Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted 5 D cosponsors

SB 6261 — Strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retaliation and the use of farm labor contractors in certain circumstances, and establishing liability for related violations.

Last action — Effective date 6/11/2020.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 6261 removes a provision that exempted nonprofit organizations from certain regulations regarding farm labor contracting. This change is significant because it aims to hold all entities, including nonprofits, accountable under the same labor laws, which should help protect agricultural workers from potential exploitation. Additionally, the bill now explicitly prohibits retaliation against employees who assert their rights, which is crucial for ensuring safe and fair working conditions in the agriculture sector.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6261State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenate Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators McCoy, Saldaña, Conway, Kuderer, Hasegawa, Wilson, C., Das, Nguyen, and Keiser)READ FIRST TIME 02/04/20.AN ACT Relating to strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retaliation and the use of farm labor contractors in certain circumstances, and establishing liability for related violations;
S-4881.1SENATE BILL 6261State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionBySenators McCoy, Saldaña, Conway, Kuderer, Hasegawa, Wilson, C., Das, Nguyen, and KeiserRead first time 01/14/20.Referred to Committee on Labor & Commerce.AN ACT Relating to strengthening the farm labor contractor system by removing an exemption for nonprofits, prohibiting retaliation and the use of farm labor contractors in certain circumstances, and establishing liability for related violations;
amending RCW 19.30.190 and 19.30.200;
Such nonprofit corporation or organization shall be one in which:(a) None of its directors, officers, or employees are deriving any profit beyond a reasonable salary for services performed in its behalf.(b) Membership dues and fees are used solely for the maintenance of the association or corporation)).--- END ---
Such nonprofit corporation or organization shall be one in which:(a) None of its directors, officers, or employees are deriving any profit beyond a reasonable salary for services performed in its behalf.(b) Membership dues and fees are used solely for the maintenance of the association or corporation)).Sec.
2.
RCW 19.30.190 and 1985 c 280 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:(1) No farm labor contractor ((or)), agricultural employer, or any person acting on behalf of a farm labor contractor or agricultural employer, may ((discharge or in any other manner discriminate))take adverse action against any employee ((because))or former employee who:(((1) The employee))(a) Has made a claim against the farm labor contractor or agricultural employer ((for compensation for the employee's personal services.))related in any way to the employee or former employee's employment;(((2) The employee))(b) Has caused to be instituted, or is about to cause to be instituted, any proceedings under or related to ((RCW 19.30.180.))this chapter;(((3) The employee))(c) Has testified or is about to testify in any such proceedings((.));(((4) The employee))(d) Has discussed or consulted with anyone concerning the employee(('s))or another person's employment rights ((under this chapter.))or safety and health laws or regulations;(e) Has informed any other person or made a complaint, or the employer believes the employee or former employee has informed any other person or made a complaint, including to the employer, the director, the attorney general, or any other person, that the employer engaged in conduct that the employee or former employee reasonably believes violates this chapter or any employment or safety and health laws or regulations;(f) Has refused to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of any state or federal employment or safety and health laws or regulations;(g) Has sought information about the employee or former employee's rights under any employment or safety and health laws or regulations, or informed others about their rights;(h) Has, or the employer believes the employee or former employee has, otherwise exercised rights under any employment or safety and health laws or regulations;
or(i) Engaged in, or benefited from, any concerted activity to improve working conditions as protected by RCW 49.32.020.(2) If an employer takes adverse action against an employee or former employee within ninety days of an activity described in subsection (1) of this section, the employer is presumed to have acted in retaliation in violation of subsection (1) of this section.
However, in the case of seasonal work, the presumption also applies if the employer fails to rehire a former employee at the next opportunity for work in the same position.
The employer may rebut the presumption with clear and convincing evidence that the adverse action was taken for a permissible purpose.(3) A complaint or other communication by an employee or former employee triggers the protections of this section regardless of whether the complaint or communication is in writing or makes explicit reference to this chapter.(4) For purposes of this section:(a) "Adverse action" means discharging, denying a promotion, demoting, failing to rehire after seasonal interruption of work, intimidating, threatening, coercing, blacklisting, penalizing, retaliating against, engaging in unfair immigration-related practices, filing a false report with a government agency, changing an employee's status to a nonemployee, or otherwise discriminating against an employee.
"Adverse action" may involve any aspect of employment, including pay, work hours, responsibilities, or other material change in the terms or conditions of employment.(b)(i) "Unfair immigration-related practice" includes any of the following:(A) Requesting more or different documents than are required under 8 U.S.C.
Sec.
1324a(b), or a refusal to honor documents tendered pursuant to that section that on their face reasonably appear to be genuine;(B) Using the federal e-verify system to check the employment authorization status of a person at a time or in a manner not required under 8 U.S.C.
Sec.
1324a(b), or not authorized under any memorandum of understanding governing the use of the federal e-verify system;(C) Threatening to file or the filing of a false police report;(D) Threatening to contact or contacting immigration authorities;
or(E) Withholding or threatening to destroy documents related to a person's immigration status.(ii) "Unfair immigration-related practice" does not include conduct undertaken at the express and specific direction or request of the federal government.Sec.
3.
RCW 19.30.200 and 2000 c 171 s 48 are each amended to read as follows:No person may utilize the services of any farm labor contractor to supply any agricultural worker unless the person first takes reasonable steps to determine that the farm labor contractor possesses a valid license required by this chapter.
Any person who ((knowingly uses the services of an unlicensed farm labor contractor))violates this section shall be personally, jointly, and severally liable with the person acting as a farm labor contractor to the same extent and in the same manner as provided in this chapter.
((In making determinations under this section, any user may rely))The only defense that may be asserted to avoid liability under this section is that the person relied upon either the license issued by the director to the farm labor contractor under RCW 19.30.030 or the director's representation that such contractor is licensed as required by this chapter.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/11/2020.

  2. Chapter 205, 2020 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 57; nays, 39; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  10. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  11. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 08:00 AM

  12. Minority; do not pass.

  13. LAWS - Majority; do pass.

  14. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 03:30 PM

  15. First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

  16. Third reading, passed; yeas, 32; nays, 16; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  17. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  18. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  19. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  20. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  21. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  22. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  23. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  24. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  25. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 10:00 AM

  26. Minority; without recommendation.

  27. Minority; do not pass.

  28. LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  29. Minority; without recommendation.

  30. Minority; do not pass.

  31. LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  32. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce at 08:00 AM

  33. First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 28 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • McCoy

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (142)

142 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 142 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 57 Yea · 39 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 141801
Republican 02101
Democrat 43000
Total 573902
% of votes cast 58%40%0%2%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Chambers — Nay
Chandler — Nay
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
DeBolt — Nay
Dolan — Yea
Hoff — Nay
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Nay
Jenkin — Nay
Johnson, J. — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Nay
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McCaslin — Nay
Mead — Yea
Mosbrucker — Nay
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Nay
Smith — Not Voting
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Nay
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Wilcox — Nay
Young — Nay
Van Werven — Nay
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Nay
Andrew Barkis Republican Nay
Carolyn Eslick Republican Nay
Chris Corry Republican Nay
Chris Gildon Republican Nay
Dan Griffey Republican Not Voting
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Nay
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jenny Graham Republican Nay
Jeremie Dufault Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Keith Goehner Republican Nay
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Matt Boehnke Republican Nay
Michelle Valdez Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Nay
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Skyler Rude Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 32 Yea · 16 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2701
Unaffiliated 16900
Democrat 14000
Total 321601
% of votes cast 65%33%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Nay
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Nay
Zeiger — Nay
Becker — Nay
Billig — Yea
Brown — Nay
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Nay
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Nay
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6261?
SB 6261 is sponsored by McCoy, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), Kuderer, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Das, Keiser, Joe Nguyen (Democrat), and Claire Wilson (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 6261?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 6261?
Track SB 6261 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6261

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6261

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →