SB 5021 — Granting interest arbitration to department of corrections employees.
Last action — Effective date 7/28/2019.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 12, 2018. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill SB 5021 clarifies that interest arbitration rights will be granted specifically to employees of the Department of Corrections, rather than to "certain employees" as previously stated. Additionally, the updated bill removes language that outlined a mediation process before arbitration, streamlining the process for resolving disputes about employee contracts. This change matters because it provides a clearer and more direct route for resolving disputes, which may help ensure that corrections employees receive timely resolutions to their contract negotiations.
S-2161.1SECONDS-0099.2SENATE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5021State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenateSessionBySenators Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Van De Wege, Walsh, Keiser, Conway, Hunt, Hobbs, Wellman, Hasegawa, and Kuderer)READKudererPrefiled FIRST12/12/18.Read TIMEfirst 02/27/19.ANtime 01/14/19.Referred to Committee on Labor & Commerce.AN ACT Relating to granting interest arbitration to certain department of corrections employees;
A new section is added to chapter 41.80 RCW to read as follows:(1) In order to maintain dedicated and uninterrupted services to the supervision of criminal offenders that are in state correctional facilities and on community supervision, it is the legislature's intent to grant certain employees of the department of corrections interest arbitration rights as an alternative means of settling disputes.(2) This section applies only to employees covered by chapter 41.06 RCW working for the department of corrections, except confidential employees as defined in RCW 41.80.005, members of the Washington management service, and internal auditors,auditors.(3) andWithin nonsupervisoryten marineworking departmentdays employees.(3)after Negotiationsthe betweenfirst Monday in September of every odd-numbered year, the employergovernor andor the exclusivegovernor's designee and the bargaining representativerepresentatives offor aany unitbargaining ofunits employeescovered by this section shall beattempt commencedto atagree leaston fivean monthsinterest beforearbitrator submissionto ofbe used if the budgetparties toare thenot legislature.successful in negotiating a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement.
If no agreement has been reached sixty days after the commencement of such negotiations then, at any time thereafter, either party may declare that an impasse exists and may submit the dispute to the commission for mediation, with or without the concurrence of the other party.
The commission shall appoint a mediator, who shall promptly meet with the representatives of the parties, either jointly or separately, and shall take such other steps as he or she may deem appropriate in order to persuade the parties to resolve their differences and effect an agreement.
A mediator, however, does not have a power of compulsion.
The mediator may consider only matters that are subject to bargaining under this chapter.(4) If an agreement is not reached following a reasonable period of negotiations and mediation, and the director, upon recommendation of the assigned mediator, finds that the parties remain at impasse, then an arbitrator must be appointed to resolve the dispute.
The issues for determination by the arbitrator must be limited to the issues certified by the executive director.(5) Within ten working days after the first Monday in September of every odd-numbered year, the governor or the governor's designee and the bargaining representatives for any bargaining units covered by this section shall attempt to agree on an interest arbitrator to be used if the parties are not successful in negotiating a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement.
The parties shall also prepare a schedule of at least five negotiation dates, absent an agreement to the contrary.(c) The parties shall execute a written agreement before December 15th of the odd-numbered year setting forth the name of the arbitrator and the dates reserved for bargaining and arbitration.(d)(i)arbitration.(4) The arbitrator mustmay holdconsider aonly hearingmatters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1), and providemay reasonablenot noticeconsider those subjects listed under RCW 41.80.020 (2) and (3) and 41.80.040.(a) In making its determination, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the following factors:(i) The financial ability of the hearingdepartment of corrections to pay for the partiescompensation and benefit provisions of a collective bargaining agreement;(ii) The constitutional and statutory authority of the employer;(iii) Stipulations of the parties;(iv) Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of personnel involved in the proceedings with the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of like personnel of like state government employers of similar size in the western United States;(v) The ability of the department of corrections to retain employees;(vi) The overall compensation presently received by department of corrections employees, including direct wage compensation, vacations, holidays, and other paid excused time, pensions, insurance benefits, and all other direct or indirect monetary benefits received;(vii) Changes in any of the dispute.factors listed in this subsection during the pendency of the proceedings;
and(viii) Such other factors which are normally or traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1).(b) The hearingdecision mustof bean informalarbitrator andunder eachthis partysection hasis subject to RCW 41.80.010(3).(c) The decision of an arbitrator is not binding on the opportunitylegislature and, if the legislature does not approve the funds necessary to presentimplement evidenceprovisions pertaining to the compensation and makefringe arguments.benefit provision of an interest arbitration award, the provisions are not binding on the state or department of corrections.(5) Subject to the provisions of this section, the parties shall follow the commission's procedures for interest arbitration.--- END ---
The arbitrator may not present the case for a party to the proceedings.(ii) The rules of evidence prevailing in judicial proceedings may be considered, but are not binding, and any oral testimony or documentary evidence or other data deemed relevant by the arbitrator may be received in evidence.
A recording of the proceedings must be taken.(iii) The arbitrator may administer oaths, require the attendance of witnesses, and require the production of such books, papers, contracts, agreements, and documents deemed by the arbitrator to be material to a just determination of the issues in dispute.
If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued by the arbitrator, or refuses to be sworn or to make an affirmation to testify, or a witness, party, or attorney for a party is guilty of contempt while in attendance at a hearing, the arbitrator may invoke the jurisdiction of the superior court in the county where the labor dispute exists, and the court may issue an appropriate order.
Any failure to obey the order may be punished by the court as a contempt thereof.(6) The arbitrator may consider only matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1), and may not consider those subjects listed under RCW 41.80.020 (2) and (3) and 41.80.040.(a) In making its determination, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the following factors:(i) The financial ability of the department of corrections to pay for the compensation and benefit provisions of a collective bargaining agreement;(ii) The constitutional and statutory authority of the employer;(iii) Stipulations of the parties;(iv) Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of personnel involved in the proceedings with the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of like personnel of like state government employers of similar size in the western United States;(v) The ability of the department of corrections to retain employees;(vi) The overall compensation presently received by department of corrections employees, including direct wage compensation, vacations, holidays, and other paid excused time, pensions, insurance benefits, and all other direct or indirect monetary benefits received;(vii) Changes in any of the factors listed in this subsection during the pendency of the proceedings;
and(viii) Such other factors which are normally or traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1).(b) The decision of an arbitrator under this section is subject to RCW 41.80.010(3).(7) During the pendency of the proceedings before the arbitrator, existing wages, hours, and other conditions of employment shall not be changed by action of either party without the consent of the other but a party may so consent without prejudice to his or her rights or position under chapter 41.56 RCW.(8)(a) If the representative of either or both the employees and the state refuses to submit to the procedures set forth in subsections (3), (4), and (5) of this section, the parties, or the commission on its own motion, may invoke the jurisdiction of the superior court for the county in which the labor dispute exists and the court may issue an appropriate order.
A failure to obey the order may be punished by the court as a contempt thereof.(b) A decision of the arbitrator is final and binding on the parties, and may be enforced at the instance of either party, the arbitrator, or the commission in the superior court for the county where the dispute arose.
However, the decision of the arbitrator is not binding on the legislature and, if the legislature does not approve the funds necessary to implement provisions pertaining to the compensation and fringe benefit provision of an interest arbitration award, the provisions are not binding on the state or department of corrections.(9) Subject to the provisions of this section, the parties shall follow the commission's procedures for interest arbitration.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 7/28/2019.
-
Chapter 233, 2019 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Passed final passage; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Senate concurred in House amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 83; nays, 9; absent, 0; excused, 6.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Committee recommendations adopted and the bill amended.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 01:30 PM
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 03:30 PM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LAWS - Majority; do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 08:00 AM
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 03:30 PM
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Walsh · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Hobbs · Cosponsor
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
- Van De Wege · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (8)
- Walsh
- Keiser
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Hobbs
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Kuderer
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 41 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 17 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 83 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 9% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Not Voting |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Nay |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Not Voting |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Not Voting |
| Van Werven | — | Nay |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Not Voting |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5021?
- SB 5021 is sponsored by Walsh, Keiser, Steve Conway (Democrat), Hobbs, Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Kuderer, Victoria Hunt (Democrat), and Van De Wege.
- What is the current status of SB 5021?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 12, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 5021?
- Track SB 5021 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5021
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5021
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →