West Virginia 2023 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 426 — Banning use of certain products and platforms deemed unsafe or high risk on government systems

Last action — Communicated to House

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

4 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 426 introduces specific regulations concerning the use of high-risk technology platforms and services within government entities in West Virginia. It empowers the Chief Information Security Officer to establish standards for identifying and managing these technologies, which can pose threats to critical state networks, including election systems. This change underscores the state's commitment to safeguarding national and local security by ensuring that government systems are protected from potential vulnerabilities, and it allows for the development of exceptions for law enforcement and other necessary uses of such technologies. Overall, the amendment enhances the state's ability to respond to evolving tech threats and implement proactive measures for cybersecurity.

→
Previous
Latest
SB426 HFAT Capito 3-6Casto 3264 Delegate Capito moved to amend the bill by striking out the title and substituting therefor a new title, to read as follows:Eng.
SB426 SFA Takubo #1 3-11Viglianco  7888 Senator Takubo moved to amend the House amendment by striking out everything after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Senate Bill No.
ARTICLE 6B.
426 -- “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §5A-6B-4a, relating to regulating, restricting, or banning high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products on government networks, devices, and systems;
CYBER SECURITY PROGRAM.
adding legislative findings related to national security threats and threats to critical state government networks and infrastructure, including election systems, posed by untrustworthy and high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, or products;
 §5A-6B-4a.
authorizing the Chief Information Security Officer to identify high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, and products and to develop statewide standards regulating their use on government networks, devices, and systems;
High-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, and products.
requiring certain government entities to adopt and enforce those standards;
(a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that it is in the best interest of the citizens of West Virginia and to national security to enact measures designed to safeguard against untrustworthy and high-risk technology and to block such technology from interfering with or damaging critical state networks and infrastructure, including, without limitation, election systems.
recommending the legislative and judicial branches to adopt and enforce those standards;
The use of certain information and communication technologies and services can create opportunities for hostile actors to exploit vulnerabilities and take adverse action against the United States or allies, which could directly or indirectly affect the safety and security of West Virginia citizens, and such use also creates opportunities for adversaries to exploit vulnerabilities and take adverse action against state or local government networks and infrastructure within or connected to West Virginia.
authorizing the promulgation of legislative and emergency rules to facilitate the purpose of this section;
As the threat landscape evolves, West Virginia shall work in cooperation with the federal government to implement appropriate safeguards to defend government networks in West Virginia and in the United States from technology threats posed by hostile actors.(b) Notwithstanding the provision of §5A-6B-1(b) of this code, all state agencies and instrumentalities, including without limitation agencies within the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, all constitutional officers, local government entities as defined by §7-1-1 or §8-1-2 of this code, county boards of education as defined by §18-1-1 of this code, and all state institutions of higher education as defined by §18B-1-2 of this code, shall enforce statewide standards developed by the Chief Information Security Officer regarding high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products.
and requiring the Chief Information Security Officer provide an annual report on threats posed by untrustworthy and high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, or products, and the actions required to mitigate those threats to the Joint Interim Committee on Government Operations. AdoptedRejected 
Additionally, all government entities subject to this subsection must, consistent with those standards and any other applicable state or federal law, restrict, remove, ban or otherwise block access to high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products on all government systems, services, networks, devices, or locations.
For purposes of this subsection, high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products are those designated as such in the Statewide Cybersecurity Standard published and maintained by the Chief Information Security Officer:
Provided, That any standards developed by the Chief Information Security Officer regarding high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products shall contain exceptions permitting, in appropriate circumstances, the use of those platforms, services, applications, programs, or products for law enforcement activities, national security interests and activities, security research, investigative efforts authorized by this code, and for other purposes related to actual or potential litigation involving the state or one of its agencies or officers:
Provided, however, that the Chief Information Security Officer shall develop standards and requirements designed to mitigate the risk of the authorized use of a high-risk platform, service, application, program, or product pursuant to the exceptions set forth in this section:
Provided, further that the Chief Information Security Officer shall, after consultation with the affected entities, exempt law enforcement agencies and other instrumentalities from the provisions of this section to the extent that the use of high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products is determined to be necessary to performance of their official duties.
 (C) The Secretary of the Department of Administration may propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code and may also promulgate emergency rules pursuant to the provisions of §29A-3-15 of this code when necessary to facilitate:
(1) completion of the duties imposed on the Chief Information Security Officer by this section, and (2) enforcement of the standards referenced in this section.(d) The Chief Information Security Officer will provide an annual report by June 1 of each year on threats posed by untrustworthy and high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, or products, and the actions required to mitigate those threats to the Joint Interim Committee on Government Operations.   AdoptedRejected
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Communicated to House

  2. Senate refused to recede; requests House to reconsider (Voice vote)

  3. House Message received

  4. Communicated to Senate

  5. House refused to concur; requested Senate to recede (Voice)

  6. House received Senate message

  7. Senate requests House to concur

  8. Senate amends House amendment and passed bill (Roll No. 602)

  9. House Message received

  10. Communicated to Senate

  11. Title amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  12. Passed House (Roll No. 656)

  13. Read 3rd time

  14. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  15. Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  16. Read 2nd time

  17. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  18. Read 1st time

  19. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  20. With amendment, do pass

  21. To House Judiciary

  22. To Judiciary

  23. Introduced in House

  24. Ordered to House

  25. Passed Senate (Roll No. 118)

  26. Read 3rd time

  27. On 3rd reading

  28. Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  29. Read 2nd time

  30. Laid over on 2nd reading 1/30/2023

  31. Laid over on 2nd reading 1/27/2023

  32. On 2nd reading

  33. Read 1st time

  34. On 1st reading

  35. Committee substitute reported

  36. To Judiciary

  37. Introduced in Senate

  38. To Judiciary

  39. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Blair

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (150)

150 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 150 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passage

Passed 31 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 15001
Unaffiliated 15002
Democrat 1000
Total 31003
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
MARONEY — Yea
STOVER — Yea
MARTIN — Yea
STUART — Yea
BOLEY — Yea
SWOPE — Yea
CAPUTO — Yea
NELSON — Yea
PHILLIPS — Yea
PLYMALE — Not Voting
TRUMP — Yea
HAMILTON — Not Voting
HUNT — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
SMITH — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
KARNES — Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Amy Grady Republican Yea
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Jay Taylor Republican Yea
Laura Wakim Chapman Republican Yea
Mark R. Maynard Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Not Voting
Mike Oliverio Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Vince Deeds Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 426?
SB 426 is sponsored by Blair and Mike Woelfel (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 426?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 426?
Track SB 426 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 426

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 426

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →