Requiring hospitals to staff qualified personnel to perform sexual assault forensic exams
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 89 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 89.
You're tracking SB 89
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 89 — Requiring hospitals to staff qualified personnel to perform sexual assault forensic exams
Last action — Chapter 275, Acts, Regular Session, 2023
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2023. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (4 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 6 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 89 updated the title of the bill to better reflect its focus on sexual assault forensic examinations. This change is important because it emphasizes the commitment to ensuring that hospitals will have trained health care providers available to conduct these examinations, which can be critical in the aftermath of an assault. By clarifying the language and intent of the bill, it aims to improve the support offered to survivors and enhance the overall response to sexual assault cases in West Virginia.
SB89 HHFAT HHRSummers AM2-20CR #1CR3338 Delegate 3338TheSummers Committeemoved onto Healthamend the bill by striking out the title and Humansubstituting Resourcestherefor moveda new title, to amendread theas billfollows:“A pageBill 1,to byamend strikingand everythingreenact after§15-9B-1a and §15-9B-4 of the enactingCode clauseof andWest insertingVirginia, in1931, lieuas thereofamended, theall following:relating to sexual assault forensic examinations;
ARTICLEdefining 9B.terms;
SEXUALrequiring ASSAULTlegislative EXAMINATIONrules; NETWORK.
§15-9B-1a.requiring hospitals to have health care providers available to conduct sexual assault forensic examinations. AdoptedRejected
Definitions.
As used in this article:(1) “Biological evidence” includes a sexual assault forensic examination kit, semen, blood, saliva, hair, skin tissue, or other identified biological material.(2) “DNA” means deoxyribonucleic acid.
DNA is located in the nucleus of cells and provides an individual’s personal genetic blueprint.
DNA encodes genetic information that is the basis of human heredity and forensic identification."Hospital" means a facility licensed pursuant to the provisions of §16-5B-1 et seq.
of this code that primarily provides inpatient diagnostic, treatment, or rehabilitative services to the injured, disabled, or sick persons under the supervision of physicians with a 24-hour emergency department. (3) “Nonreported kit” means a kit collected from an alleged victim who has consented to the collection of the kit, but has not consented to participation in the criminal justice process. (4) “Sexual assault forensic examination kit” or “kit” means a set of materials, including, but not limited to, swabs and tools for collecting blood samples, clothing, or other materials used to gather forensic evidence from a victim of a reported sexual offense and the evidence obtained with the materials.(5) “Sexual offense” means any offense or attempted offense in the jurisdiction of the state in which a sexual assault forensic examination kit is collected, including, but not limited to, the following sections:(A) §61-8-12 of this code;(B) §61-8A-2 of this code;(C) §61-8A-4 of this code;(D) §61-8A-5 of this code;(E) Any offenses listed in §61-8B-1 et seq.
of this code;(F) Any offenses listed in §61-8C-1 et seq.
of this code;(G) Any offenses listed in §61-8D-1 et seq.
of this code. (6) “Unfounded” means evidence developed after reasonable investigation and supported by proper documentation proving no crime occurred or where the alleged victim has recanted.
§15-9B-4.
Submission, testing, and retention of sexual assault forensic examination kits.
(a) The Sexual Assault Forensic Examination Commission created by §15-9B-1 of this code shall establish a subgroup of persons with subject matter expertise to establish best-practice protocols for the submission, testing, retention, and disposition of sexual assault forensic examination kits collected by health care providers.
The commission shall propose rules for legislative approval, in accordance with §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code, detailing best-practice protocols.
Upon approval of the legislative rules, local sexual assault forensic examination boards shall follow the rules.
(b) Rules promulgated pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall include:(1) Time frames for submission of sexual assault forensic examination kits in the possession of law enforcement;
and(2) Protocols for storage of DNA samples and sexual assault forensic examination kits;
and,(3) Requiring a hospital to have trained health care provider available or transfer agreement as provided in a county plan, to complete a sexual assault forensic examination.
“Available” includes, but not limited, having access to a trained sexual assault forensic examination expert via telehealth.(c) The commission may promulgate emergency rules pursuant to the provisions of §29A-3-15 of this code in order to implement this section:
Provided, That no emergency rule may permit the destruction of any DNA evidence.(d) Upon collection, a sexual assault forensic examination kit shall be submitted for testing by the health care provider to the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory within 30 days of collection or as soon thereafter as practicable.
All packaging kits for transmittal and transmittal protocols shall be designed to meet applicable standards for maintaining the efficacy of the sample and chain of custody.(e) No sexual assault forensic examination kit need be tested where the alleged victim has not consented to the testing, requests that the kit not be tested, where he or she recants as to the allegation of a sexual offense, or the allegation that a sexual offense occurred is determined to be unfounded.
If the alleged victim does not consent to law enforcement involvement, the kit shall be designated a nonreported kit and transmitted to the Marshall University Forensic Science Center.(f) The Commission shall, in cooperation with the West Virginia State Police, develop protocols for storage of previously tested materials to be made available for secondary testing upon a court order to do so.(g) Biological evidence obtained through tests of a sexual assault forensic examination kit shall not be destroyed:
(1) During the time period of incarceration of a person whose DNA was identified by the use of the biological evidence, or while the person remains under continued supervision, whichever is later in time;
or;
(2) For as long as the offense from which the biological evidence is obtained remains unresolved;
(h) Notwithstanding any provision of this code, or any rule or policy promulgated thereunder, upon completion of the processing and testing set forth in subsection (d) of this section, the sexual assault forensic examination kit shall be transmitted to the appropriate investigating local or state law-enforcement agency which shall retain all identified biological material that is secured in connection with any sexual offense or attempted sexual offense for the periods set forth in subsection (g) of this section. (i) After processing and testing of a sexual assault forensic examination kit, the West Virginia State Police Laboratory shall transmit the sexual assault forensic examination kit to the appropriate investigating state or local law-enforcement agency through any reasonable means sufficient to establish the proper chain of custody, including, but not limited to, use of the United States Postal Service or hand delivery by appropriate personnel or a law-enforcement officer.
The appropriate investigating state or local law-enforcement agency shall preserve the sexual assault forensic examination kit for the period of time prescribed in subsection (g) of this section in a condition where any biological evidence is suitable for DNA testing.
The lack of timely submission, or the inadvertent loss or destruction of a sexual assault forensic examination kit, standing alone, shall not constitute a bar to the prosecution of a sexual offense.(j) Sexual assault forensic examination kits retained pursuant to this section shall be made available for DNA testing pursuant to §15-2B-7 of this code or pursuant to an appropriate order of a circuit court of competent jurisdiction for secondary testing.(k) The appropriate investigating state or local law-enforcement agency responsible for retaining the sexual assault forensic examination kit shall obtain approval from the circuit court of competent jurisdiction for the county in which the crime occurred before disposal of any biological evidence.
Before the disposal of any sexual assault forensic examination kit, reasonable efforts shall be made to provide written notice to the victim by the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the crime occurred.
(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting a state or local law-enforcement agency’s discretion concerning the conditions under which biological evidence is retained, preserved, or transferred among different entities if the evidence is retained in a condition that is suitable for DNA testing. AdoptedRejected
View plain text versions (5)
- sb89 hfat summers 2-20 adopted.htm View text html
- sb89 h hhr am _1 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Chapter 275, Acts, Regular Session, 2023
-
Approved by Governor 3/1/2023 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/1/2023
-
To Governor 2/23/2023 - House Journal
-
To Governor 2/23/2023
-
House received Senate message
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to House
-
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 219)
-
House Message received
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Title amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Passed House (Roll No. 182)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed at foot of bills on second reading
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
With amendment, do pass
-
To House Health and Human Resources
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 61)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Mike Woelfel · Primary
- Amy Grady · Cosponsor
- Jack Woodrum · Cosponsor
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Plymale · Cosponsor
- Bill Hamilton · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mike Woelfel Democrat
Co-sponsors (5)
- Amy Grady Republican
- Jack Woodrum Republican
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Plymale
- Bill Hamilton Republican
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| STUART | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Not Voting |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| HUNT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 89?
- SB 89 is sponsored by Mike Woelfel (Democrat), Amy Grady (Republican), Jack Woodrum (Republican), Patricia Rucker (Republican), Plymale, and Bill Hamilton (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 89?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 89?
- Track SB 89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 89
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 89
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →