West Virginia 2023 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 2 R cosponsors

SB 436 — Prompt Payment Act of 2023

Last action — To House Finance

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 111 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill SB 436 updates a section concerning the rights of state agencies regarding payment claims. It clarifies that agencies can refuse payment for claims that are fraudulent, erroneous, or not compliant with legal standards, while also ensuring they don’t unfairly label valid invoices as illegitimate. This change matters because it helps protect the state's finances from improper payments while ensuring that legitimate vendors are treated fairly and paid on time.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION ENGROSSED Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 436 BY SENATORSTAR, WOPE ,EFFRIE,ANDBARRETT [Originating in the Committee on Finance;
SB436 SFA Nelson #1 2-20Childs  7949 Senator Nelson moved to amend the bill on page 3, section 2, lines 58 and 59, by striking out all of subsection (h), and inserting in lieu thereof two new subsections (h) and (i), to read as follows:(h) Nothing in this article should be construed to limit the right of a state agency or the State Auditor to refuse illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed claims for payment.
reported on February 17, 2023] Eng CS for CS for SB 436 A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article, designated §12-10-1 and §12-10-2, all relating to prompt payment of legitimate uncontested invoices by state agencies;
Examples of these types of payments include, but are not limited to:(1) Payment claims that do not conform to a State agency’s standards for payment or internal controls;(2) Payment claims of a fraudulent or a personal nature;(3) Payment claims for services not ordered, rendered, or received;(4) Payment claims that appear to be in violation of any State, local, or Federal law;(5) Claims for payment that do not conform to the payment standards administered by the State Auditor in authorized promulgated administrative law, rule, or policy, or;(6) Any other situation where paying a claim for payment would be unlawful, inappropriate, or not in the best interests of the State of West Virginia.
providing that registered and qualified vendors shall be entitled to prompt payment upon presentation to a state agency of a legitimate uncontested invoice;
Provided:
providing the rate of interest and manner of calculation;
That no state agency shall arbitrarily deem an invoice illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed solely in order to circumvent the requirements of this article.
determining the date an invoice is considered received by a state agency;
(i) No state agency shall be liable for the interest provided for in this article if the Legislature declines to fund the payment claim’s program or appropriation for a given state agency in a subsequent fiscal year or if the State Budget Office determines that the payment of interest provided for in this article provides a financial hardship or burden on the State in any given fiscal year.  AdoptedRejected
outlining rights of state agencies to receive updated invoices with interest prior to payment;
requiring state agencies to explain and calculate interest on the payment claim at the time it is submitted to the State Auditor;
providing the timeline in which state agencies shall process payments;
providing the timeline in which state agencies shall process payments for other agencies;
providing for the definition of "state agency";
and providing for exceptions.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 10.
PROMPT PAYMENT ACT OF 2023.
§12-10-1.
Short title.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the Prompt Payment Act of 2023.
§12-10-2.
Payment of legitimate uncontested invoices;
interest on late payments.
(a) Any properly registered and qualified vendor who supplies services or commodities to any state agency shall be entitled to prompt payment upon presentation to that state agency of a legitimate uncontested invoice:
Provided, That employees of the state shall not be considered vendors under this article.
(b)(1) For purchases of services or commodities made on or after July 1, 2023, a check, state warrant, purchasing card transaction, or electronic payment shall be issued in payment thereof within 45 business days after a legitimate uncontested invoice is received by the state agency receiving the services or commodities.
Any check, state warrant, purchasing card transaction, or electronic payment issued after 45 business days shall include interest calculated as the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus three percent determined on the date on which the Eng CS for CS for SB 436 check or warrant is mailed to the vendor, the electronic payment is issued and cleared through the bank, or the purchasing card transaction is initiated and cleared by the bank.
(2) For purposes of this subsection, an invoice shall be deemed to be received by a state agency on the date on which the invoice is marked as received by the state agency, the date of the postmark made by the United States Postal Service as evidenced on the envelope in which the invoice is mailed, or the date the invoice is logged received or confirmed on an electronic mailbox or messaging system, whichever is earlier, unless the vendor can provide sufficient evidence that the invoice was received by the state agency on an earlier date:
Provided, That in the event an invoice is received by a state agency prior to the date on which the commodities covered by the invoice are delivered in full and accepted or the services covered by the invoice are fully performed and accepted, the invoice shall be deemed to be received on the date on which the commodities covered by the invoice were actually delivered in full and accepted or the services covered by the invoice were fully performed and accepted.
(c) Prior to initiating payment that includes interest as provided in §12-10-2(b)(1) of this code, a state agency may request a vendor present a revised invoice for payment including itemized interest and all other charges authorized under this article.
The state agency reserves the right to recalculate and ensure the itemized interest amounts are correct prior to payment of a late invoice and shall ensure interest is appropriate and due before payment of an invoice with interest added for late payment.
The state agency shall add explanatory documentation to the claim for payment prior to submitting it to the State Auditor’s office to explain the difference between the amount of the invoice and the amount requested to pay the vendor in the statewide accounting system.
For reporting purposes, the State Auditor may require agencies to properly separate reporting of the payment for commodities and services and the payment of interest in the statewide accounting system using budgetary object codes or tracking codes.
(d) The state agency initially receiving a legitimate uncontested invoice shall process the invoice within 10 business days from the day of its receipt.
Failure to comply with the requirements Eng CS for CS for SB 436 of this subsection shall render the state agency liable for payment of the interest mandated by §12-10-2(b)(1) of this code when there is a failure to promptly pay a legitimate uncontested invoice:
Provided, That a state agency shall not be liable for payment of interest owed by another state agency under this section:
Provided, however, That the State Auditor’s office shall not be liable for payment of interest when an invoice is delayed due to the State Auditor’s office’s refusal of the payment request due to the state agency’s noncompliance with the payment standards promulgated by the State Auditor when submitting payment.
(e) Any state agency charged by law with processing another state agency’s requisition for payment of a legitimate uncontested invoice shall either process the claim or reject it for good cause within 10 business days after such processing state agency receives it.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this subsection shall render the processing state agency liable for payment of the interest mandated by §12-10-2(b)(1) of this code when there is a failure to promptly pay a legitimate uncontested invoice unless the processing state agency did not receive the invoice from the paying agency in a timely manner.
(f) For purposes of this section, "state agency" is defined as any agency, department, board, office, bureau, commission, authority, or any other entity of the executive, judicial, elected, or legislative branch of state government.
(g) The provisions of this article do not apply to any vendor, grantee, or subgrantee who is debarred, whose payments are required to be offset and intercepted to a state or federal agency, or who is otherwise ineligible to receive payment from the state by any act provided for in this code.
(h) Nothing in this article should be construed to limit the right of a state agency or the State Auditor to refuse illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed claims for payment.
Examples of these types of payments include, but are not limited to:
Show all 48 changed rows (8 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) Payment claims that do not conform to a st ate agency’s standards for payment or internal controls;
Eng CS for CS for SB 436 (2) Payment claims of a fraudulent or a personal nature;
(3) Payment claims for services not ordered, rendered, or received;
(4) Payment claims that appear to be in violation of any state, local, or Federal law;
(5) Claims for payment that do not conform to the payment standards administered by the State Auditor in authorized promulgated administrative law, rule, or policy, or;
(6) Any other situation where paying a claim for payment would be unlawful, inappropriate, or not in the best interests of the State of West Virginia:
Provided, That no state agency shall arbitrarily deem an invoice illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed solely in order to circumvent the requirements of this article.
(i) No state agency shall be liable forthe interest provided for in this article if the Legislature declines to fund the payment claim’s program or appropriation for a given state agency in a subsequent fiscal year or if the State Budget Office determines that the payment of interest provided for in this article provides a financial hardship or burden on the state in any given fiscal year.
View plain text versions (5)

How this bill changes current law

2 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill clarifies the rights of state agencies regarding payment claims and establishes circumstances under which they will not be liable for interest on claims.

  • subsection (h) → (h) Nothing in this article should be construed to limit the right of a state agency or the State Auditor to refuse illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed claims for payment. Examples of these types of payments include, but are not limited to:(1) Payment claims that do not conform to a State agency’s standards for payment or internal controls;(2) Payment claims of a fraudulent or a personal nature;(3) Payment claims for services not ordered, rendered, or received;(4) Payment claims that appear to be in violation of any State, local, or Federal law;(5) Claims for payment that do not conform to the payment standards administered by the State Auditor in authorized promulgated administrative law, rule, or policy, or;(6) Any other situation where paying a claim for payment would be unlawful, inappropriate, or not in the best interests of the State of West Virginia. Provided: That no state agency shall arbitrarily deem an invoice illegitimate, erroneous, fraudulent, or disputed solely in order to circumvent the requirements of this article.

    Establishes a detailed framework for which claims can be refused by state agencies.

  • subsection (i) → (i) No state agency shall be liable for the interest provided for in this article if the Legislature declines to fund the payment claim’s program or appropriation for a given state agency in a subsequent fiscal year or if the State Budget Office determines that the payment of interest provided for in this article provides a financial hardship or burden on the State in any given fiscal year.

    Exempts state agencies from interest liability under certain fiscal conditions.

Action History

  1. To House Finance

  2. Do pass, but first to Finance

  3. To House Government Organization

  4. To Government Organization then Finance

  5. Introduced in House

  6. Ordered to House

  7. Effective July 1, 2023 (Roll No. 233)

  8. Passed Senate (Roll No. 233)

  9. Read 3rd time

  10. On 3rd reading

  11. Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  12. Read 2nd time

  13. On 2nd reading

  14. Read 1st time

  15. On 1st reading

  16. Committee substitute for committee substitute reported

  17. To Finance

  18. Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance

  19. To Government Organization

  20. Introduced in Senate

  21. To Government Organization then Finance

  22. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (148)

148 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 148 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passage

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 16000
Unaffiliated 17000
Democrat 1000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
MARONEY — Yea
STOVER — Yea
MARTIN — Yea
STUART — Yea
BOLEY — Yea
SWOPE — Yea
CAPUTO — Yea
NELSON — Yea
PHILLIPS — Yea
PLYMALE — Yea
TRUMP — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
HUNT — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
SMITH — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
KARNES — Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Amy Grady Republican Yea
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Jay Taylor Republican Yea
Laura Wakim Chapman Republican Yea
Mark R. Maynard Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea
Mike Oliverio Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Vince Deeds Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 436?
SB 436 is sponsored by Eric Tarr (Republican), Swope, Jeffries, and Jason Barrett (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 436?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 436?
Track SB 436 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 436

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 436

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →