Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted 4 D cosponsors

SB 5021 — Granting interest arbitration to department of corrections employees.

Last action — Effective date 7/28/2019.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 12, 2018. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Bill SB 5021 clarifies that interest arbitration rights will be granted specifically to employees of the Department of Corrections, rather than to "certain employees" as previously stated. Additionally, the updated bill removes language that outlined a mediation process before arbitration, streamlining the process for resolving disputes about employee contracts. This change matters because it provides a clearer and more direct route for resolving disputes, which may help ensure that corrections employees receive timely resolutions to their contract negotiations.

→
Previous
Latest
S-2161.1SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5021State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenate Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Van De Wege, Walsh, Keiser, Conway, Hunt, Hobbs, Wellman, Hasegawa, and Kuderer)READ FIRST TIME 02/27/19.AN ACT Relating to granting interest arbitration to certain department of corrections employees;
S-0099.2SENATE BILL 5021State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenators Van De Wege, Walsh, Keiser, Conway, Hunt, Hobbs, Wellman, Hasegawa, and KudererPrefiled 12/12/18.Read first time 01/14/19.Referred to Committee on Labor & Commerce.AN ACT Relating to granting interest arbitration to department of corrections employees;
A new section is added to chapter 41.80 RCW to read as follows:(1) In order to maintain dedicated and uninterrupted services to the supervision of criminal offenders that are in state correctional facilities and on community supervision, it is the legislature's intent to grant certain employees of the department of corrections interest arbitration rights as an alternative means of settling disputes.(2) This section applies only to employees covered by chapter 41.06 RCW working for the department of corrections, except confidential employees as defined in RCW 41.80.005, members of the Washington management service, internal auditors, and nonsupervisory marine department employees.(3) Negotiations between the employer and the exclusive bargaining representative of a unit of employees shall be commenced at least five months before submission of the budget to the legislature.
A new section is added to chapter 41.80 RCW to read as follows:(1) In order to maintain dedicated and uninterrupted services to the supervision of criminal offenders that are in state correctional facilities and on community supervision, it is the legislature's intent to grant employees of the department of corrections interest arbitration rights as an alternative means of settling disputes.(2) This section applies only to employees covered by chapter 41.06 RCW working for the department of corrections, except confidential employees as defined in RCW 41.80.005, members of the Washington management service, and internal auditors.(3) Within ten working days after the first Monday in September of every odd-numbered year, the governor or the governor's designee and the bargaining representatives for any bargaining units covered by this section shall attempt to agree on an interest arbitrator to be used if the parties are not successful in negotiating a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement.
If no agreement has been reached sixty days after the commencement of such negotiations then, at any time thereafter, either party may declare that an impasse exists and may submit the dispute to the commission for mediation, with or without the concurrence of the other party.
The commission shall appoint a mediator, who shall promptly meet with the representatives of the parties, either jointly or separately, and shall take such other steps as he or she may deem appropriate in order to persuade the parties to resolve their differences and effect an agreement.
A mediator, however, does not have a power of compulsion.
The mediator may consider only matters that are subject to bargaining under this chapter.(4) If an agreement is not reached following a reasonable period of negotiations and mediation, and the director, upon recommendation of the assigned mediator, finds that the parties remain at impasse, then an arbitrator must be appointed to resolve the dispute.
The issues for determination by the arbitrator must be limited to the issues certified by the executive director.(5) Within ten working days after the first Monday in September of every odd-numbered year, the governor or the governor's designee and the bargaining representatives for any bargaining units covered by this section shall attempt to agree on an interest arbitrator to be used if the parties are not successful in negotiating a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement.
The parties shall also prepare a schedule of at least five negotiation dates, absent an agreement to the contrary.(c) The parties shall execute a written agreement before December 15th of the odd-numbered year setting forth the name of the arbitrator and the dates reserved for bargaining and arbitration.(d)(i) The arbitrator must hold a hearing and provide reasonable notice of the hearing to the parties to the dispute.
The parties shall also prepare a schedule of at least five negotiation dates, absent an agreement to the contrary.(c) The parties shall execute a written agreement before December 15th of the odd-numbered year setting forth the name of the arbitrator and the dates reserved for bargaining and arbitration.(4) The arbitrator may consider only matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1), and may not consider those subjects listed under RCW 41.80.020 (2) and (3) and 41.80.040.(a) In making its determination, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the following factors:(i) The financial ability of the department of corrections to pay for the compensation and benefit provisions of a collective bargaining agreement;(ii) The constitutional and statutory authority of the employer;(iii) Stipulations of the parties;(iv) Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of personnel involved in the proceedings with the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of like personnel of like state government employers of similar size in the western United States;(v) The ability of the department of corrections to retain employees;(vi) The overall compensation presently received by department of corrections employees, including direct wage compensation, vacations, holidays, and other paid excused time, pensions, insurance benefits, and all other direct or indirect monetary benefits received;(vii) Changes in any of the factors listed in this subsection during the pendency of the proceedings;
The hearing must be informal and each party has the opportunity to present evidence and make arguments.
and(viii) Such other factors which are normally or traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1).(b) The decision of an arbitrator under this section is subject to RCW 41.80.010(3).(c) The decision of an arbitrator is not binding on the legislature and, if the legislature does not approve the funds necessary to implement provisions pertaining to the compensation and fringe benefit provision of an interest arbitration award, the provisions are not binding on the state or department of corrections.(5) Subject to the provisions of this section, the parties shall follow the commission's procedures for interest arbitration.--- END ---
The arbitrator may not present the case for a party to the proceedings.(ii) The rules of evidence prevailing in judicial proceedings may be considered, but are not binding, and any oral testimony or documentary evidence or other data deemed relevant by the arbitrator may be received in evidence.
A recording of the proceedings must be taken.(iii) The arbitrator may administer oaths, require the attendance of witnesses, and require the production of such books, papers, contracts, agreements, and documents deemed by the arbitrator to be material to a just determination of the issues in dispute.
If a person refuses to obey a subpoena issued by the arbitrator, or refuses to be sworn or to make an affirmation to testify, or a witness, party, or attorney for a party is guilty of contempt while in attendance at a hearing, the arbitrator may invoke the jurisdiction of the superior court in the county where the labor dispute exists, and the court may issue an appropriate order.
Any failure to obey the order may be punished by the court as a contempt thereof.(6) The arbitrator may consider only matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1), and may not consider those subjects listed under RCW 41.80.020 (2) and (3) and 41.80.040.(a) In making its determination, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the following factors:(i) The financial ability of the department of corrections to pay for the compensation and benefit provisions of a collective bargaining agreement;(ii) The constitutional and statutory authority of the employer;(iii) Stipulations of the parties;(iv) Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of personnel involved in the proceedings with the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of like personnel of like state government employers of similar size in the western United States;(v) The ability of the department of corrections to retain employees;(vi) The overall compensation presently received by department of corrections employees, including direct wage compensation, vacations, holidays, and other paid excused time, pensions, insurance benefits, and all other direct or indirect monetary benefits received;(vii) Changes in any of the factors listed in this subsection during the pendency of the proceedings;
and(viii) Such other factors which are normally or traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of matters that are subject to bargaining under RCW 41.80.020(1).(b) The decision of an arbitrator under this section is subject to RCW 41.80.010(3).(7) During the pendency of the proceedings before the arbitrator, existing wages, hours, and other conditions of employment shall not be changed by action of either party without the consent of the other but a party may so consent without prejudice to his or her rights or position under chapter 41.56 RCW.(8)(a) If the representative of either or both the employees and the state refuses to submit to the procedures set forth in subsections (3), (4), and (5) of this section, the parties, or the commission on its own motion, may invoke the jurisdiction of the superior court for the county in which the labor dispute exists and the court may issue an appropriate order.
A failure to obey the order may be punished by the court as a contempt thereof.(b) A decision of the arbitrator is final and binding on the parties, and may be enforced at the instance of either party, the arbitrator, or the commission in the superior court for the county where the dispute arose.
However, the decision of the arbitrator is not binding on the legislature and, if the legislature does not approve the funds necessary to implement provisions pertaining to the compensation and fringe benefit provision of an interest arbitration award, the provisions are not binding on the state or department of corrections.(9) Subject to the provisions of this section, the parties shall follow the commission's procedures for interest arbitration.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 7/28/2019.

  2. Chapter 233, 2019 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 83; nays, 9; absent, 0; excused, 6.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee recommendations adopted and the bill amended.

  12. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  13. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  14. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM

  15. Minority; do not pass.

  16. APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  17. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 01:30 PM

  18. Referred to Appropriations.

  19. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 03:30 PM

  20. Minority; do not pass.

  21. LAWS - Majority; do pass.

  22. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 08:00 AM

  23. First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

  24. Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  25. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  26. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  27. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  28. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  29. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  30. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  31. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  32. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  33. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  34. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  35. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM

  36. Minority; without recommendation.

  37. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  38. Minority; without recommendation.

  39. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  40. Minority; without recommendation.

  41. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  42. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 03:30 PM

  43. Referred to Ways & Means.

  44. Referred to Ways & Means.

  45. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM

  46. And refer to Ways & Means.

  47. LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  48. And refer to Ways & Means.

  49. LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  50. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM

  51. First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.

  52. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (142)

142 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 142 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 48 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26100
Republican 9000
Democrat 13000
Total 48100
% of votes cast 98%2%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 83 Yea · 9 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 41002
Unaffiliated 25503
Republican 17401
Total 83906
% of votes cast 85%9%0%6%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Not Voting
Blake — Yea
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Hoff — Nay
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Nay
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mead — Yea
Morris — Not Voting
Mosbrucker — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Smith — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Not Voting
Van Werven — Nay
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Not Voting
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Not Voting
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Nay
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Nay
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Nay
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 47 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26001
Republican 8001
Democrat 13000
Total 47002
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Not Voting
Wilson, L. — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Not Voting
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5021?
SB 5021 is sponsored by Walsh, Keiser, Steve Conway (Democrat), Hobbs, Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Kuderer, Victoria Hunt (Democrat), and Van De Wege.
What is the current status of SB 5021?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 12, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 5021?
Track SB 5021 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5021

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5021

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →