Photo speed monitoring devices; high-risk intersection segments.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 336 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 336.
You're tracking SB 336
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 336 — Photo speed monitoring devices; high-risk intersection segments.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0670)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 08, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Photo speed monitoring devices; high-risk intersection segments. Permits a state or local law-enforcement agency to place and operate a photo speed monitoring device at a high-risk intersection segment, defined in the bill, located within the locality for the purpose of recording violations resulting from the operation of a vehicle in excess of the speed limit, provided that such law-enforcement agency certifies that a traffic fatality has occurred since January 1, 2014, in such segment. The bill provides the same requirements for such devices, information collected from such devices, and any enforcement actions resulting from information collected from such devices as current law applies to the use of such devices in school crossing zones and highway work zones.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
460 added · 440 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 336 made some adjustments to the existing Virginia Highway Safety Improvement Program. Notably, the bill now specifies that funds will be allocated from both the Board's set-aside funds and any relevant funds from photo speed monitoring devices, ensuring a broader financial base for safety initiatives. This change is significant because it enhances the program's funding sources and aims to improve road safety through targeted investments in infrastructure and behavioral strategies.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2024 SESSION CHAPTER E670 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 33.2-373, 46.2-208, and 46.2-882.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to photo speed monitoring devices;
R O [S 336] Approved LApril L8, 2024 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That §§ 33.2-373, 46.2-208, and 46.2-882.1 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenactedEreenacted as follows:
D§ A.33.2-373.
Virginia Highway Safety Improvement Program.
A.
The Board shall use funds set aside pursuant to § 33.2-3583B. and any funds deposited pursuant to § 46.2-882.1 for the Program.
B.
At least 54 percent for infrastructure projects that address a hazardous road location orBfeatureor feature and address an identified highway safety problem;
32. in fatalities and severe injuries;
andesAt least 29 percent for strategies and activities to address behavioral causes of crashesEthatcrashes that result 3.in fatalities and severe injuries;
and 3.
The strategy shall cover a period of at least five years and seek to achieve a significant reduction in the anticipated number of fatalities and severe injuries over the covered period and shall give priority to projects, strategies, and activities based on the expected reduction in fatalities and severe injuries relative to cost, including improvements that are widely implemented based on a high-risk roadway feature that is §correlated 46.2-208.with a particular crash type, rather than crash frequency.
§ 46.2-208.
Vehicle information, including all descriptive vehicle data and title, registration, and vehicle actB.activity data, but excluding crash data.
B.
Upon the request of (i) the subject of the information, (ii) the parent of a minor who is the subject of the information, (iii) the guardian of the subject of the information, (iv) the authorized agent or representative of the subject of the information, or (v) the owner of the vehicle that is the subject of the information, the Commissioner shall provide him with the requested information and a complete explanation of it.
If the requester is requesting such information in the scope of his official business as providedcounsel freefrom ofa charge.fender'spublic defender's office or as counsel appointed by a court, such records shall be 5.provided free of charge.
Upon5. the written request of any insurance carrier or surety, or authorized agent of either, the of 8 Commissioner shall furnish to such requester information in the record of any person subject to the provisions of this title.
TheUpon transcriptthe shallwritten includerequest any record of any convictioninsurance ofcarrier aor violationsurety, ofor anyauthorized provisionagent of anyeither, statutethe orCommissioner ordinanceshall relatingfurnish to thesuch operationrequester orinformation ownershipin ofthe arecord motor vehicle or of any injuryperson orsubject damageto inthe whichprovisions heof wasthis involvedtitle. and a report filed pursuant to § 46.2-373.
The transcript shall include any record of any conviction of a violation of any of 8 provision of any statute or ordinance relating to the operation or ownership of a motor vehicle or of any injury or damage in which he was involved and a report filed pursuant to § 46.2-373.
If the requester submits a request for information in accordance with this subdivision without an existing agreement to receive the information, the request shall be in a manner prescribed by the Department, and such request shall of 8 contain the legal authority that authorizes the performance of the requester's official functions and a description of how such information will be used to carry out such official functions.
If the E Commissioner determines that sufficient authority has not been provided by the requester to show that the purpose for which such information shall be used is one of the requester's official functions, the Commissioner shall deny such request.
Rof 8 Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, the Department shall not disseminate to any federal, state, or local government entity, law-enforcement officer, or law-enforcement agency any privileged information for any purposes related to civil immigration enforcement unless (i) the subject of the information provides consent or (ii) the requesting agency presents a lawful judicial order, judicial subpoena, or judicial warrant.
Within three business days of receiving a request for information for the purpose of civil immigrationEimmigration enforcement, the Commissioner shall send a notification to the individual about whom such information was requested that such a request was made and the identity of the entity that made such request.
The Department shall not enter into any agreement pursuant to subsection E with a requester pursuant to this subdivision unless the requester certifies that the information obtained will not be used for civil immigration purposes or knowingly disseminated to any third party for any purpose related to civil immigration enforcement.
or knowingly disseminated to any third party for any purpose related to 10.
S 11.
For the purpose of obtaining information regarding noncommercial driver's license hol3ers,holders, upon the written request of any employer, prospective employer, or authorized agent of either, 6ndand with the written consent of the individual concerned, the Commissioner shall (i) compare personal R information supplied by the requester with that contained in the Department's records and, when the information supplied by the requester is different from that contained in the Department's records, provide the requester with correct information as contained in the Department's records and (ii) provide the requester with driver information in the form of a transcript of an individual's record, including all convictions, all crashes, any type of driver's license that the individual currently possesses, and allallall driver's license suspensions, revocations, cancellations, or forfeiture, provided that such individual's position or the position that the individual is being considered for involves the operation of a motor vehicle.
For the purpose of obtaining information regarding commercial driver's license holders, upon the written request of any employer, prospective employer, or authorized agent of either, the Commissioner shall (i) compare personal information supplied by the requester with that contained in the Department's records and, when the information supplied by the requester is different from that contained in the Department's records, provide the requester with correct information as contained in the Department's records and (ii) provide the requester with driver information in the form of a transcript of such individual's record, including all convictions, all crashes, any type of driver's license that the individual currently possesses, and all driver's license suspensions, revocations, cancellations, forfeitures, or disqualifications, provided that such individual's position or the position that the individual is being considered for involves the operation of a commercial motor vehicle.
Upon the written request of any member of a volunteer fire company or volunteer emergency medical services agency and with written consent of the individual concerned, or upon the request of an applicant for membership in a volunteer fire company or to serve as volunteer emergency medical services personnel, the Commissioner shall (i) compare personal information supplied by the requester with that contained in the Department's records and, when the information supplied by the requester is different from that contained in the Department's records, provide the requester with correct information as contained in the Department's records and (ii) provide driver information in the form of a transcriptntranscript of the individual's record, including all convictions, all crashes, any type of driver's license that the individual currently possesses, and all license suspensions, revocations, cancellations, or forfeitures.
Upon the written request of a Virginia affiliate of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America, a Virginia affiliate of Compeer, or the Virginia Council of the Girl Scouts of the USA, and with the consent of the individual who is the subject of the information and has applied to be a volunteer with the requester, or on the written request of a Virginia chapter of the American Red Cross, a VirginiathVirginia chapter of the Civil Air Patrol, or Faith in Action, and with the consent of the individual who is the of 8 subject of the information and applied to be a volunteer vehicle operator with the requester, the Commissioner shall (i) compare personal information supplied by the requester with that contained in the Department's records and, when the information supplied by the requester is different from that contained in the Department's records, provide the requester with correct information as contained in the Department's records and (ii) provide driver information in the form of a transcript of the applicant's record, including all convictions, all crashes, any type of driver's license that the individual currently possesses, and all license suspensions, revocations, cancellations, or forfeitures.
Such transcript shall be provided at a fee that is one-half the normal charge if the request is accompanied by appropriate written of 8 evidence that the person has applied to be a volunteer or volunteer vehicle operator with the requester as provided in this subdivision.
Upon the written request of the executor or administrator of a deceased person's estate, the Department shall, if the deceased person had been issued a driver's license or special identification card of 8 by the Department, supply the requester with a hard copy image of any photograph of the deceased person kept in the Department's records.
E 28.
Upon written agreement, the Commissioner may digitally verify the authenticity and validity of a driver's license, learner's permit, or special identification card to the American AssociatioRAssociation of Motor Vehicle Administrators, a motor vehicle dealer as defined in § 46.2-1500, or another organization appb.approved by the Commissioner.
Uponb. written agreement, the Commissioner may release minimum information as needed in theO Department's record through any American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators service L program created for the purpose of the exchange of information to any business, government agency, or authorized agent who would otherwise be authorized to receive the information requested pursuant to this section.
EUpon 30.written agreement, the Commissioner may release minimum information as needed in the Department's record through any American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators service program created for the purpose of the exchange of information to any business, government agency, or authorized agent who would otherwise be authorized to receive the information requested pursuant to of 8 this section.
30.
Information released pursuant to this subdivision shall be limited to the name and address of the owner of the vehicle having passed a stopped school bus and the vehicle information, inc31.including all descriptive vehicle data and title and registration data for such vehicle.
Show all 67 changed lines (27 more)
31.
Information released pursuant to this subdivision shall be limited to the name and address of the owner of the vehicle having committed a vehicle speed violation of § 46S2-87346.2-873 or 46.2-878.1, as defined in § 46.2-882.1, and the vehicle information, including all descripti3edescriptive vehicle data and title and registration data, for such vehicle.
6 32.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this section other than subdivision 33, the DepartmentRshallDepartment shall not release, except upon request by the subject of the information, the guardian of the subject of the information, the parent of a minor who is the subject of the information, or the authorized agent of the subject of the information, or pursuant to a court order, (i) proof documents submitted for the purpose of obtaining a driving credential or a special identification card, (ii) the information in the Department's records indicating the type of proof documentation that was provided, or (iii) applications relating to thesthe issuance of a driving credential or a special identification card.
Information disclosed or furnished shall be assessed a fee as specified in § 46.2-214, unless as othD.otherwise provided in this section.
D.
The requesting entity shall disseminate privileged information only to third parties subject to the original purpose specified in the written agreement consistent with this title.
Any agreement that does not allow third-party distributionedistribution shall include a statement that such distribution is prohibited.
Any agreement entered into pursuant to this subsection between the Department and the Department of State Police shall specify (i) that privileged information shall be distributed only to authorized personnel of an entity meeting the definition of a criminal justice agency as defined in § 9.1-101 and other comparable local, state, and federal criminal justice agencies and entities issued a VirginiaandVirginia S-Originating Agency Identification (S-ORI) status;
(ii) that privileged information shall be accessed, of 8 used, and disseminated only for the administration of criminal justice as defined in § 9.1-101;
(b) a request made by an entity authorized to receive privileged information pursuant to subsection B, provided that such request is made on a form provided by the Department, other than a written agreement, that requires the requester to certify that such entity is entitled to receive such information pursuant to this title, state the purpose authorized pursuant to subsection B that forms the basis for the request, explain why the information requested is necessary to accomplish the stated of 8 purpose, and certify that the information will be used only for the stated purpose and the information received shall not be disseminated to third parties unless there is authorization to do so;
However, all civil penalties collected under this section of 8 resulting from a summons issued based on evidence obtained from a photo speed monitoring device placed and operated at a high-risk intersection segment shall be paid to the Commonwealth E Transportation Board to be used for the Virginia Highway Safety Improvement Program established pursuant to § 33.2-373.
N 2.
If a photo speed monitoring device is used, proof of a violation of § 46.2-873 or 46.2R878.146.2-878.1 vehicle speed violation shall be evidenced by information obtained from such device.
A certificate, or a facsimile thereof, sworn to or affirmed by a law-enforcement officer, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, videotapes, or other recorded images produced by a photo speedfspeed O monitoring device, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts contained therein.
E 3.
In the prosecution for a violation of § 46.2-873 or 46.2-878.1 vehicle speed violation in which a summons was issued by mail, prima facie evidence that the vehicle described in the summons issued pursuant to this section was operated in violation of § 46.2-873 or 46.2-878.1 a manner constituting a vehicle speed violation, together with proof that the defendant was at the time of such violation the owner, lessee, or renter of the vehicle, shall constitute in evidence a rebuttable presumption that such of 8 owner, lessee, or renter of the vehicle was the person who committed the violation.
Such presumptionsuchpresumption shall be rebutted if the owner, lessee, or renter of the vehicle (i) files an affidavit by regular mail with the clerk of the general district court that he was not the operator of the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation and provides the name and address of the person who was operating the vehicleSatvehicle at the time of the alleged violation or (ii) testifies in open court under oath that he was not the op3ratoroperator of the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation and provides the name and address of the person wh6who was operating the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation.
Such presumption shall also be rebuRtedrebutted if a certified copy of a police report, showing that the vehicle had been reported to the police as stolen prior to the time of the alleged violation of § 46.2-873 or 46.2-878.1 vehicle speed violation, is presented, prior to the return date established on the summons issued pursuant to this section, to the court adj4.adjudicating the alleged violation.
4.
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 19.2-76, a summons issued by mail pursuant to this section may be executed by mailing by first-class mail a copy thereof to the owner, lessee, or renter of the vehicle.
No proceedings for contempt or arrest of a person summoned by mailing shall be instituted for failure to appear on the return date of the summons.
compensated6. for providing a photo speed monitoring device and all related support services, including consulting, operations, and administration.
However,H. only a law-enforcement officer may swear to or of 8 affirm the certificate required by this subsection section.
A private vendor may enter into an agreement with a law-enforcement agency to be compensated for providing a photo speed monitoring device and all related support services, including consulting, operations, and administration.
However, only a law-enforcement officer may swear to or affirm the certificate required by this subsection section.
or (iv) used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a vehicle speed violation or a violation of this of 8 section or § 46.2-873 or 46.2-878.1, or such information is requested upon order from a court of competent jurisdiction.
Show all 67 changed rows (27 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- CHAP0670 View text Current pdf April 08, 2024
- SB336ER View text pdf March 06, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24107913D-H1 pdf February 22, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105033D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0670)
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 670 (effective 7/1/24)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB336ER)
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB336ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Title replaced 24107913D-H1
-
House substitute agreed to by Senate (22-Y 17-N)
-
VOTE: Passage (73-Y 26-N)
-
Passed House with substitute (73-Y 26-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute SB336H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24107913D-H1
-
Read third time
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB336H1)
-
Passed by for the day
-
Read second time
-
Committee substitute printed 24107913D-H1
-
House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Reported from Transportation with substitute (17-Y 5-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (5-Y 3-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Transportation sub: Innovations (Ad Hoc)
-
Referred to Committee on Transportation
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Transportation (10-Y 5-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB336)
-
Referred to Committee on Transportation
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105033D
Sponsors
- Danica A. Roem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 46 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Not Voting |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Nay |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Nay |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 72 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 72 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 26% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 23% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adele Y. McClure | — | Yea |
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Bill Wiley | — | Nay |
| Bonita G. Anthony | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Yea |
| Eric R. Zehr | — | Nay |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Yea |
| Jackie H. Glass | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Laura Jane Cohen | — | Yea |
| Michael B. Feggans | — | Yea |
| Milde, Paul V. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
| Terry L. Austin | — | Yea |
| Timothy P. Griffin | — | Nay |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adele Y. McClure | — | Yea |
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Bill Wiley | — | Nay |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Nay |
| Jackie H. Glass | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Not Voting |
| Michael B. Feggans | — | Yea |
| Timothy P. Griffin | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Nay |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Not Voting |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 336 do?
- Photo speed monitoring devices; high-risk intersection segments. Permits a state or local law-enforcement agency to place and operate a photo speed monitoring device at a high-risk intersection segment, defined in the bill, located within the locality for the purpose of recording violations resulting from the operation of a vehicle in excess of the speed limit, provided that such law-enforcement agency certifies that a traffic fatality has occurred since January 1, 2014, in such segment. The bill provides the same requirements for such devices, information collected from such devices, and any enforcement actions resulting from information collected from such devices as current law applies to the use of such devices in school crossing zones and highway work zones.
- Who sponsors SB 336?
- SB 336 is sponsored by Danica A. Roem.
- What is the current status of SB 336?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 336?
- Track SB 336 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 336
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 336
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →