Interlocutory ruling, order, or action; motion to reconsider.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 901 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 901.
You're tracking HB 901
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 901 — Interlocutory ruling, order, or action; motion to reconsider.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0057)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 08, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Interlocutory ruling, order, or action; motionto reconsider. Clarifies that no litigant, after making an objection or motion known to the court, shall be required to move for reconsiderationto preserve his right to appeal a ruling, order, or action of thecourt, even if such ruling, order, or action is without prejudiceto a motion to reconsider. This bill is a recommendation of the Boyd-GravesConference.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
27 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to HB 901 clarifies that formal exceptions to court rulings or orders are no longer required, simplifying the process for preserving rights to appeal or challenge decisions. It allows parties to make their objections known at the time of the ruling without needing to repeat them later, which can ease the appeals process. This change is significant because it ensures that individuals can contest court decisions more easily without the fear of losing their rights due to procedural technicalities. Overall, this aims to make the judicial process more accessible and fair for all parties involved.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2024 SESSION CHAPTER E57 An Act to amend and reenact § 8.01-384 of the Code of Virginia, relating to interlocutory ruling, order, or action;
R O [H 901] Approved LMarch L8, 1.2024 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
E § 8.01-384.
D A.
but for all purposes for which an exception has heretofore been necessary, it shall be sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court tois takemade or hissought, objectionsmakes known to the court the action ofwhich he desires the courtopportunity andto hisobject groundsto therefor;a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection shall not no thereafter prejudice him on motion for a new trial or on appeal.
and,No ifparty, aafter partyhaving hasmade noan opportunityobjection or motion known to objectthe court, shall be required to a(i) rulingmake such objection or motion again in order atto thepreserve timehis itright isto made,appeal, thechallenge, absenceor ofmove anfor objectionreconsideration shallof, nota thereafterruling, prejudiceorder, himor onaction motionof the court or (ii) move for reconsideration in order to preserve his right to appeal a newruling, trialorder, or onaction appeal.of the court, even if such ruling, order, or action is without prejudice to a motion to reconsider.
No party, after having made an objection or motion known to the court, shall be required to (i) make such objection or motion Hgain in of the court or (ii) move for reconsideration in order to preserve his right to appeal a ruling, order, oron action of the court, even if such ruling, order, or action is without prejudice to a motion to Eeconsider.
Arguments made at trial via written pleading, memorandum, recital of objections in a final order, oral argument reduced to transcript, or agreed written statements of facts shall, unless expressly withdrawn or waived, be deemed preserved therein for assertion on appeal.ofappeal. facts shall, unless expressly B.
B.
View plain text versions (3)
- CHAP0057 View text Current pdf March 08, 2024
- HB901ER View text pdf February 22, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24102432D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0057)
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 57 (effective 7/1/24)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., March 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 1, 2024
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB901ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Passed Senate (39-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Courts of Justice (15-Y 0-N)
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (99-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (99-Y 0-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Courts of Justice (21-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (7-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned Courts sub: Civil
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24102432D
Sponsors
- Kannan Srinivasan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Not Voting |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Not Voting |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Not Voting |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Not Voting |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Earley, Mark L., Jr. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Yea |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Obenshain, Chris | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Not Voting |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Yea |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Not Voting |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 901 do?
- Interlocutory ruling, order, or action; motionto reconsider. Clarifies that no litigant, after making an objection or motion known to the court, shall be required to move for reconsiderationto preserve his right to appeal a ruling, order, or action of thecourt, even if such ruling, order, or action is without prejudiceto a motion to reconsider. This bill is a recommendation of the Boyd-GravesConference.
- Who sponsors HB 901?
- HB 901 is sponsored by Kannan Srinivasan.
- What is the current status of HB 901?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 901?
- Track HB 901 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 901
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 901
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →