Strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retalia...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6261 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6261.
You're tracking SB 6261
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6261 — Strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retaliation and the use of farm labor contractors in certain circumstances, and establishing liability for related violations.
Last action — Effective date 6/11/2020.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 6261 removes a provision that exempted nonprofit organizations from certain regulations regarding farm labor contracting. This change is significant because it aims to hold all entities, including nonprofits, accountable under the same labor laws, which should help protect agricultural workers from potential exploitation. Additionally, the bill now explicitly prohibits retaliation against employees who assert their rights, which is crucial for ensuring safe and fair working conditions in the agriculture sector.
ENGROSSEDS-4881.1SENATE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6261State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenateSessionBySenators Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators McCoy, Saldaña, Conway, Kuderer, Hasegawa, Wilson, C., Das, Nguyen, and Keiser)READKeiserRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/04/20.AN01/14/20.Referred to Committee on Labor & Commerce.AN ACT Relating to strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retaliation and the use of farm labor contractors in certain circumstances, and establishing liability for related violations;
amending RCW 19.30.190 and 19.30.200;
Such nonprofit corporation or organization shall be one in which:(a) None of its directors, officers, or employees are deriving any profit beyond a reasonable salary for services performed in its behalf.(b) Membership dues and fees are used solely for the maintenance of the association or corporation)).---corporation)).Sec. END ---
2.
RCW 19.30.190 and 1985 c 280 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:(1) No farm labor contractor ((or)), agricultural employer, or any person acting on behalf of a farm labor contractor or agricultural employer, may ((discharge or in any other manner discriminate))take adverse action against any employee ((because))or former employee who:(((1) The employee))(a) Has made a claim against the farm labor contractor or agricultural employer ((for compensation for the employee's personal services.))related in any way to the employee or former employee's employment;(((2) The employee))(b) Has caused to be instituted, or is about to cause to be instituted, any proceedings under or related to ((RCW 19.30.180.))this chapter;(((3) The employee))(c) Has testified or is about to testify in any such proceedings((.));(((4) The employee))(d) Has discussed or consulted with anyone concerning the employee(('s))or another person's employment rights ((under this chapter.))or safety and health laws or regulations;(e) Has informed any other person or made a complaint, or the employer believes the employee or former employee has informed any other person or made a complaint, including to the employer, the director, the attorney general, or any other person, that the employer engaged in conduct that the employee or former employee reasonably believes violates this chapter or any employment or safety and health laws or regulations;(f) Has refused to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of any state or federal employment or safety and health laws or regulations;(g) Has sought information about the employee or former employee's rights under any employment or safety and health laws or regulations, or informed others about their rights;(h) Has, or the employer believes the employee or former employee has, otherwise exercised rights under any employment or safety and health laws or regulations;
or(i) Engaged in, or benefited from, any concerted activity to improve working conditions as protected by RCW 49.32.020.(2) If an employer takes adverse action against an employee or former employee within ninety days of an activity described in subsection (1) of this section, the employer is presumed to have acted in retaliation in violation of subsection (1) of this section.
However, in the case of seasonal work, the presumption also applies if the employer fails to rehire a former employee at the next opportunity for work in the same position.
The employer may rebut the presumption with clear and convincing evidence that the adverse action was taken for a permissible purpose.(3) A complaint or other communication by an employee or former employee triggers the protections of this section regardless of whether the complaint or communication is in writing or makes explicit reference to this chapter.(4) For purposes of this section:(a) "Adverse action" means discharging, denying a promotion, demoting, failing to rehire after seasonal interruption of work, intimidating, threatening, coercing, blacklisting, penalizing, retaliating against, engaging in unfair immigration-related practices, filing a false report with a government agency, changing an employee's status to a nonemployee, or otherwise discriminating against an employee.
"Adverse action" may involve any aspect of employment, including pay, work hours, responsibilities, or other material change in the terms or conditions of employment.(b)(i) "Unfair immigration-related practice" includes any of the following:(A) Requesting more or different documents than are required under 8 U.S.C.
Sec.
1324a(b), or a refusal to honor documents tendered pursuant to that section that on their face reasonably appear to be genuine;(B) Using the federal e-verify system to check the employment authorization status of a person at a time or in a manner not required under 8 U.S.C.
Sec.
1324a(b), or not authorized under any memorandum of understanding governing the use of the federal e-verify system;(C) Threatening to file or the filing of a false police report;(D) Threatening to contact or contacting immigration authorities;
or(E) Withholding or threatening to destroy documents related to a person's immigration status.(ii) "Unfair immigration-related practice" does not include conduct undertaken at the express and specific direction or request of the federal government.Sec.
3.
RCW 19.30.200 and 2000 c 171 s 48 are each amended to read as follows:No person may utilize the services of any farm labor contractor to supply any agricultural worker unless the person first takes reasonable steps to determine that the farm labor contractor possesses a valid license required by this chapter.
Any person who ((knowingly uses the services of an unlicensed farm labor contractor))violates this section shall be personally, jointly, and severally liable with the person acting as a farm labor contractor to the same extent and in the same manner as provided in this chapter.
((In making determinations under this section, any user may rely))The only defense that may be asserted to avoid liability under this section is that the person relied upon either the license issued by the director to the farm labor contractor under RCW 19.30.030 or the director's representation that such contractor is licensed as required by this chapter.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 6/11/2020.
-
Chapter 205, 2020 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 57; nays, 39; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 08:00 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LAWS - Majority; do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 03:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 32; nays, 16; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 10:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
Sponsors
- McCoy · Primary
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Das · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Joe Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 28 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- McCoy
Co-sponsors (8)
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Kuderer
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Das
- Keiser
- Joe Nguyen Democrat
- Claire Wilson Democrat
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 18 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 39 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 40% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Nay |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Nay |
| Jenkin | — | Nay |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Nay |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Nay |
| Van Werven | — | Nay |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 33% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Nay |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Nay |
| Becker | — | Nay |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Nay |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Nay |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6261?
- SB 6261 is sponsored by McCoy, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), Kuderer, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Das, Keiser, Joe Nguyen (Democrat), and Claire Wilson (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 6261?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 6261?
- Track SB 6261 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6261
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6261
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →