SB 398 — Protective orders; respondent to notify court of change of address.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0594)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 05, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Protective orders; respondent to notify court of change of address. Requires the respondent against whom a protective order has been issued to notify the court in writing within seven days of any change of residence while such order is in effect, provided that such order has been properly served upon the respondent. In a proceeding involving a preliminary protective order, the bill provides that the court may require the respondent to notify the court in writing within seven days of any change of residence while such preliminary protective order is in effect. The bill also provides that any failure of a respondent to make such required notification shall be punishable by contempt.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
483 added · 463 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 398 includes a requirement for individuals under protective orders to inform the court of any changes to their address. This change is important because it helps ensure that the court can maintain accurate records and provide proper protection for the petitioner, which is crucial for their safety. By keeping the court informed, it also facilitates any necessary enforcement actions related to the protective orders.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2024 SESSION CHAPTER E594 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 16.1-253.1, 16.1-279.1, 19.2-152.9, and 19.2-152.10 of the Code of Virginia, relating to protective orders;
R O [S 398] Approved LApril L5, 2024 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That §§ 16.1-253.1, 16.1-279.1, 19.2-152.9, and 19.2-152.10 of the Code of Virginia are amenEedamended and reenacted as follows:
D§ A.16.1-253.1.
UponPreliminary the filing of a petition alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subjected to family abuse, or the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protective orderorders pursuant to § 16.1-279.1 without alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subject to family abuse, the court may issue a preliminary protective order against an allegedly abusing person in ordercases to protect the health and safety of the petitioner or any family orabuse; household member of the petitioner.
Theconfidentiality. order may be issued in an ex parte proceeding upon good cause shown when the petition is supported by an affidavit or sworn testimony before the jBdge or intake officer or upon the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protecti9e order time, subject to family abuse.
IfA. an ex parte order is issued without an affidavit or a completEd form asof prescribed by subsection D of § 16.1-253.4 being presented, the court, in its order, shall state the basis upon which the order was entered, including a summary of the allegations made and the court's findings.
Upon the filing of a petition alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subjected to family abuse, or the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protective order pursuant to § 16.1-279.1 without alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a against an allegedly abusing person in order to protect the health and safety of the petitioner or any family or household member of the petitioner.
The order may be issued in an ex parte proceeding upon good cause shown when the petition is supported by an affidavit or sworn testimony before the judge or intake officer or upon the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protective order pursuant to § 16.1-279.1 without alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subject to family abuse.
If an ex parte order is issued without an affidavit or a completed form as prescribed by subsection D of § 16.1-253.4 being presented, the court, in its order, shall state the basis upon which the order was entered, including a summary of the allegations made and the court's findings.
Evidence that the petitioner has been subjected to family abuse within a reasonable time and evidence of immediate and present danger of family abuse may be established by a showing that (i) the allegedly abusing person is incarcerated and is to be released from incarceration within 30 days following the petition or has been released from incarceration within 30 days prior to the petition, (ii) the crime for which the allegedly abusing person was convicted and incarcerated involved family abuse against the petitioner, and (iii) the allegedlyersonallegedly abusing person has made threatening contact with the petitioner while he was incarcerated, exhibiting a renewed threat to the petitioner of family abuse.
allegedly3. abusing person;
Granting the petitioner possession of the premises occupied by the parties to the exclusion of the allegedly abusing person;
The court may enjoin the respondent from terminating a cellular telephone courtnumber mayor enjoinelectronic thedevice respondentbefore fromthe usingexpiration aof cellularthe telephonecontract orterm otherwith electronica devicethird-party toprovider. locate or surveille the petitioner.
The court may enjoin the respondent from using a cellular telephone or other electronic device to locate or surveille the petitioner.
petitioner8. meets the definition of owner in § 3.2-6500.panion animal as defined in § 3.2-6500 if such 9.
AnyGranting otherthe reliefpetitioner necessary for the protectionpossession of theany petitionercompanion andanimal familyas ordefined householdin members§ of3.2-6500 ofif 8such petitioner meets the petitioner.definition of owner in § 3.2-6500.
9.
Any other relief necessary for the protection of the petitioner and family or household members of the petitioner.
The court shall forthwith, but in all cases no later than the end of the business day on which the of 8 order was issued, enter and transfer electronically to the Virginia Criminal Information Network the respondent's identifying information and the name, date of birth, sex, and race of each protected person provided to the court.
At a full hearing on the petition, the court may issue a protective order pursuant to § 16.1-279.1 if the court finds that the petitioner has proven the allegation of family abuse by a preponderance of the of 8 evidence.
Neither a law-enforcement agency, the attorney for the Commonwealth, a court nor the clerE'sclerk's office, nor any employee of them, may disclose, except among themselves, the residential address, telephone number, or place of employment of the person protected by the order or that of the family of such person, except to the extent that disclosure is (i) required by law or the Rules of the SuRremeSupreme of 8 Court, (ii) necessary for law-enforcement purposes, or (iii) permitted by the court for good cause.
G.
As used in this section, "copy" includes a facsimile copy.
L J.
The respondent may be required to notify the court in writing within seven days of any chEngechange of residence while the preliminary protective order is in effect, provided that the respondent has been served a copy of such order in accordance with the provisions of this section.
Any failure of aDa respondent to make such required notification shall be punishable by contempt.
respondentA. against whom a preliminary protective order has been issued pursuant to § 16.1-253.1, thed court may issue a protective order to protect the health and safety of the petitioner and family or household members of the petitioner.
In cases of family abuse, including any case involving an incarcerated or recently incarcerated respondent against whom a preliminary protective order has been issued pursuant to § 16.1-253.1, the court may issue a protective order to protect the health and safety of the petitioner and family or household members of the petitioner.
S 1.
Prohibiting acts of family abuse or criminal offenses that result in injury to person or 3roperty;property;
Prohibiting such contacts by the respondent with the petitioner or family or household me8bersmembers of the petitioner as the court deems necessary for the health or safety of such persons;
R 3.
Enjoining the respondent from terminating any necessary utility service to the residence to which respondentthe topetitioner restorewas utilitygranted servicespossession pursuant to thatsubdivision residence;sion 3 or, where appropriate, ordering the 5.respondent to restore utility services to that residence;
5.
Granting the petitioner temporary possession or use of a motor vehicle owned by the petitioner alone or jointly owned by the parties to the exclusion of the respondent and enjoining the respondent from terminating any insurance, registration, or taxes on the motor vehicle and directing the respondent to maintain the insurance, registration, and taxes, as appropriate;
and of10. the petitioner, including a provision for temporary custody or visitation of a minor child.
Any other relief necessary for the protection of the petitioner and family or household members A1.of the petitioner, including a provision for temporary custody or visitation of a minor child.
A1.
A written motion requesting a heaIfhearing theto petitioner was a family or household member of the respondent at the time the initial protective order was issued, the court may extend the protective order forshall abe periodserved notas longersoon thanas twopossible ofon 8 years to protect the healthrespondent. and safety of the petitioner or persons who are family or household members of the petitioner at the time the request for an extension is made.
Show all 86 changed lines (46 more)
If the petitioner was a family or household member of the respondent at the time the initial protective order was issued, the court may extend the protective order for a period not longer than two years to protect the health and safety of the petitioner or persons who are family or household members of the petitioner at the time the request for an extension is made.
The ex parte preliminary protective order shall specify a date for the extension hearing, which shall be of 8 held within 15 days of the issuance of the ex parte preliminary protective order and may be held after the expiration of the protective order.
A law-enforcement officer may, in the performance of his duties, rely upon a copy of a foreign protective order or other suitable evidence which has been of 8 provided to him by any source and may also rely upon the statement of any person protected by the order that the order remains in effect.
E G.
Upon petitioner's motion to dissolve the protective order, a dissolutiRndissolution order may be issued ex parte by the court with or without a hearing.
If an ex parte hearing is held, it shall be copyheard ofby suchthe dissolutioncourt orderas onsoon respondentas inpracticable. conformity with §§ 8.01-286.1 and 8.01-296.ourtOshall serve a H.
If a dissolution order is issued ex parte, the court shall serve a copy of such dissolution order on respondent in conformity with §§ 8.01-286.1 and 8.01-296.
H.
L "Copy" includes a facsimile copy.
Lof 8 I.
Neither a law-enforcement agency, the attorney for the Commonwealth, a court nor the clerE'sclerk's office, nor any employee of them, may disclose, except among themselves, the residential address, telephone number, or place of employment of the person protected by the order or that of the family of such person, except to the extent that disclosure is (i) required by law or the Rules of the Supreme Court, (ii) necessary for law-enforcement purposes, or (iii) permitted by the court for good cause.
J.
No fee shall be charged for filing or serving any petition or order pursuant to this section.
An appeal of a final protective order issued by a circuit court pursuant to this section Shallshall be given expedited review by the Court of Appeals.
3 M.
The respondent shall be required to notify the court in writing within seven days of any 8hangechange of residence while the protective order is in effect, provided that the respondent has been serRedserved a copy of such order in accordance with the provisions of this section.
periodA. of time, subjected to an act of violence, force, or threat, or (ii) a petition or warrant has been issued for the arrest of the alleged perpetrator for any criminal offense resulting from the commission of an act of violence, force, or threat, or the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protective order pursuant to § 19.2-152.10 without alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subject to an act of violence, force, or threat, or that a petition or warrant has been issued for the arrest of the alleged perpetrator for any criminal offense resulting from the commission of an act of violence, force, or threat, the court may issue a preliminary protective order against the alleged perpetrator in order to protect the health and safety of the petitioner or any family or household member of the petitioner.
TheUpon orderthe mayfiling beof issueda inpetition alleging that (i) the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subjected to an exact parteof proceedingviolence, uponforce, goodor intakethreat, officeror (ii) a petition or uponwarrant has been issued for the arrest of the alleged perpetrator for any criminal offense resulting from the commission of an act of violence, force, or threat, or the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protective order pursuant to § 19.2-152.10.19.2-152.10 without alleging that the petitioner is or has been, within a reasonable period of time, subject to an act of violence, force, or threat, or that a petition or warrant has been issued for the arrest of the alleged perpetrator for any criminal offense resulting from the commission of an act of violence, force, or threat, the court may issue a preliminary protective order against the alleged perpetrator in order to protect the health and safety of the petitioner or any family or household member of the petitioner.
The order may be issued in an ex parte proceeding upon good cause shown when the petition is supported by an affidavit or sworn testimony before the judge or intake officer or upon the filing of a written motion requesting a hearing to extend a protective order pursuant to § 19.2-152.10.
Prohibiting acts of violence, force, or threat or criminal offenses that may result in injury to per2.person or property;
2.
The court shall forthwith, but in all cases no later than the end of the business day on which the order was issued, enter and transfer electronically to the Virginia Criminal Information Network the respondent's identifying information and the name, date of birth, sex, and race of each protected person informationprovided shall be forwarded forthwith to the primarycourt. law-enforcement agency responsible for service and entry of protective orders.
UponA receiptcopy of thea orderpreliminary byprotective theorder primarycontaining law-enforcement agency, the of 8 agency shall forthwith verify and enter any modificationsuch as necessary to the identifying information and other appropriate information required by the Department of State Police into the Virginia Criminal Information Network established and maintained by the Department pursuant to Chapter 2 (§ 52-12 et seq.) of Title 52 and the order shall be servedforwarded forthwith onto the allegedprimary perpetratorlaw-enforcement inagency personresponsible asfor providedservice in § 16.1-264, and dueentry returnof madeprotective toorders. the court.
Upon receipt of the order by the primary law-enforcement agency, the agency shall forthwith verify and enter any modification as necessary to the identifying information and other appropriate information required by the Department of State Police into the Virginia Criminal Information Network established and maintained by the Department pursuant to Chapter 2 (§ 52-12 et seq.) of Title 52 and the order shall be served forthwith on the alleged perpetrator in person as provided in § 16.1-264, and due return made to the court.
Upon service, the agency making service shall enter the date and time of service and other appropriate information required by the Department of State Police of 8 into the Virginia Criminal Information Network and make due return to the court.
The respondent may be required to notify the court in writing within seven days of any change of of 8 residence while the preliminary protective order is in effect, provided that the respondent has been served a copy of such order in accordance with the provisions of this section.
Any failure of aEa respondent to make such required notification shall be punishable by contempt.
N A.
The court may issue a protective order pursuant to this chapter to protect the health andRsafetyand safety of the petitioner and family or household members of a petitioner upon (i) the issuance of a petition or warrant for, or a conviction of, any criminal offense resulting from the commission of an act of violence, force, or threat or (ii) a hearing held pursuant to subsection D of § 19.2-152.9.
E 2.
D 3.
Any other relief necessary to prevent (i) acts of violence, force, or threat, (ii) criminal offenses that may result in injury to person or property, or (iii) communication or other contact of any kind by the4.the respondent;
and of 8 4.
on the laStlast day specified or at 11:59 p.m.
Prio3Prior to the expiration of the protective order, a petitioner may file a written motion requesting a hearing8tohearing to extend the order.
Proceedings to extend a protective order shall be given precedence on the docket of Rhethe court.
The court may extend the protective order for a period not longer than two years to protect the health and safety of the petitioner or persons who are family or household members of the petitioner at the time the request for an extension is made.
If the respondent fails to appear at the extension hearing because the respondent was not personally served, the court shall schedule a new date for the extension hearing and may extend asthe soonex asparte possibleprotective onorder theuntil respondent.such new date.
IfThe theextended respondent was personally served, where the petitionererved shows by clear and convincing evidence that a continuance is necessary to meet the ends of justice or the respondent shows good cause, the court may continue the extension hearing and such ex parte protective order shall remainbe inserved effectas untilsoon theas extensionpossible hearing.on the respondent.
If the respondent was personally served, where the petitioner shows by clear and convincing evidence that a continuance is necessary to meet the ends of justice or the respondent shows good cause, the court may continue the extension hearing and such ex parte protective order shall remain in effect until the extension hearing.
The protective conviction for violation of a protective order issuedshall pursuantexpire toat this11:59 subsection,p.m. the court that issued the original protective order may extend the protective order as the court deems necessary to protect the health and safety of the victim.
on the last day specified in the protective order, if any.
Upon a conviction for violation of a protective order issued pursuant to this subsection, the court that issued the original protective order may extend the protective order as the court deems necessary to protect the health and safety of the victim.
The court, including a circuit court if the circuit court issued the order, shall forthwith, but in all cases no later than the end of the business day on which the order was issued, enter and transfer electronically to the Virginia Criminal Information Network the respondent's identifying information and the name, date of birth, sex, and race of each protected person provided to the court and shall forthwith forward the attested copy of the protective order and containing any such identifying information to the primary law-enforcement agency responsible for service and entry of protective orders.
Upon receipt of the order by the primary law-enforcement agency, the agency shall forthwith verify and enter any modification as necessary to the identifying information and other appropriate of 8 information required by the Department of State Police into the Virginia Criminal Information Network established and maintained by the Department pursuant to Chapter 2 (§ 52-12 et seq.) of Title 52 and the order shall be served forthwith upon the respondent and due return made to the court.
Any judgment, order or decree, whether permanent or temporary, issued by a court of appropriate jurisdiction in another state, the United States or any of its territories, possessions or Commonwealths, the District of Columbia or by any tribal court of appropriate jurisdiction for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts or harassment against or contact or communication with or physical proximity of 8 to another person, including any of the conditions specified in subsection A, shall be accorded full faith and credit and enforced in the Commonwealth as if it were an order of the Commonwealth, provided reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard were given by the issuing jurisdiction to the person against whom the order is sought to be enforced sufficient to protect such person's due process rights and consistent with federal law.
Show all 86 changed rows (46 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- CHAP0594 View text Current pdf April 05, 2024
- SB398ER View text pdf March 04, 2024
- SB398S1 View text pdf February 07, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104772D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0594)
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 594 (effective 7/1/24)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB398ER)
-
Enrolled
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (97-Y 0-N)
-
Passed House BLOCK VOTE (97-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Courts of Justice (21-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (8-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substituteSB398S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24107453D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Substitute bill reprinted 24107453D-S1
-
Committee substitute printed 24107453D-S1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104772D
Sponsors
- Russet Perry · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 96 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 96 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Earley, Mark L., Jr. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Yea |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Not Voting |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Obenshain, Chris | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Not Voting |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 398 do?
- Protective orders; respondent to notify court of change of address. Requires the respondent against whom a protective order has been issued to notify the court in writing within seven days of any change of residence while such order is in effect, provided that such order has been properly served upon the respondent. In a proceeding involving a preliminary protective order, the bill provides that the court may require the respondent to notify the court in writing within seven days of any change of residence while such preliminary protective order is in effect. The bill also provides that any failure of a respondent to make such required notification shall be punishable by contempt.
- Who sponsors SB 398?
- SB 398 is sponsored by Russet Perry.
- What is the current status of SB 398?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 398?
- Track SB 398 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 398
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 398
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →