SB 274 — Prescription Drug Affordability Board; established, drug cost affordability review, report.
Last action — Requires 2/3 members present
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 02, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Prescription Drug Affordability Board established; drug cost affordability review. Establishes the Prescription Drug Affordability Board for the purpose of protecting the citizens of the Commonwealth and other stakeholders within the health care system from the high costs of prescription drug products. The bill requires the Board to meet in open session at least four times annually, with certain exceptions and requirements enumerated in the bill. Members of the Board are required to disclose any conflicts of interest, as described in the bill. The bill also creates a stakeholder council for the purpose of assisting the Board in making decisions related to drug cost affordability. The bill tasks the Board with identifying prescription, generic, and other drugs, as defined in the bill, that are offered for sale in the Commonwealth and, at the Board's discretion, conducting an affordability review of any prescription drug product. The bill lists factors for the Board to consider that indicate an affordability challenge for the health care system in the Commonwealth or high out-of-pocket costs for patients. The bill also provides that any person aggrieved by a decision of the Board may request an appeal of the Board's decision and that the Attorney General has authority to enforce the provisions of the bill. The bill provides that the Board shall establish no more than 12 upper payment limit amounts annually between January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2028.The bill requires the Board to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly twice annually, beginning on July 1, 2025, and December 31, 2025. Provisions of the bill shall apply to state-sponsored and state-regulated health plans and health programs and obligate such policies to limit drug payment amounts and reimbursements to an upper payment limit amount set by the Board, if applicable, following an affordability review. The bill specifies that Medicare Part D plans shall not be bound by such decisions of the Board.The bill also requires the nonprofit organization contracted by the Department of Health to provide prescription drug price transparency to provide the Board access to certain data reported by manufacturers. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025, and is identical to HB 570.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
362 added · 344 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Bill SB 274 involve the establishment of the Prescription Drug Affordability Board in Virginia, specifically defining terms like "biologic," "brand-name drug," and "generic drug." This new board aims to oversee and review the affordability of prescription drugs to help regulate costs and make medications more accessible to citizens. These amendments are important because they provide a structured approach to managing drug prices, which can lead to savings for consumers struggling with high prescription costs.
SESSION SENATEENROLLED SUBSTITUTEVIRGINIA REPRINTACTS 24106998DOF SENATEASSEMBLY BILL–– NO.CHAPTER E An Act to amend and reenact § 54.1-3442.02 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia 32.1-276.19, relating to Prescription Drug Affordability Board established;
274 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor on February 5, 2024) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Deeds) A BILL to amend and reenact § 54.1-3442.02 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of 32.1-276.12 through 32.1-276.19, relating to Prescription Drug Affordability Board established;
O L [S 274] L Approved E Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.D Virginia is amended by adding in Title 32.1 a chapter numbered 7.3, consisting of sectionsof numbered 32.1-276.12 through 32.1-276.19, as follows:
ThatCHAPTER §7.3. 54.1-3442.02 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Title 32.1 a chapter numbered 7.3, consisting of sections numbered 32.1-276.12 through 32.1-276.1CHAPTER 7.3.s:
S PRESCRIPTION DRUG AFFORDABILITY BOARD.
E As used in this chapter, unless the context requires a different meaning:
"Biologic" means a drug that is produced or distributed in accordance with a biologics licenselicenBe application approved under 42 U.S.C.
7 application approved under 42 U.S.C.
§ 262(k)(3).distributed in accordance with a biologics licAnselicEnse "Board" means the Prescription Drug Affordability Board.
TR "Brand-name drug" means a drug that is produced or distributed in accordance with an original new drug application approved under 21 U.S.C.
"Brand-name drug" does not include an E authorized generic drug as defined by 42 C.F.R.
"Generic drug" means (i) a retail drug that is marketed or distributed in accordance with an definedabbreviated bynew 42drug C.F.R.application approved under 21 U.S.C.
§ 447.502,355(j), or(ii) (iii)an aauthorized generic drug that entered the market before 1962 that was notrug as originallydefined marketedby under42 aC.F.R. new drug application.
S§ "Manufacturer"447.502, or (iii) a drug that entered the market before 1962 that was not ori"Manufacturer" means an entity that (i) engages in the manufacture of a prescription drug prUductproduct or (ii) enters into a lease with another manufacturer to market and distribute a prescription dBugdrug product under the entity's own name and (iii) sets or changes the wholesale acquisition cost of the pre"Nonprofitprescription datadrug servicesproduct organization"it hasmanufactures theor samemarkets. meaning as set forth in § 32.1-23.4.
S"Nonprofit "Pharmacydata benefitsservices manager"organization" has the same meaning as providedset forth in § 38.2-3465.32.1-23.4.
T"Pharmacy :benefits manager" has the same meaning as provided in § 38.2-3465.
36 "Prescription drug product" means a drug or biological product receiving approval under a drug 37 application pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
§ 355(b) or under a biologics license application approved under 42 38U.S"Stakeholder U.S.C.council" means the Prescription Drug Affordability Board stakeholder council.
§ 262.32.1-276.13.
T 39 "Stakeholder council" means the Prescription Drug Affordability Board stakeholderestablished. council.
U A.
E B.
two members by the Speaker of the House of Delegates, two members by the Senate Committee Commonwealth.on Rules, and one member by the Governor who shall be a representative of a local government in the Members of the Board shall have expertise in health care, health care economics, the federal 340Bard.
TheDrug GovernorPricing shallProgram appointand threeits alternateimpacts nonlegislativeon citizenVirginia's membersfederally ofqualified thehealth Board.centers, or clinical medicine.
Members of the Board shall have expertise in health care, health care economics, the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program and its impacts on Virginia's federally qualified health centers, or clinical medicine.
Any conflict of interSst,interest, including whether an individual has an association, including a financial or personal associati2n,association, that has the potential to bias or has the appearance of biasing the individual's decisions in matters related to the Board or the conduct of the Board's activities shall be disclosed and considered when appointingdappointing members and alternate members to the Board.
1term C.of five years.
After the initial staggering of terms, members and alternate members shall be appointed for a term of five years.
of 7 D.
A majority of SB274S1 2 of 6 the members shall constitute a quorum.
In addition to the powers set forth in this chapter, the Board may promulgate regulations for the of 7 implementation of this chapter.
ofE 6A. assist the Board in making decisions as required under this chapter.
The Board shall create a stakeholder council shalltofor consistthe purpose of 11providing nonlegislativestakeholder citizeninput membersto appointedassist the Board in accordancemaking withdecisions as required under this section.chapter.
MembersThe shallstakeholder includecouncil manufacturersshall ofconsist brand-name drugs and generic drugs, providers that dispense or administer prescription drug products, suppliers of prescription11 drugnonlegislative products,citizen andmembers consumersappointed ofin prescriptionaccordance drugwith products.this section.
NoMembersRshall moreinclude thanmanufacturers oneof stakeholderbrand-name councildrugs memberand shallgeneric bedrugs, appointedproviders tothat representdispense anyor singleadminister orgB.products.
No more than one stakeholder council member shall be appointed to represent any singleon drug organization or entity.
L B.
five members by the Speaker of the House of Delegates, one of whom shall be a representative of a rare disease and patient advocacy organization, three members by the Senate Committee on Rules, and three members by thetheE Governor.
The members of the stakeholder council shall have knowledge in one or more of the following medicinesubjects: or clinical training, (iv) consumer or patient perspectives, (v) health care costs trends and of drivers, (vi) clinical and health services research, or (vii) the health care marketplace in the Commonwealth.
Show all 98 changed lines (58 more)
S(i) D.the pharmaceutical business model, (ii) supply chain business models, (iii) the practice of medicine or clinical training, (iv) consumer or patient perspectives, (v) health care costs trends and Commonwealth.
clinical and health services research, or (vii) the health care marketplace in the D.
Vacancies shaE.shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointments.
TheS ChairE. of the Board shall select one member of the stakeholder council to serve as chaNr of the stakeholder council.
F.The Chair of the Board shall select one member of the stakeholder council to serve as cha2r of the stakeholder council.
No4 memberF. of the stakeholder council shall receive compensation as a member of the stakehAlder council, but members shall be entitled to reimbursement for expenses under standard state travel regulations promulgated pursuant to § 2.2-2823.
TNo A.member of the stakeholder council shall receive compensation as a member of the stakehRlder council, but members shall be entitled to reimbursement for expenses under standard state travel regulations promulgated pursuant to § 2.2-2823.
Nothing§ in32.1-276.16. this section shall be construed to prevent a manufacturer from marketing a prescription drug product approved by the U.S.
Drug cost affordability review.
prescription drug product approved by the U.S.
S1. Consumer Price Index, have (i) a launch wholesale acquisition cost of $60,000 or more per year orhe course of treatment or (ii) a wholesale acquisition cost increase of $3,000 or more in any 12-month period;
BBrand-name 2.drugs or biologics that, as adjusted annually for inflation in accordance with the Consumer Price Index, have (i) a launch wholesale acquisition cost of $60,000 or more per year or course of treatment or (ii) a wholesale acquisition cost increase of $3,000 or more in any 12-month period;
Biosimilars2. that have a launch wholesale acquisition cost that is not at least 20 percentSlower than the referenced brand biologic at the time the biosimilars are launched and that have been sug3.
Biosimilars that have a launch wholesale acquisition cost that is not at least 20 percent lower suggested for review by members of the public, medical professionals, or other stakeholders;en 3.
Generic drugs that, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with the Consumer Price Index, have a wholesale acquisition cost of $100 or more for (i) a 30-day supply lasting a patient for a period of 30 consecutive days based on the recommended dosage approved for labeling by the FDA, (ii) aTa supply lasting a patient fewer than 30 days based on the recommended dosage approved for labeling by the FDA, or (iii) one unit of the drug if the labeling approved by the FDA does not recommend any finb.finite dosage;
Genericb. drugs that, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with the Consumer Price Index, have a wholesale acquisition cost of at least $100 for a 30-day supply or a course of treatment less tEan 30 days and that increased by 200 percent or more during the immediately preceding 12-month period, as determined by the difference between the resulting wholesale acquisition cost and the average of the wholesale acquisition cost reported over the immediately preceding 12 months;
systemGeneric drugs that, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with the CommonwealthConsumer andPrice highIndex, out-of-pockethave costsa wholesale acquisition cost of at least $100 for patients,a including30-day drugssupply usedor toa addresscourse publicof healthtreatment emergencies;less than 30 determined by the difference between the resulting wholesale acquisition cost and the average of the wholesale acquisition cost reported over the immediately preceding 12 months;
4.
Other prescription drug products that may create affordability challenges for the health care system in the Commonwealth and high out-of-pocket costs for patients, including drugs used to address public health emergencies;
S C.
After identifying prescription drug products as required by subsection B, soliciting publ2cpublic input on prescription drug products thought to be creating affordability challenges, and compiling preliminary information about the cost of the product, patient cost sharing for the product, health plan spending on the product, stakeholder input, and other information as determined by the Board, the Board sha1l determine whether to conduct an affordability review for each identified prescription drug product.
Relevant information for conducting an affordability review may include any document or research of 7 related to the manufacturer's selection of the introductory price or price increase of the prescription drug product, including life-cycle management, net average prices in the Commonwealth, market SB274S1 4 of 6 competition and context, projected revenue, patient assistance programs specific to a prescription drug product, estimated or actual manufacturer price concessions in the market, the estimated value or cost effectiveness of the prescription drug product, and other information as determined by the Board.
Such upper payment limit amount shall be exclusive of applicable pharmacy dispensing fees and provider of 7 administration fees.
E G.
The Board may adopt the Medicare maximum fair price in § 1191(c) of Title XVII of the Social ofSecurity 6Act, amount42 establishedU.S.C. pursuant to subsection E.
The§ Board1395 shallet notseq., establish an upper payment limitt amount different than the Medicare maximum fair price for anya prescription drug product includedas inthe §upper 1191(c)payment oflimit Titleamount XVIIestablished ofpursuant theto Socialsubsection SecurityE. Act, 42 U.S.C.
§The 1395Board etshall seq.not establish an upper payment limRt amount different than the Medicare maximum fair price for any prescription drug product included in § 1H.
H.
inspectionI. only to the extent required under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (§ 2.2-3700 etblic seq.).
§Any 32.1-276.17.information submitted to the Board in accordance with this section shall be subject to public inspection only to the extent required under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (§ 2.2-3700 et seq.).
E § 32.1-276.17.
daysB. after the decision is made.
TheAny Boardperson shallaggrieved hearby a decision of the appealBoard andmay makerequest aan finalappeal of the decision within 60030 days after the appeal is requested.requested.e Board shall hear the appeal and make a final decision within 60 C.
C.Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the Board may petition for judicial review as provided by the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.).
Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the Board may petition for judicial review asS provided by the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.).
ES theA. Senate Committee on Education and Health, the Chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce andNir of Labor, the Chair of the House Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Chair of the House Committee on Labor and Commerce a report that includes the following:
AOn 1.or before December 31, 2025, and annually thereafter, the Board shall submit to the Ch2ir of the Senate Committee on Education and Health, the Chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce and4 Labor, the Chair of the House Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Chair of the HousR Committee on Labor and Commerce a report that includes the following:
1.
Prescription drug products that were subject to Board review during the previous 12-monthT12-month and the number and disposition of appeals and judicial reviews of Board decisions;
Any recommendations the Board may have regarding further legislation needed to improve E prescription drug affordability in the Commonwealth.
TSeThe study shall consider (i) the prices of generic drugs on a year-over-year basis, (ii) the degree to which generic drug prices affect yearly insurance premium changes, (iii) annual changes in insurance cost sharing forricfor generic drugs, (iv) the potential for and history of generic drug shortages, (v) the degree to which generic drug prices affect yearly Medicaid spending in the Commonwealth, and (vi) any other relevant listed in subsection A.ard shall report this study questions.to the Chairs of the Senate and House committees § 32.1-276.19.
TheRelation Board shall report this study to theother Chairshealth ofbenefit theplans. Senate and House commitSees listed in subsection A.
The provisions of this chapter obligate state-sponsored and state-regulated health plans and health programs to limit drug reimbursements and drug payment amounts to no more than the I Board-established upper payment limit amount.
Plans providing health care benefits pursuant to TartPart D of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 1395 et seq., known as Medicare Part D, shall not be bound by decisions of the Board, and any such plans may choose to reimburse more than the U drug products to citizens of the Commonwealth shall be bound to bill all health plan payers no more than the Board-established upper payment limit amount without regard to whether or not a MedicaEe Part D plan chooses to reimburse the provider above the upper payment limit amount.
Providers who dispense and administer prescription drug products to citizens of the Commonwealth shall be bound to bill all health plan payers no more Part D plan chooses to reimburse the provider above the upper payment limit amount.not a Medicare § 54.1-3442.02.
"Biosimilar" means a drug that is produced or distributed pursuant to a biologics license application approved under 42 U.S.C.
§ 262(k)(3).produced262(k)(3). or distributed pursuant to a biologics license application "Brand-name drug" means a prescription drug approved under 21 U.S.C.
"Brand-name drug" means a prescription drug approved under 21 U.S.C.
262(S).262(k).
"Biosimilar," "brand-name drug," and "generic drug" have the same meanings as provided in 2 § 3"New32.1-276.12. prescription drug" means a drug or biological product receiving initial approval under an original new drug application pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
§original 355(b)new ordrug underapplication apursuant biologicsto license21 appli1ation under 42 U.S.C.
§ 355(b) or under a biologics license application under 42 U.S.C.
of 7 "Nonprofit data services organization" has the same meaning as set forth in § 32.1-23.4.
SB274S1 6 of 6 B.
and one member for a term of one year, one member for a term of two years, and one member for a term of three years, appointed byof the7 Governor.6.
6.That the provisions of the first enactment of this act shall bEcome effective on January 1, 2025.
ThatN theR provisionsO ofL theL firstE enactmentD ofB thisR act shall become effective on January 1, 2025.
Show all 98 changed rows (58 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- SB274ER View text Current pdf February 28, 2024
- SB274S1 View text pdf February 05, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24101144D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Requires 2/3 members present
-
Passed in enrolled form rejected (21-Y 18-N)
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB274ER)
-
Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB274ER)
-
Enrolled
-
VOTE: Passage (50-Y 47-N)
-
Passed House (50-Y 47-N)
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Labor and Commerce (12-Y 10-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB274S1)
-
Read third time and passed Senate (23-Y 16-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB274S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24106998D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations (9-Y 6-N)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Substitute bill reprinted 24106998D-S1
-
Committee substitute printed 24106998D-S1
-
Reported from Commerce and Labor with substitute (10-Y 5-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB274)
-
Rereferred to Commerce and Labor
-
Rereferred from Education and Health (15-Y 0-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Education and Health
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24101144D
Sponsors
- R. Creigh Deeds · Primary
- Russet Perry · Cosponsor
- Saddam Azlan Salim · Cosponsor
- Jr. William M. Stanley · Cosponsor
- Jennifer B. Boysko · Cosponsor
- Angelia Williams Graves · Cosponsor
- Jennifer D. Carroll Foy · Cosponsor
- Suhas Subramanyam · Cosponsor
- Adam P. Ebbin · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on · 65 voted No
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 18 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 18 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 45% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Not Voting |
| David W. Marsden | — | Nay |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Nay |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 47 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 49 | 47 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 49% | 47% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Chris S. Runion | — | Nay |
| Convirs-Fowler, Kelly K. | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Nay |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Nay |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Nay |
| LeVere Bolling, Destiny | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Nay |
| Michael B. Feggans | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Nay |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Nay |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Nay |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Nay |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Nay |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Not Voting |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Not Voting |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Nay |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Nay |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 274 do?
- Prescription Drug Affordability Board established; drug cost affordability review. Establishes the Prescription Drug Affordability Board for the purpose of protecting the citizens of the Commonwealth and other stakeholders within the health care system from the high costs of prescription drug products. The bill requires the Board to meet in open session at least four times annually, with certain exceptions and requirements enumerated in the bill. Members of the Board are required to disclose any conflicts of interest, as described in the bill. The bill also creates a stakeholder council for the purpose of assisting the Board in making decisions related to drug cost affordability. The bill tasks the Board with identifying prescription, generic, and other drugs, as defined in the bill, that are offered for sale in the Commonwealth and, at the Board's discretion, conducting an affordability review of any prescription drug product. The bill lists factors for the Board to consider that indicate an affordability challenge for the health care system in the Commonwealth or high out-of-pocket costs for patients. The bill also provides that any person aggrieved by a decision of the Board may request an appeal of the Board's decision and that the Attorney General has authority to enforce the provisions of the bill. The bill provides that the Board shall establish no more than 12 upper payment limit amounts annually between January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2028.The bill requires the Board to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly twice annually, beginning on July 1, 2025, and December 31, 2025. Provisions of the bill shall apply to state-sponsored and state-regulated health plans and health programs and obligate such policies to limit drug payment amounts and reimbursements to an upper payment limit amount set by the Board, if applicable, following an affordability review. The bill specifies that Medicare Part D plans shall not be bound by such decisions of the Board.The bill also requires the nonprofit organization contracted by the Department of Health to provide prescription drug price transparency to provide the Board access to certain data reported by manufacturers. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025, and is identical to HB 570.
- Who sponsors SB 274?
- SB 274 is sponsored by R. Creigh Deeds, Russet Perry, Saddam Azlan Salim, William M. Stanley, Jr., Jennifer B. Boysko, Angelia Williams Graves, Jennifer D. Carroll Foy, Subramanyam, Suhas, and Adam P. Ebbin.
- What is the current status of SB 274?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 274?
- Track SB 274 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 274
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 274
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →