Virginia 2024 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 259 — Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; types of class actions.

Last action — Passed by for the day

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 03, 2024.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions. Provides that one or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bring a civil action or may be proceeded against in a civil action, provided that (i) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary to judicial economy; (ii) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (iii) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (iv) the representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. The bill further sets out the procedure to certify a class action, the duties of counsel appointed in a class action, the various orders a court may issue during the course of a class action, and the process by which a settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise may occur. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025, and is identical to HB 418.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

138 added · 151 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill SB 259 introduce some clarifications in the rules governing class actions in Virginia. Key changes include the addition of a requirement for questions of law or fact to be common among class members, enhancing the criteria for establishing a class action. This matters because it ensures that cases are more unified, potentially leading to fairer outcomes for individuals affected by similar issues, and it helps streamline the judicial process by avoiding conflicting rulings.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION HOUSE SUBSTITUTE 24107798D AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee for Courts of Justice on February 16, 2024) (Patrons Prior to Substitute––Senators Surovell and Bagby [SB 587]) A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 5.2, consisting of sections numbered 8.01-267.10 through 8.01-267.15, relating to civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons;
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY –– CHAPTER E An Act to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 5.2, consisting of multiple persons;
class actions.
class actions.rough 8.01-267.15, relating to civil actions filed on behalfRof O [S 259] L Approved L Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
E 1.
That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 5.2, consisting of sections numbered 8.01-267.10 through 8.01-267.15, as follows:
That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Title 8.01 a chapter numbered 5.2, D consisting of sections numbered 8.01-26CHAPTER 5.2.
CHAPTER 5.2.
8.01-267.15, as follows:
H A.
A.
One or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bOing a civ1.
One or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bring a civil action or may be proceeded against in a civil action, provided that:
The class is so numerous that joinder of all members in accordance with chapter 5.1 (§ 8.01-267.1 et seq.) or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary to judicial economy;
1.
2.
The class is so numerous that joinder of all members in accordance with chapter 5.1 (§ 8.01-267.1 et seq.) or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary toBjudicial economy;
There are questions of law or fact common to the class;
5 3.
S 3.
The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenseE of the class;
The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class;
and R 4.
and E B.
The representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
B.
S 1.
1.
Prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of (i) inconsistent or varying adjudications of individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the opposing party or (ii) adjudications of individual class members tBat, as a individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;
Prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of (i) inconsistent or varying adjudications of individual class members that would establish incompatible practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members who are not parties to thea individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;
or I 35 3.
or 3.
The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any :
The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.
36 questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other availTble 38 consider (i) the class members' interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense ofmay 39 separate actions;
In making this finding, the court may separate actions;
(ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun 40 by or against class members;
(ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun by or against class members;
and (v) Ehe practical ability of individual class members to pursue their claims without certification.
and (v) the practical ability of individual class members to pursue their claims without certification.
Such order shall define the class, identify the practicable after a person brings an action or an action is brought against a person as a classas is representative whether to certify the action as a class action.
Such order shall define the class, identify the representative party or parties, and appoint class counsel.
Any order that grants or denies class certification may be amended or altered prior to final judgment.
The court shall determine as early as is practicable after a person brings an action or an action is brought against a person as a class certification may be amended or altered prior to final judgment.Any order that grants or denies class B.
B.
For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 1 or 2 of § 8.01-267.10, the court may direct appropriate notice to such class.
For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 1 or 2 of § 8.01-267.10, the court may Sirect appropriate notice to such class.
For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, or upon ordering notice pursuant to § 8.01-267.13 to a class proposed to be certified for the purposes of settlement in accordance with subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, the court shall direct to class members notice as is reasonable under the circumstances, including sending individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort.
For any class certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.012267.10, or upon ordering notice pursuant to § 8.01-267.13 to a class proposed to be certified for the purp9ses of notice as is reasonable under the circumstances, including sending individual notice to all mem1ers who can be identified through reasonable effort.
The notice shall state clearly and concisely in plain, easily understood language (i) the nature of the action;
The notice shall state clearly and concisely (iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses;
(ii) the definition of the class certified;
(iv) that a class member may enter an appearance through anified;
(iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses;
attorney;
(iv) that a class member may enter an appearance through an attorney;
(vi) the time and manner for requesting such exclusion;
(vi) the of 3 time and manner for requesting such exclusion;
and (vii) the binding effect of a class judgment on SB259H1 2 of 3 members in accordance with subsection C.
and (vii) the binding effect of a class judgment on members in accordance with subsection C.
Unless the parties agree otherwise, the opponents of the class shall bear the expense of the notice required by this subsection.
The court may require the party opposing the class to cooperate in securing the names and addresses of the persons within the class defined by the court for the purpose of providing individual notice.
The relief provided for the class is adequate, including the costs, risks, and delay of a trial and of 3 appeal, the effectiveness of any proposed method of distributing relief to the class, the terms of any subsection D;
The relief provided for the class is adequate, including the costs, risks, and delay of a trial and appeal, the effectiveness of any proposed method of distributing relief to the class, the terms of any of 3 subdivision 3;
and attorney fees, and any agreement required to be identified in accordance with 4.
andattorney fees, and any agreement required to be identified in accordance with 4.
E 3.
The parties seeking approval shall file a statement identifying any agreement made in connection with such proposed settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise.
R 4.
If the class action was previously certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, the court class member to request exclusion if such individual class member had an earlier opportunity to request exclusion but did not do so.
Show all 56 changed rows (16 more)
Previous
Latest
L C.
In addition to the procedures enumerated in subsection B, a class member may object to thL proposed settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise if such proposal requires court approval.
Such class member shall state whether such objection applies only to the objector, to a specific subEet of the proposal is approved after a hearing on the objection, no payment or other consideration shall bes such provided for forgoing or withdrawing such objection or forgoing, dismissing, or abandoning an appeal from a judgment approving such proposal.
The parties seeking approval shall file a statement identifying any agreement made in connection witE.
Any order approving a settlement pursuant to this section that establishes a process for compensating class members shall provide for the disbursement of residual funds, if any.
If the class action was previously certified pursuant to subdivision B 3 of § 8.01-267.10, the court may refuse to approve a settlement unless such settlement affords a new opportunity for an individual class member to request exclusion if such individual class member had an earlier opportunity to request excF.
A.
In addition to the procedures enumerated in subsection B, a class member may object to the proposed settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise if such proposal requires court approval.
For the purposes of this chapter, venue shall be proper in the circuit court where any putative class member's transaction, occurrence, or injury occurred.
Such class member shall state whether such objection applies only to the objector, to a specific subset of the proposal is approved after a hearing on the objection, no payment or other consideration shall bes such provided for forgoing or withdrawing such objection or forgoing, dismissing, or abandoning an appeal from a judgment approving such proposal.
S B.
compensating class members shall provide for the disbursement of residual funds, if any.ss for O § 8.01-267.15.
When two or more separate civil actions requesting certification of a class pursuant to t2is chapter involve common questions of law or fact arising out of the same transaction, occurrence9 or series of transactions or occurrences and such classes, if certified, would encompass one or moRe of the designated by the Supreme Court of Virginia for an order of transfer.
Venue and transfer.
U A.
For the purposes of this chapter, venue shall be proper in the circuit court where any putative claB.
When two or more separate civil actions requesting certification of a class pursuant to this chapter involve common questions of law or fact arising out of the same transaction, occurrenceE or series of transactions or occurrences and such classes, if certified, would encompass one or more of the designated by the Supreme Court of Virginia for an order of transfer.
(ii) the convenience of the partiesS witnesses, and counsel;
(ii) the convenience of the parties, witnesses, and counsel;
and (v) any other relevant factors.
That the provisions of this act shall become effective on July 1, 2025.
That the provisions of this act shall become effective on January 1, 2025.
U B S T I T U T E B H 1
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Passed by for the day

  2. Vetoed by Governor

  3. Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 8, 2024

  4. Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 11, 2024

  5. Signed by President

  6. Signed by Speaker

  7. Impact statement from DPB (SB259ER)

  8. Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB259ER)

  9. Enrolled

  10. VOTE: Passage (50-Y 46-N)

  11. Passed House (50-Y 46-N)

  12. Committee on Courts of Justice substitute rejected 24107798D-H1

  13. Read third time

  14. Read second time

  15. Reported from Appropriations (12-Y 10-N)

  16. Impact statement from DPB (SB259H1)

  17. Referred to Committee on Appropriations

  18. Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (11-Y 10-N)

  19. Committee substitute printed 24107798D-H1

  20. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  21. Read first time

  22. Placed on Calendar

  23. Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 19-N)

  24. Impact statement from DPB (SB259S1)

  25. Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB259S1

  26. Committee substitute agreed to 24106124D-S1

  27. Reading of substitute waived

  28. Read second time

  29. Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)

  30. Incorporates SB587 (Bagby)

  31. Substitute bill reprinted 24106124D-S1

  32. Committee substitute printed 24106124D-S1

  33. Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (9-Y 6-N)

  34. Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  35. Impact statement from DPB (SB259)

  36. Moved from Judiciary to Courts of Justice due to a change of the committee name

  37. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  38. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24104395D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 65 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

VOTE: Passage (50-Y 46-N)

Passed 49 Yea · 46 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 494604
Total 494604
% of votes cast 49%46%0%4%
How each member voted (99)
Member Party Vote
Adele Y. McClure — Yea
Alex Q. Askew — Yea
Alfonso H. Lopez — Yea
Amy J. Laufer — Yea
Anne Ferrell Tata — Nay
Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. — Nay
Atoosa R. Reaser — Yea
Batten, Amanda E. — Nay
Betsy B. Carr — Yea
Bill Wiley — Nay
Bonita G. Anthony — Yea
Briana D. Sewell — Yea
Bulova, David L. — Yea
C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. — Yea
Charniele L. Herring — Yea
Chris S. Runion — Nay
Convirs-Fowler, Kelly K. — Yea
Cordoza, A.C. — Nay
Coyner, Carrie E. — Nay
Dan I. Helmer — Yea
David A. Reid — Yea
Debra D. Gardner — Yea
Delores L. McQuinn — Yea
Delores Oates — Not Voting
Earley, Mark L., Jr. — Nay
Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker — Yea
Ellen H. McLaughlin — Nay
Ennis, N. Baxter — Not Voting
Eric Phillips — Nay
Eric R. Zehr — Nay
Fowler, Hyland F."Buddy," Jr. — Nay
Freitas, Nicholas J. — Nay
Gilbert, C. Todd — Nay
Green, W. Chad — Nay
H. Otto Wachsmann, Jr. — Nay
Higgins, Geary — Nay
Holly M. Seibold — Yea
Irene Shin — Not Voting
Israel D. O'Quinn — Nay
Jackie H. Glass — Yea
James A. "Jay" Leftwich — Nay
James W. Morefield — Nay
Jason S. Ballard — Nay
Jeion A. Ward — Yea
Joseph P. McNamara — Nay
Joshua E. Thomas — Yea
Joshua G. Cole — Yea
Kannan Srinivasan — Yea
Karen Keys-Gamarra — Yea
Karrie K. Delaney — Yea
Kathy K.L. Tran — Yea
Katrina Callsen — Yea
Kent, Hillary Pugh — Nay
Knight, Barry D. — Nay
Laura Jane Cohen — Yea
LeVere Bolling, Destiny — Yea
Lovejoy, Ian T. — Nay
Luke E. Torian — Yea
M. Keith Hodges — Nay
Maldonado, Michelle Lopes — Yea
Marcia S. "Cia" Price — Yea
Marcus B. Simon — Yea
Marshall, Daniel W., III — Nay
Marty Martinez — Yea
Michael B. Feggans — Yea
Michael J. Jones — Yea
Michael J. Webert — Nay
Mike A. Cherry — Nay
Milde, Paul V. — Nay
Mundon King, Candi — Yea
Nadarius E. Clark — Yea
Obenshain, Chris — Nay
Orrock, Robert D., Sr. — Nay
Owen, David — Nay
Patrick A. Hope — Yea
Paul E. Krizek — Yea
Phil M. Hernandez — Yea
Phillip A. Scott — Nay
R. Lee Ware — Nay
Rae Cousins — Yea
Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. — Yea
Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. — Nay
Rodney T. Willett — Yea
Rozia A. Henson, Jr. — Yea
Sam Rasoul — Yea
Scott A. Wyatt — Nay
Shelly A. Simonds — Yea
Sickles, Mark D. — Yea
Taylor, Kim A. — Nay
Terry G. Kilgore — Nay
Terry L. Austin — Nay
Thomas A. Garrett, Jr. — Nay
Thomas C. Wright, Jr. — Nay
Timothy P. Griffin — Nay
Tony O. Wilt — Nay
Vivian E. Watts — Yea
Wendell S. Walker — Not Voting
Will Davis — Nay
Wren M. Williams — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 10 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 121000
Total 121000
% of votes cast 55%45%0%0%
How each member voted (22)

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 10 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 111001
Total 111001
% of votes cast 50%45%0%5%
How each member voted (22)

Official roll call →

Passed 21 Yea · 19 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211900
Total 211900
% of votes cast 53%48%0%0%
How each member voted (40)

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 40000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9600
Total 9600
% of votes cast 60%40%0%0%
How each member voted (15)

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 259 do?
Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions. Provides that one or more members of a class may, as representative parties on behalf of all members, bring a civil action or may be proceeded against in a civil action, provided that (i) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members or proceeding with such actions on an individual basis is impracticable or contrary to judicial economy; (ii) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (iii) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (iv) the representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. The bill further sets out the procedure to certify a class action, the duties of counsel appointed in a class action, the various orders a court may issue during the course of a class action, and the process by which a settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise may occur. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2025, and is identical to HB 418.
Who sponsors SB 259?
SB 259 is sponsored by Scott A. Surovell and Lamont Bagby.
What is the current status of SB 259?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 259?
Track SB 259 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 259

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 259

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →