Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 4 D · 2 R cosponsors

HB 1576 — Concerning construction defect actions.

Last action — Returned to Rules Committee for third reading.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of HB 1576 introduces changes that clarify the process for homeowners' associations when addressing construction defects. Notably, it specifies that the board must notify homeowners of the defects and hold a meeting to secure a majority vote before proceeding with any legal action. The update emphasizes the need for detailed information to be provided to homeowners, which enhances transparency and ensures that all homeowners have a say in the decision. These changes matter because they empower homeowners and promote collaboration, potentially leading to more informed decisions regarding construction defect disputes.

→
Previous
Latest
H-1955.2SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1576State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByHouse Civil Rights & Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Senn, Irwin, Goodman, Griffey, Ryu, Chapman, and Barkis)READ FIRST TIME 02/22/19.AN ACT Relating to construction defect actions;
H-0856.2HOUSE BILL 1576State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionByRepresentatives Senn, Irwin, Goodman, Griffey, Ryu, Chapman, and BarkisRead first time 01/24/19.Referred to Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary.AN ACT Relating to construction defect actions;
A new section is added to chapter 64.50 RCW to read as follows:(1)(a) In the event the board of directors, pursuant to RCW 64.90.405, proposes to initiate an action asserting defects in the construction of two or more residences, common elements, or common areas, this section applies.(b) The board of directors shall substantially comply with the provisions of this section.(2) Prior to commencement of an action governed by this section, the board of directors shall provide notice to unit owners and to each construction professional against whom an action is proposed, convene a meeting of unit owners to consider whether to initiate an action, and conduct a vote of unit owners on whether to do so.(3) The notice provided to unit owners and to each construction professional against whom an action is proposed shall include:(a) The date, time, and location of the meeting;(b) The nature of the action and the relief sought;
A new section is added to chapter 64.50 RCW to read as follows:(1)(a) In the event the board of directors, pursuant to RCW 64.90.405, institutes an action asserting defects in the construction of two or more residences, common elements, or common areas, this section applies.(b) The board of directors shall substantially comply with the provisions of this section.(2) Prior to the service of the summons and complaint on any defendant with respect to an action governed by this section, the board of directors shall provide notice to homeowners and to each construction professional against whom an action is proposed, convene a meeting of homeowners to consider whether to bring an action, and secure the vote of the majority of the homeowners to proceed with the action.(3) The notice provided to homeowners and to each construction professional against whom an action is proposed shall include:(a) A general description of the alleged defects with reasonable specificity, the relief sought, a good faith estimate of the benefits and risks involved, the expenses and fees that the board of directors anticipates will be incurred in prosecuting the action, and any other pertinent information;(b) A general description of the process and outcome following service of the notice of claim under RCW 64.50.020;
and(c) The expenses and fees that the board of directors anticipates will be incurred in prosecuting the action.(4) The notice to unit owners shall, in addition, include:(a) A ballot;(b) The time and date by which a ballot must be delivered to the association to be counted, which may not be fewer than forty-five days after the date of the meeting;
and(c) Notice of the meeting of the homeowners to consider whether to bring an action.(4)(a) The meeting of homeowners must be held within forty-five days of the date the notice was provided, in accordance with RCW 64.90.515, to homeowners.
and(c) The percent of votes necessary to reject the action.(5)(a) The meeting of unit owners must be held within forty-five days of the date the notice was provided.
A quorum is not required at the meeting.(b) The construction professional against whom the construction defect action is proposed, who may be the declarant or any other person or entity included within the definition of construction professional, as defined in RCW 64.50.010, shall be invited to attend and shall have an opportunity to address the homeowners concerning the alleged construction defects.(c) The presentation at the meeting by the construction professional or the construction professional's designee or designees may, but is not required to, include an offer to remedy any defect in accordance with this chapter.(5)(a) The board of directors may initiate an action only after the meeting of the homeowners to consider whether to bring an action and only if authorized by a majority of the homeowners.
A quorum is not required at the meeting.
More than a simple majority vote may not be required in the governing documents or in any contract or agreement.
(b) The construction professional against whom the construction defect action is proposed shall be invited to attend and shall have an opportunity to address the unit owners concerning the alleged construction defects.(c) The presentation at the meeting by the construction professional or the construction professional's designee or designees may, but is not required to, include an offer to remedy any defect in accordance with this chapter.(d) Following any presentations, unit owners in attendance may cast their ballots at the meeting.
Such approval is not required if the alleged construction defect pertains to a facility that is intended and used for nonresidential purposes and if the cost to repair the alleged defect does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars or when the association is the contracting party for the performance of labor or purchase of services or materials.(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a homeowner's vote shall be submitted only once and may be obtained in any written format confirming the homeowner's vote to approve or reject the proposed action.
Alternatively, unit owners may deliver their ballots to the association on or before the date by which all ballots must be delivered, which may not be fewer than forty-five days after the date of the meeting.(6)(a) Unless the unit owners of units to which a majority of the votes in the association are allocated reject the action by the date by which all ballots must be delivered, the action is ratified.(b) If the board of directors proposes to initiate an action asserting defects in the construction of two or more units, common elements, or common areas in which the declarant or an affiliate of the declarant would be a defendant, the declarant and any affiliate of the declarant shall not be eligible to vote and the action will be ratified unless a majority of the eligible votes in the association reject the action.(7)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the board of directors may commence the action only after ratification.(b) Ratification is not required if the alleged construction defect pertains to a facility that is intended and used for nonresidential purposes and if the cost to repair the alleged defect does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars or when the association is the contracting party for the performance of labor or purchase of services or materials.(8) Nothing in this section shall require the disclosure of attorney-client privileged information.(9) This section supersedes all inconsistent provisions of the governing documents of all common interest communities subject to chapter 64.90 RCW.(10)(a) For purposes of this section, "action" has the same meaning as set forth in RCW 64.50.010.(b) Unless otherwise defined in RCW 64.50.010, the terms in this section have the meaning set forth in RCW 64.90.010.--- END ---
The association shall maintain a record of all votes until the conclusion of the action, including all appeals, if any.(c)(i) For purposes of calculating the total number of eligible votes and the number of votes needed for the required majority vote under this section only, the residences owned by a development party are excluded.(ii) As used in this subsection (5)(c), "development party" means a contractor, subcontractor, developer, or builder responsible for any part of the design, construction, or repair of any portion of the common interest community and any of that party's affiliates;
and "affiliate" includes an entity controlled or owned, in whole or in part, by any person that controls or owns a development party or by the spouse of a development party.(6) For purposes of this section, "action" has the same meaning as set forth in RCW 64.50.010.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Returned to Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Placed on third reading by Rules Committee.

  3. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  4. By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

  5. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:00 AM

  6. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 94; nays, 4; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  10. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  11. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  12. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  13. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:00 AM

  14. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  15. CRJ - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  16. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  17. CRJ - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  18. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:00 AM

  19. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (144)

144 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 144 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage (#16)

Passed 94 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30300
Democrat 43000
Republican 21100
Total 94400
% of votes cast 96%4%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McCaslin — Yea
Mead — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Smith — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1576?
HB 1576 is sponsored by Irwin, Roger Goodman (Democrat), Dan Griffey (Republican), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Mike Chapman (Democrat), Andrew Barkis (Republican), and Tana Senn (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1576?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1576?
Track HB 1576 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1576

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1576

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →