SB 426 — Banning use of certain products and platforms deemed unsafe or high risk on government systems
Last action — Communicated to House
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
4 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 426 introduces specific regulations concerning the use of high-risk technology platforms and services within government entities in West Virginia. It empowers the Chief Information Security Officer to establish standards for identifying and managing these technologies, which can pose threats to critical state networks, including election systems. This change underscores the state's commitment to safeguarding national and local security by ensuring that government systems are protected from potential vulnerabilities, and it allows for the development of exceptions for law enforcement and other necessary uses of such technologies. Overall, the amendment enhances the state's ability to respond to evolving tech threats and implement proactive measures for cybersecurity.
SB426 HFATSFA CapitoTakubo 3-6Casto#1 3264 Delegate3-11Viglianco Capito 7888 Senator Takubo moved to amend the billHouse amendment by striking out theeverything titleafter andthe substitutingenacting thereforclause aand newinserting title,in tolieu readthereof asthe follows:Eng.following:
SenateARTICLE Bill6B. No.
426CYBER --SECURITY “APROGRAM. Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §5A-6B-4a, relating to regulating, restricting, or banning high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products on government networks, devices, and systems;
adding §5A-6B-4a. legislative findings related to national security threats and threats to critical state government networks and infrastructure, including election systems, posed by untrustworthy and high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, or products;
authorizingHigh-risk the Chief Information Security Officer to identify high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, and productsproducts. and to develop statewide standards regulating their use on government networks, devices, and systems;
requiring(a) certainThe governmentLegislature entitieshereby finds and declares that it is in the best interest of the citizens of West Virginia and to adoptnational security to enact measures designed to safeguard against untrustworthy and enforcehigh-risk thosetechnology standards;and to block such technology from interfering with or damaging critical state networks and infrastructure, including, without limitation, election systems.
recommendingThe use of certain information and communication technologies and services can create opportunities for hostile actors to exploit vulnerabilities and take adverse action against the legislativeUnited States or allies, which could directly or indirectly affect the safety and judicialsecurity branchesof West Virginia citizens, and such use also creates opportunities for adversaries to adoptexploit vulnerabilities and enforcetake thoseadverse standards;action against state or local government networks and infrastructure within or connected to West Virginia.
authorizingAs the promulgationthreat landscape evolves, West Virginia shall work in cooperation with the federal government to implement appropriate safeguards to defend government networks in West Virginia and in the United States from technology threats posed by hostile actors.(b) Notwithstanding the provision of legislative§5A-6B-1(b) of this code, all state agencies and emergencyinstrumentalities, rulesincluding towithout facilitatelimitation agencies within the purposeexecutive, legislative, and judicial branches, all constitutional officers, local government entities as defined by §7-1-1 or §8-1-2 of this section;code, county boards of education as defined by §18-1-1 of this code, and all state institutions of higher education as defined by §18B-1-2 of this code, shall enforce statewide standards developed by the Chief Information Security Officer regarding high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products.
andAdditionally, requiringall thegovernment Chiefentities Informationsubject Securityto Officerthis providesubsection anmust, annualconsistent reportwith onthose threatsstandards posedand byany untrustworthyother andapplicable high-riskstate platforms,or services,federal applications,law, programs,restrict, orremove, products,ban andor theotherwise actionsblock requiredaccess to mitigatehigh-risk thosetechnology threatsplatforms, toservices, theapplications, Jointprograms, Interimor Committeeproducts on Governmentall Operations. AdoptedRejected government systems, services, networks, devices, or locations.
For purposes of this subsection, high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products are those designated as such in the Statewide Cybersecurity Standard published and maintained by the Chief Information Security Officer:
Provided, That any standards developed by the Chief Information Security Officer regarding high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products shall contain exceptions permitting, in appropriate circumstances, the use of those platforms, services, applications, programs, or products for law enforcement activities, national security interests and activities, security research, investigative efforts authorized by this code, and for other purposes related to actual or potential litigation involving the state or one of its agencies or officers:
Provided, however, that the Chief Information Security Officer shall develop standards and requirements designed to mitigate the risk of the authorized use of a high-risk platform, service, application, program, or product pursuant to the exceptions set forth in this section:
Provided, further that the Chief Information Security Officer shall, after consultation with the affected entities, exempt law enforcement agencies and other instrumentalities from the provisions of this section to the extent that the use of high-risk technology platforms, services, applications, programs, or products is determined to be necessary to performance of their official duties.
(C) The Secretary of the Department of Administration may propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code and may also promulgate emergency rules pursuant to the provisions of §29A-3-15 of this code when necessary to facilitate:
(1) completion of the duties imposed on the Chief Information Security Officer by this section, and (2) enforcement of the standards referenced in this section.(d) The Chief Information Security Officer will provide an annual report by June 1 of each year on threats posed by untrustworthy and high-risk platforms, services, applications, programs, or products, and the actions required to mitigate those threats to the Joint Interim Committee on Government Operations. AdoptedRejected
View plain text versions (7)
- sb426 sfa takubo _1 3-11 adopted.htm View text html
- sb426 hfat capito 3-6 adopted.htm View text html
- sb426 sfa trump _1 1-27 adopted.htm View text html
- sb426 hjud am. _1 3-6 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Engrossed Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Communicated to House
-
Senate refused to recede; requests House to reconsider (Voice vote)
-
House Message received
-
Communicated to Senate
-
House refused to concur; requested Senate to recede (Voice)
-
House received Senate message
-
Senate requests House to concur
-
Senate amends House amendment and passed bill (Roll No. 602)
-
House Message received
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Title amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Passed House (Roll No. 656)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
With amendment, do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 118)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
Laid over on 2nd reading 1/30/2023
-
Laid over on 2nd reading 1/27/2023
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Blair · Primary
- Mike Woelfel · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Blair
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mike Woelfel Democrat
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Not Voting |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Not Voting |
| HUNT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 426?
- SB 426 is sponsored by Blair and Mike Woelfel (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 426?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 426?
- Track SB 426 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 426
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 426
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →