West Virginia 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 R cosponsors

SB 99 — Relating to meetings among county boards of education

Last action — Chapter 126, Acts, Regular Session, 2023

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2023. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

91 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 99 adds specific requirements for public meetings among county boards of education regarding the potential consolidation of school districts or sharing services. It mandates that boards agree to hold joint meetings with an impartial facilitator who will document discussions and outcomes in a detailed report. This matters because it ensures transparency, public input, and a structured approach to exploring school district changes, ultimately seeking to improve educational efficiency and effectiveness.

→
Previous
Latest
SB99 S ED AMT #1 2-7Hager  7871 The Committee on Education moved to amend the bill by striking out the title and substituting therefor a new title, to read as follows:Eng.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION ENROLLED Senate Bill 99 By Senators Nelson, Roberts, and Oliverio [Passed March 08, 2023;
Senate Bill 99—A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §18-5-28, relating to meetings of county boards of education to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing certain services;
in e]fect 90 days from passage Enr SB 99 AN ACT to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §18-5-28, relating to meetings of county boards of education to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing certain services;
and authorizing Legislature to incentivize county boards to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing of services.     AdoptedRejected
and authorizing Legislature to incentivize county boards to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing of services.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 5.
COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
§18-5-28.
Meetings among county boards of education to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing certain services.
(a) When two or more county boards of education, in order to provide efficiencies and direct cost savings, elect, by majority vote, to explore and discuss with each other:
(1) The idea of possibly consolidating their school districts into a new school district by act of the Legislature as provided by section six, article XII of the Constitution of West Virginia;
or (2) possibly sharing administrative, coordinating or other county-level services and functions between or among them, the boards shall agree upon the call of a joint special meeting to be conducted wholly in public and in accordance with guidelines and topics of discussion specified in the call and in all public notices of the meeting.
The topics shall include, but not be limited to, the extent to which existing laws appear to enable or complicate the consolidation of the school districts or the sharing of services and functions, as the case may be.
(b) The joint special meeting shall be facilitated by a party upon whom the participating boards agree.
Within 21 days following the joint meeting, the facilitator shall prepare and deliver to the participating boards a detailed written report of the meeting’s discussions and identifying any areas for further discussion or consideration by the boards.
After reviewing the facilitator’s report, each participating board shall determine by majority vote whether to accept it and whether the participating boards should meet again to discuss or consider the areas identified by the facilitator.
Whether or not a board accepts the report, each participating board shall make the report available to the public.
(c) Upon majority vote by any participating board to accept the facilitator’s report and to hold another joint special meeting of the participating boards to discuss or consider areas for further discussion or consideration identified in the facilitator’s report, the participating boards shall attend another joint special meeting called for that purpose.
The meeting shall be called, noticed, conducted, and facilitated as in the case of the initial joint special meeting.
Topics of discussion Enr SB 99 shall include, but not be limited to, the extent to which existing laws appear to enable or complicate the consolidation of the school districts or the sharing of services and functions, as the case may be.
Within 21 days following the joint meeting, the facilitator shall prepare and deliver to the participating boards a detailed written report of the meeting’s discussions and identifying any areas for further discussion or consideration by the boards.
After reviewing the facilitator’s report, each participating board shall determine by majority vote whether to accept it and whether the participating boards should meet again to discuss or consider the areas identified by the facilitator.
Whether or not a board accepts the report, each participating board shall make the report available to the public.
(d) The process set forth in subsection (c) of this section shall be repeated until 120 days have passed since the initial joint meeting or until the participating boards no longer wish to meet in joint session for those purposes, whichever first occurs.
At that point the facilitator or other individual or committee designated by the participating boards shall promptly prepare and submit to the participating boards a full report of all meetings held under this section.
The report shall identify the extent to which the participating boards think existing laws may enable or complicate the consolidation of the school districts or the sharing of services and functions, together with any suggestions of legislation to be considered by the Legislature.
Upon approval by any of the participating boards by majority vote, the report shall be forwarded to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Delegates.
If the Legislature elects to consolidate the participating county boards, it may consolidate the county boards as a pilot.
(e) Nothing in this section requires the consolidation of any school districts or that any of the participating boards share administrative, coordinating, or other county-level services and functions between or among them.
Nor may this section be construed to rescind, without action by participating county boards, any existing agreements or arrangements for the sharing of such services and functions.
(f) The Legislature may incentivize county boards to explore and discuss the feasibility of Enr SB 99 consolidating school districts or sharing of services pursuant to this section.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Chapter 126, Acts, Regular Session, 2023

  2. Approved by Governor 3/29/23

  3. To Governor 3/13/2023

  4. Approved by Governor 3/29/2023 - House Journal

  5. Approved by Governor 3/29/23 - Senate Journal

  6. To Governor 3/13/2023 - Senate Journal

  7. To Governor 3/13/2023 - House Journal

  8. House Message received

  9. Completed legislative action

  10. Communicated to Senate

  11. Passed House (Roll No. 551)

  12. Read 3rd time

  13. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  14. Read 2nd time

  15. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  16. Read 1st time

  17. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  18. Do pass

  19. To House Education

  20. To Education

  21. Introduced in House

  22. Ordered to House

  23. Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 178)

  24. Read 3rd time

  25. On 3rd reading

  26. Read 2nd time

  27. On 2nd reading

  28. Read 1st time

  29. On 1st reading

  30. Reported do pass, with title amendment

  31. To Education

  32. Introduced in Senate

  33. To Education

  34. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Nelson

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passage

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 16000
Unaffiliated 17000
Democrat 1000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
MARONEY — Yea
STOVER — Yea
MARTIN — Yea
STUART — Yea
BOLEY — Yea
SWOPE — Yea
CAPUTO — Yea
NELSON — Yea
PHILLIPS — Yea
PLYMALE — Yea
TRUMP — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
HUNT — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
SMITH — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
KARNES — Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Amy Grady Republican Yea
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Jay Taylor Republican Yea
Laura Wakim Chapman Republican Yea
Mark R. Maynard Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea
Mike Oliverio Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Vince Deeds Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 99?
SB 99 is sponsored by Nelson, Rollan A. Roberts (Republican), and Mike Oliverio (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 99?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 99?
Track SB 99 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 99

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 99

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →