Waste coal; Dept. of Energy to study environment and economic impact of eliminating piles.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SJ 258 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SJ 258.
You're tracking SJ 258
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SJ 258 — Waste coal; Dept. of Energy to study environment and economic impact of eliminating piles.
Last action — Bill text as passed Senate and House (SJ258ER)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
48 added · 55 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Senate Joint Resolution No. 258 clarify the request for the Department of Energy to study the economic and environmental impacts of eliminating waste coal piles in Southwest Virginia. The amendment emphasizes the environmental risks posed by these piles, such as their contribution to water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and highlights the financial burden of cleaning them up, which could reach $2.4 billion. This matters because it underscores the urgency of addressing a pollution problem that affects both the environment and the state's financial responsibilities while pointing to the need for effective long-term solutions.
SESSION ENGROSSEDENROLLED 23104599D SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO.
258 AMENDMENTE INN THERequesting NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the SenateDepartment Committeeof onEnergy Rules) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senatorstudy Hackworth)the Senateeconomic Amendmentsand inenvironmental [impacts ]of -eliminating FebruaryR 3,waste 2023 Reqwaste coal piles in Southwest Virginia.
Report.conomicReport. and environmental impacts of eliminating WHEREAS, the material left over from coal mining has resulted in garbage of bituminous (GOB) piles that contain mining waste and waste coal throughout Southwest Virginia;
andO EAgreed WHEREAS,to by the 1977Senate, SurfaceFebruary Mining22, Control2023 andAgreed Reclamationto Actby (SMCRA)the federalizedHouse regulatoryof NDelegates, controlFebruary over17, coal2023 surfaceL mining,L butpiles alsothat heldcontain landownersmining harmless for abandoned mine land features created prior to the SMCRA, which include waste coaland piles otherwise known as waste coal orthroughout GOBGSouthwest piles;Virginia;
andandtuminous R(GOB) E WHEREAS, the result1977 ofSurface holdingMining landownersControl harmlessand forReclamation theseAct "pre-law"(SMCRA) sitesfederalized isregulatory thatcontrol theover Commonwealthcoal issurface ultimatelymining, responsiblebut foralso cleaningheld uplandowners theharmless nearlyfor 152abandoned knownmine GOBland pilesfeatures thatD arecreated Oprior andquitousto inthe SouthwestSMCRA, Virginiawhich atinclude anwaste estimatedcoal liabilitypiles asotherwise highknown as $2.4waste billioncoal justor toGOB reclSimpiles; the sites;
WHEREAS,and theCommonwealth estimatedis 80ultimately millionresponsible cubicfor yardscleaning ofup materialthe spreadnearly over152 3,300known acresGOB contributeSpiles overthat 20,000are tonsubiquitous ofin sedimentSouthwest toVirginia Virginia'sat waterways,an annuallyestimated dischargingliability acidicas waterhigh intoas watersheds$2.4 thatbillion canjust includeto iron,reclaim manganese, and aluminum in some of the mostsites; biodiverse rivers in the United States;
and D WHEREAS, thesethe GOBestimated piles80 aremillion subjectcubic toyards randomof uncontrolledmaterial firesspread andover the3,300 Unitedacres Statescontributes GeologicalJ Surveythat reportscan thatinclude theseiron, coalmanganese, firesand posealuminum multiplein threatssome toof the globalmost environmentbiodiverse becauserivers theyin emitthe greenhouseUnitedsheds gases5 andStates; other toxic substances that threaten human and environmental health;
and E WHEREAS, currently,these theGOB onlypiles viableare optionsubject to eliminaterandom thisuncontrolled hazardfires permanentlyand isthe toUnited combustStates theR non-permanentGeological solutionsSurvey includereports cappingthat orthese interringcoal thefires material,pose exposingmultiple threats to the Commonwealthglobal toenvironment abecause long-termthey maintenanceemit liabilitygreenhouse thatgases wouldand exceedother thetoxic initialsubstances liabilitythat tothreaten reclaimhuman theand sites;environmental health;
aSdandWHEREAS, WHEREAS,currently, sincethe VCHEC'sonly commissioning,viable itoption hasto burnedeliminate overthis 10hazard millionpermanently tonsis ofto combust the material andat has2the spurredVirginia aCity self-sustainingHybrid industry,Energy GOBCenter reclamation,(VCHEC) or other approved facilities, while non-permanent solutions include capping or interring the material, exposing the Commonwealth to a long-term maintenance liability that supportswould overexceed 100the jobs;initial liability to reclaim the sites;
and 8spurred WHEREAS,a theself-sustaining Commonwealthindustry, must fully evaluate both the economic and environmental impacts ofS GOB pilesreclamation, tothat Southwestsupports Virginiaover versus100 thejobs; impact of a fully operating VCHEC facility or other 1 approved facilities and gauge the complete economic impact to the Commonwealth should VCHEC or other approved facilities be idled and the full liability of the cleanup be shouldered by taxpayers;
now,andal 36and therefore,has beWHEREAS, itthe 38Commonwealth requestedmust tofully studyevaluate both the economic and environmental impacts of eliminatingGOB waste coal piles into Southwest 39Virginia Virginia.versus the impact of a fully operating VCHEC facility or other approved facilities and gauge the complete economic impact to the Commonwealth should VCHEC or other approved facilities be idled and the full liability of the cleanup be shouldered by taxpayers;
40now, IntheRESOLVED conductingby itsthe study,Senate, the DepartmentHouse of EnergyDelegates (theconcurring, Department)That shallthe conveneDepartment aof workEnergy groupbe ofrequested stakeholdersto featuringstudy representativesthe fromeconomic state and local governments, investor-owned utilities, environmental organizations,impacts theof eliminating waste coal reclamationpiles industry,in andSouthwest othersVirginia. deemed appropriate by the Department.
In conducting its study, the Department of Energy (the Department) shall convene a work group of environmental organizations, the waste coal reclamation industry, and others deemed appropriate by the Department.
The Department shall complete its meetings by November 30, 2023, and shall submit to the Governor and the General Assembly an executive summary and a report of its findings and recommendations, if any, for publication as a House or Senate document.
unless an appropriation effectuating the purposes of this resolution is included in a general appropriation act passed in 2023 by the General Assembly that becomes law.
View plain text versions (4)
- SJ258ER View text Current pdf February 22, 2023
- SJ258ES1 View text pdf February 03, 2023
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 23104599D-S1 pdf January 27, 2023
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/23 23103817D pdf January 11, 2023
Action History
-
Bill text as passed Senate and House (SJ258ER)
-
House amendments agreed to by Senate by voice vote
-
Passed by for the day
-
Passed by for the day
-
Reconsideration of House amendment agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
House amendment agreed to by Senate by voice vote
-
VOTE: Block Vote Adoption (98-Y 0-N)
-
Agreed to by House with amendment BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by House as amended
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Taken up
-
Reported from Rules with amendment(s) (18-Y 0-N)
-
House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (6-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned Rules sub: Studies
-
Referred to Committee on Rules
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and agreed to by Senate by voice vote
-
Printed as engrossed 23104599D-ES1
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute with amendment SJ258ES1
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Reading of amendment waived
-
Committee substitute agreed to 23104599D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Reading waived (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations with amendment (16-Y 0-N)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 23104599D-S1
-
Reported from Rules with substitute
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Referred to Committee on Rules
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/23 23103817D
Sponsors
- T. Travis Hackworth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SJ 258?
- SJ 258 is sponsored by T. Travis Hackworth.
- What is the current status of SJ 258?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SJ 258?
- Track SJ 258 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SJ 258
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SJ 258
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →