Prompt Payment Act of 2023
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 436 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 436.
You're tracking SB 436
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 436 — Prompt Payment Act of 2023
Last action — To House Finance
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 111 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 436 updates a section concerning the rights of state agencies regarding payment claims. It clarifies that agencies can refuse payment for claims that are fraudulent, erroneous, or not compliant with legal standards, while also ensuring they don’t unfairly label valid invoices as illegitimate. This change matters because it helps protect the state's finances from improper payments while ensuring that legitimate vendors are treated fairly and paid on time.
WESTSB436 VIRGINIASFA LEGISLATURENelson REGULAR#1 SESSION2-20Childs ENGROSSED 7949 Senator CommitteeNelson Substitutemoved forto Committeeamend Substitutethe forbill Senateon Billpage 4363, BYsection SENATORSTAR,2, WOPElines ,EFFRIE,ANDBARRETT58 [Originatingand 59, by striking out all of subsection (h), and inserting in lieu thereof two new subsections (h) and (i), to read as follows:(h) Nothing in this article should be construed to limit the Committeeright onof Finance;a state agency or the State Auditor to refuse illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed claims for payment.
reportedExamples onof Februarythese 17,types 2023]of Engpayments CSinclude, but are not limited to:(1) Payment claims that do not conform to a State agency’s standards for CSpayment or internal controls;(2) Payment claims of a fraudulent or a personal nature;(3) Payment claims for SBservices 436not Aordered, BILLrendered, or received;(4) Payment claims that appear to amendbe thein Codeviolation of Westany Virginia,State, 1931,local, asor amended,Federal law;(5) Claims for payment that do not conform to the payment standards administered by addingthe theretoState aAuditor newin article,authorized designatedpromulgated §12-10-1administrative andlaw, §12-10-2,rule, allor relatingpolicy, toor;(6) promptAny other situation where paying a claim for payment ofwould legitimatebe uncontestedunlawful, invoicesinappropriate, byor statenot agencies;in the best interests of the State of West Virginia.
providingProvided: that registered and qualified vendors shall be entitled to prompt payment upon presentation to a state agency of a legitimate uncontested invoice;
providingThat theno ratestate ofagency interestshall andarbitrarily mannerdeem an invoice illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed solely in order to circumvent the requirements of calculation;this article.
determining(i) No state agency shall be liable for the dateinterest anprovided invoicefor isin consideredthis receivedarticle byif the Legislature declines to fund the payment claim’s program or appropriation for a given state agency;agency in a subsequent fiscal year or if the State Budget Office determines that the payment of interest provided for in this article provides a financial hardship or burden on the State in any given fiscal year. AdoptedRejected
outlining rights of state agencies to receive updated invoices with interest prior to payment;
requiring state agencies to explain and calculate interest on the payment claim at the time it is submitted to the State Auditor;
providing the timeline in which state agencies shall process payments;
providing the timeline in which state agencies shall process payments for other agencies;
providing for the definition of "state agency";
and providing for exceptions.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 10.
PROMPT PAYMENT ACT OF 2023.
§12-10-1.
Short title.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the Prompt Payment Act of 2023.
§12-10-2.
Payment of legitimate uncontested invoices;
interest on late payments.
(a) Any properly registered and qualified vendor who supplies services or commodities to any state agency shall be entitled to prompt payment upon presentation to that state agency of a legitimate uncontested invoice:
Provided, That employees of the state shall not be considered vendors under this article.
(b)(1) For purchases of services or commodities made on or after July 1, 2023, a check, state warrant, purchasing card transaction, or electronic payment shall be issued in payment thereof within 45 business days after a legitimate uncontested invoice is received by the state agency receiving the services or commodities.
Any check, state warrant, purchasing card transaction, or electronic payment issued after 45 business days shall include interest calculated as the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus three percent determined on the date on which the Eng CS for CS for SB 436 check or warrant is mailed to the vendor, the electronic payment is issued and cleared through the bank, or the purchasing card transaction is initiated and cleared by the bank.
(2) For purposes of this subsection, an invoice shall be deemed to be received by a state agency on the date on which the invoice is marked as received by the state agency, the date of the postmark made by the United States Postal Service as evidenced on the envelope in which the invoice is mailed, or the date the invoice is logged received or confirmed on an electronic mailbox or messaging system, whichever is earlier, unless the vendor can provide sufficient evidence that the invoice was received by the state agency on an earlier date:
Provided, That in the event an invoice is received by a state agency prior to the date on which the commodities covered by the invoice are delivered in full and accepted or the services covered by the invoice are fully performed and accepted, the invoice shall be deemed to be received on the date on which the commodities covered by the invoice were actually delivered in full and accepted or the services covered by the invoice were fully performed and accepted.
(c) Prior to initiating payment that includes interest as provided in §12-10-2(b)(1) of this code, a state agency may request a vendor present a revised invoice for payment including itemized interest and all other charges authorized under this article.
The state agency reserves the right to recalculate and ensure the itemized interest amounts are correct prior to payment of a late invoice and shall ensure interest is appropriate and due before payment of an invoice with interest added for late payment.
The state agency shall add explanatory documentation to the claim for payment prior to submitting it to the State Auditor’s office to explain the difference between the amount of the invoice and the amount requested to pay the vendor in the statewide accounting system.
For reporting purposes, the State Auditor may require agencies to properly separate reporting of the payment for commodities and services and the payment of interest in the statewide accounting system using budgetary object codes or tracking codes.
(d) The state agency initially receiving a legitimate uncontested invoice shall process the invoice within 10 business days from the day of its receipt.
Failure to comply with the requirements Eng CS for CS for SB 436 of this subsection shall render the state agency liable for payment of the interest mandated by §12-10-2(b)(1) of this code when there is a failure to promptly pay a legitimate uncontested invoice:
Provided, That a state agency shall not be liable for payment of interest owed by another state agency under this section:
Provided, however, That the State Auditor’s office shall not be liable for payment of interest when an invoice is delayed due to the State Auditor’s office’s refusal of the payment request due to the state agency’s noncompliance with the payment standards promulgated by the State Auditor when submitting payment.
(e) Any state agency charged by law with processing another state agency’s requisition for payment of a legitimate uncontested invoice shall either process the claim or reject it for good cause within 10 business days after such processing state agency receives it.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this subsection shall render the processing state agency liable for payment of the interest mandated by §12-10-2(b)(1) of this code when there is a failure to promptly pay a legitimate uncontested invoice unless the processing state agency did not receive the invoice from the paying agency in a timely manner.
(f) For purposes of this section, "state agency" is defined as any agency, department, board, office, bureau, commission, authority, or any other entity of the executive, judicial, elected, or legislative branch of state government.
(g) The provisions of this article do not apply to any vendor, grantee, or subgrantee who is debarred, whose payments are required to be offset and intercepted to a state or federal agency, or who is otherwise ineligible to receive payment from the state by any act provided for in this code.
(h) Nothing in this article should be construed to limit the right of a state agency or the State Auditor to refuse illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed claims for payment.
Examples of these types of payments include, but are not limited to:
Show all 48 changed lines (8 more)
(1) Payment claims that do not conform to a st ate agency’s standards for payment or internal controls;
Eng CS for CS for SB 436 (2) Payment claims of a fraudulent or a personal nature;
(3) Payment claims for services not ordered, rendered, or received;
(4) Payment claims that appear to be in violation of any state, local, or Federal law;
(5) Claims for payment that do not conform to the payment standards administered by the State Auditor in authorized promulgated administrative law, rule, or policy, or;
(6) Any other situation where paying a claim for payment would be unlawful, inappropriate, or not in the best interests of the State of West Virginia:
Provided, That no state agency shall arbitrarily deem an invoice illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed solely in order to circumvent the requirements of this article.
(i) No state agency shall be liable forthe interest provided for in this article if the Legislature declines to fund the payment claim’s program or appropriation for a given state agency in a subsequent fiscal year or if the State Budget Office determines that the payment of interest provided for in this article provides a financial hardship or burden on the state in any given fiscal year.
Show all 48 changed rows (8 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- sb436 sfa nelson _1 2-20 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Engrossed Committee Substitute for the Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute Committee Substitute for the Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies the rights of state agencies regarding payment claims and establishes circumstances under which they will not be liable for interest on claims.
-
subsection (h)→ (h) Nothing in this article should be construed to limit the right of a state agency or the State Auditor to refuse illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed claims for payment. Examples of these types of payments include, but are not limited to:(1) Payment claims that do not conform to a State agency’s standards for payment or internal controls;(2) Payment claims of a fraudulent or a personal nature;(3) Payment claims for services not ordered, rendered, or received;(4) Payment claims that appear to be in violation of any State, local, or Federal law;(5) Claims for payment that do not conform to the payment standards administered by the State Auditor in authorized promulgated administrative law, rule, or policy, or;(6) Any other situation where paying a claim for payment would be unlawful, inappropriate, or not in the best interests of the State of West Virginia. Provided: That no state agency shall arbitrarily deem an invoice illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed solely in order to circumvent the requirements of this article.Establishes a detailed framework for which claims can be refused by state agencies.
-
subsection (i)→ (i) No state agency shall be liable for the interest provided for in this article if the Legislature declines to fund the payment claim’s program or appropriation for a given state agency in a subsequent fiscal year or if the State Budget Office determines that the payment of interest provided for in this article provides a financial hardship or burden on the State in any given fiscal year.Exempts state agencies from interest liability under certain fiscal conditions.
Action History
-
To House Finance
-
Do pass, but first to Finance
-
To House Government Organization
-
To Government Organization then Finance
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Effective July 1, 2023 (Roll No. 233)
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 233)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute for committee substitute reported
-
To Finance
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Government Organization
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Government Organization then Finance
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Eric Tarr · Primary
- Swope · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Jason Barrett · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Eric Tarr Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Swope
- Jeffries
- Jason Barrett Republican
Not signed on (148)
148 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 148 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| HUNT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 436?
- SB 436 is sponsored by Eric Tarr (Republican), Swope, Jeffries, and Jason Barrett (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 436?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 436?
- Track SB 436 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 436
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 436
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →