Writ of actual innocence; previously unknown or unavailable nonbiological evidence, etc.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 422 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 422.
You're tracking HB 422
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 422 — Writ of actual innocence; previously unknown or unavailable nonbiological evidence, etc.
Last action — Approved by Governor-Chapter 625 (effective 7/1/22)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 11, 2022.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Writ of actual innocence; previously unknownor unavailable nonbiological evidence; contents and form of petition.Changes the provision requiring that a petitioner petitioning fora writ of actual innocence based on previously unknown or unavailablenonbiological evidence allege that such evidence is such as couldnot, by the exercise of diligence, have been discovered or obtainedbefore the expiration of 21 days following entry of the final orderof conviction or adjudication of delinquency by the circuit court to instead require that the petitioner allege such evidence couldnot have been discovered or obtained before the conviction or adjudicationof delinquency became final in the circuit court.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
65 added · 63 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill HB 422 clarifies the requirements for filing a petition regarding claims of actual innocence based on previously unknown or unavailable evidence. It emphasizes the need for petitioners to provide detailed information, including the circumstances of the newly discovered evidence and why it wasn't available earlier. These changes are significant because they aim to streamline the petition process, making it clearer and potentially more effective for individuals seeking to prove their innocence.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2022 SESSION CHAPTER E625 An Act to amend and reenact § 19.2-327.11 of the Code of Virginia, relating to writ of actual N innocence;
contents and form of peRition.petition.
O [H 422] Approved LApril L11, 2022 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
E § 19.2-327.11.
Contents and form of the petition based on previously unknown or unavailable Devidence eviA.of actual innocence.
A.
(ii) that the petitioner is actually innocent of the crime for which he was convicted or the offenseor forunavailable whichevidence hesupporting wasthe adjudicatedallegation delinquent;of innocence or (b) the previously untested evidenceown and the scientific testing supporting the allegation of innocence;
(iii)(iv)(a) anthat exactsuch descriptionevidence ofwas (a) the previously unknown or unavailable evidenceto supportingthe petitioner or his trial attorney of record at the allegationtime the conviction or adjudication of innocencedelinquency became final in the circuit court or (b) if known, the previouslyreason untestedthat the evidence andwas thenot subject to scientific testing supportingset theforth allegationin ofthe innocence;petition;
(iv)(a)(v) that such evidence was previously unknown or unavailable to the petitionerdate or(a) his trial attorney of record at the timeHthe conviction or adjudication of delinquency became final in the circuit court or (b) if known, th4 reason previously unknown or unavailable evidence became known or available to the petitioner and thee2(a) the circumstances under which it was discovered or (b) the results of the scientific testing of previously untested evidence became known to the petitioner or any attorney of record;
(vii) that the previously unknown, unavailable, or untested evidence is material and, when considered with all of the other evidence in the current record, will prove that no rational trier of fact would have found proof of guilt or delinquency beyond a reasonable doubt;
and (viii) that thetrierthe of previously unknown, unavailable, or untested evidence is not merely cumulative, corroborative, or collateral.
and shall enumerate and include all relevant previous records, applications, petitions, and appeals and their dispositions.
In cases brought by counsel for the petitioner, the Court of Appeals shall not accept the petition unless it is accompanied by a duly executed return of service in the form of a verification that a copy of the petition and all attachments have been served on the attorney for the Commonwealth of the jurisdiction where the conviction or adjudication of delinquency occurred and the Attorney General, or petitionersan proacceptance se, the Court of Appealsservice shallsigned not accept the petition unless it is accompanied by athese certificateofficials, that a copy of the petition and all attachments have been sent, by certified mail, to the attorney for the Commonwealth of the jurisdiction where the conviction or adjudicationany ofcombination delinquencythereof. occurred and the Attorney General.
In cases brought by petitioners pro se, the Court of Appeals shall not accept the petition unless it is accompanied by a certificate that a copy of the petition and all attachments have been sent, by certified mail, to the attorney for the Commonwealth of the jurisdiction where the conviction or adjudication of delinquency occurred and the Attorney General.
The response may contain a proffer of any evidence pertaining includingto evidencethe thatguilt wasor suppresseddelinquency ator trial.petitionerinnocence of the petitioner that is not included in the record of the case, D.including evidence that was suppressed at trial.
TheD. Court of Appeals may inspect the record of any trial or appellate court action, and the Court of 2 may, in any case, award a writ of certiorari to the clerk of the respective court below, and have brought before the Court the whole record or any part of any record.
If,The inCourt the judgment of theAppeals Court,may inspect the petitionrecord failsof toany statetrial a claim, or ifappellate thecourt assertionsaction, ofand previouslythe unknown,Court unavailable,may, orin untestedany evidence,case, evenaward ifa true,writ wouldof failcertiorari to qualify for the grantingclerk of reliefthe underrespective thiscourt chapter,below, theand Courthave maybrought dismissbefore the petitionCourt summarily,the withoutwhole anyrecord hearing or aany responsepart fromof theany Attorneyrecord. General.
If, in the judgment of the Court, the of 2 petition fails to state a claim, or if the assertions of previously unknown, unavailable, or untested evidence, even if true, would fail to qualify for the granting of relief under this chapter, the Court may dismiss the petition summarily, without any hearing or a response from the Attorney General.
View plain text versions (3)
- CHAP0625 View text Current pdf April 11, 2022
- HB422ER View text pdf March 02, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22102518D pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 625 (effective 7/1/22)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 11, 2022
-
Signed by President
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB422ER)
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Enrolled
-
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Judiciary (13-Y 0-N)
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (100-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (100-Y 0-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Courts of Justice (18-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (8-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #1
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB422)
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22102518D
Sponsors
- Charniele L. Herring · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Bourne, Jeffrey M. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Jeffrey L. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Not Voting |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Freitas, Nicholas J. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Jessica L. Anderson | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Not Voting |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 422 do?
- Writ of actual innocence; previously unknownor unavailable nonbiological evidence; contents and form of petition.Changes the provision requiring that a petitioner petitioning fora writ of actual innocence based on previously unknown or unavailablenonbiological evidence allege that such evidence is such as couldnot, by the exercise of diligence, have been discovered or obtainedbefore the expiration of 21 days following entry of the final orderof conviction or adjudication of delinquency by the circuit court to instead require that the petitioner allege such evidence couldnot have been discovered or obtained before the conviction or adjudicationof delinquency became final in the circuit court.
- Who sponsors HB 422?
- HB 422 is sponsored by Charniele L. Herring.
- What is the current status of HB 422?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 422?
- Track HB 422 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 422
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 422
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →