Determination of competency; report to Commissioner of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 688 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 688.
You're tracking SB 688
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 688 — Determination of competency; report to Commissioner of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services.
Last action — Left in Appropriations
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Determination of competency; report to Commissionerof Behavioral Health and Developmental Services. Provides thata copy of the competency report shall be sent to the Commissionerof Behavioral Health and Developmental Services for the purpose of(i) conducting peer review and (ii) monitoring use of forensic assessmentsby the courts and their impact on the defendants and the public.Under current law, copies of such reports are sent to the Commissionerof Behavioral Health and Developmental Services for the purposesof establishing and maintaining the list of approved evaluators.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
37 added · 33 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 688 clarifies the process for determining a defendant's competency to stand trial or plead by specifying criteria for appointing evaluators. It ensures that evaluators must now be trained and approved by the Commissioner of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services, which enhances the quality and consistency of evaluations. This change matters because it aims to protect defendants' rights by ensuring that only qualified professionals assess their competency, thereby improving the fairness of the judicial process.
SESSION INTRODUCEDENGROSSED 22104203D I SENATE BILL NO.
688 OfferedSenate JanuaryAmendments 20,in 2022[ N] - February 14, 2022 A BILL to amend and reenact § 19.2-169.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to determination of T competency;
report to Commissioner of ––––––––––Behavioral Health and Developmental Services.
R–––––––––– Patron––MasonPatron ––––––––––Prior Ot––––––––––ent––Senator Mason Referred to Committee on the Judiciary D –––––––––– E Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
UN 1.
C § 19.2-169.1.
evaluation and detA.G determination of competency.
R A.
–– If, at any time after the attorney for the defendant has been retained or appointed and before the end of trial, the court finds, upon hearing evidence or representations of counsel for the defendant or the attorney for the Commonwealth, that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant, whether a juvenile transferred pursuant totoat § 16.1-269.1 or adult, lacks substantial capacity to understand the proceedings against him or toSo assist his attorney in his own defense, the court shall order that a competency evaluation be performed by at least one psychiatrist or clinical psychologist who (i) has performed forensic evaluations;
(ii) has successfully completed forensic evaluation training recognized by the Commissioner of BehavioralBehavioraD forensicHealth evaluations;and Developmental Services;
and(iii) (iv)has isdemonstrated includedto onthe aCommissioner listcompetence ofto approvedperform evaluatorsforensic maintainedevaluations; by theerform Commissioner.
Band B.(iv) is included on a list of approved evaluators maintained by the Commissioner.
B.
–– The evaluation shall be performed on an outpatient basis at a mental health facility or in jail unless an outpatient evaluation has been conducted and the outpatient evaluator opines that a hospital-based evaluation is needed to reliably reach an opinion or unless the defendant is in the custody of the Commissioner of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services pursuant totoefendant is § 19.2-169.2, 19.2-169.6, 19.2-182.2, 19.2-182.3, 19.2-182.8, 19.2-182.9, or Article 5 (§ 37.2-81437.2-S14 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 37.2.
CommonwealthB toC. provide to the evaluators appointed under subsection A any information relevant to the evaluation, including, but not limited to (i) a copy of the warrant or indictment;
(ii)Provision the names and addresses of theinformation attorneyto forevaluators. the Commonwealth, the attorney for the defendant, and the judge ordering the evaluation;
–– The court shall require the attorney for the 8 Commonwealth to provide to the evaluators appointed under subsection A any information relevantEto the evaluation, including, but not limited to (i) a copy of the warrant or indictment;
(ii) the names and addresses of the attorney for the Commonwealth, the attorney for the defendant, and the judge ordering 34 the evaluation;
and (iv) a summary of the reasons for the :35 evaluation request.
35The evaluationcourt request.shall require the attorney for the defendant to provide any available information be provided to the evaluator within 96 hours of the issuance of the court order pursuant to 38 this section.
The39 courtD. shall require the attorney for the defendant to provide any available 36 psychiatric records and other information that is deemed relevant.
The courtcompetency shallreport. require that 37 information be provided to the evaluator within 96 hours of the issuance of the court order pursuant to 38 this section.
–– Upon completion of the evaluation, the evaluators shall promptly submit a report in writing to the court and the attorneys of record concerning (i) the defendant's capacity to understand the proceedings against him;
Outpatient treatment may occur in a local correctional facility or at a location determined by the appropriate community servicesfor boardthe foreseeable future due to an ongoing and irreversible medical condition, and where prior medicalt or behavioraleducational healthrecords authority.are available to support the diagnosis, or if the defendant was previously determined to be unrestorably incompetent in the past two years, the report may recommend that the court find the defendant unrestorably incompetent to stand trial and the court may proceed with the disposition of the case in accordance with § 19.2-169.3.
In cases where a defendant is likely to remain incompetent for the foreseeable future due to an ongoing and irreversible medical condition, and where prior medical determined to be unrestorably incompetent in the past two years, the report may recommend that the court find the defendant unrestorably incompetent to stand trial and the court may proceed with the disposition of the case in accordance with § 19.2-169.3.
The evaluator shall also send a redacted copy of the report removing references to the defendant's name, date of birth, case number, and court of jurisdiction to the Commissioner of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services for the purpose of (i) conducting peer review and (ii) monitoring use of forensic assessments by the courts and theirDepartment impactshall ontake theappropriate defendantsprecautions andto theprevent public.use or disclosure of identifiable information for any purposes other than those specified in this section or otherwise authorized by law.
InAny transmitting,copies storing,of andSB688E using2 theof reports,2 the reports used for anythe purposespurpose otherof thanpeer thosereview specifiedto establish and maintain the list of approved evaluators described in thissubsection sectionA orshall otherwisebe authorizedredacted by law.the Department in advance of disclosure by removing references to the defendant's name, date of birth, case number, and court of jurisdiction.
Any copies of SB688 2 of 2 the reports used for the purpose of peer review to establish and maintain the list of approved evaluators described in subsection A shall be redacted by the Department in advance of disclosure by removing references to the defendant's name, date of birth, case number, and court of jurisdiction.
[ 2.
That the provisions of this act shall not become effective unless an appropriation effectuating the purposes of this act is included in a general appropriation act passed in 2022 by the General Assembly that becomes law.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 22104203D-E Current pdf February 14, 2022
- Presented and ordered printed 22104203D View text pdf January 20, 2022
Action History
-
Left in Appropriations
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB688E)
-
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 22104203D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB688E
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Reading of amendment waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations with amendment (16-Y 0-N)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Reported from Judiciary (13-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB688)
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Presented and ordered printed 22104203D
Sponsors
- T. Montgomery "Monty" Mason · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 688 do?
- Determination of competency; report to Commissionerof Behavioral Health and Developmental Services. Provides thata copy of the competency report shall be sent to the Commissionerof Behavioral Health and Developmental Services for the purpose of(i) conducting peer review and (ii) monitoring use of forensic assessmentsby the courts and their impact on the defendants and the public.Under current law, copies of such reports are sent to the Commissionerof Behavioral Health and Developmental Services for the purposesof establishing and maintaining the list of approved evaluators.
- Who sponsors SB 688?
- SB 688 is sponsored by Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty".
- What is the current status of SB 688?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 688?
- Track SB 688 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 688
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 688
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →