HR 421 — Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act
Last action — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 12.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 15, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 R).
-
Spreading across states
Near-identical bills in 1 other state — cross-state momentum.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
HR 421 seeks to improve oversight of small businesses.
HR 421 was introduced to enhance the government's ability to oversee small businesses. This bill aims to strengthen regulatory measures and ensure small enterprises are compliant with necessary standards.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers may benefit from better-run businesses, leading to improved job stability and security.
- Families: {}
- Small Business: This means that small businesses may face increased scrutiny and new regulatory measures designed to ensure compliance.
Summary
Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act This bill modifies the rulemaking requirements and procedures of federal agencies under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 and the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, including how agencies consider economic impact with respect to small entities. Specifically, the bill requires agencies to consider the direct, and the reasonably foreseeable indirect, economic effect of a rule on small entities when determining whether a rule is likely to have a significant economic impact. Further, the regulatory flexibility analysis for rules with a significant economic impact must include a detailed description of alternatives to a proposed rule that minimize any adverse significant economic impact or maximize any beneficial significant economic impact on small entities. The bill also expands the types of agency actions (e.g., revisions to land management plans) that are subject to a regulatory impact analysis. The bill removes the authority for an agency to waive the regulatory flexibility analysis requirements and requires the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration to issue rules for compliance with such requirements.The bill also modifies the procedures for the (1) gathering of comments for a proposed rule, (2) periodic review of agency rules, and (3) judicial review of final rules.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html January 15, 2025
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 12.
Sponsors
- Harriet M. Hageman · Cosponsor
- Jake Ellzey · Cosponsor
- Josh Brecheen · Cosponsor
- Scott Fitzgerald · Cosponsor
- Daniel Webster · Cosponsor
- Jefferson Van Drew · Cosponsor
- Ben Cline · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 540 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cline, Ben Republican
Co-sponsors (6)
- Hageman, Harriet M. Republican
- Ellzey, Jake Republican
- Brecheen, Josh Republican
- Fitzgerald, Scott Republican
- Webster, Daniel Republican
- Van Drew, Jefferson Republican
Not signed on (540)
540 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 540 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Similar bills in other states
Bills in other jurisdictions that match this one by MEANING — title, summary and subject, compared across every state we track. A strong signal the same policy is moving elsewhere.
- HR 424 Texas 87% Compare text
Pick a bill from “Similar bills” above and click Compare text to see how its language differs from HR 421.
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 421 do?
- Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act This bill modifies the rulemaking requirements and procedures of federal agencies under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 and the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, including how agencies consider economic impact with respect to small entities. Specifically, the bill requires agencies to consider the direct, and the reasonably foreseeable indirect, economic effect of a rule on small entities when determining whether a rule is likely to have a significant economic impact. Further, the regulatory flexibility analysis for rules with a significant economic impact must include a detailed description of alternatives to a proposed rule that minimize any adverse significant economic impact or maximize any beneficial significant economic impact on small entities. The bill also expands the types of agency actions (e.g., revisions to land management plans) that are subject to a regulatory impact analysis. The bill removes the authority for an agency to waive the regulatory flexibility analysis requirements and requires the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration to issue rules for compliance with such requirements.The bill also modifies the procedures for the (1) gathering of comments for a proposed rule, (2) periodic review of agency rules, and (3) judicial review of final rules.
- Who sponsors HR 421?
- HR 421 is sponsored by Hageman, Harriet M. (Republican), Ellzey, Jake (Republican), Brecheen, Josh (Republican), Fitzgerald, Scott (Republican), Webster, Daniel (Republican), Van Drew, Jefferson (Republican), and Cline, Ben (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 421?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 15, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 421?
- Track HR 421 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 421
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 421
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →