator or mediator.
151 et seq.;(b) Provide for an election by card check as a means to certify representation;(c) Require the contractor to provide a list of current workers upon request of the labor organization;
Any interested labor organization availing itself of such commitment must commit to refraining from engaging in economic action or other activities that would be disruptive to the performance of the contract.
and(d) Prohibit the contractor from expending income from state contracts or other sources to obstruct, delay, or in any way compromise the labor neutrality agreement.(3) In awarding contracts listed in subsection (1) of this section, the department must require bidders to disclose past violations of the national labor relations act, 29 U.S.C.
The arbitration commitment will cover any disagreements as to the appropriate terms and conditions of employment contained in a collective bargaining agreement covering such employees.(c) Inclusion of no-strike, no-lockout, or arbitration clauses in a collective bargaining agreement with a labor organization representing the contractor's employees covered by this section.
In the event such collective bargaining agreement is due to expire during the term of the contract, the contracting employer must commit that the parties will resolve negotiation disputes as to the terms of a successor collective bargaining agreement through arbitration.(d) A commitment not to strike or engage in workplace or service disruptions on the part of the representative of the employees performing the services contracted by the state through the term of the contract with the state.(e) Any other assurances or commitments that provide equivalent assurances that labor peace will be maintained through the life of the contract with the state.(3) A contractor's labor peace assurances made to the state are a binding provision of any contract awarded by the state, and constitute a warranty to the state on the part of the contractor.(4) In the event the contractor's assurances fail to ensure labor peace, such that the services contracted by the state are interrupted, the department may revoke the contract and make arrangements for the provision of services by other means.(5) In awarding any contract subject to this section, the department must require bidders to disclose past violations of the national labor relations act, 29 U.S.C.
151 et seq.Sec.
151 et seq., as determined by the national labor relations board.
4.
The department must take into consideration such violations in awarding the contract.Sec.
3.
3729 et seq., or the state medicaid fraud false claims act, chapter 74.66 RCW, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a state contractor;(c) Conviction under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals;(d) Two or more violations, within one or more decisions, within the previous five years of the ((federal))national labor relations act as determined by the national labor relations board or court of competent jurisdiction;(e) Violation of contract provisions, as set forth in this subsection, of a character that is regarded by the director to be so serious as to justify debarment action:(i) Deliberate failure without good cause to perform in accordance with the specifications or within the time limit provided in the contract;
3729 et seq., or the state medicaid fraud false claims act, chapter 74.66 RCW, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a state contractor;(c) Conviction under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals;(d) Two or more violations within the previous five years of the ((federal))national labor relations act as determined by the national labor relations board or court of competent jurisdiction.
Significant findings by an administrative law judge of the national labor relations board of unfair labor practices by a contractor are grounds for termination of a contract with the contractor;(e) Violation of contract provisions, as set forth in this subsection, of a character that is regarded by the director to be so serious as to justify debarment action:(i) Deliberate failure without good cause to perform in accordance with the specifications or within the time limit provided in the contract;
and(b) Inform the debarred contractor of the contractor's rights to judicial or administrative review.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
and(b) Inform the debarred contractor of the contractor's rights to judicial or administrative review.--- END ---
5.
If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Senate Rules "X" file.

  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  3. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  4. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 01:30 PM

  5. First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

  6. Third reading, passed; yeas, 27; nays, 20; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  7. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  8. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  9. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  10. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  11. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  12. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  13. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  14. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  15. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM

  16. Minority; do not pass.

  17. LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  18. Minority; do not pass.

  19. LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  20. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM

  21. First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Keiser

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (148)

148 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 148 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 27 Yea · 20 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 151101
Republican 0900
Democrat 12001
Total 272002
% of votes cast 55%41%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Bailey — Nay
Becker — Nay
Billig — Yea
Brown — Nay
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Nay
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Nay
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Nay
Padden — Nay
Palumbo — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Not Voting
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Nay
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Not Voting
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5295?
SB 5295 is sponsored by Keiser, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), and Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5295?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5295?
Track SB 5295 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5295

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5295

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →