HB 800 — Public service companies; pole attachments to accommodate cable TV systems & telecommunications.
Last action — Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0822)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 17, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
14 sponsors
1 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Public service companies; pole attachments;cable television systems and telecommunications service providers. Requires a public utility, as defined in the bill, to establish and adhere to pole attachment practices and procedures that comply with certain requirements, including determining whether an attachment request is complete before reviewing such request on its merits, complying with certain timelines, and providing notice of a rearrangement to affected existing attachers. The bill provides that a public utility shall not apportion to a telecommunications service provider or cable television system the cost of replacing a red-tagged pole, as defined in the bill, provided that such utility may apportion to such provider or system the incremental cost of a taller or stronger pole that is necessitated solely by the new facilities of such provider or system. The bill authorizes the State Corporation Commission to enforce its provisions and requires the Commission to resolve disputes involving pole access within 90 days and concerning certain other matters within 120 days. This bill is identical to SB 713.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
204 added · 214 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes made to Bill HB 800 clarify definitions related to pole attachments for cable television systems and telecommunications providers. Specifically, terms such as "red-tagged pole" and "rearrangement" have been more precisely defined, which will help streamline the process for new companies wanting to attach their equipment to existing utility poles. These updates are important because they provide clearer guidelines and responsibilities for all parties involved, potentially reducing delays and disputes over pole access.
RECONVENED SESSION REENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY --–– 2024 RECONVENED SESSION CHAPTER 822R An Act to amend and reenact § 56-466.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to public service companies;
E N [H 800] Approved AprilR 17,O 20241. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
L "Cable television system" means any system licensed, franchised or certificated pursuant to ArticleErticle 1.2 (§ 15.2-2108.19 et seq.) of Chapter 21 of Title 15.2 that transmits television signals, for distribution to subscribers of its services for a fee, by means of wires or cables connecting its distributiondistributiDn facilities receiver,with andits notsubscriber's bytelevision transmissionreceiver ofor televisionother signalsequipment throughconnecting theto air.to the subscriber's television "Electricrec"Electric cooperative" means a utility services cooperative formed under or subject to Article 1 (§ 56-231.15 et seq.) of Chapter 9.1.
"New attacher" means a cable television system or telecommunications service provider requestingrequesHing a new pole attachment.
"Pole8 attachment" means any attachment by a cable television system or provider of telecommunications service to a pole, duct, conduit, right-of-way or similar facility owned or controlled by a public utility.
R "Public utility" has the same meaning ascribed thereto in § 56-232 but shall not include any utility that is regulated pursuant to 47 U.S.C.
"Rearrangement" means work performed necessitated solely by and at the request of a telecommunications service provider or cable television system to, on, or in an existing pole, duct, conduit, right-of-way, or similar facility owned or controlled by a public utility that is necessary to make suchshall include replacement, necessitated solely by and at the request of a telecommunications servicement" provider or cable television system, of the existing pole, duct, conduit, right-of-way, or similar facility usableif the existing pole, duct, conduit, right-of-way, or similar facility does not contain adequate surplus space or excess capacity and cannot be rearranged so as to create the adequate surplus space or excess capacity required for a pole attachment.
"Rearrangement""Red-tagged shallpole" includemeans replacement, necessitated solely by and at the request of a telecommunicationspole serviceowned provider or cablecontrolled televisionby system,a ofpublic theutility existingthat pole,(i) duct,is conduit,designated right-of-way,for orreplacement similarfor facilityany ifreason theunrelated existingto pole,a duct,lack conduit,of right-of-way, or similar facility does not contain adequate surplus space or excess capacity and cannot be rearranged so as to createaccommodate thea adequatenew surplusattacher's spacerequest or excess capacity required for aattachment polewas attachment.not made.
"Red-taggedhave pole"needed meansto abe polereplaced ownedat orthe controlledtime byof areplacement publiceven utilityif thatthe (i)new is"Telecommunications designatedservice forprovider" replacementmeans for any reasonpublic unrelatedservice tocorporation aor lackpublic ofservice capacitycompany tothat accommodateholds a newcertificate attacher'sof requestpublic forconvenience attachmentand ornecessity (ii) would have needed to befurnish replacedlocal atexchange thetelephone timeservice ofor replacementinterexchange eventelephone ifservice. the new attachment was not made.
"Telecommunications service provider" means any public service corporation or public service company that holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity to furnish local exchange telephone service or interexchange telephone service.
Upon request by a telecommunications service provider or cable television system to a public utility, both the public utility and the telecommunications service provider or cable television system shall negotiate in good faith to arrive at a mutually agreeable contract for attachments to the public utility'scontract polesshall bycomply with the telecommunicationsrequirements serviceof providerthis orsection.r cable television system.
The terms of such contractC. shall comply with the requirements of this section.
C.After entering into a contract for attachments to its poles by any telecommunications service provider or cable television system, a public utility shall permit, upon reasonable terms and conditions and the payment of just and reasonable annual charges and the reasonable, actual cost of any required rearrangement, the attachment of any wire, cable, facility, or apparatus to its poles or pedestals, or the placement of any wire, cable, facility, or apparatus in conduit or duct space owned or controlled by it, by such telecommunications service provider or cable television system that is authorized by law, to the service and operation of the public utility or create a safety hazard.ot interfere, obstruct, or delay D.
AfterNotwithstanding enteringthe intoprovisions aof contractsubsection forC, attachments to its poles by any telecommunications service provider or cable television system, a public utility shallproviding permit,electric uponutility reasonableservice terms and conditions and the payment of just4 andmay reasonabledeny annualaccess chargesby anda thetelecommunications reasonable,service actualprovider costor ofcable anytelevision requiredsystem rearrangement,to the attachment of any wire,pole, cable,duct, facility,conduit, orright-of-way, apparatus to its poles or pedestals,similar orfacility theowned placement of any wire, cable, facility, or apparatuscontrolled, in conduitwhole or ductin spacepart, owned or controlled by it, by such telecommunicationspublic serviceutility, providerprovided orsuch cabledenial television system that is authorizedmade byon law,a tonondiscriminatory constructbasis andon maintaingrounds theof attachment,insufficient providedcapacity that the attachment does not interfere, obstruct, or delayreasons the service and operation of thesafety, publicreliability, utility or creategenerally aapplicable safetyengineering hazard.principles.
D.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection C, a public utility providing electric utility service may deny access by a telecommunications service provider or cable television system to any pole, duct, conduit, right-of-way, or similar facility owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by such public utility, of 4 provided such denial is made on a nondiscriminatory basis on grounds of insufficient capacity or reasons of safety, reliability, or generally applicable engineering principles.
After a public utility completes rearrangement, if the cost of the work performed differs from the of 4 estimate, such public utility shall provide the new attacher a detailed, itemized final invoice of the actual rearrangement charges incurred, on a pole-by-pole basis, if requested, to accommodate thethR new attachment.
If the new attacher requests an invoice on such pole-by-pole basis and the public utilityuEility incurs fixed costs that are not reasonably calculable on a pole-by-pole basis, such public utility may present charges on a per-job basis rather than on a pole-by-pole basis for such fixed cost charges.
The of 4 public utility shall provide documentation sufficient to determine the basis of all charges, including material, labor, and other related costs that form the basis of such estimate.
N 3.
O a.
b.sent;
Set a completion date for such rearrangement that is no later than 95 days after such noticenotLce is sent;c.
c.
and E d.
D Upon providing such notice, a public utility shall provide the new attacher with a copy of any such notice, the contact information of any existing attachers, and any address to which such public utility sentencourage the completion of rearrangement by the completion date specified in such notice.notice.achers to 4.
The new attacher shall be responsible for coordinating with existing attachers to encourage the completion of rearrangement by the completion date specified in such notice.
4.
A public utility may deviate from the time limits specified in this section before offering an estimate of charges if the parties involved have no agreement specifying the rates, terms, and conditionsHonditions of attachment.
8 b.
A public utility may deviate from the time limits specified in this subsection during performanceper0ormance of a rearrangement for good and sufficient cause, as defined by the Commission, that renders it unfeasible for such public utility to complete rearrangement within such time limits.
A public utility makingmakRng such deviation shall immediately notify in writing the new attacher and affected existing attachers, and such notice shall identify the affected poles and include a detailed explanation of the reason for such deviation and a new completion date.
If the pole attachment request of a telecommunications service provider or cable television system would cause the aggregate number of attachments or attachment requests by all attachers to exceed the lesser of 300 poles per month or 0.5 percent of the total poles owned by a public utility in any given month, then such public utility shall promptly notify such new attacher and shall negotiate in good faith to contract with a mutually agreed upon third-party entity to perform all necessary work that such public utility would otherwise perform, within a reasonable timeframe and in accordance with the cost allocation principles set forth in this section.
All work performed by a contracted entity under this subdivision shallactual, bereasonable subjectcosts to the oversight of thesuch publicoversight.blic utility, which may only assess the new attacher for the actual,7. reasonable costs of such oversight.
7.
The Commission is authorized to enforce the requirements of this section and to determine just and reasonable rates, and terms and conditions of service, excluding safety and debt collection, for attachments to electric cooperative poles by telecommunications service providers or cable television systems if, following good faith negotiations to do so, the parties cannot reach agreement thereon;
Just and reasonable pole attachment rates and terms and conditions of service to be determined by the Commission shall include, without limitation, rearrangement and make-ready costs, pole replacement costs, and all other costs directly related to pole attachments and maintenance, replacement, andandement of 4 inspection of poles or pole attachments, and right of way maintenance essential to pole attachments, provided, however, that cost recovery for rearrangement, make-ready, and pole replacement shall be addressed in terms and conditions, and shall not also be included in annual rental rates;
The Commission may develop and utilize alternative forms of dispute resolution for purposes of of 4 addressing disputes (i) arising under this subsection and (ii) falling within the scope of the Commission's authority established hereunder;
That any telecommunications service provider or cable television system that receives state or federal funding for infrastructure development in the Commonwealth shall coordinate with any public utility in the Commonwealth impacted by such funding receipt during any application process and shall promptly notify any such impacted public utility of such funding receipt within 30 days after such funding receipt.
View plain text versions (5)
- HB800ER2 View text pdf April 17, 2024
- CHAP0822 View text Current pdf April 17, 2024
- HB800ER View text pdf March 25, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24107113D-H1 pdf February 08, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105075D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0822)
-
Enacted, Chapter 822 (effective 7/1/24)
-
Signed by President as reenrolled
-
Signed by Speaker as reenrolled
-
Reenrolled bill text (HB800ER2)
-
Reenrolled
-
Governor's recommendation adopted
-
Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (40-Y 0-N)
-
BLOCK VOTE: (100-Y 0-N)
-
House concurred in Governor's recommendation BLOCK VOTE (100-Y 0-N)
-
Governor's recommendation received by House
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 27, 2024
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Signed by President
-
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB800ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations (14-Y 0-N)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Reported from Commerce and Labor (15-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from SCC (HB800H1)
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (99-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (99-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB800H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24107113D-H1
-
Read second time
-
Read first time
-
Committee substitute printed 24107113D-H1
-
Reported from Labor and Commerce with substitute (22-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (10-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from SCC (HB800)
-
Assigned L & C sub: Subcommittee #3
-
Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105075D
Sponsors
- Charniele L. Herring · Primary
- Terry L. Austin · Cosponsor
- Jr. C.E. Cliff Hayes · Cosponsor
- Alfonso H. Lopez · Cosponsor
- Nadarius E. Clark · Cosponsor
- Jr. Rozia A. Henson · Cosponsor
- Terry G. Kilgore · Cosponsor
- James A. "Jay" Leftwich · Cosponsor
- Marty Martinez · Cosponsor
- Irene Shin · Cosponsor
- Bill Wiley · Cosponsor
- Scott A. Wyatt · Cosponsor
- Barry D. Knight · Cosponsor
- Michelle Lopes Maldonado · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 134 not signed on
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Not Voting |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Chris S. Runion | — | Yea |
| Convirs-Fowler, Kelly K. | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Yea |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Yea |
| LeVere Bolling, Destiny | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Michael B. Feggans | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Yea |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Yea |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Yea |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Not Voting |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Yea |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 800 do?
- Public service companies; pole attachments;cable television systems and telecommunications service providers. Requires a public utility, as defined in the bill, to establish and adhere to pole attachment practices and procedures that comply with certain requirements, including determining whether an attachment request is complete before reviewing such request on its merits, complying with certain timelines, and providing notice of a rearrangement to affected existing attachers. The bill provides that a public utility shall not apportion to a telecommunications service provider or cable television system the cost of replacing a red-tagged pole, as defined in the bill, provided that such utility may apportion to such provider or system the incremental cost of a taller or stronger pole that is necessitated solely by the new facilities of such provider or system. The bill authorizes the State Corporation Commission to enforce its provisions and requires the Commission to resolve disputes involving pole access within 90 days and concerning certain other matters within 120 days. This bill is identical to SB 713.
- Who sponsors HB 800?
- HB 800 is sponsored by Charniele L. Herring, Terry L. Austin, C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr., Alfonso H. Lopez, Nadarius E. Clark, Rozia A. Henson, Jr., Terry G. Kilgore, James A. "Jay" Leftwich, Marty Martinez, Irene Shin, Bill Wiley, Scott A. Wyatt, Barry D. Knight, and Michelle Lopes Maldonado.
- What is the current status of HB 800?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 800?
- Track HB 800 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 800
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 800
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →