Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 2 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 5444 — Providing timely competency evaluations and restoration services to persons suffering from behavioral health disorders within the framework of the forensic mental health care system consistent with the requirements agreed to in the Trueblood settlement agreement.

Last action — Effective date 7/28/2019.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 21, 2019. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of SB 5444 includes several significant changes aimed at improving how the criminal justice system handles individuals with behavioral health disorders. A new "forensic navigator" role has been introduced, which allows appointed individuals to guide defendants through the legal process and connect them with mental health resources, ensuring better support and compliance with court orders. Additionally, the timeframes for competency restoration have been updated to provide clearer guidelines on treatment periods, allowing courts to better manage cases involving defendants struggling with mental health issues. These changes matter because they aim to enhance public safety while ensuring that the rights and needs of vulnerable individuals are considered in the justice system.

→
Previous
Latest
S-2373.4SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5444State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenate Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Dhingra, O'Ban, Darneille, Wagoner, Frockt, Kuderer, and Nguyen;
Z-0347.2SENATE BILL 5444State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenators Dhingra, O'Ban, Darneille, Wagoner, Frockt, Kuderer, and Nguyen;
by request of Office of the Governor)READ FIRST TIME 03/01/19.AN ACT Relating to providing timely competency evaluations and restoration services to persons suffering from behavioral health disorders within the framework of the forensic mental health care system consistent with the requirements agreed to in the Trueblood settlement agreement;
by request of Office of the GovernorRead first time 01/21/19.Referred to Committee on Health & Long Term Care.AN ACT Relating to providing timely competency evaluations and restoration services to persons suffering from behavioral health disorders within the framework of the forensic mental health care system consistent with the requirements agreed to in the Trueblood settlement agreement;
The legislature acknowledges that these reforms will require the support of a broad range of stakeholders, including local law enforcement, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, community members, and health care providers.
The legislature acknowledges that these reforms will require the support of a broad range of stakeholders, including local law enforcement, prosecuting attorneys, community members, and health care providers.
A new section is added to chapter 10.77 RCW to read as follows:(1) Subject to the limitations described in this subsection, a court may appoint an impartial forensic navigator employed by or contracted with the department to assist individuals who have been referred for competency evaluation.(2) A forensic navigator must assist the individual to navigate the legal process and to access services related to diversion and community outpatient competency restoration.
A new section is added to chapter 10.77 RCW to read as follows:(1) Subject to the limitations described in this subsection, a court may appoint an impartial forensic navigator approved by the department to assist individuals who have been referred for competency evaluation or restoration to both navigate the forensic legal process and access available behavioral health resources.
The forensic navigator must assist the individual, prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, and the court to understand the options available to the individual and be accountable as an officer of the court for faithful execution of the responsibilities outlined in this section.(3) The duties of the forensic navigator include, but are not limited to, the following:(a) To collect relevant information about the individual, including behavioral health services and supports available to the individual that might support placement in outpatient restoration, diversion, or some combination of these;(b) To meet with, interview, and observe the individual;(c) To present information to the court in order to assist the court in understanding the treatment options available to the individual to support the entry of orders for diversion from the forensic mental health system or for community outpatient competency restoration;
A court may not issue an order appointing a forensic navigator unless there is adequate forensic navigator capacity to provide these services at the time the order is issued.(2) Unless otherwise directed by the court, the duties of the forensic navigator include, but are not limited to, the following:(a) To investigate and collect relevant information about the individual, including any relevant background, prior behavioral health history, and the circumstances that led to the current matter before the court, and report that information to the court;(b) To meet with, interview, or observe the individual, and report to the court any views or positions expressed by the individual on options pending before the court;(c) To monitor all court orders for compliance and to bring to the court's attention any change in circumstances that may require a modification of the court's order.(3) Forensic navigators may submit nonclinical recommendations to the court regarding treatment and restoration options for the individual, which the court may consider and weigh in conjunction with the recommendations of all of the parties.(4) Forensic navigators shall be deemed officers of the court for the purpose of immunity from civil liability.(5) Upon presentation of the court order of appointment by the forensic navigator, any agency, hospital, school organization, division or department of the state, doctor, nurse, or other health care provider, psychologist, psychiatrist, police department, or behavioral health provider shall permit the forensic navigator to inspect and copy any records relating to the individual named in the order of appointment, without the consent of the individual.Sec.
and(d) When the individual is ordered to receive community outpatient restoration, to provide services to the individual including:(i) Assisting the individual with attending appointments and classes relating to outpatient competency restoration;(ii) Coordinating access to housing for the individual;(iii) Meeting with the individual on a regular basis;(iv) Providing information to the court concerning the individual's progress and compliance with court-ordered conditions of release, which may include appearing at court hearings to provide information to the court;(v) Coordinating the individual's access to community case management services and mental health services;(vi) Assisting the individual with obtaining prescribed medication and encouraging adherence with prescribed medication;(vii) Prior to the conclusion of outpatient restoration services, facilitating a coordinated transition of the individual to a case manager in the community behavioral health system;(viii) Following up with the individual to check whether the meeting with a community-based case manager took place;(ix) When the individual is a high utilizer, attempting to connect the individual with high utilizer services;
and(x) Checking up on the individual at least once per month for up to sixty days after coordinated transition to community behavioral health services, without duplicating the services of the community-based case manager.(4) Forensic navigators may submit nonclinical recommendations to the court regarding treatment and restoration options for the individual, which the court may consider and weigh in conjunction with the recommendations of all of the parties.(5) If, after the forensic navigator has advised the criminal court, the court does not order the individual into outpatient competency restoration services, the role of the navigator must end.(6) Forensic navigators shall be deemed officers of the court for the purpose of immunity from civil liability.(7) The signed order for competency evaluation from the court shall serve as authority for the forensic navigator to be given access to all records held by a behavioral health, educational, or law enforcement agency or a correctional facility that relates to an individual.
Information that is protected by state or federal law, including health information, shall not be entered into the court record without the consent of the individual or their defense attorney.(8) A prosecutor may dismiss charges against an individual whenever mental illness or competency to stand trial has become an issue.(9) A court may not issue an order appointing a forensic navigator unless the department certifies that there is adequate forensic navigator capacity to provide these services at the time the order is issued.Sec.
RCW 10.31.110 and 2014 c 225 s 57 are each amended to read as follows:(1) When a police officer has reasonable cause to believe that the individual has committed acts constituting a ((nonfelony)) crime ((that is not a serious offense as identified in RCW 10.77.092)), and the individual is known by history or consultation with the behavioral health organization, managed care organization, behavioral health administrative services organization, crisis hotline, or local crisis services providers to suffer from a mental disorder, the arresting officer may:(a) Take the individual to a crisis stabilization unit as defined in RCW 71.05.020(((6))).
RCW 10.31.110 and 2014 c 225 s 57 are each amended to read as follows:(1) When a police officer has reasonable cause to believe that the individual has committed acts constituting a ((nonfelony crime that is not a serious offense as identified in RCW 10.77.092))misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, class C felony, or a class B felony that is not classified as violent under RCW 9.94A.030, excluding sex offenses under RCW 9.94A.030, and the individual is known by history or consultation with the behavioral health organization, managed care organization, or behavioral health administrative services organization to suffer from a mental disorder, the arresting officer may:(a) Take the individual to a crisis stabilization unit as defined in RCW 71.05.020(((6))).
The individual must be examined by a mental health professional within three hours of arrival;(c) Refer the individual to a mental health professional for evaluation for initial detention and proceeding under chapter 71.05 RCW;
The individual must be examined by a mental health professional within three hours of arrival;(c) Refer the individual to a mental health professional for evaluation for initial detention and proceeding under chapter 71.05 RCW, which may include detention pursuant to RCW 71.05.153 in facilities such as evaluation and treatment facilities, emergency departments of hospitals, or any other appropriate facilities;
or(d) Release the individual upon agreement to voluntary participation in outpatient treatment.(2) If the individual is released to the community, the mental health provider shall make reasonable efforts to inform the arresting officer of the planned release ((within a reasonable period of time after the))prior to release if the arresting officer has specifically requested notification and provided contact information to the provider.(3) In deciding whether to refer the individual to treatment under this section, the police officer ((shall))must be guided by ((standards))local law enforcement diversion guidelines for behavioral health developed and mutually agreed upon with the prosecuting authority((, which))with an opportunity for consultation and comment by the defense bar and disability community.
or(d) Release the individual upon agreement to voluntary participation in outpatient treatment.(2) If the individual is released to the community, the mental health provider shall inform the arresting officer of the release within a reasonable period of time after the release if the arresting officer has specifically requested notification and provided contact information to the provider.(3) In deciding whether to refer the individual to treatment under this section, the police officer shall be guided by standards mutually agreed upon with the prosecuting authority, which address, at a minimum, the length, seriousness, and recency of the known criminal history of the individual, the mental health history of the individual, ((where))if available, the opinions of a mental health professional, if available, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the alleged offense.
These guidelines must address, at a minimum, the length, seriousness, and recency of the known criminal history of the individual, the mental health history of the individual, ((where))if available, the opinions of a mental health professional, if available, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the alleged offense.
The standards must also permit an officer to refer an individual for treatment notwithstanding the existence of one or more outstanding warrants for that individual and must address the circumstances under which such a referral is permissible.
The guidelines must include a process for clearing outstanding warrants or referring the individual for assistance in clearing outstanding warrants, if any, and issuing a new court date, if appropriate, without booking or incarcerating the individual or disqualifying him or her from referral to treatment under this section, and define the circumstances under which such action is permissible.(4) Any agreement to participate in treatment shall not require individuals to stipulate to any of the alleged facts regarding the criminal activity as a prerequisite to participation in a mental health treatment alternative.
Prosecuting attorneys must provide an opportunity for the defense bar and disability community to comment on the standards before they are adopted.(4) Any agreement to participate in treatment shall not require individuals to stipulate to any of the alleged facts regarding the criminal activity as a prerequisite to participation in a mental health treatment alternative.
and(b) The original charges may be filed or referred to the prosecutor, as appropriate, and the matter may proceed accordingly.(6) The police officer is immune from liability for any good faith conduct under this section.(7) The Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall collect and maintain a file of written local law enforcement diversion guidelines for behavioral health developed pursuant to subsection (3) of this section.Sec.
and(b) The original charges may be filed or referred to the prosecutor, as appropriate, and the matter may proceed accordingly.(6) The police officer is immune from liability for any good faith conduct under this section.Sec.
c 7 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:(1)(a)(i) If the defendant is charged with a felony and determined to be incompetent, until he or she has regained the competency necessary to understand the proceedings against him or her and assist in his or her own defense, but in any event for a period of no longer than ninety days, the court((:(A)))shall commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary ((who shall place such defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for evaluation and treatment;
c 7 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:(1)(a)(i) If the defendant is charged with a felony and determined to be incompetent, until he or she has regained the competency necessary to understand the proceedings against him or her and assist in his or her own defense, but in any event for a period of no longer than ninety days, the court:(A) Shall commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary who shall place such defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for ((evaluation and treatment))inpatient competency restoration;
or(B) May alternatively order the defendant to undergo evaluation and treatment at some other facility or provider as determined by the department, or under the guidance and control of a professional person.
or(B) May alternatively order the defendant to undergo ((evaluation and treatment))outpatient competency restoration at some other facility or provider as determined by the department, or under the guidance and control of a professional person.
During the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the department may contract with one or more cities or counties to provide competency restoration services in a city or county jail if the city or county jail is willing and able to serve as a location for competency restoration services and if the secretary determines that there is an emergent need for beds and documents the justification, including a plan to address the emergency.
((During the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the department may contract with one or more cities or counties to provide competency restoration services in a city or county jail if the city or county jail is willing and able to serve as a location for competency restoration services and if the secretary determines that there is an emergent need for beds and documents the justification, including a plan to address the emergency.
Patients receiving competency restoration services in a city or county jail must be physically separated from other populations at the jail and restoration treatment services must be provided as much as possible within a therapeutic environment.))for competency restoration.
Patients receiving competency restoration services in a city or county jail must be physically separated from other populations at the jail and restoration treatment services must be provided as much as possible within a therapeutic environment.))When ordering a defendant to undergo outpatient restoration, the court shall set appropriate conditions of release and shall enforce those conditions as necessary.
The court may order the defendant to receive inpatient competency restoration or outpatient competency restoration based on the clinical recommendation in the competency evaluation.(A) To be eligible for an order for outpatient competency restoration, a defendant must be:(I) Adherent to medications or willing to receive prescribed intravenous medication;(II) Abstinent from alcohol or unprescribed drugs;
If the court revokes outpatient conditional release and orders that the treatment continue in a facility under (a)(i)(A) of this subsection, the treatment period may be for no longer than the remaining time period authorized in the original court order, not counting time periods in which the defendant was absent from the treatment program plus any additional periods authorized by this section.
and(III) Clinically stable.(B) If the court orders inpatient competency restoration, the department shall place the defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for evaluation and treatment.(C) If the court orders outpatient competency restoration, the court shall modify conditions of release as needed to authorize the department to place the person in approved housing, which may include access to supported housing, affiliated with a contracted outpatient competency restoration program.
The court may not issue an order to undergo outpatient competency restoration unless there is an available appropriate outpatient restoration program that has adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued.(ii) The ninety day period for ((evaluation and treatment))competency restoration under this subsection (1) includes only the time the defendant is actually at the facility and is in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility.(b) For a defendant whose highest charge is a class C felony, or a class B felony that is not classified as violent under RCW 9.94A.030, the maximum time allowed for the initial period of commitment for competency restoration is forty-five days.
The department must establish conditions of participation in the outpatient competency restoration program which must include the defendant being subject to medication monitoring and daily urinalysis.
The outpatient competency restoration program shall monitor the defendant during the defendant's placement in the program and report any noncompliance or significant changes with respect to the defendant to the department and, if applicable, the forensic navigator.(D) If a defendant fails to comply with the restrictions of the outpatient restoration program, such that restoration is no longer possible in that setting, the department shall remove the defendant from the outpatient restoration program and place the defendant instead in an appropriate facility of the department for inpatient competency restoration.
The department shall promptly notify the court and parties and the forensic navigator, if applicable, of the change in placement.
The inpatient competency restoration period following a change in placement under this subsection must be for the time remaining on the current competency restoration order.(E) The court may not issue an order for outpatient competency restoration unless the department certifies that there is an available appropriate outpatient competency restoration program that has adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued.(ii) The ninety day period for ((evaluation and treatment))competency restoration under this subsection (1) includes only the time the defendant is actually at the facility and is in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility.(b) For a defendant whose highest charge is a class C felony, or a class B felony that is not classified as violent under RCW 9.94A.030, the maximum time allowed for the initial period of commitment for competency restoration is forty-five days.
c 29 s 411 are each amended to read as follows:(1)(((a))) If the defendant is charged with a nonfelony crime which is a serious offense as identified in RCW 10.77.092 and found by the court to be not competent, then the court:(a) Shall dismiss the proceedings without prejudice and detain the defendant for sufficient time to allow the designated crisis responder to evaluate the defendant and consider initial detention proceedings under chapter 71.05 RCW, unless the prosecutor objects to the dismissal and provides notice of a motion for an order for competency restoration, in which case the court must schedule a hearing to determine whether to enter an order of competency restoration.(b) At the hearing, the prosecuting attorney must establish that there is a compelling state interest to order competency restoration treatment for the defendant.
c 29 s 411 are each amended to read as follows:(1)(a) If the defendant is charged with a nonfelony crime which is a serious offense as identified in RCW 10.77.092 and found by the court to be not competent, then the court:(i) May dismiss proceedings and detain the defendant for sufficient time to allow the designated crisis responder to evaluate the defendant and consider initial detention proceedings under chapter 71.05 RCW.
The court must give notice to all parties at least twenty-four hours before the dismissal of any proceeding under this subsection, and provide an opportunity for a hearing on whether to dismiss the proceedings.
Unless the prosecuting attorney requests a hearing before the expiration of the twenty-four hour period, the charges shall be dismissed without prejudice.(ii) At the hearing on whether to dismiss the proceedings, the prosecuting attorney may present evidence of a compelling state interest in pursuing competency restoration treatment for the defendant.
If the prosecuting attorney proves by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a compelling state interest in ordering competency restoration, then the court shall order competency restoration in accordance with subsection (2)(a) of this section.(2)(a) If a court finds pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section that there is a compelling state interest in pursuing competency restoration treatment, then the court(((i)))shall commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary ((who shall place such defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for evaluation and treatment;(ii) May alternatively order the defendant to undergo evaluation and treatment at some other facility or provider as determined by the department, or under the guidance and control of a professional person.
If the prosecuting attorney proves by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a compelling state interest in ordering restoration, then the court shall order competency restoration in accordance with subsection (2)(a) of this section.(2)(a) If a court finds pursuant to subsection (1)(a)(ii) of this section that there is a compelling state interest in pursuing competency restoration treatment, then the court:(i) Shall commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary who shall place such defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for ((evaluation and treatment))inpatient competency restoration;(ii) May alternatively order the defendant to undergo ((evaluation and treatment))outpatient competency restoration at some other facility or provider as determined by the department, or under the guidance and control of a professional person.
During the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the department may contract with one or more cities or counties to provide competency restoration services in a city or county jail if the city or county jail is willing and able to serve as a location for competency restoration services and if the secretary determines that there is an emergent need for beds and documents the justification, including a plan to address the emergency.
((During the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the department may contract with one or more cities or counties to provide competency restoration services in a city or county jail if the city or county jail is willing and able to serve as a location for competency restoration services and if the secretary determines that there is an emergent need for beds and documents the justification, including a plan to address the emergency.
Patients receiving competency restoration services in a city or county jail must be physically separated from other populations at the jail and restoration treatment services must be provided as much as possible within a therapeutic environment.))for competency restoration.
Patients receiving competency restoration services in a city or county jail must be physically separated from other populations at the jail and restoration treatment services must be provided as much as possible within a therapeutic environment.))When ordering a defendant to undergo outpatient restoration, the court shall set appropriate conditions of release and shall enforce those conditions as necessary.
The court may order the defendant to receive inpatient competency restoration or outpatient competency restoration based on the clinical recommendation in the competency evaluation.(i) To be eligible for an order for outpatient competency restoration, a defendant must be:(A) Adherent to medications or willing to receive prescribed intravenous medication;(B) Abstinent from alcohol or unprescribed drugs;
If the court revokes outpatient conditional release and orders that the treatment continue in a facility under (a)(i) of this subsection, the treatment period may be for no longer than the remaining time period authorized in the original court order.
and(C) Clinically stable.(ii) If the court orders inpatient competency restoration, the department shall place the defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for evaluation and treatment under (b) of this subsection.(iii) If the court orders outpatient competency restoration, the court shall modify conditions of release as needed to authorize the department to place the person in approved housing, which may include access to supported housing, affiliated with a contracted outpatient competency restoration program.
The placement under (a)(i) and (ii) of this subsection shall not exceed fourteen days in addition to any unused time of the evaluation under RCW 10.77.060.
The department shall establish conditions of participation in the outpatient competency restoration program which must include the defendant being subject to medication monitoring and daily urinalysis.
The outpatient competency restoration program shall monitor the defendant during the defendant's placement in the program and report any noncompliance or significant changes with respect to the defendant to the department and, if applicable, the forensic navigator.(iv) If a defendant fails to comply with the restrictions of the outpatient competency restoration program, such that restoration is no longer possible in that setting, the department shall remove the defendant from the outpatient restoration program and place the defendant instead in an appropriate facility of the department for inpatient competency restoration.
The department shall promptly notify the court and parties and the forensic navigator, if applicable, of the change in placement.
The inpatient competency restoration period following a change in placement under this subsection must be for the time remaining on the current competency restoration order.(v) The court may not issue an order for outpatient competency restoration unless the department certifies that there is an available appropriate outpatient restoration program that has adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued.(b) The placement under (a) (((i) and (ii))) of this subsection shall not exceed ((fourteen))twenty-nine days ((in addition to any unused time of the evaluation under RCW 10.77.060.
The fourteen-day period plus any unused time of the evaluation under RCW 10.77.060 shall))if the defendant is ordered to receive inpatient competency restoration, or shall not exceed ninety days if the defendant is ordered to receive outpatient competency restoration.
The fourteen-day period plus any unused time of the evaluation under RCW 10.77.060 shall be considered to include only the time the defendant is actually at the facility and shall be in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility;(iii) May alternatively order that the defendant be placed on conditional release for up to ninety days for mental health treatment and restoration of competency;
The court may order any combination of this subsection.
or(iv) May order any combination of this subsection.(b) If the court has determined ((or the parties agree)) that the defendant is unlikely to regain competency, the court may dismiss the charges without prejudice without ordering the defendant to undergo restoration treatment, in which case the court shall order that the defendant be referred for evaluation for civil commitment in the manner provided in (c) of this subsection.(c)(i) If the proceedings are dismissed under RCW 10.77.084 and the defendant was on conditional release at the time of dismissal, the court shall order the designated crisis responder within that county to evaluate the defendant pursuant to chapter 71.05 RCW.
This period must be considered to include only the time the defendant is actually at the facility and shall be in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility((;(iii) May alternatively order that the defendant be placed on conditional release for up to ninety days for mental health treatment and restoration of competency;
or(iv) May order any combination of this subsection)).(((b)))(c) If the court has determined ((or the parties agree)) that the defendant is unlikely to regain competency, the court may dismiss the charges without prejudice without ordering the defendant to undergo restoration treatment, in which case the court shall order that the defendant be referred for evaluation for civil commitment in the manner provided in (((c)))(d) of this subsection.(((c)))(d)(i) If the proceedings are dismissed under RCW 10.77.084 and the defendant was on conditional release at the time of dismissal, the court shall order the designated crisis responder within that county to evaluate the defendant pursuant to chapter 71.05 RCW.
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Effective date 7/28/2019.

  2. Chapter 326, 2019 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 97; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.

  12. Committee amendment not adopted.

  13. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  14. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  15. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM

  16. APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) but without amendment(s) by Civil Rights & Judiciary.

  17. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM

  18. Referred to Appropriations.

  19. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 03:30 PM

  20. Minority; do not pass.

  21. CRJ - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  22. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 08:00 AM

  23. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

  24. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  25. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  26. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  27. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  28. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  29. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  30. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  31. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  32. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  33. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 12:20 PM

  34. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  35. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  36. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  37. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  38. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  39. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  40. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM

  41. Referred to Ways & Means.

  42. Referred to Ways & Means.

  43. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care at 08:00 AM

  44. And refer to Ways & Means.

  45. BH - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  46. And refer to Ways & Means.

  47. BH - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  48. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care at 01:30 PM

  49. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Health & Long Term Care at 01:30 PM

  50. Referred to Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care.

  51. First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (144)

144 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 144 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 48 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26001
Republican 9000
Democrat 13000
Total 48001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Not Voting
Wilson, L. — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 97 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32001
Republican 22000
Democrat 43000
Total 97001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Not Voting
Blake — Yea
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mead — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Smith — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 48 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26001
Republican 9000
Democrat 13000
Total 48001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Not Voting
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5444?
SB 5444 is sponsored by Manka Dhingra (Democrat), O'Ban, Darneille, Keith Wagoner (Republican), Frockt, Kuderer, and Joe Nguyen (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5444?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 21, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 5444?
Track SB 5444 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5444

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5444

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →