Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; types of class actions.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 259 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 259.
You're tracking SB 259
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 259 — Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; types of class actions.
Last action — Passed by for the day
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 03, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions. Provides that one or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bring a civil action or may be proceeded against in a civil action, provided that (i) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary to judicial economy; (ii) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (iii) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (iv) the representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. The bill further sets out the procedure to certify a class action, the duties of counsel appointed in a class action, the various orders a court may issue during the course of a class action, and the process by which a settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise may occur. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025, and is identical to HB 418.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
138 added · 151 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SB 259 introduce some clarifications in the rules governing class actions in Virginia. Key changes include the addition of a requirement for questions of law or fact to be common among class members, enhancing the criteria for establishing a class action. This matters because it ensures that cases are more unified, potentially leading to fairer outcomes for individuals affected by similar issues, and it helps streamline the judicial process by avoiding conflicting rulings.
SESSION HOUSEENROLLED SUBSTITUTEVIRGINIA 24107798DACTS AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF AASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTE–– (ProposedCHAPTER byE theAn HouseAct Committee for Courts of Justice on February 16, 2024) (Patrons Prior to Substitute––Senators Surovell and Bagby [SB 587]) A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 5.2, consisting of sections numbered 8.01-267.10 through 8.01-267.15, relating to civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons;
class actions.actions.rough 8.01-267.15, relating to civil actions filed on behalfRof O [S 259] L Approved L Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
E 1.
That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 5.2, D consisting of sections numbered 8.01-267.108.01-26CHAPTER through5.2. 8.01-267.15, as follows:
CHAPTER8.01-267.15, 5.2.as follows:
H A.
One or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bOingbring a civ1.civil action or may be proceeded against in a civil action, provided that:
The1. class is so numerous that joinder of all members in accordance with chapter 5.1 (§ 8.01-267.1 et seq.) or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary to judicial economy;
2.The class is so numerous that joinder of all members in accordance with chapter 5.1 (§ 8.01-267.1 et seq.) or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary toBjudicial economy;
There5 are3. questions of law or fact common to the class;
SThe 3.claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenseE of the class;
Theand claimsR or4. defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class;
The representative parties shall fairly and Eadequately B.protect the interests of the class.
B.
S 1.
Prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of (i) inconsistent or varying adjudications of individual class members that would establish incompatible standardspractical ofmatter, conductwould forbe thedispositive opposingof partythe orinterests (ii) adjudications of individualthe classother members tBat,who asare anot parties to thea individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;
or I 35 3.
The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any :questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.
36In questionsmaking affectingthis onlyfinding, individual members, and that a class action is superior to other availTble 38 consider (i) the classcourt members'may interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense ofmay 39 separate actions;
(ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun 40 by or against class members;
and (v) Ehethe practical ability of individual class members to pursue their claims without certification.
Such order shall define the class, identify the practicablerepresentative afterparty a person brings an action or anparties, actionand isappoint brought against a person as a classas is representative whether to certify the action as a class action.counsel.
AnyThe ordercourt thatshall grantsdetermine as early as is practicable after a person brings an action or deniesan action is brought against a person as a class certification may be amended or altered prior to final judgment.judgment.Any order that grants or denies class B.
B.For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 1 or 2 of § 8.01-267.10, the court may direct appropriate notice to such class.
For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 13 of § 8.01-267.10, or 2upon ordering notice pursuant to § 8.01-267.13 to a class proposed to be certified for the purposes of settlement in accordance with subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, the court mayshall Sirectdirect appropriateto class members notice as is reasonable under the circumstances, including sending individual notice to suchall class.members who can be identified through reasonable effort.
For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.012267.10, or upon ordering notice pursuant to § 8.01-267.13 to a class proposed to be certified for the purp9ses of notice as is reasonable under the circumstances, including sending individual notice to all mem1ers who can be identified through reasonable effort.
The notice shall state clearly and concisely in(iii) plain, easily understood language (i) the natureclass ofclaims, theissues, action;or defenses;
(ii)(iv) thethat definitiona ofclass themember classmay certified;enter an appearance through anified;
(iii)attorney; the class claims, issues, or defenses;
(iv) that a class member may enter an appearance through an attorney;
(vi) the of 3 time and manner for requesting such exclusion;
and (vii) the binding effect of a class judgment on SB259H1 2 of 3 members in accordance with subsection C.
Unless the parties agree otherwise, the opponents of the class shall bear the expense of the notice required by this subsection.
The court may require the party opposing the class to cooperate in securing the names and addresses of the persons within the class defined by the court for the purpose of providing individual notice.
The relief provided for the class is adequate, including the costs, risks, and delay of a trial and of 3 appeal, the effectiveness of any proposed method of distributing relief to the class, the terms of any subsectionof D;3 subdivision 3;
andandattorney attorney fees, and any agreement required to be identified in accordance with 4.
E 3.
The parties seeking approval shall file a statement identifying any agreement made in connection with such proposed settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise.
R 4.
If the class action was previously certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, the court class member to request exclusion if such individual class member had an earlier opportunity to request exclusion but did not do so.
Show all 56 changed lines (16 more)
L C.
In addition to the procedures enumerated in subsection B, a class member may object to thL proposed settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise if such proposal requires court approval.
Such class member shall state whether such objection applies only to the objector, to a specific subEet of the proposal is approved after a hearing on the objection, no payment or other consideration shall bes such provided for forgoing or withdrawing such objection or forgoing, dismissing, or abandoning an appeal from a judgment approving such proposal.
TheAny partiesorder seekingapproving approvala shallsettlement filepursuant to this section that establishes a statementprocess identifyingfor anycompensating agreementclass mademembers inshall connectionprovide witE.for the disbursement of residual funds, if any.
IfA. the class action was previously certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, the court may refuse to approve a settlement unless such settlement affords a new opportunity for an individual class member to request exclusion if such individual class member had an earlier opportunity to request excF.
InFor addition to the procedurespurposes enumeratedof inthis subsectionchapter, B,venue ashall classbe memberproper mayin object to the proposedcircuit settlement,court voluntarywhere dismissal,any orputative compromiseclass ifmember's suchtransaction, proposaloccurrence, requiresor courtinjury approval.occurred.
SuchS classB. member shall state whether such objection applies only to the objector, to a specific subset of the proposal is approved after a hearing on the objection, no payment or other consideration shall bes such provided for forgoing or withdrawing such objection or forgoing, dismissing, or abandoning an appeal from a judgment approving such proposal.
compensatingWhen two or more separate civil actions requesting certification of a class memberspursuant shallto providet2is forchapter involve common questions of law or fact arising out of the disbursementsame transaction, occurrence9 or series of residualtransactions funds,or occurrences and such classes, if any.sscertified, would encompass one or moRe of the designated by the Supreme Court of Virginia for Oan §order 8.01-267.15.of transfer.
Venue and transfer.
U A.
For the purposes of this chapter, venue shall be proper in the circuit court where any putative claB.
When two or more separate civil actions requesting certification of a class pursuant to this chapter involve common questions of law or fact arising out of the same transaction, occurrenceE or series of transactions or occurrences and such classes, if certified, would encompass one or more of the designated by the Supreme Court of Virginia for an order of transfer.
(ii) the convenience of the partiesSparties, witnesses, and counsel;
and (v) any other relevant factors.
That the provisions of this act shall become effective on JulyJanuary 1, 2025.
U B S T I T U T E B H 1
Show all 56 changed rows (16 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- SB259ER View text Current pdf February 29, 2024
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24107798D-H1 pdf February 16, 2024
- SB259S1 View text pdf February 07, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104395D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Passed by for the day
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB259ER)
-
Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB259ER)
-
Enrolled
-
VOTE: Passage (50-Y 46-N)
-
Passed House (50-Y 46-N)
-
Committee on Courts of Justice substitute rejected 24107798D-H1
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Appropriations (12-Y 10-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB259H1)
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (11-Y 10-N)
-
Committee substitute printed 24107798D-H1
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 19-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB259S1)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB259S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24106124D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Incorporates SB587 (Bagby)
-
Substitute bill reprinted 24106124D-S1
-
Committee substitute printed 24106124D-S1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (9-Y 6-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB259)
-
Moved from Judiciary to Courts of Justice due to a change of the committee name
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104395D
Sponsors
- Scott A. Surovell · Primary
- Lamont Bagby · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 65 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 46 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 49 | 46 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 49% | 46% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Q. Askew | — | Yea |
| Anne Ferrell Tata | — | Nay |
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Bill Wiley | — | Nay |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Bulova, David L. | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Coyner, Carrie E. | — | Nay |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Yea |
| Ellen H. McLaughlin | — | Nay |
| James W. Morefield | — | Nay |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Nay |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Nay |
| Paul E. Krizek | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Terry L. Austin | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 45% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. | — | Nay |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Nay |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Nay |
| Earley, Mark L., Jr. | — | Nay |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Nay |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Obenshain, Chris | — | Nay |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Nay |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Nay |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 48% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Nay |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| McGuire, John J., III | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 259 do?
- Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions. Provides that one or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bring a civil action or may be proceeded against in a civil action, provided that (i) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary to judicial economy; (ii) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (iii) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (iv) the representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. The bill further sets out the procedure to certify a class action, the duties of counsel appointed in a class action, the various orders a court may issue during the course of a class action, and the process by which a settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise may occur. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025, and is identical to HB 418.
- Who sponsors SB 259?
- SB 259 is sponsored by Scott A. Surovell and Lamont Bagby.
- What is the current status of SB 259?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 259?
- Track SB 259 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 259
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 259
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →