Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 4 D · 2 R cosponsors

SB 6282 — Concerning the development of individualized highly capable learning plans.

Last action — Returned to Senate Rules 3.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 6282 introduces a clearer requirement for school districts when transitioning highly capable students from a cohort model to a noncohort model. It now mandates that an individualized learning plan must be created within 30 days of the transition, ensuring that parents are involved in the process and that the educational needs of the students are specifically addressed. This change is significant because it aims to better protect students' educational rights and ensure they continue receiving appropriate services, thus minimizing potential negative impacts on their learning.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6282State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenate Early Learning & K-12 Education (originally sponsored by Senators Pedersen, Wellman, Kuderer, Salomon, Mullet, Carlyle, Hunt, Holy, Padden, Hawkins, Zeiger, Wagoner, and Das)READ FIRST TIME 02/05/20.AN ACT Relating to the development of highly capable transition plans;
S-5161.1SENATE BILL 6282State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenators Pedersen, Wellman, Kuderer, Salomon, Mullet, Carlyle, Hunt, Holy, Padden, Hawkins, Zeiger, and WagonerRead first time 01/14/20.Referred to Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education.AN ACT Relating to the development of individualized highly capable learning plans;
The legislature recognizes that accelerated learning and enhanced instruction for highly capable students is considered part of basic education, and requires that students be offered a continuum of highly capable services in grades K-12.
The legislature recognizes that accelerated learning and enhanced instruction for highly capable students is considered part of basic education, and may be achieved through a variety of service delivery models, including cohort and noncohort models.
Accelerated learning requires access to accelerated curriculum, advanced standards, and faster pacing.
This variety of service delivery models allows school districts to address the wide range of instructional and social-emotional services needed for highly capable students.
Enhanced instruction requires that the accelerated curriculum be offered at greater depth and complexity, and that students receive direct instruction on that K-12 curriculum from educators.
However, given the unique structure of each district's program, the legislature also recognizes the impact to student learning that occurs when school districts change service delivery models, or remove student access to a given model.
Accelerated learning and enhanced instruction can be achieved through a variety of delivery models and instructional programming, which grants school districts the flexibility necessary to address a wide range of student needs.The legislature further recognizes that there has been a long history of inequitable access to highly capable services.
Therefore, the legislature intends to create a process to protect highly capable student services when a school district removes student access to the cohort model program, or changes the district's program to a noncohort service delivery model for highly capable instruction.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
Identification practices such as testing outside the school day or at locations other than a student's school and the use of testing instruments that are inaccessible to English language learners has had the effect of failing to identify highly capable students who reflect the racial and economic diversity of a school district's population.
The legislature encourages districts to reform their identification processes to address these inequities and improve access for all highly capable students.However, the legislature also recognizes the possible impact to student learning that may occur when school districts modify the delivery model of highly capable services.
Therefore, the legislature intends to create a process to protect highly capable student access to basic education when a school district substantially modifies the continuum of highly capable services provided.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 28A.185 RCW to read as follows:(1) A school district may choose to provide highly capable instruction using a variety of service delivery models.
A new section is added to chapter 28A.185 RCW to read as follows:(1)(a) When a school district transitions a highly capable student from a cohort model of instruction to a noncohort model of instruction, the school district must develop an individualized highly capable learning plan for that student in consultation with the student's parent or guardian.
However, if a school district chooses to make a substantial modification to the continuum of services provided to the highly capable students in a school or school district by transitioning the students to an alternative delivery model for highly capable instruction, it must develop a highly capable program transition plan for the group of students affected.(2)(a) Within fifteen days of formalizing the decision to transition to an alternative delivery model for highly capable instruction, a school district must provide written notice to the parents and guardians of all highly capable students that may be affected by the transition.
(b)(i) The school district must develop the individualized highly capable learning plan no later than thirty days after transitioning the highly capable student to a noncohort model of instruction within the classroom.
The notice must include a summary of the anticipated program changes and an invitation to participate in public meetings regarding development and adoption of the highly capable program transition plan.(b) Any school district required to retroactively develop a highly capable program transition plan pursuant to section 3 of this act must provide notice within fifteen days of the effective date of this section.(3) Within thirty days after providing written notice to parents and guardians, the school district must hold a public meeting to solicit comments regarding development of the highly capable program transition plan.(4) Within thirty days after the public meeting, the school district must convene a transition team to develop the highly capable program transition plan.
Upon completion, a copy of the individualized highly capable learning plan must be provided to the student's teachers and parent or guardian and recorded in the student's academic file.(ii) Any school district required to develop an individualized highly capable learning plan retroactively, pursuant to section 3 of this act, must fulfill such requirement within thirty days of the effective date of this section.(c) Each individualized highly capable learning plan must, at a minimum, include the following information:(i) A description of the highly capable student's current services under the cohort model including accelerated learning levels, instructional enhancement strategies and future expected course sequencing;(ii) A description of the services and transitional supports that the highly capable student will receive under the noncohort model, and how those services will provide the student with the educational opportunities necessary to address the student's unique needs and capabilities, including learning disabilities or special needs;(iii) A personalized plan for how the highly capable student's progress will be measured in all subjects where the student is receiving accelerated learning and enhanced instruction;(iv) A process and timeline for evaluating whether the noncohort model is successfully providing a meaningful opportunity for progress similar to that expected under the cohort model;
The transition team must be appointed by the school board of directors, and include highly capable educators, parents or guardians of highly capable students affected by the transition, and school district personnel who have experience administering highly capable programs.(5) Within thirty days of convening, the transition team must develop a highly capable program transition plan that reflects the comments received at the public meeting and that contains, at a minimum, the following information:(a) A description of the highly capable program's current structure and services, including instructional enhancement strategies and processes used to address the unique needs and capabilities of highly capable students, including those with learning disabilities and special needs;(b) A description of the services and transitional supports that highly capable students will receive under the alternative delivery model, and how those services will provide students with equivalent or enhanced educational opportunities;(c) A plan for how the progress of all highly capable students will be measured in subjects in which they are receiving accelerated learning and enhanced instruction;(d) A process and timeline for evaluating whether the alternative delivery model is successfully providing a meaningful opportunity for progress similar to that expected under the current delivery model;(e) A process to solicit feedback from parents or guardians of highly capable students, at least once each year for two years following the introduction of the alternative delivery model, to determine if any modification to the delivery model is necessary;
and(v) A process to modify the individualized highly capable learning plan if necessary.(d) If a school district fails to develop an individualized highly capable learning plan for a student as required under this section, or the individualized highly capable learning plan does not meet the minimum standards required under this section, the student's parent or guardian has a cause of action and may seek all remedies available at law or in equity.(2) For the purposes of this section the following definitions apply:(a) "Cohort model" means a delivery model for highly capable student instruction that provides accelerated learning and enhanced instruction in a self-contained environment among other highly capable students.
and(f) If one of the reasons the district is changing the highly capable delivery model is to address racial disparities within the program and increase access to educational opportunity for students of color, the transition plan must also include a description of how the new model will address racial disparities, a multiyear process for evaluating whether the new delivery model is actually increasing access to the highly capable program for students of color, and a plan for making adjustments if it is not.(6) Within thirty days of finalizing the highly capable program transition plan, the school district must adopt the plan at an open public meeting.
(b) "Individualized highly capable learning plan" means a plan developed by a school district describing the services that will provide accelerated learning and enhanced instruction, in consultation with the parents or guardians of the identified highly capable student, when the school district transitions that student from a cohort model of instruction to a noncohort model of instruction.
Upon adoption, the school district must publish the transition plan on the school district web site.(7) If a school district fails to develop a highly capable program transition plan as required under this section or, if after one year, a student subject to the transition plan is not continuing to make academic progress similar to the progress that had been made under the prior delivery model, the parent or guardian of that highly capable student may request mediation with the school district.
(c) "Noncohort model" means a delivery model for highly capable student instruction that provides accelerated learning and enhanced instruction within a general education environment.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
If the parent requests mediation with the school district, the school district shall engage an independent mediator within thirty days, at the expense of the school district, to assist the parties in creating a mutually acceptable individual transition plan.(8) For the purposes of this section, "substantial modification" means modification to the continuum of highly capable services provided to a student, made without the consent of the student's parent or guardian, that significantly adjusts or disrupts the delivery of accelerated learning or enhanced instruction.
This may include, but is not limited to, moving a student from a cohort model of instruction to a noncohort model of instruction or disrupting a student's future expected course sequencing.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
This act applies retroactively to all transitions in highly capable delivery models that occurred after January 1, 2019.--- END ---
This act applies retroactively to all transitions of highly capable students from a cohort model of instruction to a noncohort model of instruction that occurred after January 1, 2019.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Returned to Senate Rules 3.

  2. First reading, referred to Education.

  3. Third reading, passed; yeas, 39; nays, 9; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  4. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  5. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  6. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  7. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  8. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  9. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  10. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  11. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  12. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education at 01:30 PM

  13. Minority; do not pass.

  14. EDU - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  15. Minority; do not pass.

  16. EDU - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  17. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education at 01:30 PM

  18. First reading, referred to Early Learning & K-12 Education.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (11)

Not signed on (139)

139 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 139 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 39 Yea · 9 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20500
Republican 9001
Democrat 10400
Total 39901
% of votes cast 80%18%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Becker — Yea
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Nay
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Nay
Frockt — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Nay
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Nay
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Claire Wilson Democrat Nay
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6282?
SB 6282 is sponsored by Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Kuderer, Jesse Salomon (Democrat), Mullet, Carlyle, Jeff Holy (Republican), Padden, Hawkins, Zeiger, Keith Wagoner (Republican), and Victoria Hunt (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 6282?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 6282?
Track SB 6282 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6282

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6282

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →