Virginia 2024 Regular Session Status: Passed House Of Delegates

HB 697 — Synthetic media; use in furtherance of crimes involving fraud, etc., report.

Last action — Continued to 2025 in Courts of Justice (11-Y 2-N)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House of Delegates
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Synthetic media; penalty. Expands the applicability of provisions related to defamation, slander, and libel to include synthetic media, defined in the bill. The bill makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person to use any synthetic media for the purpose of committing any criminal offense involving fraud, constituting a separate and distinct offense with punishment separate and apart from any punishment received for the commission of the primary criminal offense. The bill also authorizes the individual depicted in the synthetic media to bring a civil action against the person who violates such prohibition to recover actual damages, reasonable attorney fees, and such other relief as the court determines to be appropriate. The bill directs the Attorney General to convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of synthetic media, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

72 added · 72 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of House Bill 697 introduces new definitions and parameters related to "synthetic media" and "generative artificial intelligence." It specifies that any digital content created or altered using these technologies can be considered actionable as insults if they tend to incite violence or disturb the peace. This change is significant because it addresses the growing concerns about manipulated digital content and its potential to mislead or harm individuals, allowing for legal recourse against malicious uses of synthetic media.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION INTRODUCED 24105106D I HOUSE BILL NO.
SESSION HOUSE SUBSTITUTE 24106145D AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee for Courts of Justice on February 2, 2024) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Delegate Maldonado) A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 8.01-45, 8.01-46, and 18.2-417 of the Code of Virginia to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-213.3, relating to synthetic media;
697 Offered January 10, 2024 N Prefiled January 9, 2024 T A BCode of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-2R3.3, relating to synthetic media;
–––––––––– O Patrons––Maldonado, Shin, Anthony, Clark and Henson D –––––––––– Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice U –––––––––– C Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-213.3 as follows:
That §§ 8.01-45, 8.01-46, and 18.2-417 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-213.3 as follows:
D § 8.01-45.
§ 8.01-45.
A.
For purposes of this section:
O "Artificial intelligence" means technology that uses data to train statistical models for the purpose of enabling a computer system or service to autonomously perform any task that is normally associated with human intelligence or perception, including visual perception, natural language processing, and speech recognition.
"Synthetic media" means any image, audio recording, or video recording of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct that has been created or intentionally manipulated with the use of but false image, audio, or video.chniques or other digital technology in a manner to create a realistic "Words" includes any synthetic media.
S "Generative artificial intelligence" means artificial intelligence based on a foundation model capable of and used to produce synthetic digital content including audio, images, text, and videos.
B § 8.01-46.
E incorporates generative artificial intelligence.eans any artificial intelligence system or service that "Synthetic media" means any image, audio recording, or video recording of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct that has been created or intentionally manipulated with the use Sf generative artificial intelligence systems or other digital technology in a manner to create a realistic but false image, audio, or video.
Justification and mitigation of damages.
U "Words" includes any synthetic media.
9 In any action for defamation, the defendant may justify by alleging and proving that the words spoken or, written, or otherwise represented were true, and, after notice in writing of his intention to do so, given to the plaintiff at the time of, or for, pleading to such action, may give in evidence, in mitigation of damages, that he made or offered an apology to the plaintiff for such defamation before the commencement of the action, or as soon afterwards as he had an opportunity of doing so in case the For purposes of this section, "words" means the same as that term is defined in § 8.01-45.h apology.
B In any action for defamation, the defendant may justify by alleging and proving that the words spoken or, written, or otherwise represented were true, and, after notice in writing of his intention to do so, given to the plaintiff at the time of, or for, pleading to such action, may give in evidence, in mitigation of damages, that he made or offered an apology to the plaintiff for such defamation Iefore the commencement of the action, or as soon afterwards as he had an opportunity of doing so in case the 36 action shall have been commenced before there was an opportunity of making or offering such apoTogy.
§ 18.2-417.
38 For§ 18.2-213.3.
Slander and libel.
Use of synthetic media in furtherance of crimes involving fraud;
Any person who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning any person of chaste character, any words derogatory of such person's character for virtue and chastity, or 35 imputing to such person acts not virtuous and chaste, or who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely 36 write and publish, of and concerning another person, any words which from their usual construction and 37 common acceptation are construed as insults and tend to violence and breach of the peace or who shall 38 use grossly insulting language to any person of good character or reputation is guilty of a Class 3 § 8.01-45.r.
For purposes of this section, "words" means the same as that term is defined in The defendant shall be entitled to prove upon trial in mitigation of the punishment, the provocation which induced the libelous or slanderous words, or any other fact or circumstance tending to disprove malice, or lessen the criminality of the offense.
§ 18.2-213.3.
Use of deceptive audio or visual media in furtherance of crimes involving fraud;
A.
U 39 A.
"Deceptive audio or visual media" means any synthetic media that appears to authentically depict any"Synthetic media" means the same as that term is defined in § 8.01-45.h or conduct.
40 "Synthetic media" means the same as that term is defined in § 8.01-45.
B.
T B.
It is unlawful for any person to generate, create, or use or cause to be generated, created, or used any deceptive audio or visual media for the purpose of committing any criminal offense prohibited pursuant to this chapter.
It is unlawful for any person to use any synthetic media for the purpose of committing anE criminal offense prohibited pursuant to this chapter.
There shall be a rebuttable presumption that such deceptive audio or visual media was generated or created for the purpose of committing such criminal offense if the deceptive audio or visual media is subsequently used as part of a plan or course of conduct to commit such criminal offense.
Violation of this section shall constitute a separate and distinct offense, and any person found and shall be made to run consecutively with, any punishment received for the commission of the primary HB697 2 of 2 criminal offense.
Violation of this section shall constitute a separate and distinct offense, and any person found guilty thereof is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
D.
Such punishment shall be separate and apart from anyD.
Any person who violates this section shall be liable to the individual depicted in the deceptive audio or visual media, who may bring a civil action in district court.
Any person who violates this section shall be liable to the individual depicted in the synthetic media, who may bring a civil action in district court.
E.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or enlarge the protections that 47 U.H.C.
§ 230 confers on an interactive computer service for content provided by another information content 6rovider, as such terms are defined in 47 U.S.C.
§ 230.
7 Any person who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning any person of chaste character, any words derogatory of such person's character for virtue and chastity, or imputing to such person acts not virtuous and chaste, or who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning another person, any words which from their usual construction and common acceptation are construed as insults and tend to violence and breach of the peace or who shall use grossly insulting language to any person of good character or reputation is guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.
For purposes of this section, "words" means the same as that term is defined in HB697H1 2 of 2 § 8.01-45.
The defendant shall be entitled to prove upon trial in mitigation of the punishment, the provocation which induced the libelous or slanderous words, or any other fact or circumstance tending to disprove malice, or lessen the criminality of the offense.
That the Attorney General shall convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of deceptive audio or visual media, as defined in § 18.2-213.3 of the Code of Virginia, as created by this act, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.
That the Attorney General shall convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of synthetic media, as defined in § 18.2-213.3 of the Code of Virginia, as created by this act, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.
Such work group shall consist of a representative of the Office of the Attorney General, one member of the Senate and one member of the House of Delegates who are members of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and who shall be selected by the Chair of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science, the Chief Information Officer of the Commonwealth or his designee, and any other relevant stakeholders, including technology industry representatives.
Such work group shall consist of a representative of the Office of the Attorney General, one member of the Senate and one member of the House of Delegates who are members of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and who shall be selected by the Chair of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science, the Chief Information Officer of the Commonwealth or his designee, the Superintendent of State Police or his designee, and any other relevant stakeholders, including technology industry representatives.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Continued to 2025 in Courts of Justice (11-Y 2-N)

  2. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  3. Constitutional reading dispensed

  4. VOTE: Block Vote Passage (98-Y 0-N)

  5. Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)

  6. Impact statement from DPB (HB697H1)

  7. Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB697H1

  8. Committee substitute agreed to 24106145D-H1

  9. Read second time

  10. Read first time

  11. Committee substitute printed 24106145D-H1

  12. Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (21-Y 0-N)

  13. Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)

  14. House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered

  15. Assigned Courts sub: Criminal

  16. Impact statement from DPB (HB697)

  17. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  18. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105106D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 2 voted No

Not signed on (143)

143 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 143 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 11 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11202
Total 11202
% of votes cast 73%13%0%13%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. — Yea
Emily M. Jordan — Yea
Jennifer B. Boysko — Yea
Lamont Bagby — Nay
Lashrecse D. Aird — Not Voting
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Richard H. Stuart — Not Voting
Russet Perry — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Saddam Azlan Salim — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
Subramanyam, Suhas — Nay
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 97 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 97002
Total 97002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (99)
Member Party Vote
Adele Y. McClure — Yea
Alex Q. Askew — Yea
Alfonso H. Lopez — Yea
Amy J. Laufer — Yea
Anne Ferrell Tata — Yea
Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. — Yea
Atoosa R. Reaser — Yea
Batten, Amanda E. — Yea
Betsy B. Carr — Yea
Bill Wiley — Yea
Bonita G. Anthony — Yea
Briana D. Sewell — Yea
Bulova, David L. — Yea
C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. — Yea
Charniele L. Herring — Yea
Chris S. Runion — Yea
Convirs-Fowler, Kelly K. — Yea
Cordoza, A.C. — Yea
Coyner, Carrie E. — Yea
Dan I. Helmer — Yea
David A. Reid — Yea
Debra D. Gardner — Yea
Delores L. McQuinn — Yea
Delores Oates — Yea
Earley, Mark L., Jr. — Yea
Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker — Yea
Ellen H. McLaughlin — Not Voting
Ennis, N. Baxter — Yea
Eric Phillips — Yea
Eric R. Zehr — Yea
Fowler, Hyland F."Buddy," Jr. — Yea
Freitas, Nicholas J. — Yea
Gilbert, C. Todd — Yea
Green, W. Chad — Yea
H. Otto Wachsmann, Jr. — Yea
Higgins, Geary — Yea
Holly M. Seibold — Yea
Irene Shin — Yea
Israel D. O'Quinn — Yea
Jackie H. Glass — Yea
James A. "Jay" Leftwich — Yea
James W. Morefield — Yea
Jason S. Ballard — Yea
Jeion A. Ward — Yea
Joseph P. McNamara — Yea
Joshua E. Thomas — Yea
Joshua G. Cole — Yea
Kannan Srinivasan — Yea
Karen Keys-Gamarra — Yea
Karrie K. Delaney — Yea
Kathy K.L. Tran — Yea
Katrina Callsen — Yea
Kent, Hillary Pugh — Yea
Knight, Barry D. — Yea
Laura Jane Cohen — Yea
LeVere Bolling, Destiny — Yea
Lovejoy, Ian T. — Yea
Luke E. Torian — Yea
M. Keith Hodges — Yea
Maldonado, Michelle Lopes — Yea
Marcia S. "Cia" Price — Yea
Marcus B. Simon — Yea
Marshall, Daniel W., III — Yea
Marty Martinez — Yea
Michael B. Feggans — Yea
Michael J. Jones — Yea
Michael J. Webert — Yea
Mike A. Cherry — Yea
Milde, Paul V. — Yea
Mundon King, Candi — Yea
Nadarius E. Clark — Yea
Obenshain, Chris — Yea
Orrock, Robert D., Sr. — Yea
Owen, David — Yea
Patrick A. Hope — Yea
Paul E. Krizek — Yea
Phil M. Hernandez — Yea
Phillip A. Scott — Yea
R. Lee Ware — Not Voting
Rae Cousins — Yea
Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. — Yea
Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. — Yea
Rodney T. Willett — Yea
Rozia A. Henson, Jr. — Yea
Sam Rasoul — Yea
Scott A. Wyatt — Yea
Shelly A. Simonds — Yea
Sickles, Mark D. — Yea
Taylor, Kim A. — Yea
Terry G. Kilgore — Yea
Terry L. Austin — Yea
Thomas A. Garrett, Jr. — Yea
Thomas C. Wright, Jr. — Yea
Timothy P. Griffin — Yea
Tony O. Wilt — Yea
Vivian E. Watts — Yea
Wendell S. Walker — Yea
Will Davis — Yea
Wren M. Williams — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21001
Total 21001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (22)

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 697 do?
Synthetic media; penalty. Expands the applicability of provisions related to defamation, slander, and libel to include synthetic media, defined in the bill. The bill makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person to use any synthetic media for the purpose of committing any criminal offense involving fraud, constituting a separate and distinct offense with punishment separate and apart from any punishment received for the commission of the primary criminal offense. The bill also authorizes the individual depicted in the synthetic media to bring a civil action against the person who violates such prohibition to recover actual damages, reasonable attorney fees, and such other relief as the court determines to be appropriate. The bill directs the Attorney General to convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of synthetic media, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.
Who sponsors HB 697?
HB 697 is sponsored by Irene Shin, Bonita G. Anthony, Nadarius E. Clark, Rozia A. Henson, Jr., and Michelle Lopes Maldonado.
What is the current status of HB 697?
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 697?
Track HB 697 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 697

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 697

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →