Relating to child support guidelines and Support Enforcement Commission
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 573 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 573.
You're tracking SB 573
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 573 — Relating to child support guidelines and Support Enforcement Commission
Last action — Chapter 112, Acts, Regular Session, 2023
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2023. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 573 introduced a new provision that allows parents to deduct their actual monthly student loan payments from their adjusted gross income when calculating child support obligations, with certain limitations. This change is significant because it acknowledges the financial burden of student loan debt on parents, potentially lowering their child support obligations if they are making these payments. However, the amendment also sets clear guidelines for when this deduction can be applied, including the requirement for parents to disclose any changes in their student loan payments, which helps ensure fairness in the child support system.
SB573 HFATHFA Capito 3-10Charnock3-10 #1Charnock 3919 Delegate Capito moved to amend the bill on page 3, section 202, by striking outparagraph the(3) title and substitutinginserting thereforin lieu thereof the following:“(3) Deduct from a newparent’s title,adjusted togross readincome asthe follows:Areasonable BILLmonthly amount of a student loan payment actually being paid to amendthe andlending reenact §48-1-205 ofinstitution that originally issued the Codeloan ofby Westa Virginia,parent 1931,for asa amended;student loan debt owed in his or her own name and for his or her own educational expenses;
andprovided tothat amendthe andtotal reenact §48-13-202,amount §48-13-301,of §48-13-302, §48-13-303, §48-13-403, §48-13-404, §48-13-501,the and §48-13-502 ofstudent saidloan code,payment alldeducted relatingmay generallynot toexceed 25% of the childparent’s supporttotal guidelinesgross andincome thedetermined Supportbefore Enforcementthe Commission;deduction.
allowing The Family Court shall have discretion to exclude all or a portion of the student loan deduction forif the parent with the student loan paymentsdebt underis specificin circumstances,child clarifyingsupport circumstancesarrears, if the parent is not current or is in arrears on the student loan payment, if the student loan is being paid by a third party and factorsnot forthe attributedparent, income;or if the child is not receiving or expected to receive a financial benefit from the education associated with the student loan expenses incurred.
updating If monthlythe basicstudent childloan supportdeduction obligationsis awarded:(a) The parent shall have a duty to reflectimmediately 2022disclose financialto data;the Court, the BCSE, and any other party, any changes in the monthly amount of the student loan payment, including any payment deferrals or student loan forgiveness.
updating(b) incomeThe amountCourt requiringmay manualrequire calculationa parent to determineannually basicdisclose to the Court, the BCSE, and any other party, a statement showing a history of student loan payments for the prior year.(c) Failure to timely make the disclosures above may be a basis for the Court to modify child support obligation;to exclude the student loan deduction, including retroactively to the first of the month following any unreported change.” AdoptedRejected
updating amount for the ability to pay calculation and self-support reserve;
and amending the multiplier for extended shared parenting adjustment. AdoptedRejected
View plain text versions (7)
- sb573 hfa capito 3-10 _1 adopted.htm View text html
- sb573 hfat capito 3-10 adopted.htm View text html
- sb573 h committee on the judiciary am _1 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Amended sb573 h jud am _1 as amended adopted.htm html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Chapter 112, Acts, Regular Session, 2023
-
Approved by Governor 3/29/2023
-
To Governor 3/17/2023
-
Approved by Governor 3/29/2023 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/29/2023 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/17/2023 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/17/2023 - Senate Journal
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to House
-
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 604)
-
House Message received
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Title amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Passed House (Roll No. 687)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Amendment to committee amendment adopted (voice)
-
On 3rd reading with right to amend, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
With amendment, do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 317)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Maroney · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Maroney
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (151)
151 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 151 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Not Voting |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| HUNT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 573?
- SB 573 is sponsored by Maroney.
- What is the current status of SB 573?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 573?
- Track SB 573 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 573
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 573
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →