Workers' compensation; employee may satisfy burden of proof by circumstantial evidence.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 974 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 974.
You're tracking HB 974
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 974 — Workers' compensation; employee may satisfy burden of proof by circumstantial evidence.
Last action — House sustained Governor's veto
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 07, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Workers' compensation; presumption that certaininjuries arose out of employment. Provides that in any claim for workers' compensation, where the employee suffers an unexplained fall in the course of employment, such employee may satisfy the burden of proof by circumstantial evidence, testimony of others, other evidence, or any combination thereof.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
20 added · 30 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill HB 974 clarify how certain circumstances in workers' compensation cases are handled, specifically related to injuries and deaths that occur at work. The bill now includes automatic assumptions that accidents are work-related when specific conditions are met, such as the employee being unable to testify due to injury or death occurring at the accident site. This change is important because it makes it easier for workers or their families to receive compensation, reducing the burden of proof they must meet to show the accident was work-related.
SESSION ENGROSSEDENREPRINT 24101852DVIRGINIA HOUSEACTS BILLOF NO.ASSEMBLY –– CHAPTER E N An presumption that certain injuries arose out of employment.a, relating to workers' compensation;
974R HouseO Amendments[H in974] [L ]Approved -Be Februaryit 5,enacted 2024by Athe BILLGeneral toAssembly amend and reenact § 65.2-105 of theVirginia: Code of Virginia, relating to workers' compensation;
presumptionL that1. certain injuries arose out of employment.
–––––––––– Patron PrReferred to Committee on Labor and CommerceBy Request) –––––––––– E Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
NE §A. 65.2-105.
PresumptionIn any claim for compensation, where the employee (i) is physically or mentally unable to testify as confirmed by competent medical evidence, (ii) dies with there being no evidence that certainhe injuriesever regained consciousness after the accident, (iii) dies at the accident location or nearby, or (iv) is found dead where he is reasonably expected to be as an employee, and where the factual circumstances are of and in the course of employment, it shall be presumed the accident arose out of and in the course oft of employment.employment, unless such presumption is overcome by a preponderance of competent evidence to the contrary.
GH as confirmed by competent medical evidence, (ii) dies with there being no evidence that he everRtestify regained consciousness after the accident, (iii) dies at the accident location or nearby, or (iv) is found dead where he is reasonably expected to be as an employee, and where the factual circumstances are of sufficient strength from which the only rational inference to be drawn is that the accident aroSe out of and in the course of employment, it shall be presumed the accident arose out of and in the course of contrary.t, unless such presumption is overcome by a preponderance of competent evidence to theS B.
In any claim for compensation, where the employee suffers an unexplained fall in the coursecour9e of employment,others, [other itevidence, shallor beany presumedcombination thatthereof.proof the fall arose out of the employment, unless such presuDption is overcome by a preponderance of competent evidence to the contrary the employee may satisfy the burden of proof by circumstantial evidence, testimony of4f others,R other evidence, or any combination thereof ] .
B E / / 2
View plain text versions (3)
- HB974ER View text Current pdf March 06, 2024
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 24101852D-E pdf February 05, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24101852D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
House sustained Governor's veto
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate reprinted (HB974ER)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB974ER)
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB974ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Passed Senate (20-Y 19-N)
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Commerce and Labor (9-Y 6-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB974E)
-
VOTE: Passage (54-Y 45-N)
-
Read third time and passed House (54-Y 45-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 24101852D-E
-
Engrossed by House as amended HB974E
-
Amendments by Delegate Keys-Gamarra- withdrawn
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Read second time
-
Passed by for the day
-
House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Labor and Commerce with amendment(s) (14-Y 8-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendments (5-Y 3-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB974)
-
Assigned L & C sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24101852D
Sponsors
- Karen Keys-Gamarra · Primary
- Nadarius E. Clark · Cosponsor
- Jr. Rozia A. Henson · Cosponsor
- Shelly A. Simonds · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 65 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (3)
Not signed on (144)
144 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 144 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 19 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 19 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 48% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Not Voting |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Nay |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Not Voting |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 45 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 53 | 45 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 45% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Chris S. Runion | — | Nay |
| Convirs-Fowler, Kelly K. | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Nay |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Nay |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Nay |
| LeVere Bolling, Destiny | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Nay |
| Michael B. Feggans | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Nay |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Nay |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Chris S. Runion | — | Nay |
| Convirs-Fowler, Kelly K. | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Not Voting |
| LeVere Bolling, Destiny | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Nay |
| Michael B. Feggans | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 974 do?
- Workers' compensation; presumption that certaininjuries arose out of employment. Provides that in any claim for workers' compensation, where the employee suffers an unexplained fall in the course of employment, such employee may satisfy the burden of proof by circumstantial evidence, testimony of others, other evidence, or any combination thereof.
- Who sponsors HB 974?
- HB 974 is sponsored by Karen Keys-Gamarra, Nadarius E. Clark, Rozia A. Henson, Jr., and Shelly A. Simonds.
- What is the current status of HB 974?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 974?
- Track HB 974 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 974
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 974
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →