HB 1351 — Prohibiting the imposition of minimum parking requirements except under certain circumstances.
Last action — Referred to Local Government.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
54 added · 62 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to House Bill 1351 clarify the areas where cities and counties can impose minimum parking requirements on new commercial developments near transit stops. Specifically, they have set different distances for applying these rules: a half-mile for level 1 and 2 transit services, and a quarter-mile for level 3 services. This matters because it allows for more flexibility in urban planning, encouraging developments near public transportation and potentially reducing car dependency, while still providing local governments with the ability to address parking concerns when necessary.
H-1165.1H-0341.3 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1351 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By House Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Reed, Berry, Duerr, Fitzgibbon, Peterson, Ramel, Simmons, Bateman, Doglio, Tharinger, Alvarado, Macri, and Berg)Berg READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/10/23.01/16/23.
Referred to Committee on Local Government.
1 SHBHB 1351 individuals.
A city or county may establish a requirement for the provision of more than one parking space per bedroom or .75 space per unit if the jurisdiction has determined a particular housing unit to be in an area with a lack of access to street parking capacity, physical space impediments, or other reasons supported by evidence that would make on-street parking infeasible for the unit.)) (1) Counties and cities planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may not impose minimum parking requirements for new residential or commercial developments,developments exceptin for off-street parking that is permanently marked for the exclusivefollowing usecircumstances: of individuals with p.
2p. SHB 1351 disabilities, within one-quarter mile based on walking distance, of a major transit stop that receives current or planned level 1, 2, or 3 transit service, as defined in section 2 of this act.
(2)2 AHB county1351 or(a) aWithin cityone-half planningmile under RCW 36.70A.040 may impose minimum parking requirements on an individual project in the circumstances described in subsection (1) of this section, provided that the county or city makes written findings within 30 days of the receipt of a completedtransit applicationstop that notreceives imposinglevel 1 or enforcing2 minimumtransit parkingservice, requirementsas ondefined the development would have a substantially negative impact, supported by a preponderance of the evidence in thesection record,2 on existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of thethis developmentact; project.
(3)and Subsection(b) (2)Within of this section does not apply to a housing development that is within one-quarter mile of ana existing or planned transit routestop that operatesreceives nolevel less3 frequentlytransit thanservice, twoas timesdefined perin hoursection between2 the hours of 9:00this a.m.act.
and(2) 5:00A p.m.county or a city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may impose minimum parking requirements on an individual project in the circumstances described in subsection (1) of this section, provided that the county or city makes written findings within 30 days of the receipt of a completed application that not imposing or enforcing minimum parking requirements on the development would have a substantially negative impact, supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the record, on existing on-site residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the development project.
and(3) Subsection (2) of this section does not apply to a housing development that meets either of the following criteria:
3 SHBHB 1351 (b) Receives transit service no less frequently than every 15 minutes between the hours of 6:00 a.m.
4 SHBHB 1351 (b) Receives transit service no fewer than five days per week.
(7) "Planned transit" means transit development that is included in a transit development plan as required by the department of transportation or similar long range planning document of a public transportation system or public transportation authority.
5 SHBHB 1351
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Referred to Local Government.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Local Government at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- April Berg · Cosponsor
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Emily Alvarado · Cosponsor
- Steve Tharinger · Cosponsor
- Beth Doglio · Cosponsor
- Jessica Bateman · Cosponsor
- Tarra Simmons · Cosponsor
- Alex Ramel · Cosponsor
- Strom Peterson · Cosponsor
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Cosponsor
- Davina Duerr · Cosponsor
- Liz Berry · Cosponsor
- Julia Reed · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Julia Reed Democrat
Co-sponsors (12)
- April Berg Democrat
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Emily Alvarado Democrat
- Steve Tharinger Democrat
- Beth Doglio Democrat
- Jessica Bateman Democrat
- Tarra Simmons Democrat
- Alex Ramel Democrat
- Strom Peterson Democrat
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
- Davina Duerr Democrat
- Liz Berry Democrat
Not signed on (138)
138 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 138 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1351?
- HB 1351 is sponsored by April Berg (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Emily Alvarado (Democrat), Steve Tharinger (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), Jessica Bateman (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Davina Duerr (Democrat), Liz Berry (Democrat), and Julia Reed (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1351?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1351?
- Track HB 1351 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1351
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1351
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →