Synthetic media; use in furtherance of crimes involving fraud, etc., report.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 697 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 697.
You're tracking HB 697
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 697 — Synthetic media; use in furtherance of crimes involving fraud, etc., report.
Last action — Continued to 2025 in Courts of Justice (11-Y 2-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Synthetic media; penalty. Expands the applicability of provisions related to defamation, slander, and libel to include synthetic media, defined in the bill. The bill makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person to use any synthetic media for the purpose of committing any criminal offense involving fraud, constituting a separate and distinct offense with punishment separate and apart from any punishment received for the commission of the primary criminal offense. The bill also authorizes the individual depicted in the synthetic media to bring a civil action against the person who violates such prohibition to recover actual damages, reasonable attorney fees, and such other relief as the court determines to be appropriate. The bill directs the Attorney General to convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of synthetic media, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
72 added · 72 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of House Bill 697 introduces new definitions and parameters related to "synthetic media" and "generative artificial intelligence." It specifies that any digital content created or altered using these technologies can be considered actionable as insults if they tend to incite violence or disturb the peace. This change is significant because it addresses the growing concerns about manipulated digital content and its potential to mislead or harm individuals, allowing for legal recourse against malicious uses of synthetic media.
SESSION INTRODUCEDHOUSE 24105106DSUBSTITUTE I24106145D HOUSEAMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee for Courts of Justice on February 2, 2024) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Delegate Maldonado) A BILL NO.to amend and reenact §§ 8.01-45, 8.01-46, and 18.2-417 of the Code of Virginia to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-213.3, relating to synthetic media;
697 Offered January 10, 2024 N Prefiled January 9, 2024 T A BCode of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-2R3.3, relating to synthetic media;
––––––––––1. O Patrons––Maldonado, Shin, Anthony, Clark and Henson D –––––––––– Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice U –––––––––– C Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That §§ 8.01-45, 8.01-46, and 18.2-417 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 a section numbered 18.2-213.3 as follows:
D § 8.01-45.
A.
ForO purposes"Artificial intelligence" means technology that uses data to train statistical models for the purpose of thisenabling section:a computer system or service to autonomously perform any task that is normally associated with human intelligence or perception, including visual perception, natural language processing, and speech recognition.
"SyntheticS media""Generative meansartificial anyintelligence" image,means audioartificial recording,intelligence orbased videoon recordinga offoundation anmodel individual'scapable appearance, speech, or conduct that has been created or intentionally manipulated with the use of butand falseused image,to audio,produce orsynthetic video.chniques or other digital technologycontent inincluding aaudio, mannerimages, totext, createand avideos. realistic "Words" includes any synthetic media.
BE §incorporates 8.01-46.generative artificial intelligence.eans any artificial intelligence system or service that "Synthetic media" means any image, audio recording, or video recording of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct that has been created or intentionally manipulated with the use Sf generative artificial intelligence systems or other digital technology in a manner to create a realistic but false image, audio, or video.
JustificationU and"Words" mitigationincludes ofany damages.synthetic media.
9B In any action for defamation, the defendant may justify by alleging and proving that the words spoken or, written, or otherwise represented were true, and, after notice in writing of his intention to do so, given to the plaintiff at the time of, or for, pleading to such action, may give in evidence, in mitigation of damages, that he made or offered an apology to the plaintiff for such defamation beforeIefore the commencement of the action, or as soon afterwards as he had an opportunity of doing so in case the For36 purposesaction ofshall thishave section,been "words"commenced meansbefore thethere samewas asan thatopportunity termof ismaking definedor inoffering §such 8.01-45.hapoTogy. apology.
§38 18.2-417.For§ 18.2-213.3.
SlanderUse andof libel.synthetic media in furtherance of crimes involving fraud;
Any person who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning any person of chaste character, any words derogatory of such person's character for virtue and chastity, or 35 imputing to such person acts not virtuous and chaste, or who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely 36 write and publish, of and concerning another person, any words which from their usual construction and 37 common acceptation are construed as insults and tend to violence and breach of the peace or who shall 38 use grossly insulting language to any person of good character or reputation is guilty of a Class 3 § 8.01-45.r.
For purposes of this section, "words" means the same as that term is defined in The defendant shall be entitled to prove upon trial in mitigation of the punishment, the provocation which induced the libelous or slanderous words, or any other fact or circumstance tending to disprove malice, or lessen the criminality of the offense.
§ 18.2-213.3.
Use of deceptive audio or visual media in furtherance of crimes involving fraud;
U 39 A.
"Deceptive40 audio"Synthetic or visual media" means any synthetic media that appears to authentically depict any"Synthetic media" means the same as that term is defined in § 8.01-45.h8.01-45. or conduct.
T B.
It is unlawful for any person to generate, create, or use or cause to be generated, created, or used any deceptivesynthetic audio or visual media for the purpose of committing anyanE criminal offense prohibited pursuant to this chapter.
There shall be a rebuttable presumption that such deceptive audio or visual media was generated or created for the purpose of committing such criminal offense if the deceptive audio or visual media is subsequently used as part of a plan or course of conduct to commit such criminal offense.
Violation of this section shall constitute a separate and distinct offense, and any person found andguilty shallthereof beis madeguilty to run consecutively with, any punishment received for the commission of thea primaryClass HB6971 2misdemeanor. of 2 criminal offense.
D.Such punishment shall be separate and apart from anyD.
Any person who violates this section shall be liable to the individual depicted in the deceptivesynthetic audio or visual media, who may bring a civil action in district court.
E.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or enlarge the protections that 47 U.H.C.
§ 230 confers on an interactive computer service for content provided by another information content 6rovider, as such terms are defined in 47 U.S.C.
§ 230.
7 Any person who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning any person of chaste character, any words derogatory of such person's character for virtue and chastity, or imputing to such person acts not virtuous and chaste, or who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning another person, any words which from their usual construction and common acceptation are construed as insults and tend to violence and breach of the peace or who shall use grossly insulting language to any person of good character or reputation is guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.
For purposes of this section, "words" means the same as that term is defined in HB697H1 2 of 2 § 8.01-45.
The defendant shall be entitled to prove upon trial in mitigation of the punishment, the provocation which induced the libelous or slanderous words, or any other fact or circumstance tending to disprove malice, or lessen the criminality of the offense.
That the Attorney General shall convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of deceptivesynthetic audio or visual media, as defined in § 18.2-213.3 of the Code of Virginia, as created by this act, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.
Such work group shall consist of a representative of the Office of the Attorney General, one member of the Senate and one member of the House of Delegates who are members of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and who shall be selected by the Chair of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science, the Chief Information Officer of the Commonwealth or his designee, the Superintendent of State Police or his designee, and any other relevant stakeholders, including technology industry representatives.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 24106145D-H1 Current pdf February 02, 2024
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105106D pdf January 09, 2024
Action History
-
Continued to 2025 in Courts of Justice (11-Y 2-N)
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (98-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB697H1)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB697H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 24106145D-H1
-
Read second time
-
Read first time
-
Committee substitute printed 24106145D-H1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (21-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB697)
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/24 24105106D
Sponsors
- Irene Shin · Cosponsor
- Bonita G. Anthony · Cosponsor
- Nadarius E. Clark · Cosponsor
- Jr. Rozia A. Henson · Cosponsor
- Michelle Lopes Maldonado · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (4)
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Nay |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Not Voting |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Not Voting |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jonathan, E. P. | — | Yea |
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Earley, Mark L., Jr. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Not Voting |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Joshua E. Thomas | — | Yea |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Maldonado, Michelle Lopes | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Obenshain, Chris | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Not Voting |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 697 do?
- Synthetic media; penalty. Expands the applicability of provisions related to defamation, slander, and libel to include synthetic media, defined in the bill. The bill makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person to use any synthetic media for the purpose of committing any criminal offense involving fraud, constituting a separate and distinct offense with punishment separate and apart from any punishment received for the commission of the primary criminal offense. The bill also authorizes the individual depicted in the synthetic media to bring a civil action against the person who violates such prohibition to recover actual damages, reasonable attorney fees, and such other relief as the court determines to be appropriate. The bill directs the Attorney General to convene a work group to study and make recommendations on the current enforcement of laws related to the use of synthetic media, including deepfakes, and any further action needed to address the issue of such use in fraudulent acts.
- Who sponsors HB 697?
- HB 697 is sponsored by Irene Shin, Bonita G. Anthony, Nadarius E. Clark, Rozia A. Henson, Jr., and Michelle Lopes Maldonado.
- What is the current status of HB 697?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 697?
- Track HB 697 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 697
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 697
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →