Virginia 2023 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SJ 258 — Waste coal; Dept. of Energy to study environment and economic impact of eliminating piles.

Last action — Bill text as passed Senate and House (SJ258ER)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

48 added · 55 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to Senate Joint Resolution No. 258 clarify the request for the Department of Energy to study the economic and environmental impacts of eliminating waste coal piles in Southwest Virginia. The amendment emphasizes the environmental risks posed by these piles, such as their contribution to water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and highlights the financial burden of cleaning them up, which could reach $2.4 billion. This matters because it underscores the urgency of addressing a pollution problem that affects both the environment and the state's financial responsibilities while pointing to the need for effective long-term solutions.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION ENGROSSED 23104599D SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO.
SESSION ENROLLED SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO.
258 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Rules) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Hackworth) Senate Amendments in [ ] - February 3, 2023 Reqwaste coal piles in Southwest Virginia.
258 E N Requesting the Department of Energy to study the economic and environmental impacts of eliminating R waste coal piles in Southwest Virginia.
Report.conomic and environmental impacts of eliminating WHEREAS, the material left over from coal mining has resulted in garbage of bituminous (GOB) piles that contain mining waste and waste coal throughout Southwest Virginia;
Report.
and E WHEREAS, the 1977 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) federalized regulatory N control over coal surface mining, but also held landowners harmless for abandoned mine land features created prior to the SMCRA, which include waste coal piles otherwise known as waste coal or GOBG piles;
O Agreed to by the Senate, February 22, 2023 Agreed to by the House of Delegates, February 17, 2023 L L piles that contain mining waste and waste coal throughout Southwest Virginia;
and R WHEREAS, the result of holding landowners harmless for these "pre-law" sites is that the Commonwealth is ultimately responsible for cleaning up the nearly 152 known GOB piles that are O andquitous in Southwest Virginia at an estimated liability as high as $2.4 billion just to reclSim the sites;
andtuminous (GOB) E WHEREAS, the 1977 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) federalized regulatory control over coal surface mining, but also held landowners harmless for abandoned mine land features D created prior to the SMCRA, which include waste coal piles otherwise known as waste coal or GOB piles;
WHEREAS, the estimated 80 million cubic yards of material spread over 3,300 acres contributeS over 20,000 tons of sediment to Virginia's waterways, annually discharging acidic water into watersheds that can include iron, manganese, and aluminum in some of the most biodiverse rivers in the United States;
and Commonwealth is ultimately responsible for cleaning up the nearly 152 known GOB piles that are ubiquitous in Southwest Virginia at an estimated liability as high as $2.4 billion just to reclaim the sites;
and D WHEREAS, these GOB piles are subject to random uncontrolled fires and the United States Geological Survey reports that these coal fires pose multiple threats to the global environment because they emit greenhouse gases and other toxic substances that threaten human and environmental health;
and WHEREAS, the estimated 80 million cubic yards of material spread over 3,300 acres contributes J that can include iron, manganese, and aluminum in some of the most biodiverse rivers in the Unitedsheds 5 States;
and WHEREAS, currently, the only viable option to eliminate this hazard permanently is to combust the non-permanent solutions include capping or interring the material, exposing the Commonwealth to a long-term maintenance liability that would exceed the initial liability to reclaim the sites;
and E WHEREAS, these GOB piles are subject to random uncontrolled fires and the United States R Geological Survey reports that these coal fires pose multiple threats to the global environment because they emit greenhouse gases and other toxic substances that threaten human and environmental health;
aSd WHEREAS, since VCHEC's commissioning, it has burned over 10 million tons of material and has2 spurred a self-sustaining industry, GOB reclamation, that supports over 100 jobs;
andWHEREAS, currently, the only viable option to eliminate this hazard permanently is to combust the material at the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center (VCHEC) or other approved facilities, while non-permanent solutions include capping or interring the material, exposing the Commonwealth to a long-term maintenance liability that would exceed the initial liability to reclaim the sites;
and 8 WHEREAS, the Commonwealth must fully evaluate both the economic and environmental impacts ofS GOB piles to Southwest Virginia versus the impact of a fully operating VCHEC facility or other 1 approved facilities and gauge the complete economic impact to the Commonwealth should VCHEC or other approved facilities be idled and the full liability of the cleanup be shouldered by taxpayers;
and spurred a self-sustaining industry, GOB reclamation, that supports over 100 jobs;
now, 36 therefore, be it 38 requested to study the economic and environmental impacts of eliminating waste coal piles in Southwest 39 Virginia.
andal and has WHEREAS, the Commonwealth must fully evaluate both the economic and environmental impacts of GOB piles to Southwest Virginia versus the impact of a fully operating VCHEC facility or other approved facilities and gauge the complete economic impact to the Commonwealth should VCHEC or other approved facilities be idled and the full liability of the cleanup be shouldered by taxpayers;
40 In conducting its study, the Department of Energy (the Department) shall convene a work group of stakeholders featuring representatives from state and local governments, investor-owned utilities, environmental organizations, the waste coal reclamation industry, and others deemed appropriate by the Department.
now, theRESOLVED by the Senate, the House of Delegates concurring, That the Department of Energy be requested to study the economic and environmental impacts of eliminating waste coal piles in Southwest Virginia.
In conducting its study, the Department of Energy (the Department) shall convene a work group of environmental organizations, the waste coal reclamation industry, and others deemed appropriate by the Department.
The Department shall complete its meetings by November 30, 2023, and shall submit to the Governor and the General Assembly an executive summary and a report of its findings and recommendations, if any, for publication as a House or Senate document.
The Department shall complete its meetings by November 30, 2023, and shall submit to the recommendations, if any, for publication as a House or Senate document.
unless an appropriation effectuating the purposes of this resolution is included in a general appropriation act passed in 2023 by the General Assembly that becomes law.
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Bill text as passed Senate and House (SJ258ER)

  2. House amendments agreed to by Senate by voice vote

  3. Passed by for the day

  4. Passed by for the day

  5. Reconsideration of House amendment agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)

  6. House amendment agreed to by Senate by voice vote

  7. VOTE: Block Vote Adoption (98-Y 0-N)

  8. Agreed to by House with amendment BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)

  9. Engrossed by House as amended

  10. Committee amendment agreed to

  11. Taken up

  12. Reported from Rules with amendment(s) (18-Y 0-N)

  13. House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  14. House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered

  15. Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (6-Y 0-N)

  16. Assigned Rules sub: Studies

  17. Referred to Committee on Rules

  18. Placed on Calendar

  19. Read third time and agreed to by Senate by voice vote

  20. Printed as engrossed 23104599D-ES1

  21. Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute with amendment SJ258ES1

  22. Committee amendment agreed to

  23. Reading of amendment waived

  24. Committee substitute agreed to 23104599D-S1

  25. Reading of substitute waived

  26. Read second time

  27. Reading waived (40-Y 0-N)

  28. Reported from Finance and Appropriations with amendment (16-Y 0-N)

  29. Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations

  30. Committee substitute printed 23104599D-S1

  31. Reported from Rules with substitute

  32. Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  33. Referred to Committee on Rules

  34. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/23 23103817D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SJ 258?
SJ 258 is sponsored by T. Travis Hackworth.
What is the current status of SJ 258?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SJ 258?
Track SJ 258 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SJ 258

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SJ 258

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →