United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 2 D · 2 R cosponsors
Similar bills in 1 other state →

HR 322 — Import Security and Fairness Act

Last action — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 09, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 40% · high confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Spreading across states

    Near-identical bills in 1 other state — cross-state momentum.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

HR 322 focuses on tax reforms related to health care.

HR 322 proposes changes to tax policies that affect health care costs. It aims to improve affordability and access to health services.

What this means for you
  • Workers: Workers may experience reduced healthcare costs, leading to improved financial stability.
  • Families: Families could benefit from more affordable health care options, making it easier to manage medical expenses.
  • Consumers: This means lower health care costs and better access to medical services for patients.

Summary

Import Security and Fairness ActThis bill excludes imported articles from nonmarket economy countries or countries on the Priority Watch List from receiving de minimis treatment. (Current law allows for imports under a de minimis threshold to enter the United States free of tariffs and taxes with minimal inspection. In 2016, Congress raised this threshold from $200 to $800.)Under current law, a nonmarket economy country is any foreign country that the Department of Commerce determines does not operate on market principles of cost or pricing structures, so that sales of merchandise in such country do not reflect the fair value of the merchandise. There are currently 12 countries (e.g., China and Russia) that Commerce has designated as nonmarket economy countries. This bill prohibits imports from receiving de minimis treatment if those imports are from nonmarket economy countries.Additionally, under current law, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative must annually review and report on foreign countries that deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or deny fair and equitable market access to U.S. persons who rely on intellectual property protection. There are currently seven counties (e.g., Argentina and Indonesia) on this list, known as the Priority Watch List. This bill prohibits imports from receiving de minimis treatment if those imports are from countries on the Priority Watch List.The bill also directs U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect additional information on merchandise that may qualify for de minimis treatment and establishes requirements related to detained merchandise.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

11 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill introduces new exceptions to the de minimis exemptions for articles imported under the Tariff Act of 1930 and specifies additional documentation requirements for such exemptions.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)

    (a) The Secretary → (a) In General.--The Secretary

    This change clarifies the introductory language of the section.

  • 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C)

    $800 → except as provided in subsection (b)(1), $800

    This establishes a condition under which the $800 exemption may not apply.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1321(b)

    (b) The Secretary → (b) Exceptions.--

    This rephrases the subsection heading for clarity.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1321(b)

    (1) In general.--An article may not be admitted free of duty or tax under the authority provided by subsection (a)(2)(C) if the country of origin of such article, or the country from which such article is shipped, is-- (A) a nonmarket economy country (as such term is defined in section 771(18)); and (B) a country included in the priority watch list (as such term is defined in section 182(g)(3) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242(g)(3))).

    This adds new exceptions that restrict the de minimis treatment for articles from certain countries.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1321(c)

    (c) Submission of Documentation and Information.--

    This introduces a new subsection requiring the submission of documentation for administrative exemptions.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1321(c)(1)

    For any articles that may qualify for an administrative exemption pursuant to subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of the Treasury shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Import Security and Fairness Act, prescribe regulations to require the submission, transmission, or otherwise making available of such documentation or information to U.S. Customs and Border Protection as the Secretary determines is reasonably necessary for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to determine the eligibility of such articles to qualify for such exemption.

    This mandates the creation of regulations regarding documentation for certain articles exempt under existing law.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1321(c)(2)(A)

    the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1)-- (i) shall require that documentation or information with respect to an article described in that paragraph include, at a minimum-- (i) a description of the article; (ii) the appropriate classification of the article under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States; (iii) the country of origin of the article; (iv) the country from which the article is shipped; (v) the identity of the shipper; (vi) the identity of the importer; and (vii) the transaction value of the article in the United States;

    This specifies the minimum documentation requirements for claiming administrative exemptions.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1321(c)(3)

    Any person who violates the regulations prescribed pursuant to paragraph (1) is liable for a civil penalty of $5,000 for the first violation, and $10,000 for each subsequent violation. A penalty imposed under this paragraph is in addition to any other penalty provided by law.

    This establishes civil penalties for non-compliance with the new documentation requirements.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1499(c)

    the Customs Service → U.S. Customs and Border Protection

    This updates the terminology to reflect the current name of the agency.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1499(c)(2)(A)

    The Customs Service → (A) In general.--U.S. Customs and Border Protection

    This further modernizes the text to consistently use the updated agency name.

  • 19 U.S.C. § 1499(c)(2)

    (C) Additional requirements relating to merchandise that may qualify for certain administrative exemptions.--

    This adds new requirements for handling merchandise that may qualify for exemptions.

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 543 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (543)

543 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 543 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Similar bills in other states

Bills in other jurisdictions that match this one by MEANING — title, summary and subject, compared across every state we track. A strong signal the same policy is moving elsewhere.

Pick a bill from “Similar bills” above and click Compare text to see how its language differs from HR 322.

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HR 322 do?
Import Security and Fairness ActThis bill excludes imported articles from nonmarket economy countries or countries on the Priority Watch List from receiving de minimis treatment. (Current law allows for imports under a de minimis threshold to enter the United States free of tariffs and taxes with minimal inspection. In 2016, Congress raised this threshold from $200 to $800.)Under current law, a nonmarket economy country is any foreign country that the Department of Commerce determines does not operate on market principles of cost or pricing structures, so that sales of merchandise in such country do not reflect the fair value of the merchandise. There are currently 12 countries (e.g., China and Russia) that Commerce has designated as nonmarket economy countries. This bill prohibits imports from receiving de minimis treatment if those imports are from nonmarket economy countries.Additionally, under current law, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative must annually review and report on foreign countries that deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or deny fair and equitable market access to U.S. persons who rely on intellectual property protection. There are currently seven counties (e.g., Argentina and Indonesia) on this list, known as the Priority Watch List. This bill prohibits imports from receiving de minimis treatment if those imports are from countries on the Priority Watch List.The bill also directs U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect additional information on merchandise that may qualify for de minimis treatment and establishes requirements related to detained merchandise.
Who sponsors HR 322?
HR 322 is sponsored by Suozzi, Thomas R. (Democratic), Dunn, Neal P. (Republican), Allen, Rick W. (Republican), and Salinas, Andrea (Democratic).
What is the current status of HR 322?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 09, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 322?
Track HR 322 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 322

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 322

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →