Relating to meetings among county boards of education
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 99 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 99.
You're tracking SB 99
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 99 — Relating to meetings among county boards of education
Last action — Chapter 126, Acts, Regular Session, 2023
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2023. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
91 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 99 adds specific requirements for public meetings among county boards of education regarding the potential consolidation of school districts or sharing services. It mandates that boards agree to hold joint meetings with an impartial facilitator who will document discussions and outcomes in a detailed report. This matters because it ensures transparency, public input, and a structured approach to exploring school district changes, ultimately seeking to improve educational efficiency and effectiveness.
SB99WEST SVIRGINIA EDLEGISLATURE AMTREGULAR #1SESSION 2-7HagerENROLLED 7871 TheSenate CommitteeBill on99 EducationBy movedSenators toNelson, amendRoberts, the bill by striking out the title and substitutingOliverio therefor[Passed aMarch new08, title,2023; to read as follows:Eng.
Senatein Bille]fect 99—A90 Billdays from passage Enr SB 99 AN ACT to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §18-5-28, relating to meetings of county boards of education to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing certain services;
and authorizing Legislature to incentivize county boards to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing of services. AdoptedRejectedservices.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 5.
COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
§18-5-28.
Meetings among county boards of education to explore and discuss the feasibility of consolidating school districts or sharing certain services.
(a) When two or more county boards of education, in order to provide efficiencies and direct cost savings, elect, by majority vote, to explore and discuss with each other:
(1) The idea of possibly consolidating their school districts into a new school district by act of the Legislature as provided by section six, article XII of the Constitution of West Virginia;
or (2) possibly sharing administrative, coordinating or other county-level services and functions between or among them, the boards shall agree upon the call of a joint special meeting to be conducted wholly in public and in accordance with guidelines and topics of discussion specified in the call and in all public notices of the meeting.
The topics shall include, but not be limited to, the extent to which existing laws appear to enable or complicate the consolidation of the school districts or the sharing of services and functions, as the case may be.
(b) The joint special meeting shall be facilitated by a party upon whom the participating boards agree.
Within 21 days following the joint meeting, the facilitator shall prepare and deliver to the participating boards a detailed written report of the meeting’s discussions and identifying any areas for further discussion or consideration by the boards.
After reviewing the facilitator’s report, each participating board shall determine by majority vote whether to accept it and whether the participating boards should meet again to discuss or consider the areas identified by the facilitator.
Whether or not a board accepts the report, each participating board shall make the report available to the public.
(c) Upon majority vote by any participating board to accept the facilitator’s report and to hold another joint special meeting of the participating boards to discuss or consider areas for further discussion or consideration identified in the facilitator’s report, the participating boards shall attend another joint special meeting called for that purpose.
The meeting shall be called, noticed, conducted, and facilitated as in the case of the initial joint special meeting.
Topics of discussion Enr SB 99 shall include, but not be limited to, the extent to which existing laws appear to enable or complicate the consolidation of the school districts or the sharing of services and functions, as the case may be.
Within 21 days following the joint meeting, the facilitator shall prepare and deliver to the participating boards a detailed written report of the meeting’s discussions and identifying any areas for further discussion or consideration by the boards.
After reviewing the facilitator’s report, each participating board shall determine by majority vote whether to accept it and whether the participating boards should meet again to discuss or consider the areas identified by the facilitator.
Whether or not a board accepts the report, each participating board shall make the report available to the public.
(d) The process set forth in subsection (c) of this section shall be repeated until 120 days have passed since the initial joint meeting or until the participating boards no longer wish to meet in joint session for those purposes, whichever first occurs.
At that point the facilitator or other individual or committee designated by the participating boards shall promptly prepare and submit to the participating boards a full report of all meetings held under this section.
The report shall identify the extent to which the participating boards think existing laws may enable or complicate the consolidation of the school districts or the sharing of services and functions, together with any suggestions of legislation to be considered by the Legislature.
Upon approval by any of the participating boards by majority vote, the report shall be forwarded to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Delegates.
If the Legislature elects to consolidate the participating county boards, it may consolidate the county boards as a pilot.
(e) Nothing in this section requires the consolidation of any school districts or that any of the participating boards share administrative, coordinating, or other county-level services and functions between or among them.
Nor may this section be construed to rescind, without action by participating county boards, any existing agreements or arrangements for the sharing of such services and functions.
(f) The Legislature may incentivize county boards to explore and discuss the feasibility of Enr SB 99 consolidating school districts or sharing of services pursuant to this section.
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Enrolled Version pdf
- sb99 s ed amt _1 2-7 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Chapter 126, Acts, Regular Session, 2023
-
Approved by Governor 3/29/23
-
To Governor 3/13/2023
-
Approved by Governor 3/29/2023 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/29/23 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/13/2023 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/13/2023 - House Journal
-
House Message received
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Passed House (Roll No. 551)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Do pass
-
To House Education
-
To Education
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 178)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Reported do pass, with title amendment
-
To Education
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Education
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Nelson · Primary
- Rollan A. Roberts · Cosponsor
- Mike Oliverio · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nelson
Co-sponsors (2)
- Rollan A. Roberts Republican
- Mike Oliverio Republican
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| HUNT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 99?
- SB 99 is sponsored by Nelson, Rollan A. Roberts (Republican), and Mike Oliverio (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 99?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 99?
- Track SB 99 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 99
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 99
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →