Health insurance; tobacco surcharge.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 422 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 422.
You're tracking SB 422
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 422 — Health insurance; tobacco surcharge.
Last action — Senate sustained Governor's veto
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 10, 2022.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Health insurance; tobacco surcharge. Eliminates the authority of a health carrier to vary its premium rates based on tobacco use. Under current law, a health carrier may charge premium rates up to 1.5 times higher for a tobacco user than for a nonuser. This bill is a recommendation of the Joint Commission on Health Care, and the provisions of the bill shall apply to health benefit plans providing individual or small group health insurance coverage beginning on January 1, 2023. This bill is identical to HB 675.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
79 added · 83 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill SB 422 updates the language regarding how health insurance premiums are set, specifically focusing on tobacco use. It clarifies that a health carrier can base its premium rates on age and tobacco use but limits the variation in rates to a maximum of 1.5 times for tobacco users compared to non-users. This change is significant because it aims to ensure that tobacco use is considered in pricing health insurance, while still providing some level of protection against excessive rate increases for individuals who use tobacco products. By making this adjustment, the legislation seeks to balance the interests of health carriers with the affordability of insurance for consumers.
SESSION ENGROSSEDENROLLED 22103427DVIRGINIA SENATEACTS BILLOF NO.ASSEMBLY –– CHAPTER E An Act to amend and reenact § 38.2-3447 of the Code of Virginia, relating to health insurance;
422 Senate Amendments in [ ] - January 27, 2022 Prefiled January 11, 2022 A BILL to amend and reenact § 38.2-3447 of the Code of Virginia, relating to health insurance;
PatronR PriorO to[S Engrossment––Senator422] EdwardsApproved (ByL Request)L –––––––––– Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor E –––––––––– N Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
GE § 38.2-3447.
RD A.this title to the contrary, a health carrier offering a health benefit plan providing individual or small group health insurance coverage shall develop its premium rates based on the following:
Notwithstanding1. any provision of § 38.2-3432.2, 38.2-3501, 38.2-4306, or any other section of this title to the contrary, a health carrier offering a health benefit plan providing individual or small gro1.
on2. the following:
S 2.
and S 3.
E B.
A premium rate shall not vary with respect to any particular health benefit plan by any oDheroBher factor not described in subsection A.
C.2 attributable to each family member covered under the health benefit plan.
Rating variations for family coverage shall be applied based on the portion of the premiumpremiuE that is attributableD. to each family member covered under the health benefit plan.
D.If the proposed area rate factors set forth in a rate filing for individual or small group health insurance coverage by a health carrier for a rating area exceed by more than 15 percent the weighted average of the proposed area rate factors among all rating areas in which the health carrier offers health benefit plans in that market, then:
If the proposed area rate factors set forth in a rate filing for individual or small group health insurance coverage by a health carrier for a rating area exceed by more than 15 percent the weighted benefit plans in that market, then:actors among all rating areas in which the health carrier offers health 1.
The health carrier's rate filing shall include in a publicly available and unredacted forS:form:
A comparison of the area rate factor for individual and small group health benefit plans that utilize the same provider network and provider reimbursement levels of the health benefit plans that ar2are subject to theb. filing;
EA b.detailed disclosure of the area rate factor methodology, which disclosure shall include any third-party resources or representations from a person other than the signing actuary, on which the signing actuary relied, provided that disclosure of third-party resources shall address that the source data only reflects differences in unit cost and provider practice patterns;
A detailed disclosure of the area rate factor methodology, which disclosure shall include any third-party resources or representations from a person other than the signing actuary, on which the signing actuary relied, provided that disclosure of third-party resources shall address that the source data 35 only reflects differences in unit cost and providerc. practice patterns;
andTo areathe forextent that the experiencehealth periodcarrier used:carrier is deriving any area rate factor from experience data, by rating 38area (1)for Thethe (i)experience totalperiod enrollment;used:
(1) The (i) total enrollment;
(iv) incurred claims excluding 39 anticipated or, if available, actual risk adjustment payments or receipts;
(v) incurred claims including anticipatedtheir or,rating ifareas available,in actualthat riskmarket; adjustment payments or receipts;
andandisk (vi)adjustment losspayments ratioor forreceipts; each of their rating areas in that market;
and (vi) loss ratio for each of (2) Aggregated incurred claims for any health system exceeding 30 percent of total incurred claims for that rating area in that market.
indexed3. to the same rating region for both the individual and small group markets, of 15 percent orors, more exists between health benefit plans a carrier intends to offer in the individual market and health benefit plans intended to be offered in the small group market, when those plans utilize the same provider network and provider reimbursement levels and (ii) the methodologies used to calculate the area rate factors are different between the two markets.
The Commission shall not approve the proposed rate filing if (i) a variance in area rate factors, indexed to the same rating region for both the individual and small group markets, of 15 percent or more exists between health benefit plans a carrier intends to offer in the individual market and health provider network and provider reimbursement levels and (ii) the methodologies used to calculate the area rate factors are different between the two markets.
Beginning for plan year 2020, a health carrier with an approved rate filing that contains at least one area rate factor that exceeds by more than 25 percent the weighted average of the area rate factors among all rating areas in a market in which the health carrier offers individual or small group health insurance coverage shall file with the Commission for each calendar quarter during that plan year a report that provides, for each rating area within the market in which the health carrier operates, the plan's (i) enrollment;
(iv) incurred claims excluding anticipated or, if available, actual risk adjustment payments or receipts;
(v) incurred claims including anticipated or, SB422E 2 of 2 if available, actual risk adjustment payments or receipts;
and (vii) aggregate incurred or, claims, for each health system exceeding 25 percent of total incurred claims for that rating area.
The of 2 health carrier shall make each such quarterly report publicly available, without redaction, not later than 45 days after the end of the calendar quarter.
[ 2.
View plain text versions (3)
- SB422ER View text Current pdf March 10, 2022
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 22103427D-E pdf January 27, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103427D pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Senate sustained Governor's veto
-
Requires 2/3 affirmative votes to pass in enrolled form
-
Motion to pass in enrolled form rejected (21-Y 19-N)
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 22, 2022
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Signed by President
-
Impact statement from SCC (SB422ER)
-
Enrolled
-
VOTE: Passage (61-Y 37-N)
-
Passed House (61-Y 37-N)
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Commerce and Energy (19-Y 3-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Energy
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from SCC (SB422E)
-
Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 1-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 22103427D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB422E
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Reading of amendment waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Commerce and Labor with amendment (10-Y 4-N 1-A)
-
Impact statement from SCC (SB422)
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103427D
Sponsors
- John S. Edwards · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 57 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 48% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 36 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 61 | 36 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 36% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Nay |
| Byron, Kathy J. | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Yea |
| Guzman, Elizabeth R. | — | Yea |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Yea |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Kory, Kaye | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Yea |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Yea |
| R. Lee Ware | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Nay |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 37 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 27% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Spruill, Lionell, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| Bell, John J. | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Not Voting |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 422 do?
- Health insurance; tobacco surcharge. Eliminates the authority of a health carrier to vary its premium rates based on tobacco use. Under current law, a health carrier may charge premium rates up to 1.5 times higher for a tobacco user than for a nonuser. This bill is a recommendation of the Joint Commission on Health Care, and the provisions of the bill shall apply to health benefit plans providing individual or small group health insurance coverage beginning on January 1, 2023. This bill is identical to HB 675.
- Who sponsors SB 422?
- SB 422 is sponsored by Edwards, John S..
- What is the current status of SB 422?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 422?
- Track SB 422 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 422
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 422
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →