HB 1064 — Concerning law enforcement.
Last action — Effective date 2/4/2019.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
39 sponsors
1 primary, 38 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (26 D · 3 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 1064 introduces several key changes aimed at improving law enforcement training and accountability. It emphasizes the requirement for police officers to provide first aid to individuals in their care at the earliest safe opportunity and outlines training on de-escalation tactics and mental health considerations. Additionally, the bill mandates that independent investigations take place whenever an officer's use of deadly force results in serious injury or death, ensuring that these inquiries are separate from the involved agency. These changes are significant as they aim to enhance public trust in law enforcement while prioritizing community safety and well-being.
H-0490.1SUBSTITUTEH-0244.2HOUSE HOUSE BILL 1064State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByHouseSessionByRepresentatives Public Safety (originally sponsored by Representatives Goodman, Klippert, Sells, Ryu, Orwall, Irwin, Ortiz-Self, Pellicciotti, Kirby, Appleton, Lovick, Dolan, Springer, Barkis, Santos, Griffey, Kloba, Smith, Doglio, Gregerson, Shewmake, Pollet, Tarleton, Valdez, Peterson, Fey, Stanford, Slatter, Tharinger, Hansen, Wylie, Fitzgibbon, Jinkins, Macri, Bergquist, Chambers, Graham, Frame, and Reeves)READReevesPrefiled FIRST12/17/18.Read TIMEfirst 01/17/19.ANtime 01/14/19.Referred to Committee on Public Safety.AN ACT Relating to law enforcement;
amending 2019RCW c43.101.--- 1and s36.28A.---; 9 (uncodified);
reenacting and amending RCW2019 43.101.455,c 36.28A.445,... and 9A.16.040;
s 9 (uncodified);
reenacting and amending RCW 9A.16.040;
repealing RCW 10.114.010, 10.114.020, 9A.16.045, 43.101.450, 43.101.452, 43.101.455, and 9A.16.045;36.28A.445;
repealing 2018 c 10 sss 1, 2, and 3 and 2018 c 11 sss 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7;
RCW 43.101.45543.101.--- and 2019 c 1... s 5 (Initiative Measure No.
940)s are5 each(Initiative reenactedMeasure andNo. amended to read as follows:(1) Within six months after December 6, 2018, the commission must consult with law enforcement agencies and community stakeholders and adopt rules for carrying out the training requirements of RCW 43.101.450 and 43.101.452.
Such940) rulesare must,each atamended ato minimum:(a)read Adoptas trainingfollows:(1) hourWithin requirementssix andmonths curriculumafter forDecember initial6, violence2018, de-escalationthe trainingscommission requiredmust byconsult ((thiswith act))chapterlaw 1,enforcement Lawsagencies ofand 2019;(b)community Adoptstakeholders training hour requirements and curriculumadopt rules for initialcarrying mentalout health trainings required by ((this act))chapter 1, Laws of 2019, which may include all or part of the mental health training curricularequirements establishedof under RCW 43.101.22743.101.--- and 43.101.427;(c)43.101.--- Adopt(sections annual3 training hour requirements and curricula4, forchapter continuing. trainings required by ((this act))chapter 1, Laws of 2019;(d) Establish means by which law enforcement officers will receive trainings required by ((this act))chapter 1, Laws of 2019;
and(e)(Initiative RequireMeasure complianceNo. with ((this act's))chapter 1, Laws of 2019 training requirements ((as a condition of maintaining certification)).(2) In developing curricula, the commission shall consider inclusion of the following:(a) De-escalation in patrol tactics and interpersonal communication training, including tactical methods that use time, distance, cover, and concealment, to avoid escalating situations that lead to violence;(b) Alternatives to jail booking, arrest, or citation in situations where appropriate;(c) Implicit and explicit bias, cultural competency, and the historical intersection of race and policing;(d) Skills including de-escalation techniques to effectively, safely, and respectfully interact with people with disabilities and/or behavioral health issues;(e) "Shoot/don't shoot" scenario training;(f) Alternatives to the use of physical or deadly force so that de-escalation tactics and less lethal alternatives are part of the decision-making process leading up to the consideration of deadly force ((is used only when unavoidable and as a last resort));(g) Mental health and policing, including bias and stigma;
and(h)940), Using public service, including rendering of first aid, to provide a positive point of contact between law enforcement officers and community members to increase trust and reduce conflicts.(3) The initial violence de-escalation training must educate officers on the good faith standard for use of deadly force established by ((this act))chapter 1, Laws of 20192019). and how that standard advances violence de-escalation goals.(4) The commission may provide trainings, alone or in partnership with private parties or law enforcement agencies, authorize private parties or law enforcement agencies to provide trainings, or any combination thereof.
Such rules must, at a minimum:(a) Adopt training hour requirements and curriculum for initial violence de-escalation trainings required by chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019;(b) Adopt training hour requirements and curriculum for initial mental health trainings required by chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019, which may include all or part of the mental health training curricula established under RCW 43.101.227 and 43.101.427;(c) Adopt annual training hour requirements and curricula for continuing trainings required by chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019;(d) Establish means by which law enforcement officers will receive trainings required by chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019;
and(e) Require compliance with chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019 training requirements ((as a condition of maintaining certification)).(2) In developing curricula, the commission shall consider inclusion of the following:(a) De-escalation in patrol tactics and interpersonal communication training, including tactical methods that use time, distance, cover, and concealment, to avoid escalating situations that lead to violence;(b) Alternatives to jail booking, arrest, or citation in situations where appropriate;(c) Implicit and explicit bias, cultural competency, and the historical intersection of race and policing;(d) Skills including de-escalation techniques to effectively, safely, and respectfully interact with people with disabilities and/or behavioral health issues;(e) "Shoot/don't shoot" scenario training;(f) Alternatives to the use of physical or deadly force so that de-escalation tactics and less lethal alternatives are part of the decision-making process leading up to the consideration of deadly force ((is used only when unavoidable and as a last resort));(g) Mental health and policing, including bias and stigma;
and(h) Using public service, including rendering of first aid, to provide a positive point of contact between law enforcement officers and community members to increase trust and reduce conflicts.(3) The initial violence de-escalation training must educate officers on the good faith standard for use of deadly force established by chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019 and how that standard advances violence de-escalation goals.(4) The commission may provide trainings, alone or in partnership with private parties or law enforcement agencies, authorize private parties or law enforcement agencies to provide trainings, or any combination thereof.
RCW 36.28A.44536.28A.--- and 2019 c 1... s 6 (Initiative Measure No.
940)s are6 each(Initiative reenactedMeasure andNo. amended to read as follows:(1) It is the policy of the state of Washington that all law enforcement personnel must ((render first aid to save lives))provide or facilitate first aid such that it is rendered at the earliest safe opportunity to injured persons at a scene controlled by law enforcement.(2) Within one year after December 6, 2018, the Washington state criminal justice training commission, in consultation with the Washington state patrol, the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, organizations representing state and local law enforcement officers, health providers and/or health policy organizations, tribes, and community stakeholders, shall develop guidelines for implementing the duty to render first aid adopted in this section.
940) are each amended to read as follows:(1) It is the policy of the state of Washington that all law enforcement personnel must ((render first aid to save lives))provide or facilitate first aid such that it is rendered at the earliest safe opportunity to injured persons at a scene controlled by law enforcement.(2) Within one year after December 6, 2018, the Washington state criminal justice training commission, in consultation with the Washington state patrol, the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, organizations representing state and local law enforcement officers, health providers and/or health policy organizations, tribes, and community stakeholders, shall develop guidelines for implementing the duty to render first aid adopted in this section.
RCW 9A.16.040 and 2019 c 1... s 7 (Initiative Measure No.
s 7 (Initiative Measure No.
or(b) There is probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed any crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm.Under these circumstances deadly force may also be used if necessary to prevent escape from the officer, where, if feasible, some warning is given, provided the officer meets the good faith standard of this section.(3) A public officer covered by subsection (1)(a) of this section shall not be held criminally liable for using deadly force without malice and with a good faith belief that such act is justifiable pursuant to this section.(4) A ((law enforcement))peace officer shall not be held criminally liable for using deadly force ((if such officer meets the good faith standard adopted in this section))in good faith, where "good faith" is an objective standard which shall consider all the facts, circumstances, and information known to the officer at the time to determine whether a similarly situated reasonable officer would have believed that the use of deadly force was necessary to prevent death or serious physical harm to the officer or another individual.(5) ((The following good faith standard is adopted for law enforcement officer use of deadly force:(a) The good faith standard is met only if both the objective good faith test in (b) of this subsection and the subjective good faith test in (c) of this subsection are met.(b) The objective good faith test is met if a reasonable officer, in light of all the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the time, would have believed that the use of deadly force was necessary to prevent death or serious physical harm to the officer or another individual.(c) The subjective good faith test is met if the officer intended to use deadly force for a lawful purpose and sincerely and in good faith believed that the use of deadly force was warranted in the circumstance.(d) Where the use of deadly force results in death, substantial bodily harm, or great bodily harm, an independent investigation must be completed to inform the determination of whether the use of deadly force met the objective good faith test established by this section and satisfied other applicable laws and policies.(6) For the purpose of this section, "law enforcement officer" means any law enforcement officer in the state of Washington, including but not limited to law enforcement personnel and peace officers as defined by RCW 43.101.010.))43.101.010.(7))) This section shall not be construed as:(a) Affecting the permissible use of force by a person acting under the authority of RCW 9A.16.020 or 9A.16.050;
2019 c 1... s 9 (Initiative Measure No.
940)s (uncodified)9 is(Initiative amendedMeasure toNo. read as follows:(1) Except where a different timeline is provided in ((this act))chapter 1, Laws of 2019, the Washington state criminal justice training commission must adopt any rules necessary for carrying out the requirements of ((this act))chapter 1, Laws of 2019 within one year after December 6, 2018.
In940) carrying(uncodified) outis allamended ruleto makingread underas ((thisfollows:(1) act))chapterExcept 1,where Lawsa ofdifferent 2019,timeline theis commissionprovided shallin seek((this inputact))chapter from. the attorney general, law enforcement agencies, the Washington council of police and sheriffs, the Washington state fraternal order of police, the council of metropolitan police and sheriffs, the Washington state patrol troopers association, at least one association representing law enforcement who represent traditionally underrepresented communities including the black law enforcement association of Washington, tribes, and community stakeholders.
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019, the Washington state criminal justice training commission must adopt any rules necessary for carrying out the requirements of ((this act))chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019 within one year after December 6, 2018.
Show all 50 changed lines (10 more)
In carrying out all rule making under ((this act))chapter .
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019, the commission shall seek input from the attorney general, law enforcement agencies, the Washington council of police and sheriffs, the Washington state fraternal order of police, the council of metropolitan police and sheriffs, the Washington state patrol troopers association, at least one association representing law enforcement who represent traditionally underrepresented communities including the black law enforcement association of Washington, tribes, and community stakeholders.
and, when the deadly force is used on a tribal member, such procedures must include consultation with the member's tribe and, where appropriate, information sharing with such tribe.))(2) Where ((this act))chapter 1,. Laws of 2019 requires involvement of community stakeholders, input must be sought from organizations advocating for:
(Initiative Measure No.
940), Laws of 2019 requires involvement of community stakeholders, input must be sought from organizations advocating for:
940) (uncodified);(11) RCW 43.101.450 (Violence de-escalation training) and 2018 c 11 s 3 (Initiative Measure No.
940);(12) RCW 43.101.452 (Mental health training) and 2018 c 11 s 4 (Initiative Measure No.
940);(13) RCW 43.101.455 (Violence de-escalation and mental health training—Adoption of rules—Training requirements) and 2018 c 10 s 1 & 2018 c 11 s 5 (Initiative Measure No.
940);(14) RCW 36.28A.445 (Duty to provide or facilitate first aid—Development of guidelines) and 2018 c 10 s 2 & 2018 c 11 s 6 (Initiative Measure No.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 2/4/2019.
-
Chapter 4, 2019 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Read first time, rules suspended, and placed on second reading calendar.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 98; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 03:30 PM
-
APP - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Public Safety.
-
APP - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Public Safety.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 03:30 PM
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 03:30 PM
-
PS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
PS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 01:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Public Safety.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Larry Springer · Cosponsor
- Andrew Barkis · Cosponsor
- Sharon Tomiko Santos · Cosponsor
- Dan Griffey · Cosponsor
- Shelley Kloba · Cosponsor
- Smith · Cosponsor
- Beth Doglio · Cosponsor
- Mia Gregerson · Cosponsor
- Sharon Shewmake · Cosponsor
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Tarleton · Cosponsor
- Javier Valdez · Cosponsor
- Strom Peterson · Cosponsor
- Jake Fey · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- Vandana Slatter · Cosponsor
- Steve Tharinger · Cosponsor
- Drew Hansen · Cosponsor
- Sharon Wylie · Cosponsor
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Cosponsor
- Laurie Jinkins · Cosponsor
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Steve Bergquist · Cosponsor
- Chambers · Cosponsor
- Jenny Graham · Cosponsor
- Noel Frame · Cosponsor
- Kristine Reeves · Cosponsor
- Roger Goodman · Primary
- Klippert · Cosponsor
- Sells · Cosponsor
- Cindy Ryu · Cosponsor
- Tina Orwall · Cosponsor
- Irwin · Cosponsor
- Lillian Ortiz-Self · Cosponsor
- Pellicciotti · Cosponsor
- Kirby · Cosponsor
- Appleton · Cosponsor
- John Lovick · Cosponsor
- Dolan · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 38 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Roger Goodman Democrat
Co-sponsors (38)
- Larry Springer Democrat
- Andrew Barkis Republican
- Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat
- Dan Griffey Republican
- Shelley Kloba Democrat
- Smith
- Beth Doglio Democrat
- Mia Gregerson Democrat
- Sharon Shewmake Democrat
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Tarleton
- Javier Valdez Democrat
- Strom Peterson Democrat
- Jake Fey Democrat
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- Vandana Slatter Democrat
- Steve Tharinger Democrat
- Drew Hansen Democrat
- Sharon Wylie Democrat
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
- Laurie Jinkins Democrat
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Steve Bergquist Democrat
- Chambers
- Jenny Graham Republican
- Noel Frame Democrat
- Kristine Reeves Democrat
- Klippert
- Sells
- Cindy Ryu Democrat
- Tina Orwall Democrat
- Irwin
- Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat
- Pellicciotti
- Kirby
- Appleton
- John Lovick Democrat
- Dolan
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (48)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Not Voting |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Van Werven | — | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1064?
- HB 1064 is sponsored by Larry Springer (Democrat), Andrew Barkis (Republican), Sharon Tomiko Santos (Democrat), Dan Griffey (Republican), Shelley Kloba (Democrat), Smith, Beth Doglio (Democrat), Mia Gregerson (Democrat), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Tarleton, Javier Valdez (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Jake Fey (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Vandana Slatter (Democrat), Steve Tharinger (Democrat), Drew Hansen (Democrat), Sharon Wylie (Democrat), Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Laurie Jinkins (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Steve Bergquist (Democrat), Chambers, Jenny Graham (Republican), Noel Frame (Democrat), Kristine Reeves (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), Klippert, Sells, Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Tina Orwall (Democrat), Irwin, Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), Pellicciotti, Kirby, Appleton, John Lovick (Democrat), and Dolan.
- What is the current status of HB 1064?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1064?
- Track HB 1064 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1064
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1064
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →