Land bank ordinances; disposition.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 142 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 142.
You're tracking SB 142
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 142 — Land bank ordinances; disposition.
Last action — Enacted, Chapter 713 (effective 7/1/22)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2022. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 27, 2022.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Delinquent tax lands; disposition. Authorizes localities to petition the circuit court to appoint a special commissioner to, in lieu of a sale at public auction, convey certain real estate having delinquent taxes or liens to the locality's land bank entity or an existing nonprofit entity designated by the locality to carry out the functions of a land bank entity. Currently, such real estate may be conveyed only to the locality itself. The bill also allows real estate that contains a derelict building and has delinquent taxes and liens exceeding 10 percent of its assessed value to be conveyed via special commissioner, in lieu of a sale at public auction, to the locality, the locality's land bank entity, or such existing nonprofit entity. The bill requires a land bank entity or existing nonprofit entity that receives such parcels to pay any surplusage above the amount of unpaid taxes or liens to the former owners or other parties with an interest in the property.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
59 added · 61 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill SB 142 clarifies the process by which localities can take ownership of properties with delinquent taxes or liens. Key changes include the removal of the limit on the assessed value of parcels eligible for this process and adjustments to the percentages of owed taxes that trigger localities' ability to petition for a special commissioner. This matters because it allows localities greater flexibility in managing properties that have fallen into disrepair due to unpaid taxes, which can improve community revitalization efforts.
RECONVENED SESSION REENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY --–– 2022 RECONVENED SESSION CHAPTER 713R An Act to amend and reenact § 58.1-3970.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to delinquent tax lands;
E N [S 142] Approved AprilR 27,O 20221. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
L A.
Except as provided in subsection B, in any proceedings under this article for the salesaleEof of a parcel or parcels of real estate which that meet all of the following:
(i) each parcel has delinquent real estate taxes or the locality has a lien against the parcel for removal, repair, or securing of aD building or growth,;structure;
(ii)removal eachof parceltrash, hasgarbage, anrefuse, assessed value of $75,000 or less,;litter;
andor (iii)the (a)cutting suchof taxesgrass, andweeds, liens,nor other foreign together, including penalty and accumulated interest, exceed 50 percent of the assessed value of thetheens, parcel or, (b) such taxes alone exceed 25 percent of the assessed value of the parcel, or (c) for parcels containing a structure that is a derelict building, as that term is defined in § 15.2-907.1, such taxes and liens, together, including penalty and accumulated interest, exceed 25 percent of the assessed value of the parcel, the locality may petition the circuit court to appoint a special commissioner to execute the necessary deed or deeds to convey the real estate to the locality in lieu of the sale at publicpublicSauction, auction, in lieu of the sale at public auction, to the locality, to the locality's land bank entity, or to an1n existing nonprofit entity designated by the locality to carry out the functions of a land bank entity pursuant to § 15.2-7512.
After notice as required by this article, service of process, and upon answer filed by thetheo owner or other parties in interest to the bill in equity, the court shall allow the parties to present evidence and arguments, ore tenus, prior to the appointment of the special commissioner.
Any 2 surplusage accruing to a locality, land bank entity, or existing nonprofit entity as a result of the sale of the parcel or parcels after the receipt of the deed shall be payable to the beneficiaries of any liens against the property and to the former owner, his heirs or assigns in accordance with § 58.1-3967.
No deficiency shall be charged against the owner after conveyance to the locality, land bank entity, or existingexi2. nonprofit entity.
2.
For purposes of this section,defined "existingin nonprofit§ 15.2-7500.rofit entity" and "land bank entity" have the same meaning as those terms are definedB. in § 15.2-7500.
B.For a parcel or parcels of real estate in a locality with a score of 100 or higher on the fiscal stress index, as published by the Department of Housing and Community Development in July 2020, all of the provisions of subsection A shall apply except (i) that the percentage of taxes and liens, together, including penalty and accumulated interest, and the percentage of taxes alone set forth in clause clauses (iii) (a) and (b) of subsection A shall exceed 35 percent and 15 percent, respectively, of the assessed value of the parcel or parcels or (ii) that the percentage of taxes and liens, together, including penalty subsection A shall exceed 20 percent and 10 percent, respectively, of the assessed value of the parcel or of parcels, and each parcel has an assessed value of $150,000 or less, provided that under this clause the property is not an occupied dwelling, and the locality enters into an agreement for sale of the parcel to a nonprofit organization to renovate or construct a single-family dwelling on the parcel for sale to a person or persons to reside in the dwelling whose income is below the area median income.
For a parcel or parcels of real estate in a locality with a score of 100 or higher on the fiscal stress index, as published by the Department of Housing and Community Development in July 2020, all of the provisions of subsection A shall apply except (i) that the percentage of taxes and liens, together, including penalty and accumulated interest, and the percentage of taxes alone set forth in clause clauses (iii) (a) and (b) of subsection A shall exceed 35 percent and 15 percent, respectively, of the assessed value of the parcel or parcels or (ii) that the percentage of taxes and liens, together, including penalty and accumulated interest, and the percentage of taxes alone set forth in clause clauses (iii) (a) and (b) of subsection A shall exceed 20 percent and 10 percent, respectively, of the assessed value of the parcel or parcels, and each parcel has an assessed value of $150,000 or less, provided that under this clause the property is not an occupied dwelling, and the locality enters into an agreement for sale of the parcel to a nonprofit organization to renovate or construct a single-family dwelling on the parcel for sale to a person or persons to reside in the dwelling whose income is below the area median income.
For sales by a nonprofit organization pursuant to subsection B, such sales may include either (i) both the land and the structural improvements on a property or (ii) only the structural improvements of aimprovements propertyis andpermissible notonly theif land(a) the structural improvements are locatedsubject on.to a ground lease with a community land trust, as that term is defined in § 55.1-1200;
A(b) sale of only the structural improvements is permissible only if (a) the structural improvements are subject of 2 to a ground lease withthat has a community land trust, as that term isof definedat inleast §90 55.1-1200;years;
(b)and (c) the community land trust retains a preemptive option to purchase such structural improvements areat subjecta toprice determined by a groundformula leasethat is designed to ensure that hasthe aimprovements termremain affordable in perpetuity to low-income and moderate-income families earning less than 120 percent of atthe leastarea 90median years;income, adjusted for family size.
and (c) the community land trust retains a preemptive option to purchase such structural improvements at a price determined by a formula that is of 2 designed to ensure that the improvements remain affordable in perpetuity to low-income and moderate-income families earning less than 120 percent of the area median income, adjusted for family size.
View plain text versions (5)
- SB142ER2 View text pdf April 27, 2022
- CHAP0713 View text Current pdf April 27, 2022
- SB142ER View text pdf March 07, 2022
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22106927D-H1 pdf February 23, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22102827D pdf January 08, 2022
Action History
-
Enacted, Chapter 713 (effective 7/1/22)
-
Signed by Speaker as reenrolled
-
Signed by President as reenrolled
-
Reenrolled bill text (SB142ER2)
-
Reenrolled
-
Governor's recommendation adopted
-
VOTE: Adoption (76-Y 24-N)
-
House concurred in Governor's recommendation (76-Y 24-N)
-
Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (40-Y 0-N)
-
Governor's recommendation received by Senate
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 22, 2022
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Signed by President
-
Impact statement from TAX (SB142ER)
-
Enrolled
-
Title replaced 22106927D-H1
-
House substitute agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
VOTE: Passage (77-Y 22-N)
-
Passed House with substitute (77-Y 22-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute SB142H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 22106927D-H1
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Committee substitute printed 22106927D-H1
-
Reported from Finance with substitute (18-Y 3-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Finance
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from TAX (SB142)
-
Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations (16-Y 0-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Finance and Appropriations
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22102827D
Sponsors
- Jennifer L. McClellan · Cosponsor
- Betsy B. Carr · Cosponsor
- Sam Rasoul · Cosponsor
- Ghazala F. Hashmi · Cosponsor
- John S. Edwards · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 22 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (4)
- Jennifer L. McClellan
- Betsy B. Carr
- Sam Rasoul
- Ghazala F. Hashmi
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 23% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 77 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 77 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 21% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 14% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill Wiley | — | Yea |
| Byron, Kathy J. | — | Nay |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Nay |
| Chris S. Runion | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Yea |
| Fowler, Hyland F."Buddy," Jr. | — | Yea |
| Freitas, Nicholas J. | — | Nay |
| Hudson, Sally L. | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Mundon King, Candi | — | Yea |
| Murphy, Kathleen | — | Not Voting |
| Orrock, Robert D., Sr. | — | Yea |
| R. Lee Ware | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Robinson, Roxann L. | — | Yea |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wendell S. Walker | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 142 do?
- Delinquent tax lands; disposition. Authorizes localities to petition the circuit court to appoint a special commissioner to, in lieu of a sale at public auction, convey certain real estate having delinquent taxes or liens to the locality's land bank entity or an existing nonprofit entity designated by the locality to carry out the functions of a land bank entity. Currently, such real estate may be conveyed only to the locality itself. The bill also allows real estate that contains a derelict building and has delinquent taxes and liens exceeding 10 percent of its assessed value to be conveyed via special commissioner, in lieu of a sale at public auction, to the locality, the locality's land bank entity, or such existing nonprofit entity. The bill requires a land bank entity or existing nonprofit entity that receives such parcels to pay any surplusage above the amount of unpaid taxes or liens to the former owners or other parties with an interest in the property.
- Who sponsors SB 142?
- SB 142 is sponsored by Jennifer L. McClellan, Betsy B. Carr, Sam Rasoul, Ghazala F. Hashmi, and Edwards, John S..
- What is the current status of SB 142?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 142?
- Track SB 142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 142
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 142
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →