SB 5853 — Regarding the school construction assistance program.
Last action — Rules Committee relieved of further consideration; referred to Ways & Means.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
2 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of SB 5853 includes key updates to the school construction assistance program in Washington state. Notably, it raises the state funding match floor from 20% to 30% for eligible school projects, which means school districts will receive more financial support for their construction needs. Additionally, the bill removes previous disadvantages for preserving historic buildings, encouraging their renovation and use in school projects. These changes aim to better reflect the actual costs of school construction and ensure adequate support for districts facing growing student enrollment and facility challenges.
S-2110.4SUBSTITUTES-1018.2SENATE SENATE BILL 5853State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenateSessionBySenators Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Pedersen, Warnick, Frockt, Bailey, Carlyle, Zeiger, Dhingra, Becker, Wellman, Walsh, King, Liias, Wagoner, Palumbo, Hobbs, Rivers, Keiser, Hunt, Darneille, Rolfes, Hasegawa, Conway, Braun, Billig, Kuderer, Salomon, Cleveland, McCoy, Nguyen, Short, Das, Hawkins, Takko, Saldaña, Randall, O'Ban, Wilson, C., Van De Wege, and Wilson, L.)READL.Read FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 03/01/19.AN02/07/19.Referred to Committee on Ways & Means.AN ACT Relating to the school construction assistance program;
creating a new sections;section;
This act implements the consensus recommendations of the task force that relate directly to the school construction assistance program, including:
and (2) increasing the stateconstruction matchallowance floorto fromreflect twentyactual percentconstruction tocosts; thirty percent.
Itand also(3) implementsincreasing a majority recommendation of the taskstate forcematch tofloor removefrom policytwenty disadvantagespercent to preservationthirty ofpercent. historic buildings.
ThisIt act also callsimplements fora themajority developmentrecommendation of methods to project the needtask forforce state financing of school construction and ways to reduceremove thepolicy schooldisadvantages construction costs to statepreservation andof localhistoric taxpayersbuildings.Sec. before fully implementing state funding improvements.Sec.
The additional percentage points under (c) of this subsection are ten for school districts with funding assistance percentages of more than fifty percent.))(7) IfThe the estimated total state general obligation bond appropriation for the school construction assistance program exceeds one-third of the total state general obligation bond appropriations, the state construction cost allocation used in calculating state funding assistance infor the construction of school facilities shall be reducedprovided inas thefollows:(a) omnibusTwo capitalhundred appropriationsninety-eight actdollars soand thatsixty-seven cents in the totalfiscal stateyear generalending obligationJune bond30, appropriation2026;(b) forThree thehundred schoolthirty-four constructiondollars assistanceand programsixteen doescents notin exceedthe one-thirdfiscal ofyear theending totalJune state30, general2027;(c) obligationThree bondhundred appropriations.(8)sixty-nine Statedollars fundingand assistancesixty-four cents in the constructionfiscal ofyear schoolending facilitiesJune for30, grade2028;(d) kindergartenFour throughhundred gradefive twelvedollars and classroomsthirteen plannedcents forin the exclusivefiscal useyear ofending studentsJune with30, disabilities2029;(e) shallFour behundred basedforty ondollars a space allocation per enrolled student and shallsixty-one becents providedin as follows:(a) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022:(i)2030;(f) OneFour hundred tenseventy-six squaredollars feetand maximumten percents student in kindergartenthe throughfiscal gradeyear six;(ii)ending OneJune hundred30, seventeen2031;(g) squareFive feethundred maximumeleven perdollars studentand fifty-nine cents in gradesthe sevenfiscal andyear eight;(iii)ending OneJune hundred30, thirty2032;(h) squareFive feethundred maximumforty-seven perdollars studentand seven cents in gradesthe ninefiscal throughyear twelve;ending June 30, 2033;
and(i) Beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2034, and thereafter, the state construction cost allocation used in calculating state assistance for construction of school facilities shall be based on the average cost of new construction at the time of bid of the projects funded by the school construction assistance program in the previous fiscal year adjusted for a construction inflation factor.
The superintendent of public instruction must work with the office of financial management to determine the annual construction inflation factor.(8) State funding assistance in the construction of school facilities for grade kindergarten through grade twelve and classrooms planned for the exclusive use of students with disabilities shall be based on a space allocation per enrolled student and shall be provided as follows:(a) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022:(i) One hundred ten square feet maximum per student in kindergarten through grade six;(ii) One hundred seventeen square feet maximum per student in grades seven and eight;(iii) One hundred thirty square feet maximum per student in grades nine through twelve;
and(iv) One hundred forty-four square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities;disabilities;(c) For fiscal year ending June 30, 2024:(i) One hundred thirty square feet maximum per student in kindergarten through grade six;(ii) One hundred thirty square feet maximum per student in grades seven and eight;(iii) One hundred forty square feet maximum per student in grades nine through twelve;
and(c)and(iv) One hundred forty-six square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities;(d) For fiscal year ending June 30, 2024,2025:(i) and thereafter:(i) One hundred thirtyforty square feet maximum per student in kindergarten through grade six;(ii) One hundred thirtythirty-five square feet maximum per student in grades seven and eight;(iii) One hundred fortyforty-five square feet maximum per student in grades nine through twelve;
and(iv) One hundred forty-sixforty-eight square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities.(9)disabilities;(e) SpaceFor allocationsfiscal foryear stateending fundingJune assistance30, purposes2026:(i) forOne districtshundred withforty fewersquare thanfeet fourmaximum hundredper studentsstudent in kindergarten through grade eightsix;(ii) orOne fewer than four hundred studentsforty insquare seniorfeet ormaximum four-yearper highstudent schoolsin shallgrades beseven providedand aseight;(iii) follows:NumberOne ofhundred HeadcountStudents—Gradesfifty Kindergarten – 8Maximum Space AllocationPer Facility1-20042,000 square feet201-30048,000feet squaremaximum feet301-39952,000per squarestudent feetNumberin ofgrades HeadcountStudents—Gradesnine 9-12Maximumthrough Spacetwelve; AllocationPer Facility1-20042,000 square feet201-30048,000 square feet301-39952,000 square feetNEW SECTION. Sec.
and(iv) One hundred fifty square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities;(f) For fiscal year ending June 30, 2027:(i) One hundred forty square feet maximum per student in kindergarten through grade six;(ii) One hundred forty-five square feet maximum per student in grades seven and eight;(iii) One hundred fifty-five square feet maximum per student in grades nine through twelve;
and(iv) One hundred fifty-five square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities;(g) For fiscal year ending June 30, 2028:(i) One hundred forty square feet maximum per student in kindergarten through grade six;(ii) One hundred fifty square feet maximum per student in grades seven and eight;(iii) One hundred sixty square feet maximum per student in grades nine through twelve;
and(iv) One hundred sixty square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities;
and(h) For fiscal year ending June 30, 2029, and thereafter:(i) One hundred forty square feet maximum per student in kindergarten through grade six;(ii) One hundred fifty-five square feet maximum per student in grades seven and eight;(iii) One hundred sixty-five square feet maximum per student in grades nine through twelve;
and(iv) One hundred sixty-five square feet maximum per student in any grade for classrooms for students with developmental disabilities.(9) Space allocations for state funding assistance purposes for districts with fewer than four hundred students in kindergarten through grade eight or fewer than four hundred students in senior or four-year high schools shall be provided as follows:Number of HeadcountStudents—Grades Kindergarten – 8Maximum Space AllocationPer Facility1-20042,000 square feet201-30048,000 square feet301-39952,000 square feetNumber of HeadcountStudents—Grades 9-12Maximum Space AllocationPer Facility1-20042,000 square feet201-30048,000 square feet301-39952,000 square feet NEW SECTION. Sec.
(1) The office of the superintendent of public instruction must develop a plan to implement further improvements in funding school construction.
The plan must build upon improvements enacted in this act, and recommendations of the joint legislative task force on improving state funding for school construction established in section 7009, chapter 298, Laws of 2018.
The plan must be developed in consultation with the school facilities technical advisory committee, and other technical experts.
The plan must be submitted to the governor and appropriate committees of the legislature by June 30, 2022.(2) The plan must include a program to preserve and renew school facilities constructed or modernized and accepted as complete by school boards of directors after January 1, 1994.
The program must include provisions for school districts to nominate school facilities built and accepted before January 1, 1994, for eligibility for the preservation and renewal program, provided the facility meets specified criteria for inclusion in the program.
The program is intended to reduce the costs for school facility preservation and renewal, compared to the existing modernization program for older school facilities.
School facilities that receive funding under the preservation and renewal program are no longer eligible for modernization funding unless the school facility has suffered catastrophic loss from a natural or other disaster.
The preservation and renewal program is intended to replace or renew school facility major building systems that have reached their expected life.
The plan must include definitions of major building systems and their expected lives.
The plan must:
(a) Provide incentives to school districts to provide effective building system preventative maintenance programs;
and (b) maximize long-term value from state and local investment in school facilities.(3) The plan must include:(a) A projection of the amount of space and expected costs necessary to meet the projected student enrollment growth over a ten-year period;(b) A projection of the cost to modernize school facilities built before 1994 that are likely to require comprehensive modernization or replacement over a ten-year period;(c) A projection of the cost for the school facility preservation and renewal program specified in subsection (2) of this section over a ten-year period;(d) A projection of the cost to modernize school facilities eligible for small schools preservation funding under Substitute Senate Bill No.
5572 (2019) over a ten-year period;(e) A projection of required state funds based on the existing financial assistance percentage for the projections in (a) through (d) of this subsection.
To the extent that the sum total of required and necessary state funds exceeds the ten-year projection of common school construction account revenue plus thirty-five percent of projected state bond capacity, the plan must present options for closing the shortfall.NEW SECTION. Sec.
4.
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration; referred to Ways & Means.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Capital Budget at 01:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Capital Budget.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 40; nays, 5; absent, 1; excused, 3.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 03:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Ways & Means.
Sponsors
- Jamie Pedersen · Primary
- Judy Warnick · Cosponsor
- Frockt · Cosponsor
- Bailey · Cosponsor
- Carlyle · Cosponsor
- Zeiger · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Becker · Cosponsor
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Walsh · Cosponsor
- Curtis King · Cosponsor
- Marko Liias · Cosponsor
- Keith Wagoner · Cosponsor
- Palumbo · Cosponsor
- Hobbs · Cosponsor
- Rivers · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Darneille · Cosponsor
- Rolfes · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- John Braun · Cosponsor
- Billig · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Jesse Salomon · Cosponsor
- Annette Cleveland · Cosponsor
- McCoy · Cosponsor
- Shelly Short · Cosponsor
- Das · Cosponsor
- Hawkins · Cosponsor
- Takko · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
- Randall · Cosponsor
- O'Ban · Cosponsor
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Joe Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
- L. Wilson · Cosponsor
- Van De Wege · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 38 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jamie Pedersen Democrat
Co-sponsors (38)
- Judy Warnick Republican
- Frockt
- Bailey
- Carlyle
- Zeiger
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Becker
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Walsh
- Curtis King Republican
- Marko Liias Democrat
- Keith Wagoner Republican
- Palumbo
- Hobbs
- Rivers
- Keiser
- Darneille
- Rolfes
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Steve Conway Democrat
- John Braun Republican
- Billig
- Kuderer
- Jesse Salomon Democrat Voted No
- Annette Cleveland Democrat
- McCoy
- Shelly Short Republican
- Das
- Hawkins
- Takko
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
- Randall
- O'Ban
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Joe Nguyen Democrat
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
- Wilson, L.
- Van De Wege
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 10% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Not Voting |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Not Voting |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Not Voting |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Not Voting |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Nay |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Nay |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Nay |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5853?
- SB 5853 is sponsored by Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), Judy Warnick (Republican), Frockt, Bailey, Carlyle, Zeiger, Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Becker, Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Walsh, Curtis King (Republican), Marko Liias (Democrat), Keith Wagoner (Republican), Palumbo, Hobbs, Rivers, Keiser, Darneille, Rolfes, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), John Braun (Republican), Billig, Kuderer, Jesse Salomon (Democrat), Annette Cleveland (Democrat), McCoy, Shelly Short (Republican), Das, Hawkins, Takko, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Randall, O'Ban, Claire Wilson (Democrat), Joe Nguyen (Democrat), Victoria Hunt (Democrat), Wilson, L., and Van De Wege.
- What is the current status of SB 5853?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5853?
- Track SB 5853 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5853
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5853
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →