Zoning; traffic impact statements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 377 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 377.
You're tracking HB 377
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 377 — Zoning; traffic impact statements.
Last action — Left in Counties, Cities and Towns
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Zoning; traffic impact statements. Prohibitsa locality from requiring a local traffic impact statement as a conditionfor approval of a rezoning application that involves a multifamilyresidential use of fewer than 50 residential units.
Bill Text
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24103317D Current pdf January 07, 2024
Action History
-
Left in Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (5-Y 3-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned CC & T sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24103317D
Sponsors
- David Owen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Ferrell Tata | — | Nay |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Nay |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Laura Jane Cohen | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Nay |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Not Voting |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 377 do?
- Zoning; traffic impact statements. Prohibitsa locality from requiring a local traffic impact statement as a conditionfor approval of a rezoning application that involves a multifamilyresidential use of fewer than 50 residential units.
- Who sponsors HB 377?
- HB 377 is sponsored by Owen, David.
- What is the current status of HB 377?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 377?
- Track HB 377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 377
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 377
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →